Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Prouty v. United States: Mandating Allocution and Judicial Authority in Restitution Scheduling under the MVRA

Prouty v. United States: Mandating Allocution and Judicial Authority in Restitution Scheduling under the MVRA

Date: Aug 28, 2002
Prouty v. United States: Mandating Allocution and Judicial Authority in Restitution Scheduling under the MVRA Introduction Prouty v. United States is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States...
Jurisdictional Limits on Post-Sentencing Preliminary Forfeiture Orders: Analysis of United States v. Petrie

Jurisdictional Limits on Post-Sentencing Preliminary Forfeiture Orders: Analysis of United States v. Petrie

Date: Aug 23, 2002
Jurisdictional Limits on Post-Sentencing Preliminary Forfeiture Orders: Analysis of United States v. Petrie Introduction United States v. Robert Petrie is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Right to Intervention in Interstate Water Allocation under the ACF Compact

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Right to Intervention in Interstate Water Allocation under the ACF Compact

Date: Aug 22, 2002
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Right to Intervention in Interstate Water Allocation under the ACF Compact Introduction In the landmark case The State of Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et...
Market Power in Vertical Restraints: Insights from Maris Distributing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch

Market Power in Vertical Restraints: Insights from Maris Distributing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch

Date: Aug 20, 2002
Market Power in Vertical Restraints: Insights from Maris Distributing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Introduction The case of Maris Distributing Company, a Florida corporation, versus Anheuser-Busch, Inc., a...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Amid Overwhelming Aggravators: Robinson v. Moore

Affirmation of Death Sentence Amid Overwhelming Aggravators: Robinson v. Moore

Date: Aug 9, 2002
Affirmation of Death Sentence Amid Overwhelming Aggravators: Robinson v. Moore Introduction Johnny L. Robinson, convicted of first-degree murder, kidnapping, armed robbery, and sexual battery in...
Affirmation of AEDPA’s Applicability Based on Petition Filing Date in Isaacs v. Head

Affirmation of AEDPA’s Applicability Based on Petition Filing Date in Isaacs v. Head

Date: Aug 7, 2002
Affirmation of AEDPA’s Applicability Based on Petition Filing Date in Carl J. Isaacs v. Frederick J. Head Introduction In the landmark case of Carl J. Isaacs v. Frederick J. Head, the United States...
Res Judicata and Motion Conversion in Trustmark v. ESLU: An Eleventh Circuit Analysis

Res Judicata and Motion Conversion in Trustmark v. ESLU: An Eleventh Circuit Analysis

Date: Aug 3, 2002
Res Judicata and Motion Conversion in Trustmark v. ESLU: An Eleventh Circuit Analysis Introduction In the seminal case of Trustmark Insurance Company v. ESLU, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals...
Refining False Advertising Standards: Johnson Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. 1-800 CONTACTS, Inc.

Refining False Advertising Standards: Johnson Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. 1-800 CONTACTS, Inc.

Date: Jul 30, 2002
Refining False Advertising Standards: Johnson Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. 1-800 CONTACTS, Inc. Introduction In the case of Johnson Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. 1-800 CONTACTS, Inc., adjudicated by...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Precedent on Attorneys' Fees Under Rule 68 Offers

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Precedent on Attorneys' Fees Under Rule 68 Offers

Date: Jul 25, 2002
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Precedent on Attorneys' Fees Under Rule 68 Offers Introduction In the landmark case of Utility Automation 2000, Inc. v. Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative, Inc., decided...
Cassisi Inference Reinforced in McCorvey v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.: Implications for Product Liability under Florida Law

Cassisi Inference Reinforced in McCorvey v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.: Implications for Product Liability under Florida Law

Date: Jul 25, 2002
Cassisi Inference Reinforced in McCorvey v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.: Implications for Product Liability under Florida Law Introduction The case of Charles McCorvey, Plaintiff-Appellant, Schenell...
Expanding the Leon Good Faith Exception: Consideration of External Evidence in the Eleventh Circuit

Expanding the Leon Good Faith Exception: Consideration of External Evidence in the Eleventh Circuit

Date: Jul 19, 2002
Expanding the Leon Good Faith Exception: Consideration of External Evidence in the Eleventh Circuit Introduction The case of United States of America v. Corey Martin, heard by the United States Court...
AEDPA Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling: Insights from Drew v. Department of Corrections

AEDPA Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling: Insights from Drew v. Department of Corrections

Date: Jul 19, 2002
AEDPA Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling: Insights from Drew v. Department of Corrections Introduction Drew v. Department of Corrections, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Procedural Barriers and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Fortenberry v. Haley

Affirmation of Procedural Barriers and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Fortenberry v. Haley

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Affirmation of Procedural Barriers and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Fortenberry v. Haley Introduction Fortenberry v. Haley, 297 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2002), is a significant appellate decision...
Implied Private Right of Action Under the Higher Education Act: McCulloch v. PNC Bank Inc.

Implied Private Right of Action Under the Higher Education Act: McCulloch v. PNC Bank Inc.

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Implied Private Right of Action Under the Higher Education Act: McCulloch v. PNC Bank Inc. Introduction The case of Timothy McCulloch, et al. v. PNC Bank Inc., et al., adjudicated by the United...
Abuse of Discretion in Denying Withdrawal of Admissions: Perez v. Miami-Dade County

Abuse of Discretion in Denying Withdrawal of Admissions: Perez v. Miami-Dade County

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Abuse of Discretion in Denying Withdrawal of Admissions: Perez v. Miami-Dade County Introduction Michael Perez v. Miami-Dade County is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMS MULTI-COUNT CHILD EXPLOITATION CONVICTION AND SENTENCE: Joinder of Similar Offenses and Sentencing Departures Upheld

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMS MULTI-COUNT CHILD EXPLOITATION CONVICTION AND SENTENCE: Joinder of Similar Offenses and Sentencing Departures Upheld

Date: Jul 18, 2002
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMS MULTI-COUNT CHILD EXPLOITATION CONVICTION AND SENTENCE: Joinder of Similar Offenses and Sentencing Departures Upheld Introduction United States of America v. Marvin Hersh is...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions in Securities Litigation

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions in Securities Litigation

Date: Jul 17, 2002
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions in Securities Litigation Introduction The case of Oxford Asset Management, Ltd. v. Michael Jaharis et al. serves as a pivotal precedent in...
Clarifying Sentencing Standards for Multi-object Conspiracies: Insights from United States v. Vallejo et al., 297 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2002)

Clarifying Sentencing Standards for Multi-object Conspiracies: Insights from United States v. Vallejo et al., 297 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2002)

Date: Jul 17, 2002
Clarifying Sentencing Standards for Multi-object Conspiracies: Insights from United States v. Vallejo et al., 297 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2002) Introduction United States v. Vallejo et al. is a pivotal...
Legal Commentary on United States v. Pendergraft and Spielvogel

Legal Commentary on United States v. Pendergraft and Spielvogel

Date: Jul 17, 2002
Threats to Litigation Do Not Constitute Extortion: Analysis of United States v. Pendergraft and Spielvogel Comprehensive Commentary on 297 F.3d 1198, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit,...
EEOC v. Joe's Stone Crab, Inc.: Refining Disparate Treatment Standards under Title VII

EEOC v. Joe's Stone Crab, Inc.: Refining Disparate Treatment Standards under Title VII

Date: Jul 13, 2002
EEOC v. Joe's Stone Crab, Inc.: Refining Disparate Treatment Standards under Title VII Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Joe's Stone Crab, Inc. (296 F.3d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert