Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Jurisdictional Error for Coram Nobis Relief in RICO Mail Fraud Cases: United States v. Peter

Establishing Jurisdictional Error for Coram Nobis Relief in RICO Mail Fraud Cases: United States v. Peter

Date: Oct 29, 2002
Establishing Jurisdictional Error for Coram Nobis Relief in RICO Mail Fraud Cases: United States v. Peter Introduction In United States v. Peter, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
No Reasonable Accommodation Requirement for Front-Yard Modifications in Deed-Restricted Subdivisions: An Analysis of Loren v. Sasser et al.

No Reasonable Accommodation Requirement for Front-Yard Modifications in Deed-Restricted Subdivisions: An Analysis of Loren v. Sasser et al.

Date: Oct 18, 2002
No Reasonable Accommodation Requirement for Front-Yard Modifications in Deed-Restricted Subdivisions Introduction The case of Nicole Loren, Bettie J. Newbold, and Charlene Janke, by and through...
Extended Limitation Period under AEDPA: Carl D. Bond v. Michael Moore et al.

Extended Limitation Period under AEDPA: Carl D. Bond v. Michael Moore et al.

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Extended Limitation Period under AEDPA: Carl D. Bond v. Michael Moore et al. Introduction Carl D. Bond v. Michael Moore, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Robert A. Butterworth,...
Automobili Lamborghini Exclusive, Inc. v. Martin: Establishing Standards for Sanctions and Ability to Pay in Cases of Judicial Fraud

Automobili Lamborghini Exclusive, Inc. v. Martin: Establishing Standards for Sanctions and Ability to Pay in Cases of Judicial Fraud

Date: Oct 1, 2002
Automobili Lamborghini Exclusive, Inc. v. Martin: Establishing Standards for Sanctions and Ability to Pay in Cases of Judicial Fraud Introduction The case of John Martin, Brian Neiman, and Saul...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies AEDPA §2255: Out-of-Time Appeals Do Not Constitute 'Second or Successive' Post-Conviction Relief

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies AEDPA §2255: Out-of-Time Appeals Do Not Constitute 'Second or Successive' Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Oct 1, 2002
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies AEDPA §2255: Out-of-Time Appeals Do Not Constitute 'Second or Successive' Post-Conviction Relief Introduction Ralph McIVER v. United States of America, 307 F.3d 1327 (11th...
Mandatory Arbitration and Sanctions for Vexatious Litigation: Insights from Riccard v. Prudential Insurance Company

Mandatory Arbitration and Sanctions for Vexatious Litigation: Insights from Riccard v. Prudential Insurance Company

Date: Sep 25, 2002
Mandatory Arbitration and Sanctions for Vexatious Litigation: Insights from Riccard v. Prudential Insurance Company Introduction The case of Riccard v. Prudential Insurance Company, adjudicated by...
§1983 Suit for Evidence Production Does Not Equate to Habeas Corpus: Bradley v. Pryor

§1983 Suit for Evidence Production Does Not Equate to Habeas Corpus: Bradley v. Pryor

Date: Sep 24, 2002
§1983 Suit for Evidence Production Does Not Equate to Habeas Corpus: Bradley v. Pryor Introduction Danny Joe Bradley, a death row inmate in Alabama, initiated a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 to...
Affirmation of Shotgun Pleading's Insufficiency in Securities Fraud Claims

Affirmation of Shotgun Pleading's Insufficiency in Securities Fraud Claims

Date: Sep 24, 2002
Affirmation of Shotgun Pleading's Insufficiency in Securities Fraud Claims Introduction The case of Strategic Income Fund, L.L.C., Hennessy Cadillac, Inc., et al. v. Spear, Leeds Kellogg Corporation,...
Qualified Immunity Uphheld in Warrantless Arrest Case: Knight v. Jacobson

Qualified Immunity Uphheld in Warrantless Arrest Case: Knight v. Jacobson

Date: Sep 19, 2002
Qualified Immunity Upheld in Warrantless Arrest Case: Knight v. Jacobson Introduction In the case of Arthur Knight v. Officer Jacobson, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Brownlee v. Haley: Establishing Precedent for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing

Brownlee v. Haley: Establishing Precedent for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing

Date: Sep 17, 2002
Brownlee v. Haley: Establishing Precedent for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing Introduction Virgil Lee Brownlee v. Michael Haley, Commissioner, Alabama Department of...
Ripeness of Federal Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: Insights from Maharaj v. Department of Corrections

Ripeness of Federal Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: Insights from Maharaj v. Department of Corrections

Date: Sep 14, 2002
Ripeness of Federal Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: Insights from Maharaj v. Department of Corrections Introduction Maharaj v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, 304 F.3d 1345 (11th Cir....
11th Circuit Sets New Precedent on Employer Reimbursement Obligations Under FLSA for H-2A Workers

11th Circuit Sets New Precedent on Employer Reimbursement Obligations Under FLSA for H-2A Workers

Date: Sep 12, 2002
11th Circuit Sets New Precedent on Employer Reimbursement Obligations Under FLSA for H-2A Workers Introduction In the landmark case of Jorge E. Arriaga et al. v. Florida Pacific Farms, L.L.C., Sleepy...
Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction in Cumulus Media v. Clear Channel: Trademark Protection Reinforced

Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction in Cumulus Media v. Clear Channel: Trademark Protection Reinforced

Date: Sep 7, 2002
Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction in Cumulus Media, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.: Trademark Protection Reinforced Introduction The case of Cumulus Media, Inc. v. Clear Channel...
Trade Dress Infringement Recognized as 'Advertising Injury' Under Commercial General Liability Insurance: 11th Circuit Decision

Trade Dress Infringement Recognized as 'Advertising Injury' Under Commercial General Liability Insurance: 11th Circuit Decision

Date: Sep 7, 2002
Trade Dress Infringement Recognized as 'Advertising Injury' Under Commercial General Liability Insurance: 11th Circuit Decision Introduction This commentary delves into the significant 2002 decision...
Retaliation Claims in Public Employment: A Critical Analysis of Brochu v. City of Riviera Beach

Retaliation Claims in Public Employment: A Critical Analysis of Brochu v. City of Riviera Beach

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Retaliation Claims in Public Employment: A Critical Analysis of Brochu v. City of Riviera Beach Introduction The case of Edward Brochu versus the City of Riviera Beach, adjudicated in the United...
Rhetorical Hyperbole and Defamation: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Horsley v. Feldt et al.

Rhetorical Hyperbole and Defamation: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Horsley v. Feldt et al.

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Rhetorical Hyperbole and Defamation: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Horsley v. Feldt et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Neal Horsley, d.b.a. Pathway Communications, d.b.a....
Affirmation of MDLEA Convictions: Upholding Statutory Sentencing and Jurisdiction Under Apprendi and Gaudin

Affirmation of MDLEA Convictions: Upholding Statutory Sentencing and Jurisdiction Under Apprendi and Gaudin

Date: Sep 5, 2002
Affirmation of MDLEA Convictions: Upholding Statutory Sentencing and Jurisdiction Under Apprendi and Gaudin Introduction The case of United States of America v. Pedro Luis Christopher Tinoco, et al....
Enhanced Accountability of Federally-Established Advisory Committees: Miccosukee Tribe v. SERA

Enhanced Accountability of Federally-Established Advisory Committees: Miccosukee Tribe v. SERA

Date: Sep 5, 2002
Enhanced Accountability of Federally-Established Advisory Committees: Miccosukee Tribe v. SERA Introduction The case of Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Southern Everglades Restoration...
Standards for ADA Perception Claims and Title VII Claim Admissibility: Eleventh Circuit in Williams v. Motorola

Standards for ADA Perception Claims and Title VII Claim Admissibility: Eleventh Circuit in Williams v. Motorola

Date: Aug 30, 2002
Standards for ADA Perception Claims and Title VII Claim Admissibility: Eleventh Circuit in Williams v. Motorola Introduction In the case of Melanie Williams v. Motorola, Inc., adjudicated in 2002 by...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes PLRA Non-Applicability to Civilly Committed Detainees: Troville v. Venz

Eleventh Circuit Establishes PLRA Non-Applicability to Civilly Committed Detainees: Troville v. Venz

Date: Aug 29, 2002
Eleventh Circuit Establishes PLRA Non-Applicability to Civilly Committed Detainees: Troville v. Venz Introduction In the landmark case of Bryant S. Troville v. Greg Venz, et al., the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert