Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirming Employer's Burden of Proof in ADEA and EPA Claims: Steger v. GE

Affirming Employer's Burden of Proof in ADEA and EPA Claims: Steger v. GE

Date: Jan 18, 2003
Affirming Employer's Burden of Proof in ADEA and EPA Claims: Steger v. GE Introduction The case Elizabeth Steger v. General Electric Company (GE), adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Admissibility of Evidence Obtained via Computer Hacking: Steiger v. United States Clarifies Fourth Amendment and Wiretap Act Applications

Admissibility of Evidence Obtained via Computer Hacking: Steiger v. United States Clarifies Fourth Amendment and Wiretap Act Applications

Date: Jan 15, 2003
Admissibility of Evidence Obtained via Computer Hacking: Steiger v. United States Clarifies Fourth Amendment and Wiretap Act Applications Introduction The case of United States of America v. Bradley...
Reaffirming Habeas Corpus Standards Under AEDPA: Analysis of Hubbard v. Haley

Reaffirming Habeas Corpus Standards Under AEDPA: Analysis of Hubbard v. Haley

Date: Jan 8, 2003
Reaffirming Habeas Corpus Standards Under AEDPA: Analysis of Hubbard v. Haley Introduction Hubbard v. Haley (317 F.3d 1245, 11th Cir. 2003) is a pivotal case that delves into the complexities of...
Prosecutorial Compliance with Brady, Giglio, and Jencks Act Reinforced in United States v. Jordan

Prosecutorial Compliance with Brady, Giglio, and Jencks Act Reinforced in United States v. Jordan

Date: Jan 7, 2003
Prosecutorial Compliance with Brady, Giglio, and Jencks Act Reinforced in United States v. Jordan Introduction United States of America v. Albert Jordan, Jimmy Woodward, 316 F.3d 1215 (11th Cir....
Exemption from ERISA Administrative Exhaustion Requirement Based on Summary Plan Description Interpretation

Exemption from ERISA Administrative Exhaustion Requirement Based on Summary Plan Description Interpretation

Date: Jan 4, 2003
Exemption from ERISA Administrative Exhaustion Requirement Based on Summary Plan Description Interpretation Introduction The case of Gloria Watts v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. addresses a...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Denial of Relief Despite Alibi Testimony Omission in Wellington v. Moore

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Denial of Relief Despite Alibi Testimony Omission in Wellington v. Moore

Date: Dec 19, 2002
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Denial of Relief Despite Alibi Testimony Omission in Wellington v. Moore Introduction Wellington v. Moore, decided by the United States...
Overruling BANK v. PITT: Restricting District Court’s Sua Sponte Power to Amend Complaints

Overruling BANK v. PITT: Restricting District Court’s Sua Sponte Power to Amend Complaints

Date: Dec 11, 2002
Overruling BANK v. PITT: Restricting District Court’s Sua Sponte Power to Amend Complaints Introduction The case of Andrew J. Wagner v. Daewoo Heavy Industries America Corporation, decided by the...
Affirmation of PLRA §1997e(e) Applicability to Emotional Injury Claims During Custody

Affirmation of PLRA §1997e(e) Applicability to Emotional Injury Claims During Custody

Date: Dec 11, 2002
Affirmation of PLRA §1997e(e) Applicability to Emotional Injury Claims During Custody Introduction In the case of Louis Napier v. Karen J. Preslicka, Jackson, Sandra M. Pomeroy, 314 F.3d 528 (11th...
Requirement for Inquiry Before Dismissing Prisoner’s In Forma Pauperis Claim: Wilson v. Sargent

Requirement for Inquiry Before Dismissing Prisoner’s In Forma Pauperis Claim: Wilson v. Sargent

Date: Dec 7, 2002
Requirement for Inquiry Before Dismissing Prisoner’s In Forma Pauperis Claim: Wilson v. Sargent Introduction In the landmark case Charles D. Wilson, Sr. v. George Sargent et al. (313 F.3d 1315), the...
Affirmation of Non-Defamatory Statements in Libel Suit: Hoffmann-Pugh v. Ramsey

Affirmation of Non-Defamatory Statements in Libel Suit: Hoffmann-Pugh v. Ramsey

Date: Nov 20, 2002
Affirmation of Non-Defamatory Statements in Libel Suit: Hoffmann-Pugh v. Ramsey Introduction The case of Linda Hoffmann-Pugh v. Patricia Ramsey and John Ramsey (312 F.3d 1222) presents a significant...
Delicate Boundaries of Constitutional Liability in Educational Settings: Nix v. Franklin County School District

Delicate Boundaries of Constitutional Liability in Educational Settings: Nix v. Franklin County School District

Date: Nov 20, 2002
Delicate Boundaries of Constitutional Liability in Educational Settings: Nix v. Franklin County School District Introduction The case of Nix v. Franklin County School District centers on a tragic...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in False Arrest and Unlawful Search Claims: Dahl v. Holley

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in False Arrest and Unlawful Search Claims: Dahl v. Holley

Date: Nov 20, 2002
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in False Arrest and Unlawful Search Claims: Dahl v. Holley Introduction The case of Shirley Dahl v. Jim Holley, adjudicated in the United States Court of Appeals for...
Clarifying the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Use of Force: The Vinyard v. Wilson Decision

Clarifying the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Use of Force: The Vinyard v. Wilson Decision

Date: Nov 15, 2002
Clarifying the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Use of Force: The Vinyard v. Wilson Decision Introduction Terri Vinyard v. Steve Wilson, Sheriff of Walker County, Georgia, Patrick Stanfield,...
Standard of Review in Mixed MSPB Cases: Kelliher v. Veneman

Standard of Review in Mixed MSPB Cases: Kelliher v. Veneman

Date: Nov 14, 2002
Standard of Review in Mixed MSPB Cases: Kelliher v. Veneman Introduction In John C. Kelliher v. Ann M. Veneman, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, 313 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2002), the...
Affirmation in Crawford v. Head: No Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance and Brady Violations

Affirmation in Crawford v. Head: No Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance and Brady Violations

Date: Nov 13, 2002
Affirmation in Crawford v. Head: No Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance and Brady Violations Introduction Eddie Albert Crawford sought federal habeas corpus relief following his conviction and...
SLUSA Preempts State Law Class Actions in Securities Fraud: Analysis of Behlen v. Merrill Lynch

SLUSA Preempts State Law Class Actions in Securities Fraud: Analysis of Behlen v. Merrill Lynch

Date: Nov 9, 2002
SLUSA Preempts State Law Class Actions in Securities Fraud: Analysis of Behlen v. Merrill Lynch Introduction Charles H. Behlen v. Merrill Lynch, Phoenix Investment Partners, Ltd., 311 F.3d 1087 (11th...
Time-Barred Claims and Standing in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of City of Hialeah v. Rojas and Nina

Time-Barred Claims and Standing in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of City of Hialeah v. Rojas and Nina

Date: Nov 9, 2002
Time-Barred Claims and Standing in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of City of Hialeah v. Rojas and Nina Introduction The case of City of Hialeah, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of...
Enhanced Applicability of Florida's Offer of Judgment Statute in Multistate Litigation: McMAHAN v. TOTO

Enhanced Applicability of Florida's Offer of Judgment Statute in Multistate Litigation: McMAHAN v. TOTO

Date: Nov 7, 2002
Enhanced Applicability of Florida's Offer of Judgment Statute in Multistate Litigation: McMAHAN v. TOTO Introduction Case Name: D. Bruce McMahan, Nemesis Veritas, f.k.a., McMahan Company,...
No Implied Private Right of Action Under the Air Carrier Access Act: Love v. Delta Air Lines

No Implied Private Right of Action Under the Air Carrier Access Act: Love v. Delta Air Lines

Date: Nov 1, 2002
No Implied Private Right of Action Under the Air Carrier Access Act: Love v. Delta Air Lines Introduction Cynthia Love v. Delta Air Lines is a significant appellate decision from the United States...
Eleventh Circuit Reversal in CFTC v. R.J. Fitzgerald Co., Inc.: Clarifying Fraudulent Solicitation Standards Under the Commodity Exchange Act

Eleventh Circuit Reversal in CFTC v. R.J. Fitzgerald Co., Inc.: Clarifying Fraudulent Solicitation Standards Under the Commodity Exchange Act

Date: Oct 30, 2002
Eleventh Circuit Reversal in CFTC v. R.J. Fitzgerald Co., Inc.: Clarifying Fraudulent Solicitation Standards Under the Commodity Exchange Act Introduction The case of Commodity Futures Trading...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert