Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Mootness and Jurisdiction in Immigration Detention: Soliman v. United States

Mootness and Jurisdiction in Immigration Detention: Soliman v. United States

Date: Jul 12, 2002
Mootness and Jurisdiction in Immigration Detention: Soliman v. United States Introduction The case of Nabil Soliman v. United States of America, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Carmack Amendment Preemption in State Law Claims: Smith v. UPS

Carmack Amendment Preemption in State Law Claims: Smith v. UPS

Date: Jul 12, 2002
Carmack Amendment Preemption in State Law Claims: Smith v. UPS Introduction In Frank H. Smith and Harriett C. Smith v. United Parcel Service (UPS), the Plaintiffs-Appellants challenged the dismissal...
Court Upholds Attempt Conviction in Online Minor Representation Case: United States v. Root

Court Upholds Attempt Conviction in Online Minor Representation Case: United States v. Root

Date: Jul 11, 2002
Court Upholds Attempt Conviction in Online Minor Representation Case: United States v. Root Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. John Allen Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir....
Preferred Sites v. Troup County: Upholding §704(a) Standards in Local Zoning for Wireless Communications

Preferred Sites v. Troup County: Upholding §704(a) Standards in Local Zoning for Wireless Communications

Date: Jul 11, 2002
Preferred Sites v. Troup County: Upholding §704(a) Standards in Local Zoning for Wireless Communications Introduction In Preferred Sites, LLC v. Troup County, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirming Mens Rea and Minimal Interstate Commerce Effect: Insights from Woodruff v. United States

Affirming Mens Rea and Minimal Interstate Commerce Effect: Insights from Woodruff v. United States

Date: Jul 4, 2002
Affirming Mens Rea and Minimal Interstate Commerce Effect: Insights from Woodruff v. United States Introduction Woodruff v. United States, 296 F.3d 1041 (11th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case that...
Strict Standards for Discrimination Evidence and Employer COBRA Obligations in I v. Ry Scott

Strict Standards for Discrimination Evidence and Employer COBRA Obligations in I v. Ry Scott

Date: Jun 26, 2002
Strict Standards for Discrimination Evidence and Employer COBRA Obligations in I v. Ry Scott Introduction I v. Ry Scott, 295 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case addressing the complexities...
Daubert Standard Applied to Causation in Toxic Tort: Rider v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals

Daubert Standard Applied to Causation in Toxic Tort: Rider v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals

Date: Jun 25, 2002
Daubert Standard Applied to Causation in Toxic Tort: Rider v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Introduction Rider v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 295 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2002), presents a pivotal...
Affirming Effective Counsel and Trial Court Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Van Poyck v. Florida Department of Corrections

Affirming Effective Counsel and Trial Court Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Van Poyck v. Florida Department of Corrections

Date: Jun 22, 2002
Affirming Effective Counsel and Trial Court Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Van Poyck v. Florida Department of Corrections Introduction Van Poyck v. Florida Department of Corrections, 290 F.3d 1318...
Imputing Unconstitutional Motives: Columbia County v. Matthews and Its Implications

Imputing Unconstitutional Motives: Columbia County v. Matthews and Its Implications

Date: Jun 20, 2002
Imputing Unconstitutional Motives: Columbia County v. Matthews and Its Implications Introduction The case of Elaine Matthews v. Columbia County, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Limits on the Application of PLRA §1997e(e) in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases: Mitchell v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Limits on the Application of PLRA §1997e(e) in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases: Mitchell v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Date: Jun 20, 2002
Limits on the Application of PLRA §1997e(e) in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases: Mitchell v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp. Introduction In the landmark case of William Mitchell v. Brown Williamson...
Strict Adherence to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Limitation Period Confirmed: Equitable Tolling Rejected

Strict Adherence to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Limitation Period Confirmed: Equitable Tolling Rejected

Date: Jun 19, 2002
Strict Adherence to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Limitation Period Confirmed: Equitable Tolling Rejected Introduction The case of Charles Larry Jones v. United States (304 F.3d 1035), adjudicated by the United...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Sanctions for Ad Hominem Attacks: Reinforcing Professional Conduct Standards

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Sanctions for Ad Hominem Attacks: Reinforcing Professional Conduct Standards

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Sanctions for Ad Hominem Attacks: Reinforcing Professional Conduct Standards Introduction In the appellate case Clarence Thomas v. Tenneco Packaging Co., Inc. (293 F.3d...
Discovery Rule Application in Alabama Medical Malpractice: McCormick v. Aderholt

Discovery Rule Application in Alabama Medical Malpractice: McCormick v. Aderholt

Date: Jun 11, 2002
Discovery Rule Application in Alabama Medical Malpractice: McCormick v. Aderholt Introduction The case of Harold T. McCormick v. H. Chaney Aderholt (293 F.3d 1254) addresses critical issues in...
SLUSA Preemption of State Securities Class Actions and Entity Citizenship under Diversity Jurisdiction: Riley v. Merrill Lynch

SLUSA Preemption of State Securities Class Actions and Entity Citizenship under Diversity Jurisdiction: Riley v. Merrill Lynch

Date: Jun 8, 2002
SLUSA Preemption of State Securities Class Actions and Entity Citizenship under Diversity Jurisdiction: Riley v. Merrill Lynch Introduction In the landmark case of Robert E. Riley, Jr., et al. v....
United States v. Diaz-Clark: Affirming Jurisdictional Limits on Inherent Authority for Sentence Modification

United States v. Diaz-Clark: Affirming Jurisdictional Limits on Inherent Authority for Sentence Modification

Date: Jun 6, 2002
United States v. Diaz-Clark: Affirming Jurisdictional Limits on Inherent Authority for Sentence Modification Introduction United States v. Hector Ramon Diaz-Clark, 292 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 2002), is...
Nelson v. Alabama: Validating Pro Se Representation in Resentencing Under Faretta

Nelson v. Alabama: Validating Pro Se Representation in Resentencing Under Faretta

Date: Jun 4, 2002
Nelson v. Alabama: Validating Pro Se Representation in Resentencing Under Faretta Introduction Nelson v. Alabama is a pivotal case in the realm of criminal law, particularly concerning the rights of...
Affirmation of Retaliation Protections under Title VII: Shannon v. BellSouth Telecommunications

Affirmation of Retaliation Protections under Title VII: Shannon v. BellSouth Telecommunications

Date: Jun 1, 2002
Affirmation of Retaliation Protections under Title VII: Shannon v. BellSouth Telecommunications Introduction The case of William Shannon v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., adjudicated by the...
Rhetorical Hyperbole in Defamation Law: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms First Amendment Protections

Rhetorical Hyperbole in Defamation Law: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms First Amendment Protections

Date: May 29, 2002
Rhetorical Hyperbole in Defamation Law: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms First Amendment Protections Introduction The case of Neal Horsley v. Geraldo Rivera (292 F.3d 695, 2002) presents a pivotal moment...
Enforceability of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Employment Discrimination Claims: Insights from Weeks v. Harden Manufacturing Corp.

Enforceability of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Employment Discrimination Claims: Insights from Weeks v. Harden Manufacturing Corp.

Date: May 23, 2002
Enforceability of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Employment Discrimination Claims: Insights from Weeks v. Harden Manufacturing Corp. Introduction The case of Anthony Weeks, Charles Willingham,...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Stop and Frisk: United States v. Hunter (11th Cir. 2002)

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Stop and Frisk: United States v. Hunter (11th Cir. 2002)

Date: May 22, 2002
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Stop and Frisk: United States v. Hunter (11th Cir. 2002) Introduction The case of United States of America v. Reo Leonardo Hunter addresses critical issues...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert