Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirming Statutory Damages and Cyberpiracy Protections under the Lanham Act: PetMed Express, Inc. v. MedPets.com, Inc.

Affirming Statutory Damages and Cyberpiracy Protections under the Lanham Act: PetMed Express, Inc. v. MedPets.com, Inc.

Date: Jun 29, 2004
Affirming Statutory Damages and Cyberpiracy Protections under the Lanham Act: PetMed Express, Inc. v. MedPets.com, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of PetMed Express, Inc. v. MedPets.com, Inc.,...
De Novo Review for Legal Conclusions and Summary Judgment Standards under MPPAA: Trustees v. Wolf Crane Service

De Novo Review for Legal Conclusions and Summary Judgment Standards under MPPAA: Trustees v. Wolf Crane Service

Date: Jun 26, 2004
De Novo Review for Legal Conclusions and Summary Judgment Standards under MPPAA: Trustees v. Wolf Crane Service Introduction The case of Trustees of the Central Pension Fund of the International...
Aggregation of Factual Allegations to Infer Scienter under the PSLRA: Insights from Rochelle Phillips et al. v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. et al.

Aggregation of Factual Allegations to Infer Scienter under the PSLRA: Insights from Rochelle Phillips et al. v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. et al.

Date: Jun 23, 2004
Aggregation of Factual Allegations to Infer Scienter under the PSLRA: Insights from Rochelle Phillips et al. v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. et al. Introduction The case of Rochelle Phillips, Kalford C....
Heightened Arbitrary and Capricious Review in ERISA Claims: Insights from Williams v. BellSouth Telecommunications

Heightened Arbitrary and Capricious Review in ERISA Claims: Insights from Williams v. BellSouth Telecommunications

Date: Jun 17, 2004
Heightened Arbitrary and Capricious Review in ERISA Claims: Insights from Williams v. BellSouth Telecommunications Introduction Marcia Williams v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (373 F.3d 1132)...
Limitations on Ineffective Assistance Claims in §2255 Petitions: Analysis of Black v. United States

Limitations on Ineffective Assistance Claims in §2255 Petitions: Analysis of Black v. United States

Date: Jun 17, 2004
Limitations on Ineffective Assistance Claims in §2255 Petitions: Analysis of Black v. United States Introduction The case Randy Lamar Black v. United States of America, 373 F.3d 1140 (11th Cir. 2004)...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications: Reinforcing Standards for RICO and Section 1981 Claims

Affirmation of Dismissal in Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications: Reinforcing Standards for RICO and Section 1981 Claims

Date: Jun 15, 2004
Affirmation of Dismissal in Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications: Reinforcing Standards for RICO and Section 1981 Claims Introduction The case of Sandra Jackson et al. v. BellSouth...
Establishing U.S. Base of Operations for Maritime Jurisdiction: Williams v. Cruise Ships Catering International

Establishing U.S. Base of Operations for Maritime Jurisdiction: Williams v. Cruise Ships Catering International

Date: Jun 10, 2004
Establishing U.S. Base of Operations for Maritime Jurisdiction: Williams v. Cruise Ships Catering International Introduction Case: Enrique Williams, Plaintiff, v. Cruise Ships Catering and Service...
Intake Questionnaire Does Not Constitute an EEOC Charge Under the ADEA: Analysis of Bost v. Federal Express Corp.

Intake Questionnaire Does Not Constitute an EEOC Charge Under the ADEA: Analysis of Bost v. Federal Express Corp.

Date: Jun 9, 2004
Intake Questionnaire Does Not Constitute an EEOC Charge Under the ADEA: Analysis of Bost v. Federal Express Corp. Introduction The case of Anthony W. Bost, individually and on behalf of others...
Mootness and Vested Rights in Sign Ordinance Challenges: Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of Sunrise

Mootness and Vested Rights in Sign Ordinance Challenges: Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of Sunrise

Date: Jun 8, 2004
Mootness and Vested Rights in Sign Ordinance Challenges: Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of Sunrise Introduction In the appellate case of Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of...
Limitation to Specific Occupational Roles Not Constituting Disability Under ADA: Rossbach v. City of Miami

Limitation to Specific Occupational Roles Not Constituting Disability Under ADA: Rossbach v. City of Miami

Date: Jun 8, 2004
Limitation to Specific Occupational Roles Not Constituting Disability Under ADA: Rossbach v. City of Miami Introduction The case of Rossbach et al. v. City of Miami, adjudicated by the United States...
Enforceability of Anti-Assignment Clauses in ERISA Plans: PMG v. Horton Homes

Enforceability of Anti-Assignment Clauses in ERISA Plans: PMG v. Horton Homes

Date: Jun 4, 2004
Enforceability of Anti-Assignment Clauses in ERISA Plans: PMG v. Horton Homes Introduction In the case of Physicians Multispecialty Group (PMG) v. The Health Care Plan of Horton Homes, Inc., the...
Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Right of Plaintiffs to Intervene in ADEA Class Actions After Decertification

Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Right of Plaintiffs to Intervene in ADEA Class Actions After Decertification

Date: Jun 4, 2004
Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Right of Plaintiffs to Intervene in ADEA Class Actions After Decertification Introduction The case of Arlene M. Stone, et al. v. First Union Corporation addressed...
Res Judicata Scope Limited by Settlement Terms: Norfolk Southern v. Chevron

Res Judicata Scope Limited by Settlement Terms: Norfolk Southern v. Chevron

Date: Jun 4, 2004
Res Judicata Scope Limited by Settlement Terms: Norfolk Southern Corporation v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. Introduction In Norfolk Southern Corporation v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 371 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir....
Discretionary Nature of Liquidated Damages under the Wiretap Act Established

Discretionary Nature of Liquidated Damages under the Wiretap Act Established

Date: May 29, 2004
Discretionary Nature of Liquidated Damages under the Wiretap Act Established Introduction The case of DIRECTV, Inc. v. Michael Brown (371 F.3d 814) adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirming Student Free Speech and Establishment Clause Rights in Public Schools

Affirming Student Free Speech and Establishment Clause Rights in Public Schools

Date: May 29, 2004
Affirming Student Free Speech and Establishment Clause Rights in Public Schools Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Holloman, Jr. v. George Harland, Fawn Allred (2004), the United States...
Dual Applicability of 28 U.S.C. §§2241 and 2254 in Habeas Corpus: The THOMAS v. Crosby Decision

Dual Applicability of 28 U.S.C. §§2241 and 2254 in Habeas Corpus: The THOMAS v. Crosby Decision

Date: May 27, 2004
Dual Applicability of 28 U.S.C. §§2241 and 2254 in Habeas Corpus: The THOMAS v. Crosby Decision Introduction In the landmark case of James Dwight Thomas v. James Crosby, Secretary for the Department...
Denial of Default Judgment Due to Insufficient Cause of Action in Products Liability Case

Denial of Default Judgment Due to Insufficient Cause of Action in Products Liability Case

Date: May 21, 2004
Denial of Default Judgment Due to Insufficient Cause of Action in Products Liability Case Introduction The case of Laurie Ann Pitts v. Seneca Sports, Inc. revolves around a products liability claim...
Enforcing Federal Communication Statutes: DIRECTV v. Huynh Sets New Precedent on Unauthorized Satellite Signal Access

Enforcing Federal Communication Statutes: DIRECTV v. Huynh Sets New Precedent on Unauthorized Satellite Signal Access

Date: May 20, 2004
Enforcing Federal Communication Statutes: DIRECTV v. Huynh Sets New Precedent on Unauthorized Satellite Signal Access Introduction In the case of DIRECTV, Inc. v. James Huynh, adjudicated in the...
Expanding ERISA Remedies: Upholding Section 502(a)(3) Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Expanding ERISA Remedies: Upholding Section 502(a)(3) Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Date: May 19, 2004
Expanding ERISA Remedies: Upholding Section 502(a)(3) Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Introduction In the landmark case of Gerald W. Jones et al. v. American General Life and Accident Insurance...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Traffic Stop and Use of Force Case

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Traffic Stop and Use of Force Case

Date: May 18, 2004
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Traffic Stop and Use of Force Case Introduction Stacy Allen Draper, the plaintiff-appellant, initiated legal action against Clinton D. Reynolds, a deputy sheriff...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert