Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Quincy Wade v. Ralph Battle Decision

AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Quincy Wade v. Ralph Battle Decision

Date: Aug 7, 2004
AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Quincy Wade v. Ralph Battle Decision Introduction The case of Quincy Wade v. Ralph Battle, reported at 379 F.3d 1254, was adjudicated by...
Chandler v. Crosby: Establishing Vicarious Exhaustion as Compliance with PLRA in Class Actions

Chandler v. Crosby: Establishing Vicarious Exhaustion as Compliance with PLRA in Class Actions

Date: Aug 7, 2004
Chandler v. Crosby: Establishing Vicarious Exhaustion as Compliance with PLRA in Class Actions Introduction Chandler v. Crosby is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
FMLA Protections Limited to Eligible Employees: An Analysis of Walker v. Elmore County Board of Education

FMLA Protections Limited to Eligible Employees: An Analysis of Walker v. Elmore County Board of Education

Date: Aug 6, 2004
FMLA Protections Limited to Eligible Employees: An Analysis of Walker v. Elmore County Board of Education Introduction Brandi Hare Walker, the plaintiff-appellant, brought a lawsuit against the...
Hubbard v. Campbell: Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions in Competency-to-be-Executed Claims

Hubbard v. Campbell: Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions in Competency-to-be-Executed Claims

Date: Aug 5, 2004
Hubbard v. Campbell: Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions in Competency-to-be-Executed Claims Introduction James Barney Hubbard, a death row inmate in the Alabama...
Legal Commentary: Appellate Procedure and the Importance of Timely Issue Raising in United States v. Levy

Legal Commentary: Appellate Procedure and the Importance of Timely Issue Raising in United States v. Levy

Date: Aug 4, 2004
Appellate Procedure and the Importance of Timely Issue Raising in United States v. Levy Introduction United States of America v. Raphael R. Levy, 379 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2004), is a pivotal case...
Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity in Arrests: Insights from Garrett v. Dually et al.

Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity in Arrests: Insights from Garrett v. Dually et al.

Date: Jul 31, 2004
Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity in Arrests: Insights from Garrett v. Dually et al. Introduction Garrett v. Dually et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Forum Selection Clause and Waiver of Removal Rights: Eleventh Circuit Reverses Remand in Global Satellite Communications v. Starmill U.K. Limited

Forum Selection Clause and Waiver of Removal Rights: Eleventh Circuit Reverses Remand in Global Satellite Communications v. Starmill U.K. Limited

Date: Jul 30, 2004
Forum Selection Clause and Waiver of Removal Rights: Eleventh Circuit Reverses Remand in Global Satellite Communications v. Starmill U.K. Limited Introduction The case of Global Satellite...
Establishing Strict and Joint Liability in Securities Law Violations: An In-Depth Commentary on SEC v. Calvo, III (11th Cir. 2004)

Establishing Strict and Joint Liability in Securities Law Violations: An In-Depth Commentary on SEC v. Calvo, III (11th Cir. 2004)

Date: Jul 28, 2004
Establishing Strict and Joint Liability in Securities Law Violations: An In-Depth Commentary on SEC v. Calvo, III (11th Cir. 2004) Introduction The case of SEC v. William A. Calvo III represents a...
Affirmation of Fourth Amendment Protections: Establishing Warrant Requirement for Private Office Searches in O'Rourke v. Hayes

Affirmation of Fourth Amendment Protections: Establishing Warrant Requirement for Private Office Searches in O'Rourke v. Hayes

Date: Jul 28, 2004
Affirmation of Fourth Amendment Protections: Establishing Warrant Requirement for Private Office Searches in O'Rourke v. Hayes Introduction The case of Guirlaine O'Rourke v. Christopher Hayes...
Kelley v. Secretary of Department of Corrections: A Landmark on Habeas Corpus and Due Process

Kelley v. Secretary of Department of Corrections: A Landmark on Habeas Corpus and Due Process

Date: Jul 24, 2004
Kelley v. Secretary of Department of Corrections: A Landmark on Habeas Corpus and Due Process Introduction Kelley v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, Florida Department of Corrections,...
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Habeas Corpus Relief: Peoples v. Campbell

Affirmation of Procedural Default and Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Habeas Corpus Relief: Peoples v. Campbell

Date: Jul 22, 2004
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Habeas Corpus Relief: Peoples v. Campbell Introduction In the case of John W. Peoples, Jr. v. Donal Campbell,...
Younger Abstention Applied: Federal Preemption Claims Insufficient in Hughes v. Attorney General of Florida

Younger Abstention Applied: Federal Preemption Claims Insufficient in Hughes v. Attorney General of Florida

Date: Jul 22, 2004
Younger Abstention Applied: Federal Preemption Claims Insufficient in Hughes v. Attorney General of Florida Introduction In the case of Christopher Scott Hughes and Thomas Porter Cloyd v. Attorney...
New Precedent on Trade Secret Evidence Admissibility: Analysis of PEAT Inc. v. Vanguard Research Inc.

New Precedent on Trade Secret Evidence Admissibility: Analysis of PEAT Inc. v. Vanguard Research Inc.

Date: Jul 22, 2004
New Precedent on Trade Secret Evidence Admissibility: Analysis of PEAT Inc. v. Vanguard Research Inc. Introduction The case of PEAT, Inc. v. Vanguard Research, Inc. (378 F.3d 1154) adjudicated by the...
Strict Adherence to AEDPA's Filing Requirements Affirmed in Sibley v. Rette

Strict Adherence to AEDPA's Filing Requirements Affirmed in Sibley v. Rette

Date: Jul 22, 2004
Strict Adherence to AEDPA's Filing Requirements Affirmed in Sibley v. Rette Introduction George Everette SIBLEY, Jr., and his wife, Lynda Lyon-Sibley, were convicted of capital murder on October 4,...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Strict 'Torture' Standard for CAT Relief in Removal Proceedings

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Strict 'Torture' Standard for CAT Relief in Removal Proceedings

Date: Jul 21, 2004
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Strict 'Torture' Standard for CAT Relief in Removal Proceedings Introduction The case of Jean Neckson Cadet v. John M. Bulger serves as a pivotal example in the landscape of...
Establishing Protected Liberty Interests and Intentional Punishment in Pretrial Detention: Sal v. Magluta

Establishing Protected Liberty Interests and Intentional Punishment in Pretrial Detention: Sal v. Magluta

Date: Jul 9, 2004
Establishing Protected Liberty Interests and Intentional Punishment in Pretrial Detention: Sal v. Magluta Introduction Sal v. dor Magluta, 375 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2004), is a pivotal case addressing...
Harm to Competition Essential in Sherman Act Claims: 11th Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel

Harm to Competition Essential in Sherman Act Claims: 11th Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel

Date: Jul 1, 2004
Harm to Competition Essential in Sherman Act Claims: 11th Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel Introduction The case of Spanish Broadcasting System of Florida, Inc....
District Court's Discretion Recognized in Not Appointing Counsel for Post-Appeal Rule 33 Motions and Recusal Standards: Berger v. United States

District Court's Discretion Recognized in Not Appointing Counsel for Post-Appeal Rule 33 Motions and Recusal Standards: Berger v. United States

Date: Jul 1, 2004
District Court's Discretion Recognized in Not Appointing Counsel for Post-Appeal Rule 33 Motions and Recusal Standards: Berger v. United States Introduction Berger v. United States, 375 F.3d 1223...
Reversing Arbitration Injunctions: Insights from Klay v. United Healthgroup

Reversing Arbitration Injunctions: Insights from Klay v. United Healthgroup

Date: Jul 1, 2004
Reversing Arbitration Injunctions: Insights from Klay v. United Healthgroup Introduction In Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc., United Healthcare, PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc., the United States...
Creating Genuine Issues in Sex Discrimination Claims through Decisionmaker's Admissions: Wilson v. B/E Aerospace

Creating Genuine Issues in Sex Discrimination Claims through Decisionmaker's Admissions: Wilson v. B/E Aerospace

Date: Jul 1, 2004
Creating Genuine Issues in Sex Discrimination Claims through Decisionmaker's Admissions: Wilson v. B/E Aerospace Introduction Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc., 376 F.3d 1079 (11th Cir. 2004), is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert