Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Polar: Establishing Clarity on 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a)

Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Polar: Establishing Clarity on 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a)

Date: May 14, 2004
Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Polar: Establishing Clarity on 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Luis Enrique Polar, the United States...
Enhancing Standards for Constructive Possession and Co-Conspirator Liability in Drug Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Gunn et al.

Enhancing Standards for Constructive Possession and Co-Conspirator Liability in Drug Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Gunn et al.

Date: May 13, 2004
Enhancing Standards for Constructive Possession and Co-Conspirator Liability in Drug Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Gunn et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Manuel Gunn,...
Reyes-Sanchez v. U.S. Attorney General: Clarifying the Scope of Acquiescence under the Convention Against Torture

Reyes-Sanchez v. U.S. Attorney General: Clarifying the Scope of Acquiescence under the Convention Against Torture

Date: May 13, 2004
Reyes-Sanchez v. U.S. Attorney General: Clarifying the Scope of Acquiescence under the Convention Against Torture Introduction In the landmark case of Roberto Domingo Reyes-Sanchez v. United States...
Discrimination Under ADA: Cleveland v. Home Shopping Network

Discrimination Under ADA: Cleveland v. Home Shopping Network

Date: May 12, 2004
Discrimination Under ADA: Comprehensive Commentary on Cleveland v. Home Shopping Network Introduction Alice T. Cleveland v. Home Shopping Network, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Functionality Doctrine Reaffirmed in Trade Dress Infringement: Dippin' Dots, Inc. v. Frosty Bites Distribution, LLC

Functionality Doctrine Reaffirmed in Trade Dress Infringement: Dippin' Dots, Inc. v. Frosty Bites Distribution, LLC

Date: May 12, 2004
Functionality Doctrine Reaffirmed in Trade Dress Infringement: Dippin' Dots, Inc. v. Frosty Bites Distribution, LLC Introduction In the appellate case Dippin' Dots, Inc. v. Frosty Bites Distribution,...
Enhanced Sentencing and Defense Evidence Standards under 18 U.S.C. § 1920: Insights from Hurn v. United States

Enhanced Sentencing and Defense Evidence Standards under 18 U.S.C. § 1920: Insights from Hurn v. United States

Date: May 8, 2004
Enhanced Sentencing and Defense Evidence Standards under 18 U.S.C. § 1920: Insights from Hurn v. United States Introduction Hurn v. United States (368 F.3d 1359) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Limitations on Colorado River Abstention in Parallel Federal and State Litigation: Ambrosia Coal and Construction Co. v. nia Corporation

Limitations on Colorado River Abstention in Parallel Federal and State Litigation: Ambrosia Coal and Construction Co. v. nia Corporation

Date: May 7, 2004
Limitations on Colorado River Abstention in Parallel Federal and State Litigation Ambrosia Coal and Construction Co. v. nia Corporation, 368 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2004) Introduction The case of...
Butcher v. United States: Refining Prejudice Analysis in §2255 Ineffective Assistance Claims

Butcher v. United States: Refining Prejudice Analysis in §2255 Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: May 6, 2004
Butcher v. United States: Refining Prejudice Analysis in §2255 Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Holly W. Butcher and John T. Renick v. United States of America,...
Establishing Indirect Communication Standards Under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b): Insights from United States v. Murrell

Establishing Indirect Communication Standards Under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b): Insights from United States v. Murrell

Date: May 5, 2004
Establishing Indirect Communication Standards Under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b): Insights from United States v. Murrell Introduction United States v. Anthony F. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2004),...
Admissibility of Handwriting and Competency Testimony under Federal Rules of Evidence: Odessa Dee Hall v. United Insurance Company of America

Admissibility of Handwriting and Competency Testimony under Federal Rules of Evidence: Odessa Dee Hall v. United Insurance Company of America

Date: May 1, 2004
Admissibility of Handwriting and Competency Testimony under Federal Rules of Evidence: Odessa Dee Hall v. United Insurance Company of America 1. Introduction In the appellate case of Odessa Dee Hall...
Conditional Withdrawal of Adversary Proceedings from Bankruptcy Court: An Analysis of Holmes v. Grubman

Conditional Withdrawal of Adversary Proceedings from Bankruptcy Court: An Analysis of Holmes v. Grubman

Date: Apr 30, 2004
Conditional Withdrawal of Adversary Proceedings from Bankruptcy Court: An Analysis of Holmes v. Grubman Introduction In the landmark case of Holmes v. Grubman, heard in the United States District...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Employer Liability Standards in Title VII Sexual Harassment Cases

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Employer Liability Standards in Title VII Sexual Harassment Cases

Date: Apr 28, 2004
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Employer Liability Standards in Title VII Sexual Harassment Cases Introduction In the landmark case Belinda Hulsey v. Pride Restaurants, LLC d.b.a. Burger King, the United...
Aurelio Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections: Establishing the Certificate of Appealability Requirement for Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Cases

Aurelio Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections: Establishing the Certificate of Appealability Requirement for Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Cases

Date: Apr 27, 2004
Aurelio Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections: Establishing the Certificate of Appealability Requirement for Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Cases Introduction The case of Aurelio O....
Eleventh Circuit Grants Stay Pending Interlocutory Appeal in Arbitration Motion Denial

Eleventh Circuit Grants Stay Pending Interlocutory Appeal in Arbitration Motion Denial

Date: Apr 27, 2004
Eleventh Circuit Grants Stay Pending Interlocutory Appeal in Arbitration Motion Denial Introduction In the landmark case of Blinco v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims and Expert Witness Access in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Conklin v. Schofield

Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims and Expert Witness Access in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Conklin v. Schofield

Date: Apr 22, 2004
Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims and Expert Witness Access in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Conklin v. Schofield Introduction Conklin v. Schofield (366 F.3d 1191), adjudicated...
Equal Treatment Under RLUIPA: Surfside's Zoning Ordinance Violates Religious Land Use Protections

Equal Treatment Under RLUIPA: Surfside's Zoning Ordinance Violates Religious Land Use Protections

Date: Apr 22, 2004
Equal Treatment Under RLUIPA: Surfside's Zoning Ordinance Violates Religious Land Use Protections 1. Introduction The case of Midrash Sephardi, Inc., Young Israel of Bal Harbor, Inc. v. Town of...
Dodd v. United States: Timeliness of § 2255 Petitions for Newly Recognized Rights

Dodd v. United States: Timeliness of § 2255 Petitions for Newly Recognized Rights

Date: Apr 17, 2004
Dodd v. United States: Timeliness of § 2255 Petitions for Newly Recognized Rights Introduction Overview of the Case The case of Michael Donald Dodd v. United States of America addresses a critical...
Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy Trustee Actions: Reynolds v. Wendy's International

Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy Trustee Actions: Reynolds v. Wendy's International

Date: Apr 16, 2004
Bankruptcy Trustee Actions and Judicial Estoppel: Reynolds v. Wendy's International Introduction Reynolds v. Wendy's International, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine Reinforced in Lynn v. United States

Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine Reinforced in Lynn v. United States

Date: Apr 15, 2004
Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine Reinforced in Lynn v. United States Introduction Richard LYNN v. UNITED STATES of America is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Reinforcement of the Filed Rate Doctrine in Telecommunications: Hill v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

Reinforcement of the Filed Rate Doctrine in Telecommunications: Hill v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

Date: Apr 3, 2004
Reinforcement of the Filed Rate Doctrine in Telecommunications: Hill v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Introduction The case of Priscilla Hill, on behalf of herself and all others similarly...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert