Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limitation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Family Law Disputes: Wise v. Bravo

Limitation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Family Law Disputes: Wise v. Bravo

Date: Dec 15, 1981
Limitation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Family Law Disputes: Wise v. Bravo Introduction Robert A. Wise v. Richard Anthony Bravo, The City of Pueblo, and Pueblo Police Department is a significant case...
Centurion Industries v. Cybernetic Systems: Establishing Standards for Trade Secret Disclosure in Patent Litigation

Centurion Industries v. Cybernetic Systems: Establishing Standards for Trade Secret Disclosure in Patent Litigation

Date: Dec 3, 1981
Centurion Industries v. Cybernetic Systems: Establishing Standards for Trade Secret Disclosure in Patent Litigation Introduction The case Centurion Industries, Inc. and Eric F. Burtis v. Warren...
Interpretation of Reimbursable Insurance Adjustments in Construction Contracts: Harrison Western Corp. v. Gulf Oil Co.

Interpretation of Reimbursable Insurance Adjustments in Construction Contracts: Harrison Western Corp. v. Gulf Oil Co.

Date: Nov 3, 1981
Interpretation of Reimbursable Insurance Adjustments in Construction Contracts: Harrison Western Corp. v. Gulf Oil Co. Introduction The case of Harrison Western Corporation v. Gulf Oil Company,...
Balancing Privacy and Judicial Integrity in Police Investigative File Discovery

Balancing Privacy and Judicial Integrity in Police Investigative File Discovery

Date: Sep 19, 1981
Balancing Privacy and Judicial Integrity in Police Investigative File Discovery Introduction In the landmark case of Denver Policemen's Protective Association v. Alvin Lichtenstein et al. (660 F.2d...
Establishing a Private Right of Action under §504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado

Establishing a Private Right of Action under §504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado

Date: Sep 5, 1981
Establishing a Private Right of Action under §504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado Introduction Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado, 658 F.2d...
Equitable Tolling in Title VII Claims: Carlile v. South Routt School District

Equitable Tolling in Title VII Claims: Carlile v. South Routt School District

Date: Jul 7, 1981
Equitable Tolling in Title VII Claims: Carlile v. South Routt School District Introduction In Carlile v. South Routt School District RE-3J, 652 F.2d 981 (10th Cir. 1981), the United States Court of...
Personal Staff Exception Affirmed in OWENS v. RUSH: Implications for Title VII and Civil Rights Claims

Personal Staff Exception Affirmed in OWENS v. RUSH: Implications for Title VII and Civil Rights Claims

Date: Jun 30, 1981
Personal Staff Exception Affirmed in OWENS v. RUSH: Implications for Title VII and Civil Rights Claims Introduction In the landmark case of James Owens v. Albert E. Rush et al. (654 F.2d 1370, 1981),...
Equitable Tolling and the Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: Insights from Ohio v. Peterson et al. (10th Cir. 1981)

Equitable Tolling and the Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: Insights from Ohio v. Peterson et al. (10th Cir. 1981)

Date: May 27, 1981
Equitable Tolling and the Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: Insights from Ohio v. Peterson et al. (10th Cir. 1981) Introduction Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber Ross et al., 651 F.2d...
Establishing the Importance of Factual Disputes in Summary Judgment: Barber v. General Electric Company

Establishing the Importance of Factual Disputes in Summary Judgment: Barber v. General Electric Company

Date: May 12, 1981
Establishing the Importance of Factual Disputes in Summary Judgment: Barber v. General Electric Company Introduction The case of Paul S. Barber v. General Electric Company navigates the complex...
Sex Discrimination in Federal Employment Promotions: Analysis of Bauer v. Bailer (1981)

Sex Discrimination in Federal Employment Promotions: Analysis of Bauer v. Bailer (1981)

Date: Apr 28, 1981
Sex Discrimination in Federal Employment Promotions: Analysis of Bauer v. Bailer (1981) Introduction Bauer v. Bailer is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Negligence of State Officials and the Scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from Major v. Benton et al.

Negligence of State Officials and the Scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from Major v. Benton et al.

Date: Apr 14, 1981
Negligence of State Officials and the Scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from Major v. Benton et al. Introduction Major v. Benton et al. (647 F.2d 110, Tenth Circuit, 1981) is a pivotal case that...
Double Jeopardy and Manifest Necessity: Comprehensive Analysis of Calabrese v. United States

Double Jeopardy and Manifest Necessity: Comprehensive Analysis of Calabrese v. United States

Date: Mar 27, 1981
Double Jeopardy and Manifest Necessity: Comprehensive Analysis of Calabrese v. United States Introduction In United States of America v. Calabrese et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Malandris v. Merrill Lynch: Guidelines for Punitive Damages in Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Malandris v. Merrill Lynch: Guidelines for Punitive Damages in Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Date: Mar 5, 1981
Malandris v. Merrill Lynch: Guidelines for Punitive Damages in Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Introduction In the case of Jung Ja Malandris vs. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith...
Precedent-Setting Injunctive Relief Standards under 49 U.S.C § 11503(c) for Railroads

Precedent-Setting Injunctive Relief Standards under 49 U.S.C § 11503(c) for Railroads

Date: Jan 24, 1981
Precedent-Setting Injunctive Relief Standards under 49 U.S.C § 11503(c) for Railroads Introduction The landmark decision in THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.,...
Mandamus Relief and Disclosure Obligations: An Analysis of United States v. Winner

Mandamus Relief and Disclosure Obligations: An Analysis of United States v. Winner

Date: Jan 22, 1981
Mandamus Relief and Disclosure Obligations: An Analysis of United States v. Winner Introduction The case of United States of America v. Honorable Fred M. Winner (641 F.2d 825) adjudicated by the...
Reversal of Attorney’s Fees Award in Title VII Case: Upholding the McDonnell Douglas Framework in Nulf v. International Paper Co.

Reversal of Attorney’s Fees Award in Title VII Case: Upholding the McDonnell Douglas Framework in Nulf v. International Paper Co.

Date: Jan 6, 1981
Reversal of Attorney’s Fees Award in Title VII Case: Upholding the McDonnell Douglas Framework in Nulf v. International Paper Co. Introduction Nulf v. International Paper Co. is a significant...
Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott Laboratories: Clarifying Pleading Standards in Antitrust Litigation

Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott Laboratories: Clarifying Pleading Standards in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Oct 3, 1980
Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott Laboratories: Clarifying Pleading Standards in Antitrust Litigation Introduction Mountain View Pharmacy et al. v. Abbott Laboratories et al., 630 F.2d 1383 (10th Cir....
Ramos v. Lamm: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Prison Conditions

Ramos v. Lamm: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Prison Conditions

Date: Sep 26, 1980
Ramos v. Lamm: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Prison Conditions Introduction Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559 (10th Cir. 1980), is a seminal case that significantly impacted the standards...
Reinforcing the Standing Doctrine: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Citizens Concerned v. City of Denver

Reinforcing the Standing Doctrine: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Citizens Concerned v. City of Denver

Date: Sep 5, 1980
Reinforcing the Standing Doctrine: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Citizens Concerned v. City of Denver Introduction In the landmark case of Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church and State v. The...
EEOC v. Sandia Corporation: Affirmation of Age Discrimination in Employment Practices

EEOC v. Sandia Corporation: Affirmation of Age Discrimination in Employment Practices

Date: Aug 14, 1980
EEOC v. Sandia Corporation: Affirmation of Age Discrimination in Employment Practices Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Sandia Corporation (639 F.2d 600)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert