Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Title VII Precedent on Discriminatory Promotion Policies: Muller v. U.S. Steel

Title VII Precedent on Discriminatory Promotion Policies: Muller v. U.S. Steel

Date: Jan 15, 1975
Title VII Precedent on Discriminatory Promotion Policies: Muller v. United States Steel Corporation Introduction Muller v. United States Steel Corporation is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Establishing Liability for Defective Design in Product-Related Fatalities: Gardner v. General Motors Corp.

Establishing Liability for Defective Design in Product-Related Fatalities: Gardner v. General Motors Corp.

Date: Dec 17, 1974
Establishing Liability for Defective Design in Product-Related Fatalities: Gardner v. General Motors Corp. Introduction The case of Gardner v. General Motors Corporation serves as a pivotal judicial...
Reversing Mail Fraud Conviction: Enhancing Indictment Specificity under Rule 7(c), Fed.R.Cr.P.

Reversing Mail Fraud Conviction: Enhancing Indictment Specificity under Rule 7(c), Fed.R.Cr.P.

Date: Dec 11, 1974
Reversing Mail Fraud Conviction: Enhancing Indictment Specificity under Rule 7(c), Fed.R.Cr.P. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Louis Rex Curtis (506 F.2d 985) adjudicated by the...
Equitable Ownership and Rule 25 Substitution in Tax Lien Foreclosure: Insights from United States v. Miller Brothers Construction Company, Rapidways Inc. (1974)

Equitable Ownership and Rule 25 Substitution in Tax Lien Foreclosure: Insights from United States v. Miller Brothers Construction Company, Rapidways Inc. (1974)

Date: Nov 14, 1974
Equitable Ownership and Rule 25 Substitution in Tax Lien Foreclosure: Insights from United States v. Miller Brothers Construction Company, Rapidways Inc. (1974) Introduction The case of United States...
Maintaining Corporate Separation and Personal Jurisdiction Limits: Fuqua Industries v. Herman Quarles

Maintaining Corporate Separation and Personal Jurisdiction Limits: Fuqua Industries v. Herman Quarles

Date: Nov 6, 1974
Maintaining Corporate Separation and Personal Jurisdiction Limits: Fuqua Industries v. Herman Quarles Introduction The case of Herman Quarles et al. v. Fuqua Industries, Inc. et al. (504 F.2d 1358)...
Defining Compulsory Counterclaims and Ancillary Jurisdiction in Civil Rights Actions: Pipeliners Local Union No. 798 v. EllerD

Defining Compulsory Counterclaims and Ancillary Jurisdiction in Civil Rights Actions: Pipeliners Local Union No. 798 v. EllerD

Date: Oct 3, 1974
Defining Compulsory Counterclaims and Ancillary Jurisdiction in Civil Rights Actions: Pipeliners Local Union No. 798 v. EllerD Introduction The case of Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa,...
Establishing Liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5: Insights from Kerbs v. Fall River Industries

Establishing Liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5: Insights from Kerbs v. Fall River Industries

Date: Sep 7, 1974
Establishing Liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5: Insights from Kerbs v. Fall River Industries Introduction The case Jack Kerbs v. Fall River Industries, Inc., 502 F.2d 731 (10th Cir. 1974),...
Due Process Satisfaction Through Notice in Rule 23(b)(3) Class Actions: Four Seasons Securities Litigation Commentary

Due Process Satisfaction Through Notice in Rule 23(b)(3) Class Actions: Four Seasons Securities Litigation Commentary

Date: Aug 14, 1974
Due Process Satisfaction Through Notice in Rule 23(b)(3) Class Actions: Four Seasons Securities Litigation Commentary Introduction The case of In re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation. Arthur...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Diversity Cases: Insights from Bassos v. Utah Power and Light Company

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Diversity Cases: Insights from Bassos v. Utah Power and Light Company

Date: Apr 11, 1974
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Diversity Cases: Insights from Bassos v. Utah Power and Light Company Introduction The case of Bassos v. Utah Power and Light Company presents a pivotal examination of...
Effective Opt-Out in Class Actions: Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation

Effective Opt-Out in Class Actions: Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation

Date: Feb 21, 1974
Effective Opt-Out in Class Actions: Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation Introduction The case of Arthur Andersen Co. v. Bank of America (493 F.2d 1288, 1974) addresses a pivotal issue in class...
Primary Line Price Discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act: Insights from GAS-A-CAR, Inc. v. American Petrofina, Inc.

Primary Line Price Discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act: Insights from GAS-A-CAR, Inc. v. American Petrofina, Inc.

Date: Sep 20, 1973
Primary Line Price Discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act: Insights from GAS-A-CAR, Inc. v. American Petrofina, Inc. Introduction The case of GAS-A-CAR, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, et al. v....
Affirmation of Concurrent Perjury Charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 in United States v. Masters

Affirmation of Concurrent Perjury Charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 in United States v. Masters

Date: Sep 15, 1973
Affirmation of Concurrent Perjury Charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 in United States v. Masters Introduction In the case of United States of America v. John Paul Masters, Jr., adjudicated by the United...
Constructive Trust and Fiduciary Duty in Irwin v. West End Development Company

Constructive Trust and Fiduciary Duty in Irwin v. West End Development Company

Date: Aug 18, 1973
Constructive Trust and Fiduciary Duty in Irwin et al. v. West End Development Company Introduction The case of Marguerite Irwin et al. v. West End Development Company (481 F.2d 34) adjudicated by the...
Martinez v. Richardson: Affirming Procedural Due Process in Termination of Medicare Benefits

Martinez v. Richardson: Affirming Procedural Due Process in Termination of Medicare Benefits

Date: Jan 30, 1973
Martinez v. Richardson: Affirming Procedural Due Process in Termination of Medicare Benefits Introduction Case Citation: Martinez et al. v. Richardson, 472 F.2d 1121 (10th Cir. 1973) Court: United...
Affirming Dismissal of Frivolous In Forma Pauperis Class Actions

Affirming Dismissal of Frivolous In Forma Pauperis Class Actions

Date: Oct 12, 1972
Affirming Dismissal of Frivolous In Forma Pauperis Class Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Paul X. Duhart et al. v. Norman A. Carlson, Director of Prisons, John N. Mitchell, As Attorney...
Conditional Affirmation of Specific Performance and Jurisdictional Clarity in Mining Lease Assignments

Conditional Affirmation of Specific Performance and Jurisdictional Clarity in Mining Lease Assignments

Date: May 10, 1972
Conditional Affirmation of Specific Performance and Jurisdictional Clarity in Mining Lease Assignments Introduction In the case of C. L. Whitelock v. Delbert Leatherman et al., decided on May 9,...
Sovereign Immunity of State Institutions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Eleventh Amendment Protections in University of Kansas Case

Sovereign Immunity of State Institutions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Eleventh Amendment Protections in University of Kansas Case

Date: Dec 3, 1971
Sovereign Immunity of State Institutions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Eleventh Amendment Protections in University of Kansas Case Introduction The case of John W. Brennan v. University of Kansas et al....
Enhancing Protections under Rule 10b-5: Analyzing Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Mitchell et al.

Enhancing Protections under Rule 10b-5: Analyzing Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Mitchell et al.

Date: Sep 11, 1971
Enhancing Protections under Rule 10b-5: Analyzing Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Mitchell et al. Introduction The case of Walter A. Mitchell et al. v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company et al., adjudicated by the...
Minyen v. American Home Assurance Co.: Affirming Policy Exclusions Based on Pre-Existing Conditions

Minyen v. American Home Assurance Co.: Affirming Policy Exclusions Based on Pre-Existing Conditions

Date: Jul 2, 1971
Minyen v. American Home Assurance Co.: Affirming Policy Exclusions Based on Pre-Existing Conditions Introduction Minyen v. American Home Assurance Company is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Economic Substance Doctrine Applied to Life Insurance Loan Transactions: Golsens v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Economic Substance Doctrine Applied to Life Insurance Loan Transactions: Golsens v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Jun 19, 1971
Economic Substance Doctrine Applied to Life Insurance Loan Transactions: Golsens v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction In Golsens v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, decided on June 18,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert