Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Strict Standards for Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Insights from Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Ritter

Strict Standards for Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Insights from Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Ritter

Date: Jan 4, 1967
Strict Standards for Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Insights from Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Ritter Introduction In the landmark case Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. Ritter, adjudicated by the...
Establishing Patent Validity and Infringement in Radioactivity Well Logging: Commentary on McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc.

Establishing Patent Validity and Infringement in Radioactivity Well Logging: Commentary on McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc.

Date: Apr 21, 1965
Establishing Patent Validity and Infringement in Radioactivity Well Logging: Commentary on McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc. Introduction The case of McCullough Tool Company versus Well...
Appealability of Subpoena Duces Tecum Orders Against Non-Party Witnesses in Antitrust Litigation

Appealability of Subpoena Duces Tecum Orders Against Non-Party Witnesses in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Apr 6, 1965
Appealability of Subpoena Duces Tecum Orders Against Non-Party Witnesses in Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case of COVENY Oil Company et al. v. Continental Oil Company and Texaco, Inc. (340...
Continental Oil Co. v. Frontier Refining Co.: Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Antitrust Litigation

Continental Oil Co. v. Frontier Refining Co.: Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Dec 2, 1964
Continental Oil Co. v. Frontier Refining Co.: Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case of Continental Oil Company, Appellant, v. The Frontier...
Implied Civil Remedies under SEC Rule 10b-5: Analysis of Trustell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.

Implied Civil Remedies under SEC Rule 10b-5: Analysis of Trustell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.

Date: Apr 22, 1964
Implied Civil Remedies under SEC Rule 10b-5: Analysis of Trustell v. United Underwriters, Ltd. Introduction The case of Harry H. Trustell et al. v. United Underwriters, Ltd. was brought before the...
Establishing Complete Diversity and Fraudulent Joinder in Federal Jurisdiction

Establishing Complete Diversity and Fraudulent Joinder in Federal Jurisdiction

Date: Mar 11, 1964
Establishing Complete Diversity and Fraudulent Joinder in Federal Jurisdiction Introduction The case Carl Dodd v. Fawcett Publications, Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts Over Third-Party Funds: O'Dell v. United States (Tenth Circuit, 1964)

Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts Over Third-Party Funds: O'Dell v. United States (Tenth Circuit, 1964)

Date: Jan 10, 1964
Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts Over Third-Party Funds: O'Dell v. United States (Tenth Circuit, 1964) Introduction Norene R. O'Dell v. United States of America and Jack Ruhter, Trustee...
Assignment of Cause of Action and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Bradbury v. Dennis

Assignment of Cause of Action and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Bradbury v. Dennis

Date: Oct 16, 1962
Assignment of Cause of Action and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Bradbury v. Dennis Introduction The case of T.O. Bradbury and N.B. Burt, Appellants, v. Frank Dennis, Appellee (310 F.2d 73)...
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 23(a)(3) Class Actions in Antitrust Litigation

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 23(a)(3) Class Actions in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Apr 27, 1962
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 23(a)(3) Class Actions in Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case under consideration involves multiple consolidated...
Timeliness of Notice of Appeal and Fraudulent Joinder in Louis Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores

Timeliness of Notice of Appeal and Fraudulent Joinder in Louis Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores

Date: Nov 18, 1958
Timeliness of Notice of Appeal and Fraudulent Joinder in Louis Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores Introduction The case of Louis Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores, Inc., adjudicated by the United States...
Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. §1441(c): Greenshields v. Warren Petroleum Corporation

Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. §1441(c): Greenshields v. Warren Petroleum Corporation

Date: Dec 17, 1957
Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. §1441(c): Greenshields v. Warren Petroleum Corporation Introduction Greenshields v. Warren Petroleum Corporation is a seminal case decided by the...
Reversal of Antitrust Judgment in New Home Appliance Center, Inc. v. W.G. Thompson: A Landmark Decision on Interstate Commerce Restraints

Reversal of Antitrust Judgment in New Home Appliance Center, Inc. v. W.G. Thompson: A Landmark Decision on Interstate Commerce Restraints

Date: Nov 28, 1957
Reversal of Antitrust Judgment in New Home Appliance Center, Inc. v. W.G. Thompson: A Landmark Decision on Interstate Commerce Restraints Introduction The case of New Home Appliance Center, Inc. v....
Removability and Fraudulent Joinder under 28 U.S.C. § 1446: McLeod v. Cities Service Gas Company

Removability and Fraudulent Joinder under 28 U.S.C. § 1446: McLeod v. Cities Service Gas Company

Date: Mar 20, 1956
Removability and Fraudulent Joinder under 28 U.S.C. § 1446: McLeod v. Cities Service Gas Company Introduction The case of Alfred E. McLeod and Bessie McLeod v. Cities Service Gas Company and Corinne...
Defining 'Statements Within Jurisdiction' under 18 U.S.C. §1001: Knowles v. United States

Defining 'Statements Within Jurisdiction' under 18 U.S.C. §1001: Knowles v. United States

Date: Jun 23, 1955
Defining 'Statements Within Jurisdiction' under 18 U.S.C. §1001: Knowles v. United States Introduction Knowles v. United States (224 F.2d 168, 10th Cir., 1955) is a pivotal case in understanding the...
Strict Adherence to Statutory Time Limits for Judicial Review: O v. Culp Hobby

Strict Adherence to Statutory Time Limits for Judicial Review: O v. Culp Hobby

Date: Oct 1, 1954
Strict Adherence to Statutory Time Limits for Judicial Review: O v. Culp Hobby Introduction The case of Oveta Culp Hobby, Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellant, versus...
Allocation of Sale Proceeds Between Capital Assets and Non-Compete Covenants: Tenth Circuit Upholds Tax Court's Classification

Allocation of Sale Proceeds Between Capital Assets and Non-Compete Covenants: Tenth Circuit Upholds Tax Court's Classification

Date: Mar 9, 1954
Allocation of Sale Proceeds Between Capital Assets and Non-Compete Covenants: Tenth Circuit Upholds Tax Court's Classification Introduction The case of Hamlin's Trust v. Commissioner of Internal...
Establishing Limits on Indemnity Claims Against the United States: Insights from United States v. Acord et al.

Establishing Limits on Indemnity Claims Against the United States: Insights from United States v. Acord et al.

Date: Feb 9, 1954
Establishing Limits on Indemnity Claims Against the United States: Insights from United States v. Acord et al. Introduction United States v. Acord et al. (209 F.2d 709) is a pivotal case decided by...
Unlawful Monopolization via Patent Pools: Insights from Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co.

Unlawful Monopolization via Patent Pools: Insights from Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co.

Date: Oct 14, 1952
Unlawful Monopolization via Patent Pools: Insights from Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Introduction Kobe, Inc. et al. v. Dempsey Pump Co. et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States...
Ordinary Income vs. Capital Gains: Insights from Mauldin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Ordinary Income vs. Capital Gains: Insights from Mauldin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Mar 20, 1952
Ordinary Income vs. Capital Gains: Insights from Mauldin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction Mauldin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is a landmark case decided by the United States...
Establishing Patent Invalidity through Prior Use: INSUL-WOOL Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc.

Establishing Patent Invalidity through Prior Use: INSUL-WOOL Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc.

Date: Jul 26, 1949
Establishing Patent Invalidity through Prior Use: INSUL-WOOL Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc. Introduction The case of INSUL-WOOL Insulation Corporation v. Home Insulation, Inc. (176 F.2d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert