Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Presentence Report Procedures in Rantz v. United States

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Presentence Report Procedures in Rantz v. United States

Date: Dec 7, 1988
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Presentence Report Procedures in Rantz v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Bobby Gene Rantz, 862 F.2d 808 (10th Cir....
Wheeler v. John Deere: Admissibility of Similar Accidents and Design Changes in Products Liability

Wheeler v. John Deere: Admissibility of Similar Accidents and Design Changes in Products Liability

Date: Dec 3, 1988
Wheeler v. John Deere: Admissibility of Similar Accidents and Design Changes in Products Liability Introduction In the case of Stephen Brent Wheeler v. John Deere Company, the United States Court of...
General Allegations of Fraud Do Not Void Contractual Jury Waivers: Telum, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton Credit Corporation

General Allegations of Fraud Do Not Void Contractual Jury Waivers: Telum, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton Credit Corporation

Date: Nov 26, 1988
General Allegations of Fraud Do Not Void Contractual Jury Waivers: Telum, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton Credit Corporation Introduction In the case of Telum, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation, Earl K. Cook and Carl...
Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Osborn v. Shillinger Commentary

Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Osborn v. Shillinger Commentary

Date: Nov 8, 1988
Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Osborn v. Shillinger Commentary Introduction Osborn v. Shillinger, 861 F.2d 612 (10th Cir. 1988), is a pivotal case in the realm of criminal law, particularly...
Jury Verdicts Under §1981 and Their Binding Effect on Title VII Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Skinner v. Total Petroleum

Jury Verdicts Under §1981 and Their Binding Effect on Title VII Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Skinner v. Total Petroleum

Date: Oct 15, 1988
Jury Verdicts Under §1981 and Their Binding Effect on Title VII Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Skinner v. Total Petroleum Introduction The case of Dennis Skinner v. Total Petroleum, Inc. (859...
Complete Diversity and Unincorporated Associations: Insights from Tucks v. USAA

Complete Diversity and Unincorporated Associations: Insights from Tucks v. USAA

Date: Oct 15, 1988
Complete Diversity and Unincorporated Associations: Insights from Tucks v. USAA Introduction The case of Leroy Tuck, Dorothy Tuck, et al. v. United Services Automobile Association (USAA) presents a...
Equitable Tolling in Age Discrimination Claims: Gray v. Phillips Petroleum Co. Analysis

Equitable Tolling in Age Discrimination Claims: Gray v. Phillips Petroleum Co. Analysis

Date: Oct 1, 1988
Equitable Tolling in Age Discrimination Claims: Gray v. Phillips Petroleum Co. Analysis Introduction The case Robert L. Gray et al. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution in Federal Tort Claims Act Cases

Affirmation of Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution in Federal Tort Claims Act Cases

Date: Sep 30, 1988
Affirmation of Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution in Federal Tort Claims Act Cases Carl E. Bills v. The United States of America, 857 F.2d 1404 (10th Cir. 1988) Introduction The case of Carl E. Bills,...
Affirmation of Business Judgment Protections in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims

Affirmation of Business Judgment Protections in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims

Date: Sep 28, 1988
Affirmation of Business Judgment Protections in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims Introduction The case WILLIAM LUCAS, JIM HOUSE, JOHN THOMASON, AND HOWARD McCULLY v. DOVER CORPORATION, NORRIS DIVISION...
Equal Protection and Police Protection in Domestic Violence Cases: Watson v. City of Kansas City, K.S.

Equal Protection and Police Protection in Domestic Violence Cases: Watson v. City of Kansas City, K.S.

Date: Sep 15, 1988
Equal Protection and Police Protection in Domestic Violence Cases: Watson v. City of Kansas City, Kansas Introduction Watson v. City of Kansas City, Kansas is a seminal case adjudicated by the United...
Criteria for Petitioning Creditors in Involuntary Bankruptcy: Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.

Criteria for Petitioning Creditors in Involuntary Bankruptcy: Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.

Date: Sep 3, 1988
Criteria for Petitioning Creditors in Involuntary Bankruptcy: Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp. Introduction The case of William R. Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corporation and Nucorp Supply, Inc.,...
Balancing R.S. 2477 Rights-of-Way with FLPMA and NEPA Obligations: Comprehensive Analysis in Sierra Club v. Hodel

Balancing R.S. 2477 Rights-of-Way with FLPMA and NEPA Obligations: Comprehensive Analysis in Sierra Club v. Hodel

Date: Sep 1, 1988
Balancing R.S. 2477 Rights-of-Way with FLPMA and NEPA Obligations: Comprehensive Analysis in Sierra Club v. Hodel Introduction In Sierra Club, A Non-Profit Corporation v. Donald P. Hodel, et al., the...
Clarifying the One Satisfaction Rule and Assignment Clauses in Securities Fraud: U.S. Industries v. Touche Ross

Clarifying the One Satisfaction Rule and Assignment Clauses in Securities Fraud: U.S. Industries v. Touche Ross

Date: Aug 23, 1988
Clarifying the One Satisfaction Rule and Assignment Clauses in Securities Fraud: U.S. Industries v. Touche Ross Introduction The case U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross Co., decided by the United...
Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Under the EAJA and Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from Adamson v. Bowen

Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Under the EAJA and Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from Adamson v. Bowen

Date: Aug 16, 1988
Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Under the EAJA and Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from Adamson v. Bowen Introduction The case of Gerald K. Adamson v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health...
Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment: Insights from Jones v. City and County of Denver

Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment: Insights from Jones v. City and County of Denver

Date: Aug 13, 1988
Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment: Insights from Jones v. City and County of Denver Introduction The case of Charles F. Jones, Jr. v. City and County of Denver, decided by the United States...
Affirmation of Mercy Hospital’s Dismissal of Antitrust Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of McKenzie v. Mercy Hospital

Affirmation of Mercy Hospital’s Dismissal of Antitrust Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of McKenzie v. Mercy Hospital

Date: Aug 11, 1988
Affirmation of Mercy Hospital’s Dismissal of Antitrust Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of McKenzie v. Mercy Hospital Introduction The case of Steve L. McKenzie, D.O., Plaintiff-Appellant versus...
Fed.R.Evid. 702 Restricts Expert Testimony from Defining Legal Standards - SPECHT v. JENSEN

Fed.R.Evid. 702 Restricts Expert Testimony from Defining Legal Standards - SPECHT v. JENSEN

Date: Aug 4, 1988
Fed.R.Evid. 702 Restricts Expert Testimony from Defining Legal Standards - SPECHT v. JENSEN Introduction SPECHT v. JENSEN is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Protected Speech in Public Employment: Conaway v. City of Kansas City

Protected Speech in Public Employment: Conaway v. City of Kansas City

Date: Aug 3, 1988
Protected Speech in Public Employment: Conaway v. City of Kansas City Introduction Clyde Conaway v. Edward C. Smith et al., 853 F.2d 789 (10th Cir. 1988), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Establishing Administrative Expense Priority for Earned Bonuses in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re Amarex, Inc.

Establishing Administrative Expense Priority for Earned Bonuses in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re Amarex, Inc.

Date: Jul 30, 1988
Establishing Administrative Expense Priority for Earned Bonuses in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re Amarex, Inc. Introduction In Re Amarex, Inc., Debtor. Robert O. Isaac, Appellee, v. Temex Energy,...
Establishing the Limits of Rule 15(c) FRCP in Extending Statute of Limitations: Insights from Anderson v. Deere Co.

Establishing the Limits of Rule 15(c) FRCP in Extending Statute of Limitations: Insights from Anderson v. Deere Co.

Date: Jul 27, 1988
Establishing the Limits of Rule 15(c) FRCP in Extending Statute of Limitations: Insights from Anderson v. Deere Co. Introduction The case of Warren L. Anderson and Ruby Anderson v. Deere Co., John...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert