Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reinforcing Pleading Standards for Antitrust and RICO Actions: Cayman Exploration Corp. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.

Reinforcing Pleading Standards for Antitrust and RICO Actions: Cayman Exploration Corp. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.

Date: Apr 27, 1989
Reinforcing Pleading Standards for Antitrust and RICO Actions: Cayman Exploration Corp. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. Introduction The case of Cayman Exploration Corporation v. United Gas Pipe Line...
Coercive Warrantless Home Arrest Violates Payton: Unlawful Seizure and Tainted Evidence in U.S. v. Arthur Maez

Coercive Warrantless Home Arrest Violates Payton: Unlawful Seizure and Tainted Evidence in U.S. v. Arthur Maez

Date: Apr 20, 1989
Coercive Warrantless Home Arrest Violates Payton: Unlawful Seizure and Tainted Evidence in U.S. v. Arthur Maez Introduction United States of America v. Arthur Maez (872 F.2d 1444) is a pivotal case...
Due Process Protections for Prisoner Property Interests: Insights from Gillihan v. Shillinger

Due Process Protections for Prisoner Property Interests: Insights from Gillihan v. Shillinger

Date: Apr 13, 1989
Due Process Protections for Prisoner Property Interests: Insights from Gillihan v. Shillinger Introduction Gillihan v. Shillinger, 872 F.2d 935 (10th Cir. 1989), is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Establishing Standing in RICO Claims: Insights from Grider v. Texas Oil Gas Corp.

Establishing Standing in RICO Claims: Insights from Grider v. Texas Oil Gas Corp.

Date: Mar 22, 1989
Establishing Standing in RICO Claims: Insights from Grider v. Texas Oil Gas Corp. Introduction The case of Grider v. Texas Oil Gas Corp., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Clarifying 'Carrying' of Firearms under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Tenth Circuit Sets New Precedent

Clarifying 'Carrying' of Firearms under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Tenth Circuit Sets New Precedent

Date: Mar 18, 1989
Clarifying 'Carrying' of Firearms under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Tenth Circuit Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of United States of America v. Martin Cardenas, adjudicated in the United States...
Affirmation of Take-or-Pay Obligations under Oklahoma Law: Kaiser-Francis Oil Co. v. Producer's Gas Co.

Affirmation of Take-or-Pay Obligations under Oklahoma Law: Kaiser-Francis Oil Co. v. Producer's Gas Co.

Date: Mar 9, 1989
Affirmation of Take-or-Pay Obligations under Oklahoma Law: Kaiser-Francis Oil Co. v. Producer's Gas Co. Introduction The legal dispute between Kaiser-Francis Oil Company, a Delaware corporation, and...
Durre v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections: Affirmation of Dismissal under Section 1983

Durre v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections: Affirmation of Dismissal under Section 1983

Date: Mar 1, 1989
Durre v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections: Affirmation of Dismissal under Section 1983 Introduction Edgar Lee Durre, an inmate within the Colorado Department of Corrections, initiated a legal challenge...
Grubb v. FDIC: Affirming Rule 10b-5 Standing and Causation in Securities Fraud Claims

Grubb v. FDIC: Affirming Rule 10b-5 Standing and Causation in Securities Fraud Claims

Date: Feb 17, 1989
Grubb v. FDIC: Affirming Rule 10b-5 Standing and Causation in Securities Fraud Claims Introduction In the landmark case Grubb v. FDIC, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Procedural Mandates for Amending Complaints in RICO Cases: Insights from Bonnie Glenn v. First National Bank

Procedural Mandates for Amending Complaints in RICO Cases: Insights from Bonnie Glenn v. First National Bank

Date: Feb 16, 1989
Procedural Mandates for Amending Complaints in RICO Cases: Insights from Bonnie Glenn v. First National Bank Introduction The case of Bonnie Glenn and Glenn's Enterprises Inc. v. First National Bank...
Limitations on Amending Defendants in Federal Employment Discrimination Actions: Johnson v. United States Postal Service

Limitations on Amending Defendants in Federal Employment Discrimination Actions: Johnson v. United States Postal Service

Date: Feb 16, 1989
Limitations on Amending Defendants in Federal Employment Discrimination Actions: Johnson v. United States Postal Service Introduction Jerrald M. Johnson v. United States Postal Service is a...
Strict Adherence to Medical-Vocational Guidelines Affirmed in Disability Claims: Gossett v. Bowen

Strict Adherence to Medical-Vocational Guidelines Affirmed in Disability Claims: Gossett v. Bowen

Date: Feb 14, 1989
Strict Adherence to Medical-Vocational Guidelines Affirmed in Disability Claims: Gossett v. Bowen Introduction The case of Benjamin S. Gossett v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D. addresses the intricacies of...
Admissibility of Prior Convictions and Due Process in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Insights from Nichols v. Sullivan

Admissibility of Prior Convictions and Due Process in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Insights from Nichols v. Sullivan

Date: Feb 7, 1989
Admissibility of Prior Convictions and Due Process in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Insights from Nichols v. Sullivan Introduction The case of Russell Earl Nichols v. George Sullivan, decided by the...
Establishing Standards for Willfulness in ADEA Retaliation Claims: Anderson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Establishing Standards for Willfulness in ADEA Retaliation Claims: Anderson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Date: Feb 4, 1989
Establishing Standards for Willfulness in ADEA Retaliation Claims: Anderson v. Phillips Petroleum Co. 1. Introduction The case of Craig A. Anderson v. Phillips Petroleum Company, decided by the...
Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Kunkel v. Continental Casualty Co.

Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Kunkel v. Continental Casualty Co.

Date: Jan 31, 1989
Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Kunkel v. Continental Casualty Co. Introduction The case of Kunkel v. Continental Casualty Company (866 F.2d 1269, United States...
Nondischargeability of Debts Under § 523(a)(6): In Re Posta and Jones Posta Case Analysis

Nondischargeability of Debts Under § 523(a)(6): In Re Posta and Jones Posta Case Analysis

Date: Jan 27, 1989
Nondischargeability of Debts Under § 523(a)(6): In Re Posta and Jones Posta Case Analysis Introduction The case of In Re Gregory Alyan Posta and Mary Jones Posta, C.I.T. Financial Services, Inc.,...
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicle Stops and Drug Searches: U.S. v. Stone

Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicle Stops and Drug Searches: U.S. v. Stone

Date: Jan 26, 1989
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicle Stops and Drug Searches: U.S. v. Stone Introduction The case of United States of America v. John David Stone (866 F.2d 359) presents a pivotal...
Affirmation of Hopkinson’s Murder Convictions and Death Sentence: Upholding Eighth Amendment and Confrontation Clause Standards

Affirmation of Hopkinson’s Murder Convictions and Death Sentence: Upholding Eighth Amendment and Confrontation Clause Standards

Date: Jan 24, 1989
Affirmation of Hopkinson’s Murder Convictions and Death Sentence: Upholding Eighth Amendment and Confrontation Clause Standards Introduction In the landmark case Hopkinson v. Shillinger, decided by...
Substantial Evidence and the Consideration of Nonexertional Limitations in Social Security Disability Claims: Ray v. Bowen

Substantial Evidence and the Consideration of Nonexertional Limitations in Social Security Disability Claims: Ray v. Bowen

Date: Jan 10, 1989
Substantial Evidence and the Consideration of Nonexertional Limitations in Social Security Disability Claims: Ray v. Bowen Introduction Ray v. Bowen is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Objective Standard for Pretextual Traffic Stops: Guzman v. United States

Objective Standard for Pretextual Traffic Stops: Guzman v. United States

Date: Dec 31, 1988
Objective Standard for Pretextual Traffic Stops: Guzman v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-Lazo is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
After-Acquired Misconduct and Employment Discrimination: Summers v. State Farm

After-Acquired Misconduct and Employment Discrimination: Summers v. State Farm

Date: Dec 31, 1988
After-Acquired Misconduct and Employment Discrimination: Summers v. State Farm Introduction Summer v. State Farm is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert