Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Interpreting 'Substantial Justification' under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Insights from Hadden v. Bowen

Interpreting 'Substantial Justification' under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Insights from Hadden v. Bowen

Date: Jul 21, 1988
Interpreting 'Substantial Justification' under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Insights from Hadden v. Bowen Introduction Hadden v. Bowen, 851 F.2d 1266 (10th Cir. 1988), represents a pivotal case...
ERISA Preemption in Pension Benefit Disputes: Analysis of George Straub v. Western Union Telegraph Company

ERISA Preemption in Pension Benefit Disputes: Analysis of George Straub v. Western Union Telegraph Company

Date: Jul 16, 1988
ERISA Preemption in Pension Benefit Disputes: Analysis of George Straub v. Western Union Telegraph Company Introduction The case of George Straub v. Western Union Telegraph Company, adjudicated by...
Functional Literacy Standards in Social Security Disability Determinations: Eggleston v. Bowen

Functional Literacy Standards in Social Security Disability Determinations: Eggleston v. Bowen

Date: Jul 15, 1988
Functional Literacy Standards in Social Security Disability Determinations: Eggleston v. Bowen Introduction The case of William B. Eggleston v. Otis R. Bowen, decided by the United States Court of...
Racial Discrimination Claims under §1981 Not Precluded by the Railway Labor Act: McAlester v. United Airlines

Racial Discrimination Claims under §1981 Not Precluded by the Railway Labor Act: McAlester v. United Airlines

Date: Jul 15, 1988
Racial Discrimination Claims under §1981 Not Precluded by the Railway Labor Act: McAlester v. United Airlines Introduction The case of Walter McAlester v. United Airlines, Inc. (851 F.2d 1249)...
Overruling A.O. Smith: Establishing New Jurisdictional Standards for Premature Appeals

Overruling A.O. Smith: Establishing New Jurisdictional Standards for Premature Appeals

Date: Jul 6, 1988
Overruling A.O. Smith: Establishing New Jurisdictional Standards for Premature Appeals Introduction In the case of Robert Lewis v. B.F. Goodrich Company; Daniel Newsome; Roy Ailstock, decided on July...
Bernal v. Bowen: Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial Based on Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity

Bernal v. Bowen: Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial Based on Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Bernal v. Bowen: Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial Based on Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity Introduction Bernal v. Bowen, 851 F.2d 297 (10th Cir. 1988), is a pivotal...
Affirmed: Expansion and Clarification of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Criteria

Affirmed: Expansion and Clarification of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Criteria

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Affirmed: Expansion and Clarification of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Criteria Introduction The case of United States of America v. Alfred Lee Apodaca, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Reed v. Bowen: Upholding Strict Class Certification Standards under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)

Reed v. Bowen: Upholding Strict Class Certification Standards under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)

Date: Jun 16, 1988
Reed v. Bowen: Upholding Strict Class Certification Standards under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) Introduction Reed v. Bowen, 849 F.2d 1307 (10th Cir. 1988), addresses pivotal issues concerning class action...
United States v. Estrada, Jr.: Reinforcing the Right to an Evidentiary Hearing for Plea Challenges under 28 U.S.C. §2255

United States v. Estrada, Jr.: Reinforcing the Right to an Evidentiary Hearing for Plea Challenges under 28 U.S.C. §2255

Date: Jun 15, 1988
United States v. Estrada, Jr.: Reinforcing the Right to an Evidentiary Hearing for Plea Challenges under 28 U.S.C. §2255 Introduction United States v. Estrada, Jr. is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Enhanced Liability Standards for Chemical Manufacturers: Burnette v. Dow Chemical Co. Analysis

Enhanced Liability Standards for Chemical Manufacturers: Burnette v. Dow Chemical Co. Analysis

Date: Jun 14, 1988
Enhanced Liability Standards for Chemical Manufacturers: Burnette v. Dow Chemical Co. Analysis Introduction The landmark case of Burnette v. Dow Chemical Company, adjudicated by the United States...
Sanctioning Attorneys for Frivolous Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Glass v. Phelps-Chartered

Sanctioning Attorneys for Frivolous Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Glass v. Phelps-Chartered

Date: Jun 14, 1988
Sanctioning Attorneys for Frivolous Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Glass v. Phelps-Chartered Introduction The case of GEORGE A. GLASS, JR. AND NONA GLASS, PLAINTIFFS versus PHELPS-CHARTERED,...
Balancing Arbitration Rights and Waiver: The Tenth Circuit’s Ruling in Peterson v. Shearson/American Express

Balancing Arbitration Rights and Waiver: The Tenth Circuit’s Ruling in Peterson v. Shearson/American Express

Date: Jun 10, 1988
Balancing Arbitration Rights and Waiver: The Tenth Circuit’s Ruling in Peterson v. Shearson/American Express Introduction Peterson v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. is a pivotal case decided by the...
Exclusion of Government Expert Evidence Under Rule 16(d)(2): Precedent from U.S.A. v. Wicker and Siler

Exclusion of Government Expert Evidence Under Rule 16(d)(2): Precedent from U.S.A. v. Wicker and Siler

Date: Jun 7, 1988
Exclusion of Government Expert Evidence Under Rule 16(d)(2): Precedent from U.S.A. v. Wicker and Siler Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Tony Ray Wicker and Vickie...
Limits of First Amendment Protection for Public Employees' Official Reports: An Analysis of KOCH v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON

Limits of First Amendment Protection for Public Employees' Official Reports: An Analysis of KOCH v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON

Date: Jun 3, 1988
Limits of First Amendment Protection for Public Employees' Official Reports: An Analysis of KOCH v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON Introduction The case of Thomas G. KOCH v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON, adjudicated by...
Strict Standards for Judicial Recusal and Discovery Compliance: Willner v. University of Kansas

Strict Standards for Judicial Recusal and Discovery Compliance: Willner v. University of Kansas

Date: Jun 2, 1988
Strict Standards for Judicial Recusal and Discovery Compliance: Willner v. University of Kansas Introduction Dorothy Willner v. University of Kansas is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Limits on Magistrate Authority in Imposing Dismissal Sanctions: Ocelot Oil Corp. v. Sparrow Industries

Limits on Magistrate Authority in Imposing Dismissal Sanctions: Ocelot Oil Corp. v. Sparrow Industries

Date: Jun 1, 1988
Limits on Magistrate Authority in Imposing Dismissal Sanctions: Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow Industries Introduction The case of Ocelot Oil Corporation, et al. v. Sparrow Industries, et al.,...
Independent Tort Requirement for Punitive Damages in Kansas Insurance Fraud Claims

Independent Tort Requirement for Punitive Damages in Kansas Insurance Fraud Claims

Date: May 27, 1988
Independent Tort Requirement for Punitive Damages in Kansas Insurance Fraud Claims Introduction The case of Patricia M. Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (848 F.2d 141)...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Summary Judgment: Pueblo Neighborhood Health Centers v. Losavio

Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Summary Judgment: Pueblo Neighborhood Health Centers v. Losavio

Date: May 25, 1988
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Summary Judgment: Pueblo Neighborhood Health Centers v. Losavio Introduction Pueblo Neighborhood Health Centers, Inc., et al., and Oliver P. Pacheco, et...
Eastwood v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Qualified and Absolute Immunity under §1983

Eastwood v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Qualified and Absolute Immunity under §1983

Date: May 13, 1988
Eastwood v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Qualified and Absolute Immunity under §1983 Introduction The case of Eastwood v. Department of Corrections, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
United States v. Leary and Kleinberg: Reinforcing the Fourth Amendment's Particularity Requirement

United States v. Leary and Kleinberg: Reinforcing the Fourth Amendment's Particularity Requirement

Date: May 3, 1988
United States v. Leary and Kleinberg: Reinforcing the Fourth Amendment's Particularity Requirement Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Richard J. Leary and F.L. Kleinberg Co.,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert