Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Absolute Judicial Immunity and Sanctions in Crabtree v. Muchmore

Affirmation of Absolute Judicial Immunity and Sanctions in Crabtree v. Muchmore

Date: Jun 5, 1990
Affirmation of Absolute Judicial Immunity and Sanctions in Crabtree v. Muchmore Introduction The case of Catherine Dianne Crabtree, a Minor, et al. v. Clyde D. Muchmore, et al. was heard by the...
Market Power and Unreasonable Restraint in Health Care Financing: Comprehensive Commentary on Reazin v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas

Market Power and Unreasonable Restraint in Health Care Financing: Comprehensive Commentary on Reazin v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas

Date: May 23, 1990
Market Power and Unreasonable Restraint in Health Care Financing: Comprehensive Commentary on Reazin v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas Introduction In the landmark case of Reazin v. Blue Cross Blue...
Expanding the Application of the Travel Act and Forfeiture Laws in Drug Trafficking: An Analysis of United States v. Harris

Expanding the Application of the Travel Act and Forfeiture Laws in Drug Trafficking: An Analysis of United States v. Harris

Date: May 17, 1990
Expanding the Application of the Travel Act and Forfeiture Laws in Drug Trafficking: An Analysis of United States v. Harris Introduction United States of America v. Mark A. Harris, 903 F.2d 770 (10th...
Qualified Immunity and Employment Discrimination: Insights from Verna Lewis v. City of Ft. Collins

Qualified Immunity and Employment Discrimination: Insights from Verna Lewis v. City of Ft. Collins

Date: May 15, 1990
Qualified Immunity and Employment Discrimination: Insights from Verna Lewis v. City of Ft. Collins Introduction In the landmark case of Verna Lewis v. City of Ft. Collins, adjudicated by the United...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Disciplinary Rule 7-104(A)(1) in Pre-Indictment Investigations

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Disciplinary Rule 7-104(A)(1) in Pre-Indictment Investigations

Date: May 9, 1990
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Disciplinary Rule 7-104(A)(1) in Pre-Indictment Investigations Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Donald Eugene Ryans, the United...
Final Decisionmaking Authority and Deliberate Indifference in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Ware v. Unified School Dist. No. 492

Final Decisionmaking Authority and Deliberate Indifference in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Ware v. Unified School Dist. No. 492

Date: May 8, 1990
Final Decisionmaking Authority and Deliberate Indifference in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Ware v. Unified School Dist. No. 492 Introduction The case of Norma J. Ware v. Unified School District...
Setoff and Recoupment in Bankruptcy: Insights from In Re Nathan Davidovich and Amy Jill Davidovich

Setoff and Recoupment in Bankruptcy: Insights from In Re Nathan Davidovich and Amy Jill Davidovich

Date: May 3, 1990
Setoff and Recoupment in Bankruptcy: Insights from In Re Nathan Davidovich and Amy Jill Davidovich Introduction The case of In Re Nathan Davidovich and Amy Jill Davidovich, Debtors, presents a...
Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Securities Classification in Cascade Energy v. Banks et al.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Securities Classification in Cascade Energy v. Banks et al.

Date: Apr 26, 1990
Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Securities Classification in Cascade Energy v. Banks et al. Introduction The case of Cascade Energy and Metals Corporation v. Banks et al. adjudicated in the United...
Judicial Precedent: Laches and Immunity in Zoning Ordinance Challenges

Judicial Precedent: Laches and Immunity in Zoning Ordinance Challenges

Date: Apr 26, 1990
Laches and Immunity in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: Insights from Thatcher Enterprises v. Cache County Introduction The case of Thatcher Enterprises, et al. v. Cache County Corporation, et al....
Affirmation of Security Interests in Rental Income Under 11 U.S.C. §546(b) in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Affirmation of Security Interests in Rental Income Under 11 U.S.C. §546(b) in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Affirmation of Security Interests in Rental Income Under 11 U.S.C. §546(b) in Bankruptcy Proceedings Introduction The case of Virginia Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Frank E. Wood et...
Establishing Eighth Amendment Standards and Remedies under Section 1983: The Berry v. City of Muskogee Decision

Establishing Eighth Amendment Standards and Remedies under Section 1983: The Berry v. City of Muskogee Decision

Date: Apr 11, 1990
Establishing Eighth Amendment Standards and Remedies under Section 1983: The Berry v. City of Muskogee Decision Introduction In the landmark case Linnie Kay Berry v. City of Muskogee, Oklahoma (900...
Establishing Limits on Cumulative-Error Doctrine in Defense Counsel Performance: UNITED STATES v. RIVERA

Establishing Limits on Cumulative-Error Doctrine in Defense Counsel Performance: UNITED STATES v. RIVERA

Date: Apr 5, 1990
Establishing Limits on Cumulative-Error Doctrine in Defense Counsel Performance: UNITED STATES v. RIVERA 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Luis Anthony Rivera (900 F.2d 1462)...
Absolute Judicial Immunity and the Mootness of Declaratory Relief: Insights from Schepp v. Fremont County

Absolute Judicial Immunity and the Mootness of Declaratory Relief: Insights from Schepp v. Fremont County

Date: Mar 31, 1990
Absolute Judicial Immunity and the Mootness of Declaratory Relief: Insights from Schepp v. Fremont County Introduction Edward G. Schepp, the plaintiff-appellant, filed a lawsuit against Fremont...
Retaliation Protections for Inmates Exercising Court Access: Smith v. Defendants

Retaliation Protections for Inmates Exercising Court Access: Smith v. Defendants

Date: Mar 30, 1990
Retaliation Protections for Inmates Exercising Court Access: Smith v. Defendants Introduction Smith v. Maschner et al. is a landmark 1990 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Good-Faith Exception Applied to Exclusionary Rule: United States v. Corral-Corral

Good-Faith Exception Applied to Exclusionary Rule: United States v. Corral-Corral

Date: Mar 29, 1990
Good-Faith Exception Applied to Exclusionary Rule: United States v. Corral-Corral Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Rene Corral-Corral, 899 F.2d 927 (10th Cir. 1990), the United...
Distinct Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Absolute vs. Qualified Immunity in Turney v. O'Toole

Distinct Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Absolute vs. Qualified Immunity in Turney v. O'Toole

Date: Mar 27, 1990
Distinct Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Absolute vs. Qualified Immunity in Turney v. O'Toole Introduction Rocky James Turney v. James O'Toole is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States...
Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa: Establishing Property Interest and First Amendment Retaliation Under Section 1983

Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa: Establishing Property Interest and First Amendment Retaliation Under Section 1983

Date: Mar 23, 1990
Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa: Establishing Property Interest and First Amendment Retaliation Under Section 1983 Introduction Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Aggregation of Drug Quantities and Role Characterization in Sentencing: United States v. Rutter

Aggregation of Drug Quantities and Role Characterization in Sentencing: United States v. Rutter

Date: Mar 14, 1990
Aggregation of Drug Quantities and Role Characterization in Sentencing: United States v. Rutter Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Ervin Earl Rutter, decided on March...
Distinguishing §1983 and §1985(3) Claims: Harmless Error Affirmed in Dixon v. City of Lawton

Distinguishing §1983 and §1985(3) Claims: Harmless Error Affirmed in Dixon v. City of Lawton

Date: Mar 9, 1990
Distinguishing §1983 and §1985(3) Claims: Harmless Error Affirmed in Dixon v. City of Lawton Introduction Joyce Dixon v. City of Lawton, Oklahoma is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
U.S. v. Williams: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Good Faith in Racketeering and Drug Conspiracy Conviction

U.S. v. Williams: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Good Faith in Racketeering and Drug Conspiracy Conviction

Date: Mar 6, 1990
U.S. v. Williams: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Good Faith in Racketeering and Drug Conspiracy Conviction Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert