Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Multiplicity and Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy Prosecutions: United States v. Morehead et al. (1992)

Multiplicity and Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy Prosecutions: United States v. Morehead et al. (1992)

Date: Mar 5, 1992
Multiplicity and Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy Prosecutions: United States v. Morehead et al. (1992) Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Morehead, Sr., Morehead, Jr., and...
Strict Adherence to Post-Judgment Motion Timelines: Van Skiver v. United States

Strict Adherence to Post-Judgment Motion Timelines: Van Skiver v. United States

Date: Feb 22, 1992
Strict Adherence to Post-Judgment Motion Timelines: Van Skiver v. United States Introduction Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241 (10th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: The Dulin v. Cook and Deland Decision

Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: The Dulin v. Cook and Deland Decision

Date: Feb 19, 1992
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: The Dulin v. Cook and Deland Decision Introduction Michael R. Dulin, a petitioner in the case Dulin v. Cook and Deland (957 F.2d 758), challenged the...
Deliberate Indifference to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Prisons: CLEMMONS v. BOHANNON

Deliberate Indifference to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Prisons: CLEMMONS v. BOHANNON

Date: Feb 15, 1992
Deliberate Indifference to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Prisons: CLEMMONS v. BOHANNON Introduction CLEMMONS v. BOHANNON, 956 F.2d 1523 (10th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case addressing the rights of...
Reinforcement of Rule 9(b) Particularity in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Farlow v. Peat Marwick Mitchell Co.

Reinforcement of Rule 9(b) Particularity in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Farlow v. Peat Marwick Mitchell Co.

Date: Feb 14, 1992
Reinforcement of Rule 9(b) Particularity in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Farlow v. Peat Marwick Mitchell Co. Introduction Farlow et al. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell Co. is a pivotal case...
Ensuring Accurate Vocational Assessments in SSI Claims: Insights from Hedstrom v. Sullivan

Ensuring Accurate Vocational Assessments in SSI Claims: Insights from Hedstrom v. Sullivan

Date: Feb 12, 1992
Ensuring Accurate Vocational Assessments in SSI Claims: Insights from Hedstrom v. Sullivan Introduction In the landmark case of Leata Hedstrom, a/k/a Leata McDermott v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary...
Clarifying Property Interests in Municipal Employment: Phillips v. Calhoun Establishes Limits on Due Process Protections for Unclassified City Personnel

Clarifying Property Interests in Municipal Employment: Phillips v. Calhoun Establishes Limits on Due Process Protections for Unclassified City Personnel

Date: Feb 12, 1992
Clarifying Property Interests in Municipal Employment: Phillips v. Calhoun Establishes Limits on Due Process Protections for Unclassified City Personnel Introduction Phillips v. Calhoun (956 F.2d...
Affirmation of Fraud Claims and Venue Change Standards in Litigation Funding: Scheidt v. Klein

Affirmation of Fraud Claims and Venue Change Standards in Litigation Funding: Scheidt v. Klein

Date: Feb 12, 1992
Affirmation of Fraud Claims and Venue Change Standards in Litigation Funding: Scheidt v. Klein Introduction In the landmark case of William B. Scheidt and Wanda C. Scheidt v. William Randolph Klein,...
Defining Horizontal Relationships in Group Boycotts Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Clarifications on Rule 11 Sanctions

Defining Horizontal Relationships in Group Boycotts Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Clarifications on Rule 11 Sanctions

Date: Feb 6, 1992
Defining Horizontal Relationships in Group Boycotts Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Clarifications on Rule 11 Sanctions Introduction The case of Kenneth P. Coffey, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant,...
Defining Qualified Immunity in Employment Discrimination Claims: Patrick v. Miller et al.

Defining Qualified Immunity in Employment Discrimination Claims: Patrick v. Miller et al.

Date: Jan 28, 1992
Defining Qualified Immunity in Employment Discrimination Claims: Patrick v. Miller et al. Introduction The case of Fred L. Patrick v. Eugene Miller, John Bloomberg, and the City of Norman addresses...
Res Judicata in Employment Litigation: The Shirley Clark v. Haas Group Precedent

Res Judicata in Employment Litigation: The Shirley Clark v. Haas Group Precedent

Date: Jan 16, 1992
Res Judicata in Employment Litigation: The Shirley Clark v. Haas Group Precedent Introduction Shirley Clark v. Haas Group, Inc., 953 F.2d 1235 (10th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Pretrial Order Specificity Essential for Preserving Free Speech Claims: Hullman v. Pratt Community College

Pretrial Order Specificity Essential for Preserving Free Speech Claims: Hullman v. Pratt Community College

Date: Jan 15, 1992
Pretrial Order Specificity Essential for Preserving Free Speech Claims: Hullman v. Pratt Community College Introduction Don H. Hullman, a long-serving administrator at Pratt Community College (PCC),...
Strict Contractual Interpretation of HMO Benefits Under ERISA: McGee v. Equicor

Strict Contractual Interpretation of HMO Benefits Under ERISA: McGee v. Equicor

Date: Jan 14, 1992
Strict Contractual Interpretation of HMO Benefits Under ERISA: McGee v. Equicor Introduction In the landmark case Charlie McGee v. Equicor-Equitable HCA Corporation, adjudicated by the United States...
Ensuring Due Process: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Lafferty v. Cook Reinforces Proper Standards for Competency to Stand Trial

Ensuring Due Process: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Lafferty v. Cook Reinforces Proper Standards for Competency to Stand Trial

Date: Jan 4, 1992
Ensuring Due Process: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Lafferty v. Cook Reinforces Proper Standards for Competency to Stand Trial Introduction The case of Ronald Watson Lafferty v. Gerald Cook navigated the...
Enhancing Protections Under EDWARDS v. ARIZONA: Suppression of Incriminating Statements Post Right to Counsel Invocation

Enhancing Protections Under EDWARDS v. ARIZONA: Suppression of Incriminating Statements Post Right to Counsel Invocation

Date: Dec 21, 1991
Enhancing Protections Under EDWARDS v. ARIZONA: Suppression of Incriminating Statements Post Right to Counsel Invocation Introduction In United States of America v. Joseph B. Kelsey, 951 F.2d 1196...
Voluntary Waiver of Counsel and Evidentiary Admissibility in Tax Evasion: United States v. Burson

Voluntary Waiver of Counsel and Evidentiary Admissibility in Tax Evasion: United States v. Burson

Date: Dec 21, 1991
Voluntary Waiver of Counsel and Evidentiary Admissibility in Tax Evasion: United States v. Burson Introduction United States of America v. Cecil L. Burson, 952 F.2d 1196 (10th Cir. 1991), is a...
Kaw Tribe Housing Authority v. City of Ponca City: Establishing Limitations on Political Subdivision Standing

Kaw Tribe Housing Authority v. City of Ponca City: Establishing Limitations on Political Subdivision Standing

Date: Dec 20, 1991
Kaw Tribe Housing Authority v. City of Ponca City: Establishing Limitations on Political Subdivision Standing Introduction The case Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. City...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict FTCA Limitations and Precludes Bivens Claims in Pipkin v. USPS

Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict FTCA Limitations and Precludes Bivens Claims in Pipkin v. USPS

Date: Dec 13, 1991
Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict FTCA Limitations and Precludes Bivens Claims in Pipkin v. USPS Introduction Pipkin v. United States Postal Service is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Establishing Disability During Insured Period: Insights from FLINT v. SULLIVAN

Establishing Disability During Insured Period: Insights from FLINT v. SULLIVAN

Date: Dec 10, 1991
Establishing Disability During Insured Period: Insights from FLINT v. SULLIVAN Introduction FLINT v. SULLIVAN is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on...
Strict Adherence to FTCA's Two-Year Limitation Period in Medical Malpractice Claims: Bradley v. United States

Strict Adherence to FTCA's Two-Year Limitation Period in Medical Malpractice Claims: Bradley v. United States

Date: Dec 10, 1991
Strict Adherence to FTCA's Two-Year Limitation Period in Medical Malpractice Claims: Bradley v. United States Introduction Stephen Bradley v. United States of America, by Veterans Administration is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert