Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Judicial Immunity and Restrictions on Frivolous Pro Se Litigation: Winslow v. Romer et al.

Affirmation of Judicial Immunity and Restrictions on Frivolous Pro Se Litigation: Winslow v. Romer et al.

Date: Mar 21, 1991
Affirmation of Judicial Immunity and Restrictions on Frivolous Pro Se Litigation: Winslow v. Romer et al. Introduction In the case of Rainsford J. Winslow et al. v. Governor Roy Romer et al.,...
Enhancing Sentencing Standards for Cocaine Base: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Turner

Enhancing Sentencing Standards for Cocaine Base: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Turner

Date: Mar 21, 1991
Enhancing Sentencing Standards for Cocaine Base: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Turner Introduction The case of United States of America v. Thomas Turner, 928 F.2d 956 (10th Cir. 1991),...
MELTON v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY: Clarifying Due Process Requirements for Public Employee Termination

MELTON v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY: Clarifying Due Process Requirements for Public Employee Termination

Date: Mar 20, 1991
MELTON v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY: Clarifying Due Process Requirements for Public Employee Termination Introduction The case of Raymon J. MELTON v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, decided by the United States...
Strict Requirements for Money Laundering Convictions Established in Sanders v. United States

Strict Requirements for Money Laundering Convictions Established in Sanders v. United States

Date: Mar 20, 1991
Strict Requirements for Money Laundering Convictions Established in Sanders v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Johnny Lee Sanders (928 F.2d 940) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Title VII's Disparate Treatment and Impact in Police Hiring Practices: Insights from Drake v. City of Fort Collins

Title VII's Disparate Treatment and Impact in Police Hiring Practices: Insights from Drake v. City of Fort Collins

Date: Mar 14, 1991
Title VII's Disparate Treatment and Impact in Police Hiring Practices: Insights from Drake v. City of Fort Collins Introduction Drake v. City of Fort Collins, 927 F.2d 1156 (10th Cir. 1991), is a...
Due Process and Procedural Safeguards for Rule 60(b) Motions in Vehicle Impoundment Cases: Steven v. Summers

Due Process and Procedural Safeguards for Rule 60(b) Motions in Vehicle Impoundment Cases: Steven v. Summers

Date: Mar 14, 1991
Due Process and Procedural Safeguards for Rule 60(b) Motions in Vehicle Impoundment Cases: Steven v. Summers Introduction Steven V. Summers, the plaintiff-appellant, initiated a pro se action against...
10th Circuit Establishes Precedence for Recovery from State Funds Despite Bankruptcy Discharge

10th Circuit Establishes Precedence for Recovery from State Funds Despite Bankruptcy Discharge

Date: Mar 14, 1991
10th Circuit Establishes Precedence for Recovery from State Funds Despite Bankruptcy Discharge Introduction In the landmark case In re Ralph L. Walker, Debtor; Walker v. Wilde et al., 927 F.2d 1138...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Williams v. Bowman Livestock Equipment Company

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Williams v. Bowman Livestock Equipment Company

Date: Mar 13, 1991
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Williams v. Bowman Livestock Equipment Company Introduction The case of Melvin Williams v. Bowman Livestock Equipment Company (927 F.2d 1128, 10th...
Extradition Due Process and Injury Standards: Long v. Shillinger

Extradition Due Process and Injury Standards: Long v. Shillinger

Date: Mar 7, 1991
Extradition Due Process and Injury Standards: Long v. Shillinger Introduction In the case of Royal Russell Long v. Duane Shillinger (927 F.2d 525, 10th Cir. 1991), the United States Court of Appeals...
Effective Cross-Examination Maintained Despite Lost Preliminary Hearing Tapes and Sealed Affidavits: Analysis of Tapia v. Tansy

Effective Cross-Examination Maintained Despite Lost Preliminary Hearing Tapes and Sealed Affidavits: Analysis of Tapia v. Tansy

Date: Mar 6, 1991
Effective Cross-Examination Maintained Despite Lost Preliminary Hearing Tapes and Sealed Affidavits: Analysis of Tapia v. Tansy, 926 F.2d 1554 (10th Cir. 1991) Introduction The case of Santiago Tapia...
State Action Immunity and Property Interest in Zoning Decisions: Jacobs v. City of Lawrence, 10th Cir. 1991

State Action Immunity and Property Interest in Zoning Decisions: Jacobs v. City of Lawrence, 10th Cir. 1991

Date: Mar 6, 1991
State Action Immunity and Property Interest in Zoning Decisions: Jacobs v. City of Lawrence, 10th Cir. 1991 Introduction Jacobs, Visconsi Jacobs Company; Richard A. Armstrong; and Betty J. Grisham...
Preservation of Evidentiary Objections and the Plain Error Standard in Civil Rights Litigation

Preservation of Evidentiary Objections and the Plain Error Standard in Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Mar 2, 1991
Preservation of Evidentiary Objections and the Plain Error Standard in Civil Rights Litigation Introduction In Kenneth Franklin McEwen v. City of Norman, Oklahoma, and Jim Parks, the United States...
Reversal of Conspiracy Convictions Due to Prejudicial Omission of Character Evidence Instruction – United States v. Daily and Figge

Reversal of Conspiracy Convictions Due to Prejudicial Omission of Character Evidence Instruction – United States v. Daily and Figge

Date: Mar 2, 1991
Reversal of Conspiracy Convictions Due to Prejudicial Omission of Character Evidence Instruction – United States v. Daily and Figge Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Sammy...
Defining Employment Relationships for Discrimination Claims: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Williams v. Meeese

Defining Employment Relationships for Discrimination Claims: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Williams v. Meeese

Date: Feb 28, 1991
Defining Employment Relationships for Discrimination Claims: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Williams v. Meeese Introduction Haywood Williams, Jr. v. Edwin Meeese et al., 926 F.2d 994 (10th Cir. 1991),...
Admissibility of Character Evidence and Entrapment Defense in United States v. Sullivan: A Comprehensive Commentary

Admissibility of Character Evidence and Entrapment Defense in United States v. Sullivan: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Feb 23, 1991
Admissibility of Character Evidence and Entrapment Defense in United States v. Sullivan: A Comprehensive Commentary 1. Introduction United States v. Sullivan, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Clarifying the Two Dismissal Rule and State Limitation Periods in Employment Discrimination and section 1983 Claims: Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District

Clarifying the Two Dismissal Rule and State Limitation Periods in Employment Discrimination and section 1983 Claims: Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Clarifying the Two Dismissal Rule and State Limitation Periods in Employment Discrimination and section 1983 Claims: Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District Introduction In Vicki H. Brown v....
Balancing Discovery Relevance and Work Product Protection: Insights from Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories

Balancing Discovery Relevance and Work Product Protection: Insights from Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories

Date: Feb 15, 1991
Balancing Discovery Relevance and Work Product Protection: Insights from Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories Introduction Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc. is a pivotal 1991 decision by the...
Revisiting ERISA Limitations and Enforceability of Release Waivers in Employment Discrimination Claims: Wright v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

Revisiting ERISA Limitations and Enforceability of Release Waivers in Employment Discrimination Claims: Wright v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

Date: Feb 14, 1991
Revisiting ERISA Limitations and Enforceability of Release Waivers in Employment Discrimination Claims: Wright v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Introduction The case of Kenneth W. Wright v....
Limits on Fourth Amendment Privacy for Non-Owner Drivers and Sentencing Discretion Clarified in Jefferson v. United States

Limits on Fourth Amendment Privacy for Non-Owner Drivers and Sentencing Discretion Clarified in Jefferson v. United States

Date: Jan 30, 1991
Limits on Fourth Amendment Privacy for Non-Owner Drivers and Sentencing Discretion Clarified in Jefferson v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Anthony Ray...
Defining 'Personal Staff' under FLSA: Insights from Nichols v. Hurley

Defining 'Personal Staff' under FLSA: Insights from Nichols v. Hurley

Date: Jan 30, 1991
Defining 'Personal Staff' under FLSA: Insights from Nichols v. Hurley Introduction The case of Nichols v. Hurley along with Cossey v. Gray, consolidated under Nos. 89-7033 and 89-7080, presented a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert