Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Waiver and Estoppel in Take-or-Pay Gas Contracts: Prenalta Corp. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.

Waiver and Estoppel in Take-or-Pay Gas Contracts: Prenalta Corp. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.

Date: Dec 7, 1991
Waiver and Estoppel in Take-or-Pay Gas Contracts: Prenalta Corp. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. Introduction Prenalta Corporation and associated individual plaintiffs (collectively referred to as...
Reversal of Perjury Conviction Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Arising from Conflict of Interest

Reversal of Perjury Conviction Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Arising from Conflict of Interest

Date: Dec 3, 1991
Reversal of Perjury Conviction Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Arising from Conflict of Interest Introduction The case of Dennis Wayne Moore v. United States of America involves significant...
Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Products Liability: Werth v. Makita Reversed

Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Products Liability: Werth v. Makita Reversed

Date: Nov 26, 1991
Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Products Liability: Werth v. Makita Reversed Introduction The case of Werth v. Makita Electric Works, Ltd., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Punitive Damages in Products Liability: Mason v. Texaco Establishes New Precedent

Punitive Damages in Products Liability: Mason v. Texaco Establishes New Precedent

Date: Nov 19, 1991
Punitive Damages in Products Liability: Mason v. Texaco Establishes New Precedent Introduction The case of Mason v. Texaco, Inc. (948 F.2d 1546, 10th Cir. 1991) marks a significant milestone in the...
10th Circuit Reinforces Absolute Immunity for Conspiracies to Perjure under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

10th Circuit Reinforces Absolute Immunity for Conspiracies to Perjure under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Nov 19, 1991
10th Circuit Reinforces Absolute Immunity for Conspiracies to Perjure under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In the significant case of Miller v. Glanz et al. (948 F.2d 1562, 10th Cir. 1991), the United...
Renfro v. City of Emporia: Compensable On-Call Time for Firefighters under FLSA

Renfro v. City of Emporia: Compensable On-Call Time for Firefighters under FLSA

Date: Nov 14, 1991
Renfro v. City of Emporia: Compensable On-Call Time for Firefighters under FLSA Introduction Renfro et al. v. City of Emporia, Kansas is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Ex Post Facto Violations in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of US v. Saucedo

Ex Post Facto Violations in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of US v. Saucedo

Date: Nov 14, 1991
Ex Post Facto Violations in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of United States v. Saucedo, 950 F.2d 1508 (10th Cir. 1991) Introduction United States of America v. Joe Luis Saucedo is a pivotal case...
Qualified Immunity and Material Omissions in Arrest Affidavits: Insights from Salmon v. Schwarz & Gonzalez

Qualified Immunity and Material Omissions in Arrest Affidavits: Insights from Salmon v. Schwarz & Gonzalez

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Qualified Immunity and Material Omissions in Arrest Affidavits: Insights from Salmon v. Schwarz & Gonzalez Introduction Parties Involved: Plaintiffs-Appellees: Margarito Salmon, Magdalena Salmon,...
Affirmation of Conviction and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in United States v. Short

Affirmation of Conviction and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in United States v. Short

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Affirmation of Conviction and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in United States v. Short (947 F.2d 1445) Introduction United States v. Short is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Abuse of the Writ in Habeas Corpus Petition: William Andrews v. Gary DeLand et al.

Affirmation of Procedural Default and Abuse of the Writ in Habeas Corpus Petition: William Andrews v. Gary DeLand et al.

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Abuse of the Writ in Habeas Corpus Petition: William Andrews v. Gary DeLand et al. Introduction In the landmark case of William Andrews v. Gary DeLand, Director...
Denial of Judicial Access Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Comprehensive Analysis of Stump v. Gates

Denial of Judicial Access Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Comprehensive Analysis of Stump v. Gates

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Denial of Judicial Access Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Comprehensive Analysis of Stump v. Gates Introduction In the landmark case Sara Stump and Andrew M. Ocrant v. Daryl G. Gates, decided on October 31,...
Pre-Petition Tax Refunds as Bankruptcy Estate Property: Analysis of In Re Barowsky et al. v Serelson

Pre-Petition Tax Refunds as Bankruptcy Estate Property: Analysis of In Re Barowsky et al. v Serelson

Date: Oct 25, 1991
Pre-Petition Tax Refunds as Bankruptcy Estate Property: Analysis of In Re Barowsky et al. v Serelson Introduction The case of In Re Barowsky et al. v Serelson addresses a pivotal issue in bankruptcy...
Affirmation of Consent Validity and Waiver of Unlawful Detention in Traffic Stop Searches

Affirmation of Consent Validity and Waiver of Unlawful Detention in Traffic Stop Searches

Date: Oct 16, 1991
Affirmation of Consent Validity and Waiver of Unlawful Detention in Traffic Stop Searches Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kevin Wesly Dewitt, True Name, Kenneth Odell Rison (946...
Confirming the Traditional Test for Lesser Included Offenses and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions: United States v. Horn

Confirming the Traditional Test for Lesser Included Offenses and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions: United States v. Horn

Date: Oct 10, 1991
Confirming the Traditional Test for Lesser Included Offenses and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions: United States v. Horn Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Ronnie Horn,...
Default Judgment Standards and Due Process in In Re Bill W. Rains

Default Judgment Standards and Due Process in In Re Bill W. Rains

Date: Oct 8, 1991
Default Judgment Standards and Due Process in In Re Bill W. Rains Introduction The case of In Re Bill W. Rains, also known as Billy Wayne Rains, deliberated on the propriety of a default judgment...
Combined Evaluation of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Hargis v. Sullivan

Combined Evaluation of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Hargis v. Sullivan

Date: Oct 5, 1991
Combined Evaluation of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Hargis v. Sullivan Introduction In Donald G. Hargis v. Louis W. Sullivan, 945 F.2d 1482 (10th Cir. 1991), the...
Affirmation of 'Law of the Case' Doctrine: Binding Appellate Decisions on Remand in Criminal Proceedings – United States v. Monsisvais

Affirmation of 'Law of the Case' Doctrine: Binding Appellate Decisions on Remand in Criminal Proceedings – United States v. Monsisvais

Date: Oct 4, 1991
Affirmation of 'Law of the Case' Doctrine: Binding Appellate Decisions on Remand in Criminal Proceedings – United States v. Monsisvais Introduction United States v. Heriberto Fernandez Monsisvais,...
Mandamus Relief in Class Actions: Insights from McNeil v. Guthrie

Mandamus Relief in Class Actions: Insights from McNeil v. Guthrie

Date: Sep 26, 1991
Mandamus Relief in Class Actions: Insights from McNeil v. Guthrie Introduction The case of Michael Douglas McNeil v. William B. Guthrie, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions: Malice Aforethought and Felony Murder under 18 U.S.C. §1111

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions: Malice Aforethought and Felony Murder under 18 U.S.C. §1111

Date: Sep 25, 1991
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions: Malice Aforethought and Felony Murder under 18 U.S.C. §1111 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Eugene Mervin Sides, 944 F.2d 1554...
ERISA Preemption and Third-Party Promissory Estoppel Claims: Insights from Hospice of Metro Denver, Inc. v. Group Health Insurance of Oklahoma, Inc.

ERISA Preemption and Third-Party Promissory Estoppel Claims: Insights from Hospice of Metro Denver, Inc. v. Group Health Insurance of Oklahoma, Inc.

Date: Sep 11, 1991
ERISA Preemption and Third-Party Promissory Estoppel Claims: Insights from Hospice of Metro Denver, Inc. v. Group Health Insurance of Oklahoma, Inc. Introduction The case of Hospice of Metro Denver,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert