Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Extending Appeal Deadlines Under Bankruptcy §108(b): Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in Software Copyright Infringement Case

Extending Appeal Deadlines Under Bankruptcy §108(b): Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in Software Copyright Infringement Case

Date: May 20, 1993
Extending Appeal Deadlines Under Bankruptcy §108(b): Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in Software Copyright Infringement Case Introduction The case of Autoskill Inc. v. National Educational Support...
Affirming Agency Deference and Administrative Record Adequacy in Redd et al. v. Yuetter et al., 10th Cir. 1993

Affirming Agency Deference and Administrative Record Adequacy in Redd et al. v. Yuetter et al., 10th Cir. 1993

Date: May 20, 1993
Affirming Agency Deference and Administrative Record Adequacy in Redd et al. v. Yuetter et al., 10th Cir. 1993 Introduction The case of Redd et al. v. Yuetter et al., decided by the United States...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Apportionment of Damages and Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Hybrid LMRA §301 Class Action

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Apportionment of Damages and Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Hybrid LMRA §301 Class Action

Date: May 20, 1993
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Apportionment of Damages and Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Hybrid LMRA §301 Class Action Introduction The case of Stephen T. Aguinaga, Wayne Pappan, Janet Brown,...
Standards for Proving Lost Profits in Civil Conspiracy Claims under Oklahoma Law: TK-7 Corp. v. Estate of Barbouti

Standards for Proving Lost Profits in Civil Conspiracy Claims under Oklahoma Law: TK-7 Corp. v. Estate of Barbouti

Date: May 8, 1993
Standards for Proving Lost Profits in Civil Conspiracy Claims under Oklahoma Law TK-7 Corporation, Tal Technologies, and Moshe Tal v. The Estate of Ihsan Barbouti, Deceased, and Haidar Barbouti (993...
Strengthening Transferability Standards for Advanced-Age Disability Claims: Nielson v. Sullivan

Strengthening Transferability Standards for Advanced-Age Disability Claims: Nielson v. Sullivan

Date: May 6, 1993
Strengthening Transferability Standards for Advanced-Age Disability Claims: Nielson v. Sullivan Introduction In the landmark case of Dick Nielson v. Louis W. Sullivan, decided by the United States...
Enhancing FTCA Liability: Franklin v. United States and the Intersection with VA Personnel Immunity

Enhancing FTCA Liability: Franklin v. United States and the Intersection with VA Personnel Immunity

Date: May 6, 1993
Enhancing FTCA Liability: Franklin v. United States and the Intersection with VA Personnel Immunity Introduction Verdie Mae Franklin, acting as the administratrix of the estate of her late husband,...
Admissibility of Closed Circuit Testimony and Hearsay Statements in Child Assault Cases: Farley v. United States

Admissibility of Closed Circuit Testimony and Hearsay Statements in Child Assault Cases: Farley v. United States

Date: May 6, 1993
Admissibility of Closed Circuit Testimony and Hearsay Statements in Child Assault Cases: Farley v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Darryl Farley is a landmark case adjudicated...
Timeliness of Pro Se Prisoner Appeals and the Viability of Excessive Force Claims under §1983: Swoboda v. Dubach

Timeliness of Pro Se Prisoner Appeals and the Viability of Excessive Force Claims under §1983: Swoboda v. Dubach

Date: May 5, 1993
Timeliness of Pro Se Prisoner Appeals and the Viability of Excessive Force Claims under §1983: Swoboda v. Dubach Introduction In the landmark appellate decision Scott William Swoboda v. Jerry K....
Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Butler v. City of Norman

Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Butler v. City of Norman

Date: Apr 29, 1993
Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Butler v. City of Norman Introduction Butler v. The City of Norman is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on...
Comprehensive Commentary on SHARON N. RAGLAND v. DONNA E. SHALALA: A Tenth Circuit Perspective on Disability Determinations

Comprehensive Commentary on SHARON N. RAGLAND v. DONNA E. SHALALA: A Tenth Circuit Perspective on Disability Determinations

Date: Apr 29, 1993
Comprehensive Commentary on SHARON N. RAGLAND v. DONNA E. SHALALA: A Tenth Circuit Perspective on Disability Determinations Introduction The case of Sharon N. Ragland v. Donna E. Shalala serves as a...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA: Insights from Association for Community Living v. Romer

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA: Insights from Association for Community Living v. Romer

Date: Apr 28, 1993
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Insights from Association for Community Living v. Romer Introduction Association for Community...
Prima Facie Burden in Religious Discrimination Cases: Insights from Shapolia v. Los Alamos National Laboratory

Prima Facie Burden in Religious Discrimination Cases: Insights from Shapolia v. Los Alamos National Laboratory

Date: Apr 28, 1993
Prima Facie Burden in Religious Discrimination Cases: Insights from Shapolia v. Los Alamos National Laboratory Introduction Shapolia v. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 992 F.2d 1033 (10th Cir. 1993),...
Sanchez v. Philip Morris: Clarifying Employer Justifications in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims

Sanchez v. Philip Morris: Clarifying Employer Justifications in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims

Date: Apr 21, 1993
Sanchez v. Philip Morris: Clarifying Employer Justifications in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims Introduction The case of Raul C. Sanchez v. Philip Morris Incorporated, adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of State Statute of Limitations in Reverse Discrimination Claims

Affirmation of State Statute of Limitations in Reverse Discrimination Claims

Date: Apr 13, 1993
Affirmation of State Statute of Limitations in Reverse Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Marvin D. Baker v. The Board of Regents of the State of Kansas and University of Kansas Medical...
Reevaluating Fourth Amendment Seizures: Insights from United States v. King and Burdex

Reevaluating Fourth Amendment Seizures: Insights from United States v. King and Burdex

Date: Mar 27, 1993
Reevaluating Fourth Amendment Seizures: Insights from United States v. King and Burdex Introduction United States of America v. Terry King and Valerie Jean Burdex is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Unconstitutional Blanket Strip Searches and Limiting Qualified Immunity in Minor Offense Detainee Cases – Chapman v. Nichols

Unconstitutional Blanket Strip Searches and Limiting Qualified Immunity in Minor Offense Detainee Cases – Chapman v. Nichols

Date: Mar 24, 1993
Unconstitutional Blanket Strip Searches and Limiting Qualified Immunity in Minor Offense Detainee Cases – Chapman v. Nichols Introduction The case of Julie Chapman et al. v. Doug Nichols et al....
Standing to Challenge Vehicle Searches: Analysis of United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548 (10th Cir. 1993)

Standing to Challenge Vehicle Searches: Analysis of United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548 (10th Cir. 1993)

Date: Mar 23, 1993
Standing to Challenge Vehicle Searches: Analysis of United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548 (10th Cir. 1993) Introduction In United States of America v. Jaime Soto, 988 F.2d 1548 (10th Cir. 1993), the...
Enhancing Product Liability: Hinds v. General Motors on Seat Belt Defects

Enhancing Product Liability: Hinds v. General Motors on Seat Belt Defects

Date: Mar 17, 1993
Enhancing Product Liability: Hinds v. General Motors on Seat Belt Defects Introduction The case of CLYDE W. HINDS AND MARY LEE HINDS v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (988 F.2d 1039) adjudicated by the...
Limitation on Relief under ERISA: Exclusion of Extra-Contractual Compensatory Damages Affirmed by the Tenth Circuit

Limitation on Relief under ERISA: Exclusion of Extra-Contractual Compensatory Damages Affirmed by the Tenth Circuit

Date: Mar 10, 1993
Limitation on Relief under ERISA: Exclusion of Extra-Contractual Compensatory Damages Affirmed by the Tenth Circuit Introduction The case of Melissa Hurt Lafoy v. HMO Colorado addresses significant...
Mandatory §506 Valuation for Secured Claims in Chapter 12 Bankruptcy: In Re Harrison and Agricredit Corp.

Mandatory §506 Valuation for Secured Claims in Chapter 12 Bankruptcy: In Re Harrison and Agricredit Corp.

Date: Mar 4, 1993
Mandatory §506 Valuation for Secured Claims in Chapter 12 Bankruptcy: In Re Harrison and Agricredit Corp. Introduction The case In Re Robert Ray Harrison and Frankey Daylene Harrison, Debtors,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert