Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Voluntary Consent and Scope of Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Santurio

Voluntary Consent and Scope of Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Santurio

Date: Jul 9, 1994
Voluntary Consent and Scope of Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Santurio Introduction The case of United States of America v. Louis E. Santurio, decided by the United States Court of...
Unconstitutional Detention and Consent in Traffic Stops: United States v. Sandoval (10th Cir. 1994)

Unconstitutional Detention and Consent in Traffic Stops: United States v. Sandoval (10th Cir. 1994)

Date: Jul 8, 1994
Unconstitutional Detention and Consent in Traffic Stops: United States v. Sandoval (10th Cir. 1994) Introduction United States v. Miguel Sandoval is a seminal case decided by the United States Court...
Access to Criminal Justice Records: Balancing Privacy and Free Speech Rights in Lanphere Urbaniak v. Colorado

Access to Criminal Justice Records: Balancing Privacy and Free Speech Rights in Lanphere Urbaniak v. Colorado

Date: Jul 2, 1994
Access to Criminal Justice Records: Balancing Privacy and Free Speech Rights in Lanphere Urbaniak v. Colorado Introduction Lanphere Urbaniak v. Colorado, 21 F.3d 1508 (10th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal...
Redefining the Boundaries of Terry Stops: Excessive Force and Its Implications

Redefining the Boundaries of Terry Stops: Excessive Force and Its Implications

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Redefining the Boundaries of Terry Stops: Excessive Force and Its Implications Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Manuel Melendez-Garcia, adjudicated by the United...
State Law Claims Against Non-Fiduciary Service Providers Not Preempted by ERISA: Insights from Airparts Co. v. Custom Benefit Services of Austin

State Law Claims Against Non-Fiduciary Service Providers Not Preempted by ERISA: Insights from Airparts Co. v. Custom Benefit Services of Austin

Date: Jul 1, 1994
State Law Claims Against Non-Fiduciary Service Providers Not Preempted by ERISA: Insights from Airparts Co. v. Custom Benefit Services of Austin Introduction The case of Airparts Company, Inc. v....
Judicial Estoppel and Homestead Exemption: Insights from Osborn v. Durant Bank Trust Company

Judicial Estoppel and Homestead Exemption: Insights from Osborn v. Durant Bank Trust Company

Date: Jun 25, 1994
Judicial Estoppel and Homestead Exemption: Insights from Osborn v. Durant Bank Trust Company Introduction In Re O.J. Osborn and Roma Lou Osborn, Debtors, 24 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 1994), presents a...
Affirmation of Convictions and Proper Admission of Coconspirator Statements in Urena v. USA

Affirmation of Convictions and Proper Admission of Coconspirator Statements in Urena v. USA

Date: Jun 23, 1994
Affirmation of Convictions and Proper Admission of Coconspirator Statements in Urena v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Rafael A. Urena, 27 F.3d 1487 (10th Cir. 1994), is a...
RCRA Preemption and the Commerce Clause: Insights from Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County

RCRA Preemption and the Commerce Clause: Insights from Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County

Date: Jun 23, 1994
RCRA Preemption and the Commerce Clause: Insights from Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County Introduction The case of Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County...
Reasonable Suspicion and Seizure: Insights from United States v. Carhee

Reasonable Suspicion and Seizure: Insights from United States v. Carhee

Date: Jun 23, 1994
Reasonable Suspicion and Seizure: Insights from United States v. Carhee Introduction The case of United States of America v. Reginald Keith Carhee, 27 F.3d 1493 (10th Cir. 1994), addresses critical...
Martin Marietta Corp. v. Barbara Van Den Arend: Reinforcing Standards for Pretext in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims

Martin Marietta Corp. v. Barbara Van Den Arend: Reinforcing Standards for Pretext in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims

Date: Jun 21, 1994
Martin Marietta Corp. v. Barbara Van Den Arend: Reinforcing Standards for Pretext in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Barbara Van Den Arend v. Martin Marietta...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Immigration Habeas Corpus: Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Immigration Habeas Corpus: Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten

Date: Jun 21, 1994
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Immigration Habeas Corpus: Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten Introduction The case of Carlos Galaviz-Medina v. Tom Wooten, Warden, FCI Florence, CO, and U.S. Immigration Review...
Regulatory Agencies’ Breach of Contract in Supervisory Goodwill Treatment

Regulatory Agencies’ Breach of Contract in Supervisory Goodwill Treatment

Date: Jun 14, 1994
Regulatory Agencies’ Breach of Contract in Supervisory Goodwill Treatment Introduction The case of Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Security Federal Savings and Loan Association,...
Mandating Judicial Recusal Under 28 U.S.C. §455(a) in the Context of Credible Threats – United States v. Harry Greenspan

Mandating Judicial Recusal Under 28 U.S.C. §455(a) in the Context of Credible Threats – United States v. Harry Greenspan

Date: Jun 7, 1994
Mandating Judicial Recusal Under 28 U.S.C. §455(a) in the Context of Credible Threats – United States v. Harry Greenspan Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Harry Greenspan, the...
Affirmation of Non-Triggering Employee Benefit Obligations in Business Transfers: Headrick v. Rockwell International Corporation

Affirmation of Non-Triggering Employee Benefit Obligations in Business Transfers: Headrick v. Rockwell International Corporation

Date: May 24, 1994
Affirmation of Non-Triggering Employee Benefit Obligations in Business Transfers: Headrick v. Rockwell International Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Headrick v. Rockwell...
Strict Threshold for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Analysis of Bella v. Chamberlain and Meyers

Strict Threshold for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Analysis of Bella v. Chamberlain and Meyers

Date: May 21, 1994
Strict Threshold for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Analysis of Bella v. Chamberlain and Meyers Introduction The case of Charles Bella v. Lee Chamberlain and Curtis Meyers, adjudicated...
Due Process Violation in Evidence Destruction: The Bohl & Bell Case

Due Process Violation in Evidence Destruction: The Bohl & Bell Case

Date: May 21, 1994
Due Process Violation in Evidence Destruction: The Bohl & Bell Case Introduction The case of United States of America v. George L. Bohl and Richard R. Bell represents a significant judicial...
Enforcement of Discovery Obligations for Pro Se Litigants: Insights from Oklahoma Federated Gold v. Blodgett

Enforcement of Discovery Obligations for Pro Se Litigants: Insights from Oklahoma Federated Gold v. Blodgett

Date: May 17, 1994
Enforcement of Discovery Obligations for Pro Se Litigants: Insights from Oklahoma Federated Gold and Numismatics, Inc. v. Blodgett Introduction The case Oklahoma Federated Gold and Numismatics, Inc....
Reaffirming Qualified Immunity in Fourth Amendment Misidentification: Beard v. City of Northglenn

Reaffirming Qualified Immunity in Fourth Amendment Misidentification: Beard v. City of Northglenn

Date: May 12, 1994
Reaffirming Qualified Immunity in Fourth Amendment Misidentification: Herschel Beard, III v. City of Northglenn Introduction In the landmark case of Herschel Beard, III and Carol Goslin v. The City...
Enhancing ERISA Compliance: Tenth Circuit Upholds Penalty and Attorneys’ Fees in Moothart v. Bell Pollock

Enhancing ERISA Compliance: Tenth Circuit Upholds Penalty and Attorneys’ Fees in Moothart v. Bell Pollock

Date: May 7, 1994
Enhancing ERISA Compliance: Tenth Circuit Upholds Penalty and Attorneys’ Fees in Moothart v. Bell Pollock Introduction The case of Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell Pollock,...
Conflicts of Interest in Bankruptcy Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of In Re Interwest Business Equipment, Inc. et al.

Conflicts of Interest in Bankruptcy Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of In Re Interwest Business Equipment, Inc. et al.

Date: May 3, 1994
Conflicts of Interest in Bankruptcy Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of In Re Interwest Business Equipment, Inc. et al. Introduction The case In Re Interwest Business Equipment, Inc., Green...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert