Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Haddock v. United States: Defining Ineffective Assistance and Loss Calculation in Sentencing Introduction United States of America v. Kenneth E. Haddock, 12 F.3d 950 (10th Cir. 1993), represents a...
Nitsua Management v. United States: Clarifying Jurisdiction and Due Process in Civil Asset Forfeiture Introduction The case of United States of America v. 51 Pieces of Real Property, Roswell, New...
Summary Judgment on Express Warranty Claims in Voelkel v. General Motors Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Voelkel v. General Motors Corporation, reported at 846 F. Supp. 1482, the United...
Affirmation of District Court's Discretion in Attorney's Fees and Costs in Removal and Remand Cases: Daleske v. Fairfield Introduction The case of Daleske et al. v. Fairfield Communities, Inc. heard...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Section 1981 Discrimination Claim: Durham v. Xerox Introduction The case of Mary P. Durham v. Xerox Corporation (18 F.3d 836) adjudicated by the United States Court...
Judicial Restrictions on Repetitive and Frivolous Filings: The Winslow Precedent Introduction The case of In re Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow, Debtors (17 F.3d 314) adjudicated by the...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Contribution Despite Oklahoma's Parental Immunity Doctrine in Wrongful Death Actions Introduction The case of Lewis R. Robinson et al. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (16...
Reaffirming the Colorado River Doctrine: Fox v. Maulding Introduction In Odell Fox and Sharon Fox v. Dwight M. Maulding et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Standing Limitations in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re American Ready Mix, Inc. Case Analysis Introduction The case of In Re American Ready Mix, Inc., Debtor, and Albuquerque Sand Gravel, Inc., d/b/a...
Clarification on Due Process and Equal Protection in Prisoner Administrative Segregation Introduction The case of Vernon Templeman v. Frank Gunter et al. addressed significant issues regarding the...
Jurisdictional Constraints on Collateral Attacks Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Analysis of United States v. Bustillos Introduction United States of America v. Fernando Bustillos is a pivotal case...
Random Dog Sniffs in Public Parking Lots: A New Fourth Amendment Precedent Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Keith Rudolph Ludwig, 10 F.3d 1523 (10th Cir. 1994), the...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Preconditions under FTCA and Bivens: Insights from Industrial Constructors Corp. v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Introduction The case of Industrial Constructors...
Ensuring Adequate Notice for Sentence Enhancement Under 21 U.S.C. § 851: A Tenth Circuit Analysis Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rene Gonzalez-Lerma examined critical aspects of...
Limits on Appellate Review of Consent Decree Denials under CERCLA: Insights from State of Utah v. Kennecott Corporation Introduction The case of State of Utah v. Kennecott Corporation addressed...
Two-Year Presumption for Inordinate Appellate Delays in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Harris et al. v. Oklahoma Introduction In the landmark case of Harris et al. v. Oklahoma, decided by the United States...
Design Requirement in Money Laundering: Insights from United States v. Garcia-Emanuel Introduction United States of America v. Mario R. Garcia-Emanuel is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Standing in Tribal Water Rights: Analysis of Hackford v. Babbitt Introduction Hackford v. Babbitt, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on January 21, 1994, addresses...
Cone v. Longmont United Hospital: Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case Introduction In the landmark case of Sharon G. Cone v. Longmont United Hospital Association, decided on...
Latent Ambiguity in General Releases: Implications from Vitkus v. Beatrice Co. Introduction In the realm of employment law, the enforceability and scope of release agreements are paramount in...