Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Standing Limitations in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re American Ready Mix, Inc. Case Analysis

Standing Limitations in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re American Ready Mix, Inc. Case Analysis

Date: Feb 3, 1994
Standing Limitations in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re American Ready Mix, Inc. Case Analysis Introduction The case of In Re American Ready Mix, Inc., Debtor, and Albuquerque Sand Gravel, Inc., d/b/a...
Clarification on Due Process and Equal Protection in Prisoner Administrative Segregation

Clarification on Due Process and Equal Protection in Prisoner Administrative Segregation

Date: Feb 3, 1994
Clarification on Due Process and Equal Protection in Prisoner Administrative Segregation Introduction The case of Vernon Templeman v. Frank Gunter et al. addressed significant issues regarding the...
Jurisdictional Constraints on Collateral Attacks Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Analysis of United States v. Bustillos

Jurisdictional Constraints on Collateral Attacks Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Analysis of United States v. Bustillos

Date: Feb 3, 1994
Jurisdictional Constraints on Collateral Attacks Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Analysis of United States v. Bustillos Introduction United States of America v. Fernando Bustillos is a pivotal case...
Random Dog Sniffs in Public Parking Lots: A New Fourth Amendment Precedent

Random Dog Sniffs in Public Parking Lots: A New Fourth Amendment Precedent

Date: Feb 3, 1994
Random Dog Sniffs in Public Parking Lots: A New Fourth Amendment Precedent Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Keith Rudolph Ludwig, 10 F.3d 1523 (10th Cir. 1994), the...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Preconditions under FTCA and Bivens: Insights from Industrial Constructors Corp. v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

Strict Adherence to Procedural Preconditions under FTCA and Bivens: Insights from Industrial Constructors Corp. v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

Date: Feb 3, 1994
Strict Adherence to Procedural Preconditions under FTCA and Bivens: Insights from Industrial Constructors Corp. v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Introduction The case of Industrial Constructors...
Ensuring Adequate Notice for Sentence Enhancement Under 21 U.S.C. § 851: A Tenth Circuit Analysis

Ensuring Adequate Notice for Sentence Enhancement Under 21 U.S.C. § 851: A Tenth Circuit Analysis

Date: Feb 1, 1994
Ensuring Adequate Notice for Sentence Enhancement Under 21 U.S.C. § 851: A Tenth Circuit Analysis Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rene Gonzalez-Lerma examined critical aspects of...
Limits on Appellate Review of Consent Decree Denials under CERCLA: Insights from State of Utah v. Kennecott

Limits on Appellate Review of Consent Decree Denials under CERCLA: Insights from State of Utah v. Kennecott

Date: Feb 1, 1994
Limits on Appellate Review of Consent Decree Denials under CERCLA: Insights from State of Utah v. Kennecott Corporation Introduction The case of State of Utah v. Kennecott Corporation addressed...
Two-Year Presumption for Inordinate Appellate Delays in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Harris et al. v. Oklahoma

Two-Year Presumption for Inordinate Appellate Delays in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Harris et al. v. Oklahoma

Date: Jan 27, 1994
Two-Year Presumption for Inordinate Appellate Delays in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Harris et al. v. Oklahoma Introduction In the landmark case of Harris et al. v. Oklahoma, decided by the United States...
Design Requirement in Money Laundering: Insights from United States v. Garcia-Emanuel

Design Requirement in Money Laundering: Insights from United States v. Garcia-Emanuel

Date: Jan 26, 1994
Design Requirement in Money Laundering: Insights from United States v. Garcia-Emanuel Introduction United States of America v. Mario R. Garcia-Emanuel is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Standing in Tribal Water Rights: Analysis of Hackford v. Babbitt

Standing in Tribal Water Rights: Analysis of Hackford v. Babbitt

Date: Jan 22, 1994
Standing in Tribal Water Rights: Analysis of Hackford v. Babbitt Introduction Hackford v. Babbitt, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on January 21, 1994, addresses...
Cone v. Longmont United Hospital: Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case

Cone v. Longmont United Hospital: Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case

Date: Jan 21, 1994
Cone v. Longmont United Hospital: Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case Introduction In the landmark case of Sharon G. Cone v. Longmont United Hospital Association, decided on...
Latent Ambiguity in General Releases: Implications from Vitkus v. Beatrice Co.

Latent Ambiguity in General Releases: Implications from Vitkus v. Beatrice Co.

Date: Jan 14, 1994
Latent Ambiguity in General Releases: Implications from Vitkus v. Beatrice Co. Introduction In the realm of employment law, the enforceability and scope of release agreements are paramount in...
Strict Compliance with Service of Process: Insights from Despain v. Salt Lake Area Metro Gang Unit

Strict Compliance with Service of Process: Insights from Despain v. Salt Lake Area Metro Gang Unit

Date: Jan 11, 1994
Strict Compliance with Service of Process: Insights from Despain v. Salt Lake Area Metro Gang Unit Introduction In Despain v. Salt Lake Area Metro Gang Unit, the United States Court of Appeals for...
The Right to Petition Without Prejudice: Insights from Clark v. Tansy

The Right to Petition Without Prejudice: Insights from Clark v. Tansy

Date: Dec 31, 1993
The Right to Petition Without Prejudice: Insights from Clark v. Tansy Introduction Terry Clark v. Robert J. Tansy, Warden; Attorney General for the State of New Mexico, 13 F.3d 1407 (10th Cir. 1993),...
Federal Habeas Corpus Authority to Bar Retrial: Insights from CAPPS v. SULLIVAN

Federal Habeas Corpus Authority to Bar Retrial: Insights from CAPPS v. SULLIVAN

Date: Dec 30, 1993
Federal Habeas Corpus Authority to Bar Retrial: Insights from CAPPS v. SULLIVAN Introduction The case of James Capps v. George Sullivan, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado Workmen’s Compensation Exclusivity: Medical Monitoring Claims Barred Under Price-Anderson Act

Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado Workmen’s Compensation Exclusivity: Medical Monitoring Claims Barred Under Price-Anderson Act

Date: Dec 21, 1993
Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado Workmen’s Compensation Exclusivity: Medical Monitoring Claims Barred Under Price-Anderson Act Introduction In the landmark case of The Building and Construction...
Establishing Limits on Prosecutorial Immunity and Due Process in Property Seizure: DiCesare v. Stuart et al.

Establishing Limits on Prosecutorial Immunity and Due Process in Property Seizure: DiCesare v. Stuart et al.

Date: Dec 21, 1993
Establishing Limits on Prosecutorial Immunity and Due Process in Property Seizure: DiCesare v. Stuart et al. Introduction The case of Joseph Angelo DiCesare v. Larry D. Stuart, Rene P. Henry, Jr., et...
United States v. Lee Roberts: Clarifying Single Conspiracy and Sentencing Standards in Drug Offenses

United States v. Lee Roberts: Clarifying Single Conspiracy and Sentencing Standards in Drug Offenses

Date: Dec 18, 1993
United States v. Lee Roberts: Clarifying Single Conspiracy and Sentencing Standards in Drug Offenses Introduction The case of United States of America v. Lee W. Roberts is a pivotal appellate...
Unnamed Class Members Must Formally Intervene to Appeal Settlement Approvals Under Rule 23: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision

Unnamed Class Members Must Formally Intervene to Appeal Settlement Approvals Under Rule 23: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision

Date: Dec 17, 1993
Unnamed Class Members Must Formally Intervene to Appeal Settlement Approvals Under Rule 23: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision Introduction In the case of Feivel Gottlieb et al. v. Stewart Carrell et...
Steele v. Young: Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Double Jeopardy and Due Process Claims

Steele v. Young: Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Double Jeopardy and Due Process Claims

Date: Dec 9, 1993
Steele v. Young: Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Double Jeopardy and Due Process Claims Introduction In the case of James Ray Steele v. Leroy Young, Warden; Attorney General of the State of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert