Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Recognition of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome under Social Security Disability: Sisco v. Sullivan

Recognition of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome under Social Security Disability: Sisco v. Sullivan

Date: Dec 1, 1993
Recognition of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome under Social Security Disability: Sisco v. Sullivan Introduction Sisco v. Sullivan, 10 F.3d 739 (10th Cir. 1993), is a landmark case in the realm of Social...
10th Circuit Upholds District Court's Reverse Bifurcation and Expert Testimony Handling in Asbestos Liability Case

10th Circuit Upholds District Court's Reverse Bifurcation and Expert Testimony Handling in Asbestos Liability Case

Date: Nov 30, 1993
10th Circuit Upholds District Court's Reverse Bifurcation and Expert Testimony Handling in Asbestos Liability Case Introduction In Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 11 F.3d 957 (10th Cir....
Limitation on Warrantless Vehicle Trunk Searches Based Solely on Odor: United States v. Nielsen

Limitation on Warrantless Vehicle Trunk Searches Based Solely on Odor: United States v. Nielsen

Date: Nov 23, 1993
Limitation on Warrantless Vehicle Trunk Searches Based Solely on Odor: United States v. Nielsen Introduction In United States of America v. Douglas Merrill Nielsen, decided by the United States Court...
Nondischargeability of Attorney's Fees in Custody Proceedings Under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)

Nondischargeability of Attorney's Fees in Custody Proceedings Under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)

Date: Nov 17, 1993
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney. Nondischargeability of Attorney's...
Key Legal Principles in Washington v. United States: Chain of Custody Admissibility and Sentencing Standards

Key Legal Principles in Washington v. United States: Chain of Custody Admissibility and Sentencing Standards

Date: Nov 16, 1993
Key Legal Principles in Washington v. United States: Chain of Custody Admissibility and Sentencing Standards Introduction United States of America v. Patrick E. Washington is a pivotal case decided...
ERISA § 206(d)(1) and Garnishment of Received Pension Benefits: Insights from Curtis Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association

ERISA § 206(d)(1) and Garnishment of Received Pension Benefits: Insights from Curtis Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association

Date: Nov 5, 1993
ERISA § 206(d)(1) and Garnishment of Received Pension Benefits: Insights from Curtis Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association Introduction The case of Curtis Guidry v. Sheet Metal...
Admissibility of Hearsay and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Melvin Joe

Admissibility of Hearsay and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Melvin Joe

Date: Nov 4, 1993
Admissibility of Hearsay and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Melvin Joe Introduction United States of America v. Melvin Joe, 8 F.3d 1488 (10th Cir. 1993), is a pivotal case that delves into...
Feasibility of Safer Design in Strict Product Liability: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Allen v. Minnstar, Inc.

Feasibility of Safer Design in Strict Product Liability: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Allen v. Minnstar, Inc.

Date: Nov 2, 1993
Feasibility of Safer Design in Strict Product Liability: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Allen v. Minnstar, Inc. Introduction The case of Scott Allen v. Minnstar, Inc., dba Genmar Industries, Inc., dba...
Enhanced Miranda Protections in Coercive Terry Stops: Perdue v. United States

Enhanced Miranda Protections in Coercive Terry Stops: Perdue v. United States

Date: Nov 2, 1993
Enhanced Miranda Protections in Coercive Terry Stops: Perdue v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Vincent Anthony Perdue, adjudicated by the United States...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Reduction of Attorney's Fees Award in Sex Discrimination Settlement

Tenth Circuit Affirms Reduction of Attorney's Fees Award in Sex Discrimination Settlement

Date: Oct 30, 1993
Tenth Circuit Affirms Reduction of Attorney's Fees Award in Sex Discrimination Settlement Introduction In the landmark case of Linda Sue Bratcher v. Bray-Doyle Independent School District No. 42, the...
Reaffirming Reasonable Attorneys' Fees in Common Fund Settlements: Analysis of In re Odis Ward Litigation

Reaffirming Reasonable Attorneys' Fees in Common Fund Settlements: Analysis of In re Odis Ward Litigation

Date: Oct 29, 1993
Reaffirming Reasonable Attorneys' Fees in Common Fund Settlements: Analysis of In re Odis Ward Litigation Introduction The case of Odis Ward, et al. v. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc....
Enhancing Miranda Protections in Custodial Interrogations: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in United States v. Griffin

Enhancing Miranda Protections in Custodial Interrogations: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in United States v. Griffin

Date: Oct 27, 1993
Enhancing Miranda Protections in Custodial Interrogations: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in United States v. Griffin Introduction United States of America v. Teresa Mechell Griffin is a pivotal case...
Establishing the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison Test in Computer Program Copyright Infringement: Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries

Establishing the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison Test in Computer Program Copyright Infringement: Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries

Date: Oct 20, 1993
Establishing the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison Test in Computer Program Copyright Infringement Introduction The case The Gates Rubber Company v. Bando Chemical Industries (9 F.3d 823, 10th...
Reaffirming the Good Faith Exception and Voluntary Consent in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence: United States v. McKneely

Reaffirming the Good Faith Exception and Voluntary Consent in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence: United States v. McKneely

Date: Oct 9, 1993
Reaffirming the Good Faith Exception and Voluntary Consent in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence United States v. McKneely, 6 F.3d 1447 (10th Cir. 1993) Introduction The case of United States of America...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Analysis of Oulds v. Principal

Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Analysis of Oulds v. Principal

Date: Oct 7, 1993
Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Analysis of Oulds v. Principal Introduction Jaclyn G. Oulds v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co., decided by the United States...
Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Record Development in Social Security Disability Appeals: Insights from Baca v. DHHS

Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Record Development in Social Security Disability Appeals: Insights from Baca v. DHHS

Date: Sep 29, 1993
Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Record Development in Social Security Disability Appeals: Insights from Baca v. Department of Health and Human Services Introduction Raymond Baca, an unemployed shoe...
Res Judicata and Private Property Claims: Insights from Satsky v. Paramount Communications

Res Judicata and Private Property Claims: Insights from Satsky v. Paramount Communications

Date: Sep 25, 1993
Res Judicata and Private Property Claims: Insights from Satsky v. Paramount Communications Introduction The case of Satsky et al. v. Paramount Communications, Inc., heard by the United States Court...
Withholding Relief on Ineffective Assistance Claims: United States v. Gordon

Withholding Relief on Ineffective Assistance Claims: United States v. Gordon

Date: Sep 22, 1993
Withholding Relief on Ineffective Assistance Claims: United States v. Gordon Introduction United States of America v. Harry Jarmar Gordon, 4 F.3d 1567 (10th Cir. 1993), is a pivotal case addressing...
Affirming Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction in SIPA Liquidation: Upholding Voidability of Preferential and Fraudulent Transfers Under 11 U.S.C. §§ 547 and 548

Affirming Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction in SIPA Liquidation: Upholding Voidability of Preferential and Fraudulent Transfers Under 11 U.S.C. §§ 547 and 548

Date: Sep 18, 1993
Affirming Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction in SIPA Liquidation: Upholding Voidability of Preferential and Fraudulent Transfers Under 11 U.S.C. §§ 547 and 548 1. Introduction In the case of In re...
Limits of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): Private Conspiracies and Protected Rights

Limits of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): Private Conspiracies and Protected Rights

Date: Sep 15, 1993
Limits of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): Private Conspiracies and Protected Rights Introduction In the landmark case Robert G. Tilton v. Gary L. Richardson et al. (6 F.3d 683, 10th Cir. 1993), the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert