Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Age Discrimination Through Constructive Discharge: Insights from Sears v. James et al., Tenth Circuit

Establishing Age Discrimination Through Constructive Discharge: Insights from Sears v. James et al., Tenth Circuit

Date: Apr 12, 1994
Establishing Age Discrimination Through Constructive Discharge: Insights from Sears v. James et al., Tenth Circuit Introduction In the landmark case of H. Brendan James et al. v. Sears, Roebuck and...
Glenn v. Shalala: Establishing the Burden of Proof and Substantial Evidence in Social Security Disability Terminations

Glenn v. Shalala: Establishing the Burden of Proof and Substantial Evidence in Social Security Disability Terminations

Date: Apr 9, 1994
Glenn v. Shalala: Establishing the Burden of Proof and Substantial Evidence in Social Security Disability Terminations Introduction Glenn v. Shalala is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Good Faith Belief and the Amount in Controversy Requirement: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Watson v. Blankinship

Good Faith Belief and the Amount in Controversy Requirement: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Watson v. Blankinship

Date: Apr 2, 1994
Good Faith Belief and the Amount in Controversy Requirement: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Watson v. Blankinship Introduction The case of William C. Watson, Kelly Macias, and Rufugio Macias v. Norman C....
Affirmation of Pretrial Dismissal in UNITED STATES v. HALL: Clarifying the Boundaries of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)

Affirmation of Pretrial Dismissal in UNITED STATES v. HALL: Clarifying the Boundaries of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)

Date: Mar 31, 1994
Affirmation of Pretrial Dismissal in UNITED STATES v. HALL: Clarifying the Boundaries of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) Introduction UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GREGORY R. HALL, A/K/A DON CUSICK, 20 F.3d 1084...
Voluntary Consent in Terry Stops: Insights from United States v. Muldrow

Voluntary Consent in Terry Stops: Insights from United States v. Muldrow

Date: Mar 26, 1994
Voluntary Consent in Terry Stops: Insights from United States v. Muldrow Introduction United States v. Muldrow, 19 F.3d 1332 (10th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case addressing the complexities...
Sham Transfers and Conspiracy Under the National Firearms Act: The Fleming Case

Sham Transfers and Conspiracy Under the National Firearms Act: The Fleming Case

Date: Mar 24, 1994
Sham Transfers and Conspiracy Under the National Firearms Act: The Fleming Case Introduction The case of United States of America v. William Hugh Fleming (19 F.3d 1325) is a landmark decision by the...
Reaffirmation of Absolute Immunity and Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Claims: Hunt v. Bennett, 10th Cir. 1994

Reaffirmation of Absolute Immunity and Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Claims: Hunt v. Bennett, 10th Cir. 1994

Date: Mar 23, 1994
Reaffirmation of Absolute Immunity and Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Claims: Hunt v. Bennett, 10th Cir. 1994 Introduction The case of Michael Rhodes Hunt v. Thomas A. Bennett et al.,...
Rejecting Per Se Rules for Citizen-Police Encounters in Private Train Roomettes: United States v. Little (1994)

Rejecting Per Se Rules for Citizen-Police Encounters in Private Train Roomettes: United States v. Little (1994)

Date: Mar 23, 1994
Rejecting Per Se Rules for Citizen-Police Encounters in Private Train Roomettes: United States v. Little (1994) Introduction In United States of America v. Bonnie Kaye Little, 18 F.3d 1499 (10th Cir....
Limits on Offensive Collateral Estoppel in Employment Discrimination: Meredith v. Beech Aircraft

Limits on Offensive Collateral Estoppel in Employment Discrimination: Meredith v. Beech Aircraft

Date: Mar 22, 1994
Limits on Offensive Collateral Estoppel in Employment Discrimination: Meredith v. Beech Aircraft Introduction The case of Janis E. Meredith v. Beech Aircraft Corporation addresses critical issues...
Diversity Jurisdiction and Employee Exclusions in Insurance Coverage: Analysis of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Colley

Diversity Jurisdiction and Employee Exclusions in Insurance Coverage: Analysis of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Colley

Date: Mar 16, 1994
Diversity Jurisdiction and Employee Exclusions in Insurance Coverage: Analysis of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Colley Introduction State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company...
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections Against Unreasonable Detentions: United States v. Fernandez

Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections Against Unreasonable Detentions: United States v. Fernandez

Date: Mar 12, 1994
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections Against Unreasonable Detentions: United States v. Fernandez Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Edelmiro Augustin Fernandez, 18 F.3d...
Amending Habeas Corpus Petitions: Establishing Standards for District Court Discretion

Amending Habeas Corpus Petitions: Establishing Standards for District Court Discretion

Date: Mar 8, 1994
Amending Habeas Corpus Petitions: Establishing Standards for District Court Discretion Introduction The case of Ronald Edward Gillette v. Robert J. Tansy and Attorney General of the State of New...
Haddock v. United States: Defining Ineffective Assistance and Loss Calculation in Sentencing

Haddock v. United States: Defining Ineffective Assistance and Loss Calculation in Sentencing

Date: Mar 3, 1994
Haddock v. United States: Defining Ineffective Assistance and Loss Calculation in Sentencing Introduction United States of America v. Kenneth E. Haddock, 12 F.3d 950 (10th Cir. 1993), represents a...
Nitsua Management v. United States: Clarifying Jurisdiction and Due Process in Civil Asset Forfeiture

Nitsua Management v. United States: Clarifying Jurisdiction and Due Process in Civil Asset Forfeiture

Date: Mar 1, 1994
Nitsua Management v. United States: Clarifying Jurisdiction and Due Process in Civil Asset Forfeiture Introduction The case of United States of America v. 51 Pieces of Real Property, Roswell, New...
Summary Judgment on Express Warranty Claims in Voelkel v. General Motors

Summary Judgment on Express Warranty Claims in Voelkel v. General Motors

Date: Mar 1, 1994
Summary Judgment on Express Warranty Claims in Voelkel v. General Motors Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Voelkel v. General Motors Corporation, reported at 846 F. Supp. 1482, the United...
Affirmation of District Court's Discretion in Attorney's Fees and Costs in Removal and Remand Cases: Daleske v. Fairfield

Affirmation of District Court's Discretion in Attorney's Fees and Costs in Removal and Remand Cases: Daleske v. Fairfield

Date: Mar 1, 1994
Affirmation of District Court's Discretion in Attorney's Fees and Costs in Removal and Remand Cases: Daleske v. Fairfield Introduction The case of Daleske et al. v. Fairfield Communities, Inc. heard...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Section 1981 Discrimination Claim: Durham v. Xerox

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Section 1981 Discrimination Claim: Durham v. Xerox

Date: Feb 25, 1994
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Section 1981 Discrimination Claim: Durham v. Xerox Introduction The case of Mary P. Durham v. Xerox Corporation (18 F.3d 836) adjudicated by the United States Court...
Judicial Restrictions on Repetitive and Frivolous Filings: The Winslow Precedent

Judicial Restrictions on Repetitive and Frivolous Filings: The Winslow Precedent

Date: Feb 24, 1994
Judicial Restrictions on Repetitive and Frivolous Filings: The Winslow Precedent Introduction The case of In re Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow, Debtors (17 F.3d 314) adjudicated by the...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Contribution Despite Oklahoma's Parental Immunity Doctrine in Wrongful Death Actions

Tenth Circuit Affirms Contribution Despite Oklahoma's Parental Immunity Doctrine in Wrongful Death Actions

Date: Feb 16, 1994
Tenth Circuit Affirms Contribution Despite Oklahoma's Parental Immunity Doctrine in Wrongful Death Actions Introduction The case of Lewis R. Robinson et al. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (16...
Reaffirming the Colorado River Doctrine: Fox v. Maulding

Reaffirming the Colorado River Doctrine: Fox v. Maulding

Date: Feb 11, 1994
Reaffirming the Colorado River Doctrine: Fox v. Maulding Introduction In Odell Fox and Sharon Fox v. Dwight M. Maulding et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert