Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Williamson et al.

Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Williamson et al.

Date: Apr 15, 1995
Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Williamson et al. Introduction United States of America v. Clarissa Williamson et al., 53 F.3d 1500 (10th Cir. 1995), is a...
LUCERO v. GUNTER: Upholding the Constitutionality of Random Urinalysis in Prisons

LUCERO v. GUNTER: Upholding the Constitutionality of Random Urinalysis in Prisons

Date: Apr 13, 1995
LUCERO v. GUNTER: Upholding the Constitutionality of Random Urinalysis in Prisons Introduction Anthony Lucero, a prisoner at the Limon Correctional Facility in Colorado, challenged the constitutional...
Abandonment of Trademark Rights through Naked Licensing: Analysis of Stanfield v. Osborne Industries

Abandonment of Trademark Rights through Naked Licensing: Analysis of Stanfield v. Osborne Industries

Date: Apr 12, 1995
Abandonment of Trademark Rights through Naked Licensing: Analysis of Stanfield v. Osborne Industries Introduction The appellate case of STANFIELD v. OSBORNE INDUSTRIES, INC., 52 F.3d 867 (10th Cir....
At-Will Employment and the Role of Policy Manual Disclaimers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hatfield v. Converse County Commissioners

At-Will Employment and the Role of Policy Manual Disclaimers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hatfield v. Converse County Commissioners

Date: Apr 12, 1995
At-Will Employment and the Role of Policy Manual Disclaimers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hatfield v. Converse County Commissioners Introduction Marjorie Hatfield, the plaintiff-appellant, brought...
Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards

Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards

Date: Apr 8, 1995
Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards Introduction The case of Richard Albright v. M. Rodriguez et al. adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Espinoza v. United States: Expansion of District Courts' Discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m)

Espinoza v. United States: Expansion of District Courts' Discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m)

Date: Apr 5, 1995
Espinoza v. United States: Expansion of District Courts' Discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) Introduction Toby J. Espinoza v. United States of America is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Scope of Arbitration Clauses in Antitrust Litigation: Coors Brewing Co. v. Molson Breweries

Scope of Arbitration Clauses in Antitrust Litigation: Coors Brewing Co. v. Molson Breweries

Date: Mar 31, 1995
Scope of Arbitration Clauses in Antitrust Litigation: Coors Brewing Co. v. Molson Breweries Introduction Coors Brewing Company v. Molson Breweries is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Reinforcing Judicial Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity for State Defense Attorneys in §1983 Claims: Analysis of HARRIS v. CHAMPION

Reinforcing Judicial Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity for State Defense Attorneys in §1983 Claims: Analysis of HARRIS v. CHAMPION

Date: Mar 31, 1995
Reinforcing Judicial Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity for State Defense Attorneys in §1983 Claims: Analysis of HARRIS v. CHAMPION Introduction HARRIS v. CHAMPION is a significant appellate...
United States v. Colorado Eastern Railroad Company: Distinguishing CERCLA §107 Cost Recovery from §113(f) Contribution Claims

United States v. Colorado Eastern Railroad Company: Distinguishing CERCLA §107 Cost Recovery from §113(f) Contribution Claims

Date: Mar 18, 1995
United States v. Colorado Eastern Railroad Company: Distinguishing CERCLA §107 Cost Recovery from §113(f) Contribution Claims Introduction The case United States of America v. Colorado Eastern...
Religious Freedom Restoration Act Establishes Rigorous Standards for Prisoners' Religious Rights

Religious Freedom Restoration Act Establishes Rigorous Standards for Prisoners' Religious Rights

Date: Mar 15, 1995
Religious Freedom Restoration Act Establishes Rigorous Standards for Prisoners' Religious Rights Introduction In the landmark case of Robert Henry Werner aka Redelk Ironhorse Thomas v. O. Lane...
Brady v. Smith: Upholding Due Process in Habeas Corpus Appeals

Brady v. Smith: Upholding Due Process in Habeas Corpus Appeals

Date: Mar 8, 1995
Brady v. Smith: Upholding Due Process in Habeas Corpus Appeals Introduction Brady v. Smith is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, delivered on March 7,...
Proper Application of Section 1915(d): Tenth Circuit Reverses Frivolous Dismissal in Fratus v. Deland

Proper Application of Section 1915(d): Tenth Circuit Reverses Frivolous Dismissal in Fratus v. Deland

Date: Mar 8, 1995
Proper Application of Section 1915(d): Tenth Circuit Reverses Frivolous Dismissal in Fratus v. Deland Introduction The case of David James Fratus v. Gary W. Deland et al. serves as a pivotal...
Strict Criteria for Valid Jury Waivers and Plea Agreement Rejections Established in United States v. Robertson et al.

Strict Criteria for Valid Jury Waivers and Plea Agreement Rejections Established in United States v. Robertson et al.

Date: Mar 7, 1995
Strict Criteria for Valid Jury Waivers and Plea Agreement Rejections Established in United States v. Robertson et al. Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Steven Robertson...
Establishing Insurer's Duty of Good Faith in Plan Administration: Insights from Wolf v. Prudential

Establishing Insurer's Duty of Good Faith in Plan Administration: Insights from Wolf v. Prudential

Date: Mar 7, 1995
Establishing Insurer's Duty of Good Faith in Plan Administration: Insights from Wolf v. Prudential Introduction Scott Wolf and Brenda Wolf, a married couple and members of the First Baptist Church of...
Scope of Criminally Derived Property and Money Laundering Enhancements in Fraud Schemes: Commentary on U.S. v. Massey, Wilkins, and Wilkins

Scope of Criminally Derived Property and Money Laundering Enhancements in Fraud Schemes: Commentary on U.S. v. Massey, Wilkins, and Wilkins

Date: Mar 7, 1995
Scope of Criminally Derived Property and Money Laundering Enhancements in Fraud Schemes Commentary on United States of America v. Von Dale Massey, Sr., Sandra Wilkins, and Jack Z. Wilkins, 48 F.3d...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Private Security Pat-Downs: Kelly Gallagher v. Neil Young Freedom Concert

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Private Security Pat-Downs: Kelly Gallagher v. Neil Young Freedom Concert

Date: Mar 1, 1995
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Private Security Pat-Downs: Kelly Gallagher v. Neil Young Freedom Concert Introduction In the case of Kelly Gallagher et al. v. Neil Young Freedom Concert, the...
Proper Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: The Cruse v. HHS Precedent

Proper Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: The Cruse v. HHS Precedent

Date: Feb 24, 1995
Proper Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: The Cruse v. HHS Precedent Introduction The case of Alice Cruse v. United States Department of Health Human Services (49...
Affirming Summary Judgment Standards in Age Discrimination Claims and Protective Orders in Deposititions: Thomas v. IBM

Affirming Summary Judgment Standards in Age Discrimination Claims and Protective Orders in Deposititions: Thomas v. IBM

Date: Feb 22, 1995
Affirming Summary Judgment Standards in Age Discrimination Claims and Protective Orders in Depositions: Thomas v. IBM Introduction The case of Darlene Thomas v. International Business Machines...
Affirmation and Remittitur of Punitive Damages in Fiduciary Duty Breach: Klein et al. v. Grynberg et al.

Affirmation and Remittitur of Punitive Damages in Fiduciary Duty Breach: Klein et al. v. Grynberg et al.

Date: Feb 17, 1995
Affirmation and Remittitur of Punitive Damages in Fiduciary Duty Breach: Klein et al. v. Grynberg et al. Introduction The case of Klein et al. v. Grynberg et al. adjudicated by the United States...
Ordinary Course of Business Defense Refused in Ponzi Scheme Transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 547: In Re Heggland Case

Ordinary Course of Business Defense Refused in Ponzi Scheme Transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 547: In Re Heggland Case

Date: Feb 14, 1995
Ordinary Course of Business Defense Refused in Ponzi Scheme Transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 547: In Re Heggland Case Introduction The case of In re Hegglard Investments Associates, Inc., Debtor. Harvey...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert