Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Standards for Jury Instructions on Venue in Conspiracy and Possession Charges: Carter v. United States

Establishing Standards for Jury Instructions on Venue in Conspiracy and Possession Charges: Carter v. United States

Date: Dec 17, 1997
Establishing Standards for Jury Instructions on Venue in Conspiracy and Possession Charges: Carter v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Israel Carter, Jr., 130 F.3d...
Retroactive Amendments to ERISA Welfare Benefit Plans and Protection of Vested Rights: Member Services v. CE Administrators

Retroactive Amendments to ERISA Welfare Benefit Plans and Protection of Vested Rights: Member Services v. CE Administrators

Date: Dec 16, 1997
Retroactive Amendments to ERISA Welfare Benefit Plans and Protection of Vested Rights: Member Services v. CE Administrators Introduction Member Services Life Insurance Company, doing business as...
Exhaustion Doctrine and Introduction of New Evidence in Habeas Corpus: Demarest v. Price (1997)

Exhaustion Doctrine and Introduction of New Evidence in Habeas Corpus: Demarest v. Price (1997)

Date: Dec 4, 1997
Exhaustion Doctrine and Introduction of New Evidence in Habeas Corpus: Demarest v. Price (1997) Introduction In the landmark case of Richard S. Demarest v. William Price; Gale Norton, Attorney...
Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence Under Daubert: Analysis of United States v. Call

Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence Under Daubert: Analysis of United States v. Call

Date: Dec 4, 1997
Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence Under Daubert: Analysis of United States v. Call Introduction United States of America v. Justin Call, 129 F.3d 1402 (10th Cir. 1997), addresses the contentious...
Reliability of Drug Dog Alerts and Material Omissions in Affidavits: Tenth Circuit Reverses Suppression of Evidence in Kennedy Case

Reliability of Drug Dog Alerts and Material Omissions in Affidavits: Tenth Circuit Reverses Suppression of Evidence in Kennedy Case

Date: Dec 4, 1997
Reliability of Drug Dog Alerts and Material Omissions in Affidavits: Tenth Circuit Reverses Suppression of Evidence in Kennedy Case Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Keiran...
Smith v. Norwest Financial: Defining Severity and Pervasiveness in Title VII Hostile Work Environment Claims

Smith v. Norwest Financial: Defining Severity and Pervasiveness in Title VII Hostile Work Environment Claims

Date: Dec 4, 1997
Smith v. Norwest Financial: Defining Severity and Pervasiveness in Title VII Hostile Work Environment Claims Introduction Smith v. Norwest Financial Acceptance, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Establishing Viewpoint Neutrality in Limited Public Fora: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Summum v. Salt Lake County

Establishing Viewpoint Neutrality in Limited Public Fora: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Summum v. Salt Lake County

Date: Nov 29, 1997
Establishing Viewpoint Neutrality in Limited Public Fora: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Summum v. Salt Lake County Introduction The case of Summum, a Utah corporate sole, Plaintiff-Appellant, v....
Certification of ADEA Collective Actions in Patterns and Practices Discrimination: Vaszlavik v. Storage Technology Corporation

Certification of ADEA Collective Actions in Patterns and Practices Discrimination: Vaszlavik v. Storage Technology Corporation

Date: Nov 27, 1997
Certification of ADEA Collective Actions in Patterns and Practices Discrimination: Vaszlavik v. Storage Technology Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Vaszlavik et al. v. Storage...
Sutton v. United Airlines: Clarifying ADA Disability Definitions

Sutton v. United Airlines: Clarifying ADA Disability Definitions

Date: Nov 27, 1997
Sutton v. United Airlines: Clarifying ADA Disability Definitions Introduction In Sutton and Hinton v. United Airlines, Inc. (130 F.3d 893, 10th Cir. 1997), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Application of the Statute of Frauds in Real Property Contracts: A Tenth Circuit Analysis in GFF Corp. v. AWG

Application of the Statute of Frauds in Real Property Contracts: A Tenth Circuit Analysis in GFF Corp. v. AWG

Date: Nov 26, 1997
Application of the Statute of Frauds in Real Property Contracts: A Tenth Circuit Analysis in GFF Corp. v. AWG Introduction The case of GFF Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. (130 F.3d...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gender Discrimination and Equal Pay Act Claims under Title VII

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gender Discrimination and Equal Pay Act Claims under Title VII

Date: Nov 25, 1997
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gender Discrimination and Equal Pay Act Claims under Title VII Introduction The case of Shelley A. Sprague v. Thorn Americas, Inc. and Ed Kowalski (129 F.3d 1355)...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in False Arrest Claims: Clanton v. Cooper

Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in False Arrest Claims: Clanton v. Cooper

Date: Nov 18, 1997
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in False Arrest Claims: Clanton v. Cooper Introduction The case of Carolyn Clanton v. Jody Cooper (129 F.3d 1147, 10th Circuit, 1997) presents a pivotal...
United States v. Smartt: Strict Boundaries on Post-Sentencing Modifications Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)

United States v. Smartt: Strict Boundaries on Post-Sentencing Modifications Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)

Date: Nov 13, 1997
United States v. Smartt: Strict Boundaries on Post-Sentencing Modifications Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) Introduction United States of America v. Buddie Lee Smartt, 129 F.3d 539 (10th Cir. 1997), is a...
Nguyen v. Reynolds: Tenth Circuit Affirmation on AEDPA Applicability and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Nguyen v. Reynolds: Tenth Circuit Affirmation on AEDPA Applicability and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Nov 8, 1997
Nguyen v. Reynolds: Tenth Circuit Affirmation on AEDPA Applicability and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction Nguyen v. Reynolds is a significant appellate decision rendered by the United...
Enforcing Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Bivens Actions: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision

Enforcing Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Bivens Actions: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision

Date: Oct 29, 1997
Enforcing Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Bivens Actions: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision Introduction The case of Jonathan T. Garrett v. Kathleen M. Hawk et al. (127 F.3d 1263, 10th Cir....
Association Discrimination under the ADA: Employer's Right to Terminate Based on Disabled Associate's Direct Threat

Association Discrimination under the ADA: Employer's Right to Terminate Based on Disabled Associate's Direct Threat

Date: Oct 29, 1997
Association Discrimination under the ADA: Employer's Right to Terminate Based on Disabled Associate's Direct Threat Introduction The case of Howard Den Hartog v. Wasatch Academy and Joseph Loftin...
Clarifying Antitrust Standing: Direct Purchaser Rule in Tying Arrangements – Sports Racing Services, Inc. v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.

Clarifying Antitrust Standing: Direct Purchaser Rule in Tying Arrangements – Sports Racing Services, Inc. v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.

Date: Oct 29, 1997
Clarifying Antitrust Standing: Direct Purchaser Rule in Tying Arrangements – Sports Racing Services, Inc. v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Sports Racing Services,...
Exhaustion of State Remedies and Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Parkhurst v. Shillinger

Exhaustion of State Remedies and Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Parkhurst v. Shillinger

Date: Oct 24, 1997
Exhaustion of State Remedies and Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Parkhurst v. Shillinger Introduction Derrick R. Parkhurst v. Duane Shillinger is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Affidavit Sufficiency and Warrant Particularity in Search and Seizure: United States v. Hargus

Affidavit Sufficiency and Warrant Particularity in Search and Seizure: United States v. Hargus

Date: Oct 23, 1997
Affidavit Sufficiency and Warrant Particularity in Search and Seizure: United States v. Hargus Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Charley Hargus, 128 F.3d 1358 (10th...
Constructive Discharge and Due Process: Insights from Yearous v. Niobrara County Memorial Hospital

Constructive Discharge and Due Process: Insights from Yearous v. Niobrara County Memorial Hospital

Date: Oct 22, 1997
Constructive Discharge and Due Process: Insights from Yearous v. Niobrara County Memorial Hospital Introduction In Yearous; Crisman; Robinson; and Frahm v. Niobrara County Memorial Hospital, the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert