Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Time-Barred Title VII and Preemption of Constitutional Claims Confirmed in Belhomme v. Widnall

Time-Barred Title VII and Preemption of Constitutional Claims Confirmed in Belhomme v. Widnall

Date: Oct 15, 1997
Time-Barred Title VII and Preemption of Constitutional Claims Confirmed in Belhomme v. Widnall Introduction The case of Renaud Belhomme v. Sheila Widnall, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force...
Enhancing the Standards for Qualified Immunity: Comprehensive Analysis of Breidenbach et al. v. Bolish

Enhancing the Standards for Qualified Immunity: Comprehensive Analysis of Breidenbach et al. v. Bolish

Date: Oct 11, 1997
Enhancing the Standards for Qualified Immunity: Comprehensive Analysis of Breidenbach et al. v. Bolish Introduction In the landmark case of Breidenbach et al. v. Bolish, the United States Court of...
Younger Abstention and Federalism: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Taylor v. Jaquez Et Al

Younger Abstention and Federalism: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Taylor v. Jaquez Et Al

Date: Oct 11, 1997
Younger Abstention and Federalism: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Taylor v. Jaquez Et Al Introduction The case of Zachary Taylor, as Executor of the Estate of Jack T. Taylor, Jr., Deceased; Taylor...
Comprehensive Commentary on J.B. v. Washington County: Affirmation of Procedural and Substantive Due Process Protections in Child Custody Investigations

Comprehensive Commentary on J.B. v. Washington County: Affirmation of Procedural and Substantive Due Process Protections in Child Custody Investigations

Date: Oct 8, 1997
Affirmation of Procedural and Substantive Due Process Protections in Child Custody Investigations: A Commentary on J.B. v. Washington County Introduction The case J.B., Individually, and for Her...
Choice of Law Determination Essential for Arbitration Clause Materiality under UCC 2-207: Insights from Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. Seatex

Choice of Law Determination Essential for Arbitration Clause Materiality under UCC 2-207: Insights from Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. Seatex

Date: Oct 4, 1997
Choice of Law Determination Essential for Arbitration Clause Materiality under UCC 2-207: Insights from Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. Seatex Introduction The case of Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. Seatex...
Ripeness in Takings Claims: SK Finance SA v. La Plata County

Ripeness in Takings Claims: SK Finance SA v. La Plata County

Date: Oct 2, 1997
Ripeness in Takings Claims: SK Finance SA v. La Plata County Introduction In the case of SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit addressed critical...
Strict Interpretation of "Writing" in Bankruptcy Fraud Exceptions: In re Kaspar

Strict Interpretation of "Writing" in Bankruptcy Fraud Exceptions: In re Kaspar

Date: Oct 1, 1997
Strict Interpretation of "Writing" in Bankruptcy Fraud Exceptions: In re Kaspar Introduction The case of In re Kaspar (125 F.3d 1358, 1997) represents a significant precedent in bankruptcy law,...
Standards for Subpoena Duces Tecum Enforcement in Pro Se Prisoner Litigation: Windsor v. Martindale and Smith

Standards for Subpoena Duces Tecum Enforcement in Pro Se Prisoner Litigation: Windsor v. Martindale and Smith

Date: Sep 23, 1997
Standards for Subpoena Duces Tecum Enforcement in Pro Se Prisoner Litigation: Windsor v. Martindale and Smith Introduction The case of Michael Duane Windsor v. Lieutenant John Martindale and Sergeant...
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Protections in Lawmaster v. Ward

Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Protections in Lawmaster v. Ward

Date: Sep 19, 1997
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Protections in Lawmaster v. Ward Introduction In John Lawmaster v. P. Blair Ward et al., 125 F.3d 1341 (10th Cir. 1997), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Application of Res Judicata to Supplemental Claims in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Nwosun v. General Mills Restaurants, Inc.

Application of Res Judicata to Supplemental Claims in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Nwosun v. General Mills Restaurants, Inc.

Date: Sep 9, 1997
Application of Res Judicata to Supplemental Claims in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Nwosun v. General Mills Restaurants, Inc. Introduction Nwosun v. General Mills Restaurants, Inc. is a...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Rule 9(b) Pleading Standards for Securities Section 11 and 10(b) Claims

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Rule 9(b) Pleading Standards for Securities Section 11 and 10(b) Claims

Date: Sep 6, 1997
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Rule 9(b) Pleading Standards for Securities Section 11 and 10(b) Claims Introduction In Arthur M. Schwartz v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals...
Strengthening ADA Protections Against Intrusive Drug Testing Policies: Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort

Strengthening ADA Protections Against Intrusive Drug Testing Policies: Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort

Date: Sep 3, 1997
Strengthening ADA Protections Against Intrusive Drug Testing Policies: Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort Introduction In the landmark case of Jane Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort,...
US Forest Service Timber Sale Approval Upheld: Compliance with NEPA, NFMA, and APA Affirmed

US Forest Service Timber Sale Approval Upheld: Compliance with NEPA, NFMA, and APA Affirmed

Date: Aug 28, 1997
US Forest Service Timber Sale Approval Upheld: Compliance with NEPA, NFMA, and APA Affirmed Introduction The case of Friends of the Bow et al. v. Thompson et al. (124 F.3d 1210) revolves around a...
Limits on Secured Creditors’ Outside Payments Under Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plans

Limits on Secured Creditors’ Outside Payments Under Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plans

Date: Aug 27, 1997
Limits on Secured Creditors’ Outside Payments Under Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plans Introduction In Re: Gary Talbot and Sherry Talbot, Debtors. United States of America, Appellant, v. Barbara W. Richman,...
Grossman v. Novell, Inc.: Upholding the 'Bespeaks Caution' Doctrine in Securities Fraud Claims

Grossman v. Novell, Inc.: Upholding the 'Bespeaks Caution' Doctrine in Securities Fraud Claims

Date: Aug 21, 1997
Grossman v. Novell, Inc.: Upholding the 'Bespeaks Caution' Doctrine in Securities Fraud Claims Introduction Grossman v. Novell, Inc. is a significant appellate decision from the United States Court...
Sufficiency of Evidence in Aiding and Abetting Murder: Wingfield v. Massie

Sufficiency of Evidence in Aiding and Abetting Murder: Wingfield v. Massie

Date: Aug 20, 1997
Sufficiency of Evidence in Aiding and Abetting Murder: Wingfield v. Massie Introduction Wingfield v. Massie, 122 F.3d 1329 (10th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case that explores the boundaries of evidence...
Applying Younger Abstention Doctrine in Section 1983 Relief Against State Prosecutorial Actions

Applying Younger Abstention Doctrine in Section 1983 Relief Against State Prosecutorial Actions

Date: Aug 16, 1997
Applying Younger Abstention Doctrine in Section 1983 Relief Against State Prosecutorial Actions Introduction The case FRED W. PHELPS, SR. et al. v. JOAN HAMILTON et al. (122 F.3d 885) adjudicated by...
Establishing Precedent on Attorney’s Fees Awards under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Phelps v. Hamilton

Establishing Precedent on Attorney’s Fees Awards under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Phelps v. Hamilton

Date: Aug 13, 1997
Establishing Precedent on Attorney’s Fees Awards under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Phelps v. Hamilton Introduction Phelps v. Hamilton is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Balancing Full Faith and Credit with §1983: Insights from Phelps v. Hamilton

Balancing Full Faith and Credit with §1983: Insights from Phelps v. Hamilton

Date: Aug 13, 1997
Balancing Full Faith and Credit with §1983: Insights from Phelps v. Hamilton Introduction Phelps v. Hamilton, 122 F.3d 1309 (10th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case that addresses the interplay between...
Balancing Rape Shield Protections and Defendant's Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of Richmond v. Embry

Balancing Rape Shield Protections and Defendant's Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of Richmond v. Embry

Date: Aug 12, 1997
Balancing Rape Shield Protections and Defendant's Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of Richmond v. Embry Introduction Richmond v. Embry, 122 F.3d 866 (10th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case that examines...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert