Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Oklahoma's "Continuing Threat" Aggravator in Castro v. Ward

Affirmation of Oklahoma's "Continuing Threat" Aggravator in Castro v. Ward

Date: Mar 3, 1998
Affirmation of Oklahoma's "Continuing Threat" Aggravator and Habeas Corpus Standards in Castro v. Ward Introduction Castro v. Ward (138 F.3d 810, 10th Cir. 1998) is a significant case in the realm of...
Legally Binding Commentary: Witt v. Roadway Express Establishes Critical Precedent on Title VII Limitations

Legally Binding Commentary: Witt v. Roadway Express Establishes Critical Precedent on Title VII Limitations

Date: Feb 28, 1998
Witt v. Roadway Express: Tenth Circuit Sets Important Precedent on Title VII Limitations Introduction In the landmark case of Charles James Witt v. Roadway Express et al., the United States Court of...
Brady Materiality in Criminal Appeals: The Trujillo Case

Brady Materiality in Criminal Appeals: The Trujillo Case

Date: Feb 24, 1998
Brady Materiality in Criminal Appeals: The Trujillo Case Introduction The case of United States of America v. Charles Lee Trujillo (136 F.3d 1388) serves as a pivotal examination of the BRADY v....
Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.: Clarifying Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine in Indemnity Actions

Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.: Clarifying Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine in Indemnity Actions

Date: Feb 14, 1998
Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.: Clarifying Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine in Indemnity Actions Introduction In Frontier Refining Inc., a Wyoming corporation...
Reasonable Suspicion and Investigative Detention in Traffic Stops: Insights from United States v. Hunnicutt

Reasonable Suspicion and Investigative Detention in Traffic Stops: Insights from United States v. Hunnicutt

Date: Feb 10, 1998
Reasonable Suspicion and Investigative Detention in Traffic Stops: Insights from United States v. Hunnicutt Introduction United States of America v. Denny Ray Hunnicutt is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Sellers v. Ward: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Standards in Multiple Personality Disorder Defense

Sellers v. Ward: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Standards in Multiple Personality Disorder Defense

Date: Feb 5, 1998
Sellers v. Ward: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Standards in Multiple Personality Disorder Defense Introduction In Sellers v. Ward, 135 F.3d 1333 (10th Cir. 1998), the United States Court of Appeals...
Balancing Probative Value and Prejudicial Risk: Tenth Circuit Upholds Rule 403 Application to Rule 413 Evidence in Sexual Assault Case

Balancing Probative Value and Prejudicial Risk: Tenth Circuit Upholds Rule 403 Application to Rule 413 Evidence in Sexual Assault Case

Date: Feb 3, 1998
Balancing Probative Value and Prejudicial Risk: Tenth Circuit Upholds Rule 403 Application to Rule 413 Evidence in Sexual Assault Case Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v....
Affirmation of NCAA's Antitrust Violation: Enhancing the Rule of Reason in Sports Law

Affirmation of NCAA's Antitrust Violation: Enhancing the Rule of Reason in Sports Law

Date: Jan 24, 1998
Affirmation of NCAA's Antitrust Violation: Enhancing the Rule of Reason in Sports Law Introduction The case of Norman LAW, Andrew Greer, Peter Herrmann, Michael Jarvis, Jr., and Charles M. Rieb,...
Abatement of Malicious Prosecution Claims Upon Defendant's Death: Insights from Melton Pietrowski v. Town of Dibble

Abatement of Malicious Prosecution Claims Upon Defendant's Death: Insights from Melton Pietrowski v. Town of Dibble

Date: Jan 22, 1998
Abatement of Malicious Prosecution Claims Upon Defendant's Death: Insights from Melton Pietrowski v. Town of Dibble Introduction The case of Melton Pietrowski v. Town of Dibble, adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Constitutionality of Fed.R.Evid. 413 in Sexual Assault Cases: Enjady v. United States

Establishing the Constitutionality of Fed.R.Evid. 413 in Sexual Assault Cases: Enjady v. United States

Date: Jan 21, 1998
Establishing the Constitutionality of Fed.R.Evid. 413 in Sexual Assault Cases: Enjady v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kerry Neil Enjady (134 F.3d 1427)...
Frustration of Purpose in Plea Agreements: Reinstatement of Dismissed Counts in Bunner Case

Frustration of Purpose in Plea Agreements: Reinstatement of Dismissed Counts in Bunner Case

Date: Jan 21, 1998
Frustration of Purpose in Plea Agreements: Reinstatement of Dismissed Counts in Bunner Case Introduction The legal landscape surrounding plea agreements was notably shaped by the United States of...
Affirmation of Dual Sovereignty and Rejection of Sham Prosecution in Double Jeopardy Claims: United States v. Trammell

Affirmation of Dual Sovereignty and Rejection of Sham Prosecution in Double Jeopardy Claims: United States v. Trammell

Date: Jan 13, 1998
Affirmation of Dual Sovereignty and Rejection of Sham Prosecution in Double Jeopardy Claims: United States v. Trammell Introduction United States of America v. Michael W. Trammell, 133 F.3d 1343...
Double Jeopardy Clarified: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Lucero v. Kerby

Double Jeopardy Clarified: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Lucero v. Kerby

Date: Jan 9, 1998
Double Jeopardy Clarified: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Lucero v. Kerby Introduction In Raymond Lucero v. Dareld L. Kerby, decided on January 8, 1998, by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirming 'Intent to Conceal' in Attempted Money Laundering: Legal Insights from United States v. Wolny, 10th Cir. 1998

Affirming 'Intent to Conceal' in Attempted Money Laundering: Legal Insights from United States v. Wolny, 10th Cir. 1998

Date: Jan 7, 1998
Affirming 'Intent to Conceal' in Attempted Money Laundering: Legal Insights from United States v. Wolny, 10th Cir. 1998 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Boleslaw Wolny, 133 F.3d...
Abuse of Discretion in Dismissal for Failure to Respond: Tenth Circuit Reverses District Court in Murray v. Archambo

Abuse of Discretion in Dismissal for Failure to Respond: Tenth Circuit Reverses District Court in Murray v. Archambo

Date: Jan 3, 1998
Abuse of Discretion in Dismissal for Failure to Respond: Tenth Circuit Reverses District Court in Murray v. Archambo Introduction The case of Curtis L. Murray, Jr. v. Curt Archambo, adjudicated by...
Interpreting "Significant Work-Related Limitations" Under Section 12.05C: Insights from Hinkle v. Apfel

Interpreting "Significant Work-Related Limitations" Under Section 12.05C: Insights from Hinkle v. Apfel

Date: Dec 25, 1997
Interpreting "Significant Work-Related Limitations" Under Section 12.05C: Insights from Hinkle v. Apfel Introduction Hinkle v. Apfel, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Enhanced Duty of Federal Employers to Reassign Disabled Employees: Insights from Woodman v. USPS

Enhanced Duty of Federal Employers to Reassign Disabled Employees: Insights from Woodman v. USPS

Date: Dec 25, 1997
Enhanced Duty of Federal Employers to Reassign Disabled Employees: Insights from Woodman v. USPS Introduction In Patricia Kaye Woodman v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, and United States...
Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad System: Establishing the Standard for Admitting Expert Testimony under Daubert

Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad System: Establishing the Standard for Admitting Expert Testimony under Daubert

Date: Dec 24, 1997
Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad System: Establishing the Standard for Admitting Expert Testimony under Daubert Introduction In the case of Jon Bradley Summers; Glyn E. Potts,...
Separation of Church and State in Public School Choirs: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Establishment Clause Claims

Separation of Church and State in Public School Choirs: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Establishment Clause Claims

Date: Dec 19, 1997
Separation of Church and State in Public School Choirs: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Establishment Clause Claims Introduction In the case of Cheryl Bauchman v. West High School and Associates,...
Multiplicity of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) Charges: United States v. Johnson

Multiplicity of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) Charges: United States v. Johnson

Date: Dec 17, 1997
Multiplicity of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) Charges: United States v. Johnson Introduction United States of America v. Coyette Deon Johnson is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert