Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Affirmation of Oklahoma's "Continuing Threat" Aggravator and Habeas Corpus Standards in Castro v. Ward Introduction Castro v. Ward (138 F.3d 810, 10th Cir. 1998) is a significant case in the realm of...
Witt v. Roadway Express: Tenth Circuit Sets Important Precedent on Title VII Limitations Introduction In the landmark case of Charles James Witt v. Roadway Express et al., the United States Court of...
Brady Materiality in Criminal Appeals: The Trujillo Case Introduction The case of United States of America v. Charles Lee Trujillo (136 F.3d 1388) serves as a pivotal examination of the BRADY v....
Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.: Clarifying Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine in Indemnity Actions Introduction In Frontier Refining Inc., a Wyoming corporation...
Reasonable Suspicion and Investigative Detention in Traffic Stops: Insights from United States v. Hunnicutt Introduction United States of America v. Denny Ray Hunnicutt is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Sellers v. Ward: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Standards in Multiple Personality Disorder Defense Introduction In Sellers v. Ward, 135 F.3d 1333 (10th Cir. 1998), the United States Court of Appeals...
Balancing Probative Value and Prejudicial Risk: Tenth Circuit Upholds Rule 403 Application to Rule 413 Evidence in Sexual Assault Case Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v....
Affirmation of NCAA's Antitrust Violation: Enhancing the Rule of Reason in Sports Law Introduction The case of Norman LAW, Andrew Greer, Peter Herrmann, Michael Jarvis, Jr., and Charles M. Rieb,...
Abatement of Malicious Prosecution Claims Upon Defendant's Death: Insights from Melton Pietrowski v. Town of Dibble Introduction The case of Melton Pietrowski v. Town of Dibble, adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Constitutionality of Fed.R.Evid. 413 in Sexual Assault Cases: Enjady v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kerry Neil Enjady (134 F.3d 1427)...
Frustration of Purpose in Plea Agreements: Reinstatement of Dismissed Counts in Bunner Case Introduction The legal landscape surrounding plea agreements was notably shaped by the United States of...
Affirmation of Dual Sovereignty and Rejection of Sham Prosecution in Double Jeopardy Claims: United States v. Trammell Introduction United States of America v. Michael W. Trammell, 133 F.3d 1343...
Double Jeopardy Clarified: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Lucero v. Kerby Introduction In Raymond Lucero v. Dareld L. Kerby, decided on January 8, 1998, by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirming 'Intent to Conceal' in Attempted Money Laundering: Legal Insights from United States v. Wolny, 10th Cir. 1998 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Boleslaw Wolny, 133 F.3d...
Abuse of Discretion in Dismissal for Failure to Respond: Tenth Circuit Reverses District Court in Murray v. Archambo Introduction The case of Curtis L. Murray, Jr. v. Curt Archambo, adjudicated by...
Interpreting "Significant Work-Related Limitations" Under Section 12.05C: Insights from Hinkle v. Apfel Introduction Hinkle v. Apfel, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Enhanced Duty of Federal Employers to Reassign Disabled Employees: Insights from Woodman v. USPS Introduction In Patricia Kaye Woodman v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, and United States...
Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad System: Establishing the Standard for Admitting Expert Testimony under Daubert Introduction In the case of Jon Bradley Summers; Glyn E. Potts,...
Separation of Church and State in Public School Choirs: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Establishment Clause Claims Introduction In the case of Cheryl Bauchman v. West High School and Associates,...
Multiplicity of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) Charges: United States v. Johnson Introduction United States of America v. Coyette Deon Johnson is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...