Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Smith: Circumstantial Evidence, Premeditation, and Harmless Juror Misconduct

United States v. Smith: Circumstantial Evidence, Premeditation, and Harmless Juror Misconduct

Date: Apr 23, 2025
United States v. Smith: Circumstantial Evidence, Premeditation, and Harmless Juror Misconduct 1. Introduction In United States v. Smith, 23-7087 (10th Cir. Apr. 22, 2025), the Tenth Circuit...
Emphasizing Particularity and Non-Ascertainability in Trade-Secret Claims under DTSA and OUTSA

Emphasizing Particularity and Non-Ascertainability in Trade-Secret Claims under DTSA and OUTSA

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Emphasizing Particularity and Non-Ascertainability in Trade-Secret Claims under DTSA and OUTSA Introduction Double Eagle Alloys, Inc. v. Hooper, No. 24-5089 (10th Cir. Apr. 22, 2025), marks an...
United States v. Fowler: Inapplicability of the Miranda Exclusionary Rule at Sentencing Absent Intent to Enhance Penalty

United States v. Fowler: Inapplicability of the Miranda Exclusionary Rule at Sentencing Absent Intent to Enhance Penalty

Date: Apr 23, 2025
United States v. Fowler: Inapplicability of the Miranda Exclusionary Rule at Sentencing Absent Intent to Enhance Penalty Introduction United States v. Fowler, decided by the Tenth Circuit on April...
Immediacy Requirement for Constitutionally Permissible Use of Deadly Force Against Household Pets

Immediacy Requirement for Constitutionally Permissible Use of Deadly Force Against Household Pets

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Immediacy Requirement for Constitutionally Permissible Use of Deadly Force Against Household Pets Introduction Love v. Grashorn, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on...
Affirming §922(g)(1) and Clarifying Plain-Error Limits on Coerced Evidentiary Stipulations in United States v. Mayfield

Affirming §922(g)(1) and Clarifying Plain-Error Limits on Coerced Evidentiary Stipulations in United States v. Mayfield

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Affirming §922(g)(1) and Clarifying Plain-Error Limits on Coerced Evidentiary Stipulations in United States v. Mayfield Introduction United States v. Mayfield (10th Cir. 2025) addresses two...
Ripeness Exception for Successive §2255 Motions: In re Henley

Ripeness Exception for Successive §2255 Motions: In re Henley

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Ripeness Exception for Successive §2255 Motions: In re Henley Introduction In In re: Henley, the Tenth Circuit addressed whether a federal prisoner needs appellate authorization to file what would...
Establishing Genuine Disputes Over Imminence: Deadly Force & Qualified Immunity under the Fourth Amendment

Establishing Genuine Disputes Over Imminence: Deadly Force & Qualified Immunity under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Establishing Genuine Disputes Over Imminence: Deadly Force & Qualified Immunity under the Fourth Amendment Introduction Estate of Patrick Harmon, Sr. v. Salt Lake City (10th Cir. Apr. 22, 2025)...
Discouraged Disclosure Policies and Municipal Liability: Lee v. Poudre School District R-1

Discouraged Disclosure Policies and Municipal Liability: Lee v. Poudre School District R-1

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Discouraged Disclosure Policies and Municipal Liability: Lee v. Poudre School District R-1 (10th Cir. Apr. 22, 2025) Introduction In Lee v. Poudre School District R-1, the Tenth Circuit addressed for...
Foreseeable Avoidance and Proximate Cause in Parked‐Vehicle Collisions

Foreseeable Avoidance and Proximate Cause in Parked‐Vehicle Collisions

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Foreseeable Avoidance and Proximate Cause in Parked‐Vehicle Collisions Introduction Estate of Laura Ratley v. Awad, 23‐6169 (10th Cir. Apr. 22, 2025), presents a tragic collision on the Cimarron...
Presumption of Reasonableness for Guidelines Sentencing Under U.S.S.G. §2G2.2 Upheld

Presumption of Reasonableness for Guidelines Sentencing Under U.S.S.G. §2G2.2 Upheld

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Presumption of Reasonableness for Guidelines Sentencing Under U.S.S.G. §2G2.2 Upheld Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in...
Licensing Does Not Constitute State Action: Clarifying the State Actor Requirement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Licensing Does Not Constitute State Action: Clarifying the State Actor Requirement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Licensing Does Not Constitute State Action: Clarifying the State Actor Requirement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Rogers v. Brown,...
Clarifying Recusal and Jury‐Instruction Standards: United States v. Woodmore

Clarifying Recusal and Jury‐Instruction Standards: United States v. Woodmore

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Clarifying Recusal and Jury‐Instruction Standards: United States v. Woodmore Introduction United States v. Woodmore, 10th Cir. No. 23-7057 (Apr. 18, 2025), is the second appellate decision in the...
Limits on Federal Jurisdiction over State Child‐Welfare Determinations: Sovereign Immunity, Rooker‐Feldman, and Ex parte Young in K.A. v. Barnes

Limits on Federal Jurisdiction over State Child‐Welfare Determinations: Sovereign Immunity, Rooker‐Feldman, and Ex parte Young in K.A. v. Barnes

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Limits on Federal Jurisdiction over State Child‐Welfare Determinations: Sovereign Immunity, Rooker‐Feldman, and Ex parte Young in K.A. v. Barnes Introduction K.A. v. Barnes, decided April 18, 2025,...
Non-Exclusive Social Media License Bars User’s Copyright Claims

Non-Exclusive Social Media License Bars User’s Copyright Claims

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Non-Exclusive Social Media License Bars User’s Copyright Claims 1. Introduction In Sethunya v. TikTok, Inc., 10th Cir. No. 24-4045 (Apr. 18, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Clarifying the Nexus Requirement for § 924(c)(1) Guilty Pleas – United States v. Gray

Clarifying the Nexus Requirement for § 924(c)(1) Guilty Pleas – United States v. Gray

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Clarifying the Nexus Requirement for § 924(c)(1) Guilty Pleas – United States v. Gray Introduction United States v. Gray (10th Cir. Apr. 17, 2025) addresses the sufficiency of the factual basis a...
Clarifying Section 1983 Remedies: No Private Right Under § 242 & Limits on Grand Jury and Malicious-Prosecution Claims

Clarifying Section 1983 Remedies: No Private Right Under § 242 & Limits on Grand Jury and Malicious-Prosecution Claims

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Clarifying Section 1983 Remedies: No Private Right Under § 242 & Limits on Grand Jury and Malicious-Prosecution Claims Introduction Phillips v. Rose (10th Cir. Apr. 17, 2025) arises from an incident...
Actual Innocence Does Not Excuse AEDPA’s Statute of Limitations: Stevens v. Rankins

Actual Innocence Does Not Excuse AEDPA’s Statute of Limitations: Stevens v. Rankins

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Actual Innocence Does Not Excuse AEDPA’s Statute of Limitations: Stevens v. Rankins Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s decision in Stevens v. Rankins reaffirms the rigorous one-year statute of...
United States v. McKinney: Law-of-the-Case Bars Re-Litigation of Franks Suppression Claims on §2255

United States v. McKinney: Law-of-the-Case Bars Re-Litigation of Franks Suppression Claims on §2255

Date: Apr 18, 2025
United States v. McKinney: Law-of-the-Case Bars Re-Litigation of Franks Suppression Claims on §2255 Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s April 17, 2025 order denying a...
Unexpected and Instantaneous Loss: Reevaluation of “Sudden” in Homeowners’ Insurance Coverage

Unexpected and Instantaneous Loss: Reevaluation of “Sudden” in Homeowners’ Insurance Coverage

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Unexpected and Instantaneous Loss: Reevaluation of “Sudden” in Homeowners’ Insurance Coverage Introduction Catalano v. Allstate Indemnity Company (10th Cir. 2025) confronts the meaning of “sudden and...
Clarifying Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Standards for Investigative Misconduct and Pre-Indictment Delay: Crothers v. Carr

Clarifying Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Standards for Investigative Misconduct and Pre-Indictment Delay: Crothers v. Carr

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Clarifying Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Standards for Investigative Misconduct and Pre-Indictment Delay: Crothers v. Carr Introduction Crothers v. Carr (10th Cir. 2025) addresses a pair of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert