Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Employer's Age-Animosity in ADEA Claims: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Da v. Minshall

Establishing Employer's Age-Animosity in ADEA Claims: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Da v. Minshall

Date: Mar 29, 2003
Establishing Employer's Age-Animosity in ADEA Claims: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Da v. Minshall Introduction The case of David Minshall versus McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Company, doing business as...
Establishing the Anniversary Method for AEDPA §2255 Limitations: Insights from United States v. Hurst

Establishing the Anniversary Method for AEDPA §2255 Limitations: Insights from United States v. Hurst

Date: Mar 22, 2003
Establishing the Anniversary Method for AEDPA §2255 Limitations: Insights from United States v. Hurst Introduction The case of United States v. Jerry D. Hurst, 322 F.3d 1256 (10th Cir. 2003),...
Strict Enforcement of the Confrontation Clause: Tenth Circuit Establishes High Standard for Witness Availability under AEDPA

Strict Enforcement of the Confrontation Clause: Tenth Circuit Establishes High Standard for Witness Availability under AEDPA

Date: Mar 19, 2003
Strict Enforcement of the Confrontation Clause: Tenth Circuit Establishes High Standard for Witness Availability under AEDPA Introduction The case of Kenneth Mark Cook v. Da (323 F.3d 825) represents...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Bestfoods Principle: Minority Shareholders Not Liable as Operators or Arrangers under CERCLA – Raytheon Constructors Inc. v. ASARCO Inc.

Tenth Circuit Upholds Bestfoods Principle: Minority Shareholders Not Liable as Operators or Arrangers under CERCLA – Raytheon Constructors Inc. v. ASARCO Inc.

Date: Mar 12, 2003
Tenth Circuit Upholds Bestfoods Principle: Minority Shareholders Not Liable as Operators or Arrangers under CERCLA – Raytheon Constructors Inc. v. ASARCO Inc. Introduction The case of Raytheon...
Reinforcement of Entrapment Doctrine and Standards for Jury Impartiality in United States v. Scull and Bono

Reinforcement of Entrapment Doctrine and Standards for Jury Impartiality in United States v. Scull and Bono

Date: Mar 12, 2003
Reinforcement of Entrapment Doctrine and Standards for Jury Impartiality in United States v. Scull and Bono Introduction In the case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Scull...
Standing in First Amendment Challenges: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Ward v. Utah

Standing in First Amendment Challenges: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Ward v. Utah

Date: Mar 11, 2003
Standing in First Amendment Challenges: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Ward v. Utah Introduction In Eric Ward v. The State of Utah, 321 F.3d 1263 (10th Cir. 2003), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Establishing Precedent on Qualified Immunity in Academic Retaliation Cases: Hulen v. CSU

Establishing Precedent on Qualified Immunity in Academic Retaliation Cases: Hulen v. CSU

Date: Mar 5, 2003
Establishing Precedent on Qualified Immunity in Academic Retaliation Cases: Hulen v. CSU Introduction The case of Myron Hulen, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert Yates, Daniel D. Costello,...
Jurisdictional Clarity in Clean Air Act Enforcement: USWA v. Oregon Steel Mills

Jurisdictional Clarity in Clean Air Act Enforcement: USWA v. Oregon Steel Mills

Date: Mar 4, 2003
Jurisdictional Clarity in Clean Air Act Enforcement: USWA v. Oregon Steel Mills Introduction The case of United Steelworkers of America (USWA) v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.; CFI Steel, L.P., d/b/a...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Validity of Stock Transfer Restrictions in JOAs under Utah Law in Tribune Publishing v. MediaNews Group

Tenth Circuit Upholds Validity of Stock Transfer Restrictions in JOAs under Utah Law in Tribune Publishing v. MediaNews Group

Date: Feb 25, 2003
Tenth Circuit Upholds Validity of Stock Transfer Restrictions in JOAs under Utah Law in Tribune Publishing v. MediaNews Group Introduction The case of SALT LAKE TRIBUNE PUBLISHING COMPANY, LLC,...
10th Circuit Clarifies Irreparable Harm Standard in Environmental Law: Greater Protection for Threatened Species

10th Circuit Clarifies Irreparable Harm Standard in Environmental Law: Greater Protection for Threatened Species

Date: Feb 21, 2003
10th Circuit Clarifies Irreparable Harm Standard in Environmental Law: Greater Protection for Threatened Species Introduction In Greater Yellowstone Coalition; Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance,...
Brown v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration: Emphasizing Detailed ALJ Findings in Disability Determinations

Brown v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration: Emphasizing Detailed ALJ Findings in Disability Determinations

Date: Feb 20, 2003
Brown v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration: Emphasizing Detailed ALJ Findings in Disability Determinations Introduction The case of Martha D. Brown v. Commissioner of the Social...
Federal Question Jurisdiction in State-Created Causes: Union Pacific v. Nicodemus and Morris

Federal Question Jurisdiction in State-Created Causes: Union Pacific v. Nicodemus and Morris

Date: Feb 14, 2003
Federal Question Jurisdiction in State-Created Causes: Union Pacific v. Nicodemus and Morris Introduction In the landmark case of Warren D. Nicodemus, Trustee of the Warren D. Nicodemus Living Trust...
Extending PIP Benefits to Pedestrians: Analysis of State Farm v. Clark

Extending PIP Benefits to Pedestrians: Analysis of State Farm v. Clark

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Extending PIP Benefits to Pedestrians: Analysis of State Farm v. Clark Introduction In the landmark case of Ricky Eugene Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, the United States...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming Commission Establishes No Private Right of Action Under IGRA

Affirmation of Dismissal in Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming Commission Establishes No Private Right of Action Under IGRA

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Affirmation of Dismissal in Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming Commission Establishes No Private Right of Action Under IGRA Introduction The case of Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming Commission, decided...
Protected Property Interests and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain Rural Electric Association

Protected Property Interests and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain Rural Electric Association

Date: Feb 11, 2003
Protected Property Interests and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain Rural Electric Association Introduction The case of Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain...
Affirmation of Judicial Absolute Immunity in §1983 Claims: Ledbetter v. City of Topeka

Affirmation of Judicial Absolute Immunity in §1983 Claims: Ledbetter v. City of Topeka

Date: Feb 7, 2003
Affirmation of Judicial Absolute Immunity in §1983 Claims: Ledbetter v. City of Topeka Introduction In the case of Joseph R. Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, Kansas, decided by the United States Court of...
Establishing Racial Discrimination Standards in Airline Customer Service under 42 U.S.C. §1981: Commentary on Sawyer and Fuller v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Establishing Racial Discrimination Standards in Airline Customer Service under 42 U.S.C. §1981: Commentary on Sawyer and Fuller v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Date: Feb 6, 2003
Establishing Racial Discrimination Standards in Airline Customer Service under 42 U.S.C. §1981: Commentary on Sawyer and Fuller v. Southwest Airlines Co. Introduction The case of Louise Sawyer and...
Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Standards: Consent, Curtilage, and Protective Sweeps in United States v. Cavely

Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Standards: Consent, Curtilage, and Protective Sweeps in United States v. Cavely

Date: Feb 5, 2003
Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Standards: Consent, Curtilage, and Protective Sweeps in United States v. Cavely Introduction United States of America v. Everett Lee Cavely is a significant case...
Cumulative Error in Capital Cases: The Cargle v. Warden Judgment

Cumulative Error in Capital Cases: The Cargle v. Warden Judgment

Date: Jan 28, 2003
Cumulative Error in Capital Cases: The Cargle v. Warden Judgment Introduction The case of Marcus L. Cargle v. Mike Mullin, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary (317 F.3d 1196) serves as a pivotal...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies ADA Employer Definition in Trainor v. Apollo Metal Specialties

Tenth Circuit Clarifies ADA Employer Definition in Trainor v. Apollo Metal Specialties

Date: Jan 24, 2003
Tenth Circuit Clarifies ADA Employer Definition in Trainor v. Apollo Metal Specialties Introduction In Randy Trainor v. Apollo Metal Specialties, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert