Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Standing to Challenge Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Valdez Hocker

Establishing Standing to Challenge Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Valdez Hocker

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Establishing Standing to Challenge Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Valdez Hocker Introduction United States v. Jesus Valdez Hocker, 333 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case...
Reversing Dismissal of In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff: Insights from Olsen v. Mapes et al.

Reversing Dismissal of In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff: Insights from Olsen v. Mapes et al.

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Reversing Dismissal of In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff: Insights from Olsen v. Mapes et al. Introduction In the appellate case of Tom Olsen and Naomi Olsen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Paul Mapes; Robert...
Affirmation of Exhaustion Requirement for §1983 Claims in Private Prisons: Beaudry v. Corrections Corporation of America

Affirmation of Exhaustion Requirement for §1983 Claims in Private Prisons: Beaudry v. Corrections Corporation of America

Date: Jun 18, 2003
Affirmation of Exhaustion Requirement for §1983 Claims in Private Prisons: Beaudry v. Corrections Corporation of America Introduction In the landmark case of Beaudry v. Corrections Corporation of...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Clarification on Excessive Force in Christiansen v. City of Tulsa

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Clarification on Excessive Force in Christiansen v. City of Tulsa

Date: Jun 17, 2003
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Clarification on Excessive Force in Christiansen v. City of Tulsa Introduction Christiansen v. City of Tulsa, 332 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case...
Criteria for Treating Physician’s Opinions in SSI Disability Determinations

Criteria for Treating Physician’s Opinions in SSI Disability Determinations

Date: Jun 11, 2003
Criteria for Treating Physician’s Opinions in SSI Disability Determinations Introduction The case of Pauline Doyal v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Employment Termination and Racial Discrimination: Burns v. Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County

Employment Termination and Racial Discrimination: Burns v. Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County

Date: Jun 4, 2003
Employment Termination and Racial Discrimination: Burns v. Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County Introduction The case of Rick D. Burns v. Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County,...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Context of Mental Capacity: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Context of Mental Capacity: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation

Date: Jun 4, 2003
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Context of Mental Capacity: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation Introduction In the case of William J. Spahr, by and through his co-conservators Steven D. Spahr...
Enhancing Procedural Fairness in Disability Benefit Assessments: Angel v. Barnhart

Enhancing Procedural Fairness in Disability Benefit Assessments: Angel v. Barnhart

Date: May 31, 2003
Enhancing Procedural Fairness in Disability Benefit Assessments: Angel v. Barnhart Introduction Sarah Angel, the plaintiff-appellant, challenged the denial of her applications for Disability...
Strengthened Objective Consumer Expectations Standard in Utah Strict Products Liability: The Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Brown v. Sears

Strengthened Objective Consumer Expectations Standard in Utah Strict Products Liability: The Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Brown v. Sears

Date: May 15, 2003
Strengthened Objective Consumer Expectations Standard in Utah Strict Products Liability: The Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Brown v. Sears Introduction The case of Chani Brown, individually and as...
Limitation of the Commercial Activity Exception under FSIA: SOUTHWAY v. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

Limitation of the Commercial Activity Exception under FSIA: SOUTHWAY v. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

Date: May 14, 2003
Limitation of the Commercial Activity Exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: SOUTHWAY v. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA Introduction The case of Southway T. Southway, Douglas Houghton, and...
De Novo Review Mandated for "Deemed Denials" in ERISA Claims: Gilbertson v. AlliedSignal

De Novo Review Mandated for "Deemed Denials" in ERISA Claims: Gilbertson v. AlliedSignal

Date: May 7, 2003
De Novo Review Mandated for "Deemed Denials" in ERISA Claims: Gilbertson v. AlliedSignal Introduction Gilbertson v. AlliedSignal, Inc. and Life Insurance Company of North America, 328 F.3d 625 (10th...
Reaffirmation of Limited Taxpayer Standing and Eleventh Amendment Protections in State Bond Issuance Cases

Reaffirmation of Limited Taxpayer Standing and Eleventh Amendment Protections in State Bond Issuance Cases

Date: May 7, 2003
Reaffirmation of Limited Taxpayer Standing and Eleventh Amendment Protections in State Bond Issuance Cases Introduction The case of A.E. Higganbotham v. State of Oklahoma presents a significant...
United States v. Cisneros: Affirming District Courts' Authority to Revoke Magistrate Judges' Release Orders under the Bail Reform Act

United States v. Cisneros: Affirming District Courts' Authority to Revoke Magistrate Judges' Release Orders under the Bail Reform Act

Date: May 7, 2003
United States v. Cisneros: Affirming District Courts' Authority to Revoke Magistrate Judges' Release Orders under the Bail Reform Act Introduction United States v. Lorena Cisneros, 328 F.3d 610 (10th...
Roska v. Peterson: Affirming Parental Due Process Rights in Child Custody Proceedings

Roska v. Peterson: Affirming Parental Due Process Rights in Child Custody Proceedings

Date: Apr 30, 2003
Roska v. Peterson: Affirming Parental Due Process Rights in Child Custody Proceedings Introduction In Roska v. Peterson, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir. 2003), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Qualified Immunity in Prison Officials: Verdecia v. Adams et al. (10th Cir. 2003)

Qualified Immunity in Prison Officials: Verdecia v. Adams et al. (10th Cir. 2003)

Date: Apr 30, 2003
Qualified Immunity in Prison Officials: Verdecia v. Adams et al. (10th Cir. 2003) Introduction Heriberto Verdecia v. Officer Adams, U.S.P., Florence, CO; D. Pruyne, Officer, U.S.P., Florence, CO;...
Affirmation of Default Judgment Enforcement and Supplemental Jurisdiction in Discovery Sanctions: OLCOTT v. DELAWARE FLOOD CO.

Affirmation of Default Judgment Enforcement and Supplemental Jurisdiction in Discovery Sanctions: OLCOTT v. DELAWARE FLOOD CO.

Date: Apr 25, 2003
Affirmation of Default Judgment Enforcement and Supplemental Jurisdiction in Discovery Sanctions: OLCOTT v. DELAWARE FLOOD COmpany Introduction The case of Bernard OLCOTT v. DELAWARE FLOOD COmpany...
Affirming the Federal Prosecution of Bribery under the Travel Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Welch and Johnson

Affirming the Federal Prosecution of Bribery under the Travel Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Welch and Johnson

Date: Apr 23, 2003
Affirming the Federal Prosecution of Bribery under the Travel Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Welch and Johnson Introduction The case of United States of America v. Thomas K. Welch...
Reaffirming the Gatekeeper Role: Daubert Standard in DODGE v. COTTER CORP.

Reaffirming the Gatekeeper Role: Daubert Standard in DODGE v. COTTER CORP.

Date: Apr 23, 2003
Reaffirming the Gatekeeper Role: Daubert Standard in DODGE v. COTTER CORP. Introduction DODGE v. COTTER CORPoration, 328 F.3d 1212 (10th Cir. 2003), represents a pivotal appellate decision...
Retaliation under Title VII: Causation and Adverse Actions Reexamined in Wells v. Colorado DOT

Retaliation under Title VII: Causation and Adverse Actions Reexamined in Wells v. Colorado DOT

Date: Apr 19, 2003
Retaliation under Title VII: Causation and Adverse Actions Reexamined in Wells v. Colorado DOT Introduction Wells v. Colorado Department of Transportation is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction: Tenth Circuit Reverses Habeas Corpus Relief in Darks v. Mullin

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction: Tenth Circuit Reverses Habeas Corpus Relief in Darks v. Mullin

Date: Apr 12, 2003
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction: Tenth Circuit Reverses Habeas Corpus Relief in Darks v. Mullin Introduction In the case of Tyrone P. Darks v. Mike Mullin, Warden, Oklahoma State...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert