Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Presumption of Prejudice in Appeals: United States v. Snitz

Presumption of Prejudice in Appeals: United States v. Snitz

Date: Sep 5, 2003
Presumption of Prejudice in Appeals: United States v. Snitz Introduction United States of America v. Robert J. Snitz, 342 F.3d 1154 (10th Cir. 2003), marks a significant development in appellate law...
Affirmation of Dismissal for Non-Compliance and Discovery Failures in Juvenile Abuse Litigation

Affirmation of Dismissal for Non-Compliance and Discovery Failures in Juvenile Abuse Litigation

Date: Sep 4, 2003
Affirmation of Dismissal for Non-Compliance and Discovery Failures in Juvenile Abuse Litigation Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, in a decision rendered on...
Adams v. Kinder-Morgan: Reinforcing PSLRA Pleading Standards for Securities Fraud and Control Person Liability

Adams v. Kinder-Morgan: Reinforcing PSLRA Pleading Standards for Securities Fraud and Control Person Liability

Date: Aug 30, 2003
Adams v. Kinder-Morgan: Reinforcing PSLRA Pleading Standards for Securities Fraud and Control Person Liability Introduction Case: James E. Adams; Stanley R. Lamb; Anthony Vartuli, on behalf of...
Reaffirming Tribal Sovereignty: Tenth Circuit Upholds Immunity from State Fuel Taxation in Winnebago Tribe v. Stovall

Reaffirming Tribal Sovereignty: Tenth Circuit Upholds Immunity from State Fuel Taxation in Winnebago Tribe v. Stovall

Date: Aug 29, 2003
Reaffirming Tribal Sovereignty: Tenth Circuit Upholds Immunity from State Fuel Taxation in Winnebago Tribe v. Stovall Introduction The case of Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska et al. v. Carla J. Stovall...
Doebele v. Sprint: Refining ADA's "Regarded As" Disability and Retaliation Framework

Doebele v. Sprint: Refining ADA's "Regarded As" Disability and Retaliation Framework

Date: Aug 29, 2003
Doebele v. Sprint: Refining ADA's "Regarded As" Disability and Retaliation Framework Introduction Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Company and Sprint Spectrum, L.P., 342 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir....
Clarifying Culpability Standards in Felony Murder: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Workman v. Mullin

Clarifying Culpability Standards in Felony Murder: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Workman v. Mullin

Date: Aug 27, 2003
Clarifying Culpability Standards in Felony Murder: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in Workman v. Mullin Introduction The case of Windel Ray Workman versus Mike Mullin, Warden of the Oklahoma State...
United States v. Da: Clarifying the Bruton Rule and its Implications in Joint Trials

United States v. Da: Clarifying the Bruton Rule and its Implications in Joint Trials

Date: Aug 20, 2003
United States v. Da: Clarifying the Bruton Rule and its Implications in Joint Trials Introduction In the seminal case of United States v. Da, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Eighth Amendment Accountability for Delegated Supervisory Officials Upheld: Smith v. Cochran

Eighth Amendment Accountability for Delegated Supervisory Officials Upheld: Smith v. Cochran

Date: Aug 13, 2003
Eighth Amendment Accountability for Delegated Supervisory Officials Upheld: Smith v. Cochran Introduction The case of Pamela Smith v. Don Cochran addressed significant issues surrounding the...
Admissibility of Crime-Scene Photographs Undermines Fundamental Fairness in Death Penalty Sentencing

Admissibility of Crime-Scene Photographs Undermines Fundamental Fairness in Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: Aug 13, 2003
Admissibility of Crime-Scene Photographs Undermines Fundamental Fairness in Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction In the case of Brian Spears and Dudley Powell v. Mike Mullin, Warden, Oklahoma State...
Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Crumpacker v. State of Kansas

Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Crumpacker v. State of Kansas

Date: Aug 9, 2003
Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Crumpacker v. State of Kansas Introduction In the appellate case Jill M. Crumpacker v. State of Kansas,...
Comprehensive Commentary on Barnett v. Shidler: Establishing the Holistic Approach to Trade Secret Protection

Comprehensive Commentary on Barnett v. Shidler: Establishing the Holistic Approach to Trade Secret Protection

Date: Aug 7, 2003
Comprehensive Commentary on Barnett v. Shidler: Establishing the Holistic Approach to Trade Secret Protection Introduction In the landmark case of Harvey Barnett, Inc. v. Ann Shidler et al., decided...
Qualified Immunity and Police Use of Deadly Force: Analysis of Carr v. City of Oklahoma City

Qualified Immunity and Police Use of Deadly Force: Analysis of Carr v. City of Oklahoma City

Date: Aug 5, 2003
Qualified Immunity and Police Use of Deadly Force: Analysis of Carr v. City of Oklahoma City Introduction Carr v. City of Oklahoma City is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Clarifying 'Adverse Employment Action' under Title VII: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Stinnett v. Safeway, Inc.

Clarifying 'Adverse Employment Action' under Title VII: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Stinnett v. Safeway, Inc.

Date: Aug 2, 2003
Clarifying 'Adverse Employment Action' under Title VII: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Stinnett v. Safeway, Inc. Introduction In Michelle Stinnett v. Safeway, Inc., 337 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir. 2003),...
Establishing ADA Protections in Hiring Practices: Davidson v. America Online, Inc.

Establishing ADA Protections in Hiring Practices: Davidson v. America Online, Inc.

Date: Jul 31, 2003
Establishing ADA Protections in Hiring Practices: Davidson v. America Online, Inc. Introduction The case of George M. Davidson v. America Online, Inc. (337 F.3d 1179) serves as a pivotal moment in...
Clarifying the Scope of Collateral Attack Waivers: Application to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Motions

Clarifying the Scope of Collateral Attack Waivers: Application to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Motions

Date: Jul 30, 2003
Clarifying the Scope of Collateral Attack Waivers: Application to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Motions Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jesus Chavez-Salais, adjudicated by the United...
Mandatory Parental Consent for Medical Examinations in Head Start Programs Under Fourth Amendment Protections

Mandatory Parental Consent for Medical Examinations in Head Start Programs Under Fourth Amendment Protections

Date: Jul 22, 2003
Mandatory Parental Consent for Medical Examinations in Head Start Programs Under Fourth Amendment Protections Introduction The case of Jack Dubbs, et al. v. Head Start, Inc. (336 F.3d 1194)...
10th Circuit Establishes Limits on §301 LMRA Preemption: Remand of Employment Termination Claims to State Court

10th Circuit Establishes Limits on §301 LMRA Preemption: Remand of Employment Termination Claims to State Court

Date: Jul 17, 2003
10th Circuit Establishes Limits on §301 LMRA Preemption: Remand of Employment Termination Claims to State Court Introduction In the landmark case of Donald Karnes v. The Boeing Company, decided on...
Integration Mandate Under ADA: Oklahoma HCBS Prescription Cap Reversed

Integration Mandate Under ADA: Oklahoma HCBS Prescription Cap Reversed

Date: Jul 16, 2003
Integration Mandate Under ADA: Oklahoma HCBS Prescription Cap Reversed Introduction The case of Katherine Fisher; Earlee Heath; Karol Loy v. Oklahoma Health Care Authority (335 F.3d 1175) addresses...
A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Ringold and Brown

A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Ringold and Brown

Date: Jul 16, 2003
Affirmation of Consensual Encounters and Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: United States v. Ringold and Brown Introduction United States v. Ringold and Brown, 335 F.3d 1168 (10th Cir. 2003), is...
Establishing Interstate Commerce Basis in Online Child Pornography under 18 U.S.C § 2252: Tenth Circuit Upholds Conviction

Establishing Interstate Commerce Basis in Online Child Pornography under 18 U.S.C § 2252: Tenth Circuit Upholds Conviction

Date: Jul 8, 2003
Establishing Interstate Commerce Basis in Online Child Pornography under 18 U.S.C § 2252: Tenth Circuit Upholds Conviction Introduction The case of United States of America v. Randy C. Kimler,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert