Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Standards Under AEDPA in Torres v. Mullin

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Standards Under AEDPA in Torres v. Mullin

Date: Jan 24, 2003
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Standards Under AEDPA in Torres v. Mullin, 317 F.3d 1145 (10th Cir. 2003) Introduction Osbaldo Torres, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted by an Oklahoma jury of two...
Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Burger v. Scott

Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Burger v. Scott

Date: Jan 16, 2003
Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Burger v. Scott Introduction The case of Derek D. Burger v. H.N. Scott, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Expectation of Privacy for Social Guests and Exigent Circumstances in Methamphetamine Manufacturing Cases

Expectation of Privacy for Social Guests and Exigent Circumstances in Methamphetamine Manufacturing Cases

Date: Jan 15, 2003
Expectation of Privacy for Social Guests and Exigent Circumstances in Methamphetamine Manufacturing Cases Introduction In United States v. Joel Dean Rhiger, 315 F.3d 1283 (10th Cir. 2003), the United...
Limiting Vicarious Liability under the Lanham Act: Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen

Limiting Vicarious Liability under the Lanham Act: Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen

Date: Jan 7, 2003
Limiting Vicarious Liability under the Lanham Act: Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen Introduction In the landmark case The Procter & Gamble Company v. Randy L. Haugen, adjudicated by the United States...
Equitable Tolling in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: York v. GaLetka

Equitable Tolling in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: York v. GaLetka

Date: Jan 3, 2003
Equitable Tolling in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: York v. GaLetka Introduction Donald William York v. Hank GaLetka, 314 F.3d 522 (10th Cir. 2003), is a seminal case addressing the application of...
Preferential Transfer and Financial Conduit: Insights from In re Wayne R. Ogden

Preferential Transfer and Financial Conduit: Insights from In re Wayne R. Ogden

Date: Dec 31, 2002
Preferential Transfer and Financial Conduit: Insights from In re Wayne R. Ogden Introduction The case of In re Wayne R. Ogden, Debtor. Steven R. Bailey, Trustee of the Estate of Wayne R. Ogden,...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Class Action Settlement Approval Despite Objector Appeals

Tenth Circuit Upholds Class Action Settlement Approval Despite Objector Appeals

Date: Dec 25, 2002
Tenth Circuit Upholds Class Action Settlement Approval Despite Objector Appeals Introduction In the landmark case of Rutter Wilbanks Corp. v. Shell Oil Co. (314 F.3d 1180, 2002), the United States...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Interpretation of Forum Selection Clauses: Mandatory vs Permissive

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Interpretation of Forum Selection Clauses: Mandatory vs Permissive

Date: Dec 24, 2002
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Interpretation of Forum Selection Clauses: Mandatory vs Permissive Introduction The case of K V Scientific Co., Inc. v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft (BMW)...
Claim Preclusion in Employment Litigation: Insights from Wilkes v. Wyoming Department of Employment Division of Labor Standards

Claim Preclusion in Employment Litigation: Insights from Wilkes v. Wyoming Department of Employment Division of Labor Standards

Date: Dec 24, 2002
Claim Preclusion in Employment Litigation: Insights from Wilkes v. Wyoming Department of Employment Division of Labor Standards Introduction The case of Lorna Wilkes v. Wyoming Department of...
Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Hooper v. Mullin

Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Hooper v. Mullin

Date: Dec 20, 2002
Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Hooper v. Mullin Introduction The case of Michael Edward Hooper v. Mike Mullin, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Enforced Against Intertwined Federal Claims in KENMEN ENGINEERING v. CITY OF UNION

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Enforced Against Intertwined Federal Claims in KENMEN ENGINEERING v. CITY OF UNION

Date: Dec 18, 2002
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Enforced Against Intertwined Federal Claims in KENMEN ENGINEERING v. CITY OF UNION Introduction The case KENMEN ENGINEERING, a partnership composed of Kenneth Miles and Ken...
Defining Employer under the ADA: County Board of Commissioners Lacks Duty to Sheriff's Employees

Defining Employer under the ADA: County Board of Commissioners Lacks Duty to Sheriff's Employees

Date: Dec 13, 2002
Defining Employer under the ADA: County Board of Commissioners Lacks Duty to Sheriff's Employees Introduction The case of Gary Bristol v. Board of County Commissioners of Clear Creek County addresses...
Deliberate Indifference to Mental Health Conditions: Insights from Olsen v. Layton Hills Mall

Deliberate Indifference to Mental Health Conditions: Insights from Olsen v. Layton Hills Mall

Date: Dec 12, 2002
Deliberate Indifference to Mental Health Conditions: Insights from Olsen v. Layton Hills Mall Introduction Carl Kipp Olsen and his family filed a lawsuit against multiple defendants, including...
Gallegos v. United States: Reinforcing the "Knock and Announce" Requirement under 18 U.S.C. § 3109

Gallegos v. United States: Reinforcing the "Knock and Announce" Requirement under 18 U.S.C. § 3109

Date: Dec 12, 2002
Gallegos v. United States: Reinforcing the "Knock and Announce" Requirement under 18 U.S.C. § 3109 Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Gallegos, 314 F.3d 456 (10th Cir. 2002), the...
Reaffirming Procedural Safeguards in Summary Judgment: Murray v. City of Tahlequah

Reaffirming Procedural Safeguards in Summary Judgment: Murray v. City of Tahlequah

Date: Dec 7, 2002
Reaffirming Procedural Safeguards in Summary Judgment: Murray v. City of Tahlequah Introduction In Murray v. City of Tahlequah, 312 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2002), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reed v. Nellcor Puritan Bennett: Upholding Federal Standards in Summary Judgment Procedures

Reed v. Nellcor Puritan Bennett: Upholding Federal Standards in Summary Judgment Procedures

Date: Dec 7, 2002
Reed v. Nellcor Puritan Bennett: Upholding Federal Standards in Summary Judgment Procedures Introduction The case of Mariah V. Reed v. Nellcor Puritan Bennett (312 F.3d 1190) adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Dismissal Sanctions for Attorney Noncompliance: Roger D. Gripe v. City of Enid

Affirmation of Dismissal Sanctions for Attorney Noncompliance: Roger D. Gripe v. City of Enid

Date: Dec 5, 2002
Affirmation of Dismissal Sanctions for Attorney Noncompliance: Roger D. Gripe v. City of Enid Introduction The case of Roger D. Gripe versus the City of Enid, Oklahoma deliberated on the...
Requirement of Specific Special Damages in Utah Defamation Law: Insights from Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P.

Requirement of Specific Special Damages in Utah Defamation Law: Insights from Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P.

Date: Nov 27, 2002
Requirement of Specific Special Damages in Utah Defamation Law: Insights from Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P. Introduction In the landmark case of Computerized Thermal Imaging,...
Mandamus Relief in Enforcement of Zoning Ordinances: County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co. of New Mexico

Mandamus Relief in Enforcement of Zoning Ordinances: County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co. of New Mexico

Date: Nov 27, 2002
Mandamus Relief in Enforcement of Zoning Ordinances: County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co. of New Mexico Introduction The case of County of Santa Fe, New Mexico, v. Public Service Company of New...
Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: A Comprehensive Commentary on Le v. Mullin

Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: A Comprehensive Commentary on Le v. Mullin

Date: Nov 27, 2002
Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: A Comprehensive Commentary on Le v. Mullin (311 F.3d 1002) Introduction The appellate case of Hung Thanh Le v. Mike Mullin,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert