Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

sienkiewicz-v-greif-(uk)-ltd:-upholding-the-fairchild-barker-exception-and-rejecting-the-& Case Commentaries

No Second Bite at the Cherry – The Supreme Court Re-Defines the
Interplay Between Sections 3 and 4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

No Second Bite at the Cherry – The Supreme Court Re-Defines the Interplay Between Sections 3 and 4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Date: Jul 16, 2025
No Second Bite at the Cherry – The Supreme Court Re-Defines the Interplay Between Sections 3 and 4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996 Introduction In Criminal Asset Bureau v Routeback Media AB t/a...
Desai v Wood – No Implied or Constructive Trust over Liability Insurance Proceeds Absent Express Agreement or Segregation

Desai v Wood – No Implied or Constructive Trust over Liability Insurance Proceeds Absent Express Agreement or Segregation

Date: Jul 16, 2025
Desai & Anor v Wood & Anor ([2025] EWCA Civ 906) “No Implied or Constructive Trust over Liability Insurance Proceeds Absent Express Agreement or Segregation” 1. Introduction This Court of Appeal...
“No Estoppel in Proceeds-of-Crime Reviews” – Supreme Court Clarifies Unlimited Re-Opening of Section 3(3) and Section 4 Proceedings

“No Estoppel in Proceeds-of-Crime Reviews” – Supreme Court Clarifies Unlimited Re-Opening of Section 3(3) and Section 4 Proceedings

Date: Jul 16, 2025
“No Estoppel in Proceeds-of-Crime Reviews” – Supreme Court Clarifies Unlimited Re-Opening of Section 3(3) and Section 4 Proceedings Introduction The Supreme Court of Ireland, in Criminal Assets...
The “Zeman Threshold” – Supreme Court Clarifies Cross-Examination Rights and Fresh-Evidence Requirements in Proceeds of Crime Act Reviews

The “Zeman Threshold” – Supreme Court Clarifies Cross-Examination Rights and Fresh-Evidence Requirements in Proceeds of Crime Act Reviews

Date: Jul 16, 2025
The “Zeman Threshold” – Supreme Court Clarifies Cross-Examination Rights and Fresh-Evidence Requirements in Proceeds of Crime Act Reviews Introduction Criminal Asset Bureau v Routeback Media & Harry...
Restricting GAL Cost Entitlements and Joinder in Plenary Proceedings – A Commentary on B v Child & Family Agency [2025] IESC 33

Restricting GAL Cost Entitlements and Joinder in Plenary Proceedings – A Commentary on B v Child & Family Agency [2025] IESC 33

Date: Jul 16, 2025
Restricting GAL Cost Entitlements and Joinder in Plenary Proceedings – A Commentary on B v Child & Family Agency [2025] IESC 33 1. Introduction B v Child & Family Agency (Approved) ([2025] IESC 33)...
MU v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Mandatory Assessment of State Protection & Internal Relocation in Article 3 ECHR Deportation Appeals

MU v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Mandatory Assessment of State Protection & Internal Relocation in Article 3 ECHR Deportation Appeals

Date: Jul 16, 2025
MU v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Mandatory Assessment of State Protection & Internal Relocation in Article 3 ECHR Deportation Appeals Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in MU...
Discovery Before Pleadings & Statutory Supremacy of the Legal Costs Adjudicator – Comment on Flatley & Anor v Novellus Finance Ltd & Ors [2025] IEHC 404

Discovery Before Pleadings & Statutory Supremacy of the Legal Costs Adjudicator – Comment on Flatley & Anor v Novellus Finance Ltd & Ors [2025] IEHC 404

Date: Jul 16, 2025
Discovery Before Pleadings & the Statutory Supremacy of the Legal Costs Adjudicator Commentary on Flatley & Anor v Novellus Finance Ltd & Ors [2025] IEHC 404 1. Introduction Flatley & Anor v Novellus...
Stevens v R – Correcting Confiscation Orders when Defined-Benefit Pensions Have No Market Value: Fairness over Finality

Stevens v R – Correcting Confiscation Orders when Defined-Benefit Pensions Have No Market Value: Fairness over Finality

Date: Jul 16, 2025
Stevens v R – Correcting Confiscation Orders when Defined-Benefit Pensions Have No Market Value: Fairness over Finality 1. Introduction In Stevens, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 1123) the Court of Appeal...
“Severability of Flawed Short-Form Reasons” – A Comment on Vaid v Minister for Justice & Anor [2025] IEHC 389

“Severability of Flawed Short-Form Reasons” – A Comment on Vaid v Minister for Justice & Anor [2025] IEHC 389

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Severability of Flawed Short-Form Reasons” – A Comment on Vaid v Minister for Justice & Anor [2025] IEHC 389 1. Introduction The High Court’s decision in Vaid v Minister for Justice & Anor ([2025]...
Strict Adherence to Statutory Judicial Review under the Planning and Development Act 2000 for Challenges to Derelict-Site Vesting Orders – Commentary on Telstar Investments Ltd v Dublin City Council [2025] IEHC 386

Strict Adherence to Statutory Judicial Review under the Planning and Development Act 2000 for Challenges to Derelict-Site Vesting Orders – Commentary on Telstar Investments Ltd v Dublin City Council [2025] IEHC 386

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Strict Adherence to Statutory Judicial Review under the Planning and Development Act 2000 for Challenges to Derelict-Site Vesting Orders Commentary on Telstar Investments Ltd v Dublin City Council...
Perez v Coombe: High Court Clarifies the Status of Clinical Guidelines and the “Two-Schools-of-Thought” Defence in Irish Medical-Negligence Law

Perez v Coombe: High Court Clarifies the Status of Clinical Guidelines and the “Two-Schools-of-Thought” Defence in Irish Medical-Negligence Law

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Perez v Coombe: High Court Clarifies the Status of Clinical Guidelines and the “Two-Schools-of-Thought” Defence in Irish Medical-Negligence Law 1. Introduction Citation: Perez v Coombe Women &...
Pepper Finance v. Cuffe – Conclusive Land Registry Entries & Admissibility of Litigation-Generated Business Records in Summary Possession Actions

Pepper Finance v. Cuffe – Conclusive Land Registry Entries & Admissibility of Litigation-Generated Business Records in Summary Possession Actions

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Pepper Finance v. Cuffe – Conclusive Land Registry Entries & Admissibility of Litigation-Generated Business Records in Summary Possession Actions 1. Introduction Court: High Court of Ireland  | ...

    “Entitlement-to-Rent” as the Sole Test of Landlord Status under the Residential Tenancies Act 2004 – A Comment on Ó Laoire v. Residential Tenancies Board [2025] IEHC 384

“Entitlement-to-Rent” as the Sole Test of Landlord Status under the Residential Tenancies Act 2004 – A Comment on Ó Laoire v. Residential Tenancies Board [2025] IEHC 384

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Entitlement-to-Rent” as the Sole Test of Landlord Status under the Residential Tenancies Act 2004 – A Comprehensive Commentary on Ó Laoire v. Residential Tenancies Board [2025] IEHC 384 1....
Refusal to Engage with Recommended Supports as Ground for Interim Suspension under Section 60 – A Commentary on Medical Council v PQ [2025] IEHC 390

Refusal to Engage with Recommended Supports as Ground for Interim Suspension under Section 60 – A Commentary on Medical Council v PQ [2025] IEHC 390

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Refusal to Engage with Recommended Supports as Ground for Interim Suspension under Section 60 – A Commentary on Medical Council v PQ [2025] IEHC 390 1. Introduction This commentary analyses the...
“Statutory Enforcement v. Judicial Review” – Procedural Limits Clarified in Malone v GCHL Ltd & Ors [No. 3] ([2025] IEHC 397)

“Statutory Enforcement v. Judicial Review” – Procedural Limits Clarified in Malone v GCHL Ltd & Ors [No. 3] ([2025] IEHC 397)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Statutory Enforcement v. Judicial Review” – Procedural Limits Clarified in Malone v GCHL Ltd & Ors [No. 3] ([2025] IEHC 397) 1. Introduction This third judgment in the long-running environmental...
“Proportional ‘Wasted-Costs’ Orders for Late Amendments” – Commentary on Lobov v McGregor [2025] IEHC 398

“Proportional ‘Wasted-Costs’ Orders for Late Amendments” – Commentary on Lobov v McGregor [2025] IEHC 398

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Proportional ‘Wasted-Costs’ Orders for Late Amendments” – Commentary on Lobov v McGregor [2025] IEHC 398 1. Introduction Lobov v McGregor is a High Court of Ireland decision delivered electronically...
From Rent to Trade: The Exclusive-Possession Test for Emergency Accommodation Income after Hade v Revenue Commissioners

From Rent to Trade: The Exclusive-Possession Test for Emergency Accommodation Income after Hade v Revenue Commissioners

Date: Jul 15, 2025
From Rent to Trade: The Exclusive-Possession Test for Emergency Accommodation Income after Hade v Revenue Commissioners 1. Introduction The High Court decision in Hade v Revenue Commissioners ([2025]...
Todd v Rex ([2025] EWCA Crim 883): Re-affirming the “Relevant Similarity & Temporal Nexus” Test under s.41(3)(c) YJCEA 1999

Todd v Rex ([2025] EWCA Crim 883): Re-affirming the “Relevant Similarity & Temporal Nexus” Test under s.41(3)(c) YJCEA 1999

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Todd v Rex ([2025] EWCA Crim 883): Re-affirming the “Relevant Similarity & Temporal Nexus” Test under s.41(3)(c) Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 1. Introduction Court of Appeal (Criminal...
The Tallentire Principle: Judicial Comment on a Defendant’s Failure to Call a Witness

The Tallentire Principle: Judicial Comment on a Defendant’s Failure to Call a Witness

Date: Jul 15, 2025
The Tallentire Principle: Judicial Comment on a Defendant’s Failure to Call a Witness Introduction Tallentire & Anor v Rex ([2025] EWCA Crim 885) presented the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)...
“Good and Sufficient Reason” Re-Defined: When Public Interest in Systemic Bias Outweighs Planning Certainty – A Commentary on Thomson v. An Bord Pleanála [2025] IESC 31

“Good and Sufficient Reason” Re-Defined: When Public Interest in Systemic Bias Outweighs Planning Certainty – A Commentary on Thomson v. An Bord Pleanála [2025] IESC 31

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Good and Sufficient Reason” Re-Defined: When Public Interest in Systemic Bias Outweighs Planning Certainty – A Commentary on Thomson & anor v. An Bord Pleanála [2025] IESC 31 1. Introduction The...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert