Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

sienkiewicz-v-greif-(uk)-ltd:-upholding-the-fairchild-barker-exception-and-rejecting-the-& Case Commentaries

“Opinion-Not-Construction” Rule for Benchmark-Fraud Cases – A Commentary on Hayes & Palombo ([2025] UKSC 29)

“Opinion-Not-Construction” Rule for Benchmark-Fraud Cases – A Commentary on Hayes & Palombo ([2025] UKSC 29)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“Opinion-Not-Construction” Rule for Benchmark-Fraud Cases A Comprehensive Commentary on Hayes & Palombo ([2025] UKSC 29) 1. Introduction The joined appeals of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo provided the...
“One Balance to Rule Them All” – The Supreme Court Authorises Aggregated Public-Interest Balancing under FOIA 2000

“One Balance to Rule Them All” – The Supreme Court Authorises Aggregated Public-Interest Balancing under FOIA 2000

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“One Balance to Rule Them All” – The Supreme Court Authorises Aggregated Public-Interest Balancing under FOIA 2000 Introduction Department for Business and Trade v The Information Commissioner [2025]...
Beyond the Personal Injuries Guidelines:  A Commentary on Kemmy v. Murray & Tusla [2025] IEHC 421

Beyond the Personal Injuries Guidelines: A Commentary on Kemmy v. Murray & Tusla [2025] IEHC 421

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Beyond the Personal Injuries Guidelines: Kemmy v. Murray & Anor – Establishing an Autonomous Common-Law Framework for Damages in Child Sexual Abuse Claims 1. Introduction In July 2025 the Irish High...
The Foy Principle: Transparency in Redemption Accounting and Familial Attachment as Decisive Factors in Receiver Injunctions

The Foy Principle: Transparency in Redemption Accounting and Familial Attachment as Decisive Factors in Receiver Injunctions

Date: Jul 24, 2025
The Foy Principle: Transparency in Redemption Accounting and Familial Attachment as Decisive Factors in Receiver Injunctions 1. Introduction Foy v O'Connor & BCM Global ASI Ltd ([2025] IEHC 422) is a...

        “Ex Motu Mootness” – The High Court’s Inherent Power to Terminate Proceedings
        Lacking a Live Controversy: A Commentary on Croghan & Ors v Collins & Ors
        ([2025] IEHC 413)

“Ex Motu Mootness” – The High Court’s Inherent Power to Terminate Proceedings Lacking a Live Controversy: A Commentary on Croghan & Ors v Collins & Ors ([2025] IEHC 413)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“Ex Motu Mootness” – The High Court’s Inherent Power to Terminate Proceedings Lacking a Live Controversy Commentary on Croghan & Ors v Collins & Ors (Approved) ([2025] IEHC 413) 1. Introduction...
No Automatic Rent Cesser for COVID-19 Closures in Commercial Leases – Commentary on BVK Elektra 2 Liffey Phase 1 ICAV v Elite Gastrobars Ltd & Anor [2025] IEHC 420

No Automatic Rent Cesser for COVID-19 Closures in Commercial Leases – Commentary on BVK Elektra 2 Liffey Phase 1 ICAV v Elite Gastrobars Ltd & Anor [2025] IEHC 420

Date: Jul 24, 2025
No Automatic Rent Cesser for COVID-19 Closures in Commercial Leases Commentary on BVK Elektra 2 Liffey Phase 1 ICAV v Elite Gastrobars Ltd & Bunker Estates Ltd (High Court, O’Donnell J., 23 July...
Peer-Induced Admissions and the Limits of the Mushtaq Safeguard: A Commentary on Debonsu, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 959

Peer-Induced Admissions and the Limits of the Mushtaq Safeguard: A Commentary on Debonsu, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 959

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Peer-Induced Admissions and the Limits of the Mushtaq Safeguard: Detailed Commentary on Debonsu, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 959) 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Debonsu sharply defines...
“Mind the Guidelines”: Ventaway Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála – High Court Clarifies Duty to Give Express Reasons When Departing from an Inspector on SPPR-Based Issues

“Mind the Guidelines”: Ventaway Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála – High Court Clarifies Duty to Give Express Reasons When Departing from an Inspector on SPPR-Based Issues

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Mind the Guidelines”: Ventaway Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála – High Court Clarifies Duty to Give Express Reasons When Departing from an Inspector on SPPR-Based Issues 1. Introduction The decision of...
“No-Prejudice, Proportionality” Test for Extending Time-Limits in International Protection Judicial Reviews – Comment on P. (Zimbabwe) v. IPAT [2025] IEHC 403

“No-Prejudice, Proportionality” Test for Extending Time-Limits in International Protection Judicial Reviews – Comment on P. (Zimbabwe) v. IPAT [2025] IEHC 403

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“No-Prejudice, Proportionality” Test for Extending Time-Limits in International Protection Judicial Reviews Commentary on P. (Zimbabwe) v. International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Ors [2025] IEHC...

        The “Five-Year Inactivity / Pressing-Exigency” Test:  High Court Applies Kirwan v. Connors to Strike-Out in Nowak v. Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland

The “Five-Year Inactivity / Pressing-Exigency” Test: High Court Applies Kirwan v. Connors to Strike-Out in Nowak v. Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland

Date: Jul 23, 2025
The “Five-Year Inactivity / Pressing-Exigency” Test: High Court Applies Kirwan v. Connors to Strike-Out in Nowak v. Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland 1. Introduction Peter Nowak’s...
Re-affirming the “Exceptional Public Importance” Threshold for Leave-to-Appeal in Protection Cases: Commentary on M.M.S. v. IPAT & Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 409

Re-affirming the “Exceptional Public Importance” Threshold for Leave-to-Appeal in Protection Cases: Commentary on M.M.S. v. IPAT & Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 409

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Re-affirming the “Exceptional Public Importance” Threshold for Leave-to-Appeal in Protection Cases: Commentary on M.M.S. v. The International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Minister for Justice [2025]...
The “Mc Gowan Principles” – Particularity, Consistency and Developer-Control in Irish Planning Judicial Review

The “Mc Gowan Principles” – Particularity, Consistency and Developer-Control in Irish Planning Judicial Review

Date: Jul 23, 2025
The “Mc Gowan Principles” Particularity, Consistency and Developer-Control in Irish Planning Judicial Review 1. Introduction Mc Gowan & Anor v An Coimisiún Pleanála ([2025] IEHC 405) is a significant...
“Harmless-Error & Workability” Doctrine in Climate–Related Planning Litigation: Friends of Killymooney Lough v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 407

“Harmless-Error & Workability” Doctrine in Climate–Related Planning Litigation: Friends of Killymooney Lough v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 407

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Harmless-Error & Workability” Doctrine in Climate–Related Planning Litigation Friends of Killymooney Lough v An Coimisiún Pleanála & Ors [2025] IEHC 407 1. Introduction This High Court decision,...
Cahill v Residential Tenancies Board (IEHC, 2025): The High Court Re-affirms the Absolute and Non-Extendable 21-Day Limit for Section 123 Appeals

Cahill v Residential Tenancies Board (IEHC, 2025): The High Court Re-affirms the Absolute and Non-Extendable 21-Day Limit for Section 123 Appeals

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Cahill v Residential Tenancies Board (IEHC, 2025): The High Court Re-affirms the Absolute and Non-Extendable 21-Day Limit for Section 123 Appeals 1. Introduction In Cahill v Residential Tenancies...
Hegarty v. The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána – The “Distinct-Purpose” Rule and the Reach of s.14(2) Dismissals

Hegarty v. The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána – The “Distinct-Purpose” Rule and the Reach of s.14(2) Dismissals

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Hegarty v. The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána – The “Distinct-Purpose” Rule and the Reach of s.14(2) Dismissals Introduction The Supreme Court of Ireland has delivered a deeply significant...
The Hegarty Doctrine: Supreme Court Affirms Commissioner’s Power to Invoke Section 14(2) After Completion of Garda Disciplinary Proceedings

The Hegarty Doctrine: Supreme Court Affirms Commissioner’s Power to Invoke Section 14(2) After Completion of Garda Disciplinary Proceedings

Date: Jul 23, 2025
The Hegarty Doctrine: Supreme Court Affirms Commissioner’s Power to Invoke Section 14(2) After Completion of Garda Disciplinary Proceedings Introduction In Hegarty v The Commissioner of an Garda...
Broadened Standing to Oppose Common-Law Recognition of Foreign Insolvencies – A Commentary on Vesnin v Queeld Ventures Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 951

Broadened Standing to Oppose Common-Law Recognition of Foreign Insolvencies – A Commentary on Vesnin v Queeld Ventures Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 951

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Broadened Standing to Oppose Common-Law Recognition of Foreign Insolvencies Commentary on Vesnin v Queeld Ventures Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 951 1. Introduction Vesnin v Queeld Ventures Ltd & Ors is...
Galvin v DPP: Distinguishing Ex-Facie and Fact-Sensitive Constitutional Challenges – The Supreme Court Re-Defines the Prematurity Doctrine

Galvin v DPP: Distinguishing Ex-Facie and Fact-Sensitive Constitutional Challenges – The Supreme Court Re-Defines the Prematurity Doctrine

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Galvin v DPP: Distinguishing Ex-Facie and Fact-Sensitive Constitutional Challenges – The Supreme Court Re-Defines the Prematurity Doctrine 1. Introduction Case citation: Galvin v The Director of...
“The Parmar Principles” – Evidential Comparators, Adverse Disclosure Inferences & Appellate Restraint in Race Discrimination Claims

“The Parmar Principles” – Evidential Comparators, Adverse Disclosure Inferences & Appellate Restraint in Race Discrimination Claims

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“The Parmar Principles” – Evidential Comparators, Adverse Disclosure Inferences & Appellate Restraint in Race Discrimination Claims 1. Introduction Leicester City Council v Parmar ([2025] EWCA Civ...
“Prematurity Re-Defined” – Galvin v. DPP & ors: The Supreme Court’s New Framework for Early Constitutional Challenges

“Prematurity Re-Defined” – Galvin v. DPP & ors: The Supreme Court’s New Framework for Early Constitutional Challenges

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Prematurity Re-Defined” – Galvin v. DPP & ors: The Supreme Court’s New Framework for Early Constitutional Challenges 1. Introduction Galvin v The Director of Public Prosecutions & ors ([2025] IESC...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert