Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

all Case Commentaries

Beyond Beveridge: Distress as Non-Corroborative Yet Admissible, and the Primacy of Mutual Corroboration—TH v HM Advocate [2025] HCJAC 46

Beyond Beveridge: Distress as Non-Corroborative Yet Admissible, and the Primacy of Mutual Corroboration—TH v HM Advocate [2025] HCJAC 46

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Beyond Beveridge: Distress as Non-Corroborative Yet Admissible, and the Primacy of Mutual Corroboration—TH v HM Advocate [2025] HCJAC 46 Introduction In TH v His Majesty’s Advocate [2025] HCJAC 46,...
The Billing-Currency Rule for Costs: Costs orders lie in sterling or the solicitors’ billing currency, not the claimant’s “loss currency”

The Billing-Currency Rule for Costs: Costs orders lie in sterling or the solicitors’ billing currency, not the claimant’s “loss currency”

Date: Oct 23, 2025
The Billing-Currency Rule for Costs: Costs orders lie in sterling or the solicitors’ billing currency, not the claimant’s “loss currency” Case: Process & Industrial Developments Ltd v The Federal...
Policy Parity Is Not Legal Parity: Appropriate Assessment at the Discharge Stage for European Sites, but NPPF Ramsar Policy Cannot Override Vested Outline Permissions

Policy Parity Is Not Legal Parity: Appropriate Assessment at the Discharge Stage for European Sites, but NPPF Ramsar Policy Cannot Override Vested Outline Permissions

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Policy Parity Is Not Legal Parity: Appropriate Assessment at the Discharge Stage for European Sites, but NPPF Ramsar Policy Cannot Override Vested Outline Permissions Introduction This Supreme Court...
R v WCU [2025] EWCA Crim 1414: Reaffirming the “exceptional” threshold for 30+ year sentences, tightening late guilty plea credit, and correcting the use of Special Custodial Sentences alongside Extended Sentences

R v WCU [2025] EWCA Crim 1414: Reaffirming the “exceptional” threshold for 30+ year sentences, tightening late guilty plea credit, and correcting the use of Special Custodial Sentences alongside Extended Sentences

Date: Oct 23, 2025
R v WCU [2025] EWCA Crim 1414: Reaffirming the “exceptional” threshold for 30+ year sentences, tightening late guilty plea credit, and correcting the use of Special Custodial Sentences alongside...
New Latitude in AIE Statutory Appeals and the “Moldova Effect” on AIE Fees: High Court Refers Post‑MOP Question to the CJEU

New Latitude in AIE Statutory Appeals and the “Moldova Effect” on AIE Fees: High Court Refers Post‑MOP Question to the CJEU

Date: Oct 23, 2025
New Latitude in AIE Statutory Appeals and the “Moldova Effect” on AIE Fees: High Court Refers Post‑MOP Question to the CJEU Introduction This commentary examines the High Court of Ireland’s decision...
Post‑Kirwan Strike-Out and Five‑Year Inactivity: High Court consolidates Order 19 (2023) powers to dismiss dormant mortgage litigation and vacate lis pendens

Post‑Kirwan Strike-Out and Five‑Year Inactivity: High Court consolidates Order 19 (2023) powers to dismiss dormant mortgage litigation and vacate lis pendens

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Post‑Kirwan Strike-Out and Five‑Year Inactivity: High Court consolidates Order 19 (2023) powers to dismiss dormant mortgage litigation and vacate lis pendens Introduction In Cullen v Start Mortgages...
High Court clarifies that individuals cannot mount freestanding transposition challenges; a three‑step standing test under s.87(10) EPA Act and the limits of actio popularis in environmental judicial review

High Court clarifies that individuals cannot mount freestanding transposition challenges; a three‑step standing test under s.87(10) EPA Act and the limits of actio popularis in environmental judicial review

Date: Oct 22, 2025
High Court clarifies that individuals cannot mount freestanding transposition challenges; a three‑step standing test under s.87(10) EPA Act and the limits of actio popularis in environmental judicial...
Old Plan Policies Survive during s.31 Draft Direction where they 'Correspond' to the New Plan; Court Sets Six-Factor Test for Declaratory Relief and Reaffirms Harmless-Error Discretion in Renewable Energy Consents

Old Plan Policies Survive during s.31 Draft Direction where they 'Correspond' to the New Plan; Court Sets Six-Factor Test for Declaratory Relief and Reaffirms Harmless-Error Discretion in Renewable Energy Consents

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Old Plan Policies Survive during s.31 Draft Direction where they 'Correspond' to the New Plan; Court Sets Six-Factor Test for Declaratory Relief and Reaffirms Harmless-Error Discretion in Renewable...
Reserved Lifetime Residence and Income Create “Settled Property” for CGT: High Court Reaffirms Keegan in O’Dwyer v Revenue Commissioners [2025] IEHC 490

Reserved Lifetime Residence and Income Create “Settled Property” for CGT: High Court Reaffirms Keegan in O’Dwyer v Revenue Commissioners [2025] IEHC 490

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Reserved Lifetime Residence and Income Create “Settled Property” for CGT: High Court Reaffirms Keegan in O’Dwyer v Revenue Commissioners [2025] IEHC 490 Introduction In O’Dwyer v The Revenue...
“Reasonably Required” Means Already Known: High Court Clarifies that a Valid s.865 TCA Repayment Claim May Rely on Revenue-Held PAYE Data

“Reasonably Required” Means Already Known: High Court Clarifies that a Valid s.865 TCA Repayment Claim May Rely on Revenue-Held PAYE Data

Date: Oct 22, 2025
“Reasonably Required” Means Already Known: High Court Clarifies that a Valid s.865 TCA Repayment Claim May Rely on Revenue-Held PAYE Data Introduction In McNamara [Deceased] v The Revenue...
CPR 52.19 costs caps refused where service-charge recoupment would shift unrecovered appeal costs onto non‑appellant leaseholders

CPR 52.19 costs caps refused where service-charge recoupment would shift unrecovered appeal costs onto non‑appellant leaseholders

Date: Oct 22, 2025
CPR 52.19 costs caps refused where service-charge recoupment would shift unrecovered appeal costs onto non‑appellant leaseholders Introduction This commentary examines the England and Wales Court of...
Cummer Coaches: Scheduled Public Bus Services Are Not “Qualifying Persons” for Touring Coach VAT Refunds; “Contracts for Group Transport” Means Multiple Group-Tourist Contracts

Cummer Coaches: Scheduled Public Bus Services Are Not “Qualifying Persons” for Touring Coach VAT Refunds; “Contracts for Group Transport” Means Multiple Group-Tourist Contracts

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Cummer Coaches: Scheduled Public Bus Services Are Not “Qualifying Persons” for Touring Coach VAT Refunds; “Contracts for Group Transport” Means Multiple Group-Tourist Contracts Introduction This...
Egregious contempt and retention intentions do not bar restorative orders: High Court mandates full remediation under s.160 for intensified unauthorised quarrying

Egregious contempt and retention intentions do not bar restorative orders: High Court mandates full remediation under s.160 for intensified unauthorised quarrying

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Egregious contempt and retention intentions do not bar restorative orders: High Court mandates full remediation under s.160 for intensified unauthorised quarrying Case: Bencik & Anor v Hilltop...
School Exclusions: Governors’ Policy and DfE Guidance Set the Legal Test; Behaviour Policies Cannot Elevate the Threshold — Immaterial Errors and High‑Intensity Review Clarified in SAG v Governing Body of Winchmore School [2025] EWCA Civ 1335

School Exclusions: Governors’ Policy and DfE Guidance Set the Legal Test; Behaviour Policies Cannot Elevate the Threshold — Immaterial Errors and High‑Intensity Review Clarified in SAG v Governing Body of Winchmore School [2025] EWCA Civ 1335

Date: Oct 22, 2025
School Exclusions: Governors’ Policy and DfE Guidance Set the Legal Test; Behaviour Policies Cannot Elevate the Threshold — Immaterial Errors and High‑Intensity Review Clarified Case: SAG, R (On the...
Onuzi v SSHD: FTT’s role under s 40(3) confirmed as public-law review of causation; prolonged identity deception ordinarily material to naturalisation

Onuzi v SSHD: FTT’s role under s 40(3) confirmed as public-law review of causation; prolonged identity deception ordinarily material to naturalisation

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Onuzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1337: FTT’s role under s 40(3) confirmed as public-law review of causation; prolonged identity deception ordinarily material to...
Automatic cessation of the main homelessness duty on acceptance of a Part VI offer; section 184 does not govern discharge decisions; challenges must run through the Part VII review/appeal scheme

Automatic cessation of the main homelessness duty on acceptance of a Part VI offer; section 184 does not govern discharge decisions; challenges must run through the Part VII review/appeal scheme

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Automatic cessation of the main homelessness duty on acceptance of a Part VI offer; section 184 does not govern discharge decisions; challenges must run through the Part VII review/appeal scheme...
JK [2025] EWCA Civ 1309 — Local authorities may use the parens patriae jurisdiction to secure a British child’s return from a non‑Contracting State notwithstanding an intention to issue care proceedings (Re M “sufficiently compelling” test affirmed; FLA 1986 largely irrelevant)

JK [2025] EWCA Civ 1309 — Local authorities may use the parens patriae jurisdiction to secure a British child’s return from a non‑Contracting State notwithstanding an intention to issue care proceedings (Re M “sufficiently compelling” test affirmed; FLA 1986 largely irrelevant)

Date: Oct 22, 2025
JK [2025] EWCA Civ 1309: Local authorities can secure a British child’s return under the inherent jurisdiction even where care proceedings are intended; Family Law Act 1986 largely irrelevant to...
Late Quantum-Phase Amendments and Litigation Holds: The Court of Appeal’s Four‑Stage Prejudice Analysis in ENRC v Dechert & SFO

Late Quantum-Phase Amendments and Litigation Holds: The Court of Appeal’s Four‑Stage Prejudice Analysis in ENRC v Dechert & SFO

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Late Quantum-Phase Amendments and Litigation Holds: The Court of Appeal’s Four‑Stage Prejudice Analysis in ENRC v Dechert & SFO Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s judgment in...
Bradley v Abacus: Court of Appeal confines s.27A review to the “no reasonable landlord” test and clarifies the two‑stage allocation of service charge items

Bradley v Abacus: Court of Appeal confines s.27A review to the “no reasonable landlord” test and clarifies the two‑stage allocation of service charge items

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Bradley v Abacus: Court of Appeal confines s.27A review to the “no reasonable landlord” test and clarifies the two‑stage allocation of service charge items Introduction This Court of Appeal decision...
Blake & Ors v Fox: Court of Appeal reasserts Dingle for serious-harm causation, adopts “material contribution” for specific losses, and clarifies mitigation and media republication in libel

Blake & Ors v Fox: Court of Appeal reasserts Dingle for serious-harm causation, adopts “material contribution” for specific losses, and clarifies mitigation and media republication in libel

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Blake & Ors v Fox: Court of Appeal reasserts Dingle for serious-harm causation, adopts “material contribution” for specific losses, and clarifies mitigation and media republication in libel...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert