Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Application of Paragraph 340 in Asylum Cases: STARRED AH v. Secretary of State

Clarifying the Application of Paragraph 340 in Asylum Cases: STARRED AH v. Secretary of State

Date: Feb 16, 2000
Clarifying the Application of Paragraph 340 in Asylum Cases: STARRED AH v. Secretary of State Introduction The case of STARRED AH (Paragraph 340 of HC 395, Cooperation) (Algeria) ([2000] UKIAT...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Sex Discrimination Litigation: Smith v. Zeneca (2000) EAT 1450

Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Sex Discrimination Litigation: Smith v. Zeneca (2000) EAT 1450

Date: Feb 10, 2000
Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Sex Discrimination Litigation: Smith v. Zeneca (2000) EAT 1450 Introduction Smith v. Zeneca (Agrochemicals) Ltd ([2000] UKEAT 1450_98_0902) is a pivotal...
Capital Contributions vs. Loans in Company Liquidation: The Privy Council's Ruling in Kellar v. Williams

Capital Contributions vs. Loans in Company Liquidation: The Privy Council's Ruling in Kellar v. Williams

Date: Feb 8, 2000
Capital Contributions vs. Loans in Company Liquidation: The Privy Council's Ruling in Kellar v. Stanley Williams Introduction Kellar v. Stanley Williams (Turks and Caicos Islands) is a landmark case...
Glasgow City Council v. Marshall: Redefining the Section 1(3) Defence in Equal Pay Claims

Glasgow City Council v. Marshall: Redefining the Section 1(3) Defence in Equal Pay Claims

Date: Feb 4, 2000
Glasgow City Council v. Marshall: Redefining the Section 1(3) Defence in Equal Pay Claims Introduction The case of Glasgow City Council and Others v. Marshall and Others ([2000] ICR 196) represents a...
Attributing Custody Rights to Courts under the Hague Convention: The House of Lords Decision in H (A Minor), In re

Attributing Custody Rights to Courts under the Hague Convention: The House of Lords Decision in H (A Minor), In re

Date: Feb 4, 2000
Attributing Custody Rights to Courts under the Hague Convention: The House of Lords Decision in H (A Minor), In re Introduction The case of H (A Minor), In re [2000] UKHL 6; adjudicated by the United...
Determining Sub-Tenancies Through Collusive Notices to Quit: A Comprehensive Analysis of Barrett v. Morgan [2000]

Determining Sub-Tenancies Through Collusive Notices to Quit: A Comprehensive Analysis of Barrett v. Morgan [2000]

Date: Jan 28, 2000
Determining Sub-Tenancies Through Collusive Notices to Quit: A Comprehensive Analysis of Barrett v. Morgan [2000] Introduction The landmark case of Barrett and Others v. Morgan [2000] 1 All ER 481...
Clarification of Relevant Periods under Section 67(1A)(c) in Sentencing Young Offenders

Clarification of Relevant Periods under Section 67(1A)(c) in Sentencing Young Offenders

Date: Jan 28, 2000
Clarification of Relevant Periods under Section 67(1A)(c) in Sentencing Young Offenders Introduction In the landmark case of Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte A, R v. ([2000] 2 AC...
Burridge v. London Borough of Harrow and Others: Clarifying Resource Considerations in Special Educational Needs Placements

Burridge v. London Borough of Harrow and Others: Clarifying Resource Considerations in Special Educational Needs Placements

Date: Jan 28, 2000
Burridge v. London Borough of Harrow and Others: Clarifying Resource Considerations in Special Educational Needs Placements Introduction Burridge v. London Borough of Harrow and Others ([2000] WLR...
Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: House of Lords in Gregory v. Portsmouth City Council [2000] UKHL 3

Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: House of Lords in Gregory v. Portsmouth City Council [2000] UKHL 3

Date: Jan 28, 2000
Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: House of Lords in Gregory v. Portsmouth City Council [2000] UKHL 3 Introduction Gregory v. Portsmouth City Council ([2000] UKHL 3) is a landmark case decided by...
Refining Tribunal Approaches to Sexual Discrimination: Insights from Driskel v. Peninsula Business Services Ltd

Refining Tribunal Approaches to Sexual Discrimination: Insights from Driskel v. Peninsula Business Services Ltd

Date: Dec 18, 1999
Refining Tribunal Approaches to Sexual Discrimination: Insights from Driskel v. Peninsula Business Services Ltd Introduction Driskel v. Peninsula Business Services Ltd & Ors ([1999] UKEAT...
Cross-Border Enforcement of Search Warrants: Insights from R v. Manchester Stipendiary Magistrate and the Lord Advocate, Ex Parte Granada Television Ltd [1999] UKHL 51

Cross-Border Enforcement of Search Warrants: Insights from R v. Manchester Stipendiary Magistrate and the Lord Advocate, Ex Parte Granada Television Ltd [1999] UKHL 51

Date: Dec 15, 1999
Cross-Border Enforcement of Search Warrants: Insights from R v. Manchester Stipendiary Magistrate and the Lord Advocate, Ex Parte Granada Television Ltd [1999] UKHL 51 Introduction The case of...
Due Process and Inhuman Treatment in Capital Punishment: Analysis of Higgs and Mitchell v. The Minister of National Security and Others

Due Process and Inhuman Treatment in Capital Punishment: Analysis of Higgs and Mitchell v. The Minister of National Security and Others

Date: Dec 15, 1999
Due Process and Inhuman Treatment in Capital Punishment: Analysis of Higgs and Mitchell v. The Minister of National Security and Others Introduction In the landmark case of Higgs and David Mitchell...
Heinz Co Ltd v Kenrick [2000] IRLR 144: Establishing Key Principles in Disability Discrimination and Unfair Dismissal Law

Heinz Co Ltd v Kenrick [2000] IRLR 144: Establishing Key Principles in Disability Discrimination and Unfair Dismissal Law

Date: Dec 4, 1999
Heinz Co Ltd v Kenrick [2000] IRLR 144: Establishing Key Principles in Disability Discrimination and Unfair Dismissal Law Introduction The case of Heinz Co Ltd v Kenrick ([2000] IRLR 144) serves as a...
Defining the Scope of Fiduciary Duty: Privy Council in Arklow Investments Ltd v ID Maclean

Defining the Scope of Fiduciary Duty: Privy Council in Arklow Investments Ltd v ID Maclean

Date: Dec 2, 1999
Defining the Scope of Fiduciary Duty: Privy Council in Arklow Investments Ltd v ID Maclean Introduction Arklow Investments Ltd and Another v. I.D. Maclean and Others (New Zealand) [1999] UKPC 51 is a...
Just and Equitable Extension of Time in Racial Discrimination Claims: Dean v. London Borough of Islington

Just and Equitable Extension of Time in Racial Discrimination Claims: Dean v. London Borough of Islington

Date: Dec 2, 1999
Just and Equitable Extension of Time in Racial Discrimination Claims: Dean v. London Borough of Islington Introduction The case of Dean v. London Borough of Islington ([1999] UKEAT 594_97_0112)...
Employment Status of Statutory Office Holders: Johnson v. Ryan & Ors

Employment Status of Statutory Office Holders: Johnson v. Ryan & Ors

Date: Nov 30, 1999
Employment Status of Statutory Office Holders: Johnson v. Ryan & Ors Introduction Johnson v. Ryan & Ors ([2000] ICR 236) is a landmark case adjudicated by the United Kingdom Employment Appeal...
Clarifying Rateable Valuation for Multifunctional Hereditaments: Coventry and Solihull Waste Disposal Co Ltd v Russell

Clarifying Rateable Valuation for Multifunctional Hereditaments: Coventry and Solihull Waste Disposal Co Ltd v Russell

Date: Nov 26, 1999
Clarifying Rateable Valuation for Multifunctional Hereditaments: Coventry and Solihull Waste Disposal Co Ltd v Russell Introduction The case of Coventry and Solihull Waste Disposal Company Ltd v....
Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board: Precedent on Recoverable Damages for Unwanted Pregnancy

Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board: Precedent on Recoverable Damages for Unwanted Pregnancy

Date: Nov 26, 1999
Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board: Precedent on Recoverable Damages for Unwanted Pregnancy Introduction Macfarlane and Another v. Tayside Health Board (Scotland) [2000] 2 AC 59 is a landmark case...
Carmichael v. National Power Plc: Defining Employment Status and Mutual Obligations in Casual Contracts

Carmichael v. National Power Plc: Defining Employment Status and Mutual Obligations in Casual Contracts

Date: Nov 19, 1999
Carmichael v. National Power Plc: Defining Employment Status and Mutual Obligations in Casual Contracts Introduction The case of Carmichael and Another v. National Power Plc ([1999] ICR 1226) is a...
Imperial Chemical Industries v. Colmer [1999]: Defining "Holding Company" in Tax Relief Eligibility

Imperial Chemical Industries v. Colmer [1999]: Defining "Holding Company" in Tax Relief Eligibility

Date: Nov 19, 1999
Imperial Chemical Industries v. Colmer [1999]: Defining "Holding Company" in Tax Relief Eligibility Introduction The case of Imperial Chemical Industries v. Colmer ([1999] UKHL 48; [1999] 1 WLR 2035)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert