Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Repudiatory Breach and Partnership Liability: An Analysis of Hurst v. Bryk and Others [2000] UKHL 19

Repudiatory Breach and Partnership Liability: An Analysis of Hurst v. Bryk and Others [2000] UKHL 19

Date: Mar 31, 2000
Repudiatory Breach and Partnership Liability: An Analysis of Hurst v. Bryk and Others [2000] UKHL 19 1. Introduction The case of Hurst v. Bryk and Others [2000] UKHL 19 serves as a pivotal judicial...
Comprehensive Commentary on the House of Lords Decision in Secretary of State For The Home Department, Ex Parte Hindley, R v. [2000] 2 All ER 385

Comprehensive Commentary on the House of Lords Decision in Secretary of State For The Home Department, Ex Parte Hindley, R v. [2000] 2 All ER 385

Date: Mar 31, 2000
Establishing the Legality of Whole Life Tariffs: Insights from the House of Lords in Secretary of State For The Home Department, Ex Parte Hindley 1. Introduction The case of Regina v. Secretary of...
Vicarious Liability of Local Councils for Councillors' Conduct: Insights from Moores v. Bude-Stratton Town Council

Vicarious Liability of Local Councils for Councillors' Conduct: Insights from Moores v. Bude-Stratton Town Council

Date: Mar 28, 2000
Vicarious Liability of Local Councils for Councillors' Conduct: Insights from Moores v. Bude-Stratton Town Council Introduction Moores v. Bude-Stratton Town Council ([2001] BLGR 129) is a pivotal...
Establishing the Necessity of Identification Parades in Disputed Cases: Goldson and McGlashan v. The Queen

Establishing the Necessity of Identification Parades in Disputed Cases: Goldson and McGlashan v. The Queen

Date: Mar 24, 2000
Establishing the Necessity of Identification Parades in Disputed Cases: Goldson and McGlashan v. The Queen Introduction The case of Goldson and Devon McGlashan v. The Queen (Jamaica) [2000] UKPC 9...
Hamilton v. Al Fayed [2000] UKHL 18: Waiving Parliamentary Privilege in Defamation Proceedings

Hamilton v. Al Fayed [2000] UKHL 18: Waiving Parliamentary Privilege in Defamation Proceedings

Date: Mar 24, 2000
Hamilton v. Al Fayed [2000] UKHL 18: Waiving Parliamentary Privilege in Defamation Proceedings Introduction Hamilton v. Al Fayed is a landmark judgment delivered by the United Kingdom House of Lords...
Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Inc. v. Herbert Broderick: Establishing Flexibility in Damage Assessment Dates

Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Inc. v. Herbert Broderick: Establishing Flexibility in Damage Assessment Dates

Date: Mar 21, 2000
Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Inc. v. Herbert Broderick: Establishing Flexibility in Damage Assessment Dates Introduction The case of Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Inc. v. Herbert Broderick ([2000] UKPC 11)...
Establishing Duty of Care in Foster Placements: Analysis of W 1-6 v. Essex County Council and Another [2000] UKHL 17

Establishing Duty of Care in Foster Placements: Analysis of W 1-6 v. Essex County Council and Another [2000] UKHL 17

Date: Mar 17, 2000
Establishing Duty of Care in Foster Placements: Analysis of W 1-6 v. Essex County Council and Another [2000] UKHL 17 Introduction The case of W 1-6 v. Essex County Council and Another ([2000] UKHL...
Attributable Harm in Child Care Orders: Lancashire County Council v. Barlow

Attributable Harm in Child Care Orders: Lancashire County Council v. Barlow

Date: Mar 17, 2000
Attributable Harm in Child Care Orders: Lancashire County Council v. Barlow Introduction The case of Lancashire County Council & Anor v. Barlow & Anor ([2000] BLGR 347) represents a significant...
Establishing Causation in Medical Injury Claims: Insights from Dingley v Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police [2000] UKHL 14

Establishing Causation in Medical Injury Claims: Insights from Dingley v Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police [2000] UKHL 14

Date: Mar 10, 2000
Establishing Causation in Medical Injury Claims: Insights from Dingley v Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police [2000] UKHL 14 Introduction Parties Involved: Appellant: Mr. Dingley, a retired police...
Preserving the Right of Appeal: House of Lords Upholds Appealability of Section 9 Decisions under the Arbitration Act 1996

Preserving the Right of Appeal: House of Lords Upholds Appealability of Section 9 Decisions under the Arbitration Act 1996

Date: Mar 10, 2000
Preserving the Right of Appeal: House of Lords Upholds Appealability of Section 9 Decisions under the Arbitration Act 1996 Introduction The case of Inco Europe Ltd and Others v. First Choice...
Establishing Reasonable Investigation Standards in Unfair Dismissal: Midland Bank Plc v Madden

Establishing Reasonable Investigation Standards in Unfair Dismissal: Midland Bank Plc v Madden

Date: Mar 8, 2000
Establishing Reasonable Investigation Standards in Unfair Dismissal: Midland Bank Plc v Madden Introduction Midland Bank Plc v. Madden ([2000] 2 All ER 741) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Quantifying Damages for Injury to Feelings in Racial Discrimination: Gbaja-Biamila v. DHL International Decision

Quantifying Damages for Injury to Feelings in Racial Discrimination: Gbaja-Biamila v. DHL International Decision

Date: Mar 2, 2000
Quantifying Damages for Injury to Feelings in Racial Discrimination: Gbaja-Biamila v. DHL International Decision Introduction The case of Gbaja-Biamila v. DHL International (UK) Ltd & Ors ([2000]...
Intoxication as a Mitigating Factor in Murder: Von Starck v. The Queen (Jamaica) [2000] UKPC 5

Intoxication as a Mitigating Factor in Murder: Von Starck v. The Queen (Jamaica) [2000] UKPC 5

Date: Feb 29, 2000
Intoxication as a Mitigating Factor in Murder: Von Starck v. The Queen ([2000] UKPC 5) Introduction Von Starck v. The Queen (Jamaica) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Privy Council on February...
Mens Rea Requirements in Incitement to Indecency with Children: Insights from B v. DPP (2000)

Mens Rea Requirements in Incitement to Indecency with Children: Insights from B v. DPP (2000)

Date: Feb 24, 2000
Mens Rea Requirements in Incitement to Indecency with Children: Insights from B v. Director of Public Prosecutions ([2000] UKHL 13) Introduction B v. Director of Public Prosecutions is a landmark...
Burton v. Mayor of Camden [2000]: Affirming Non-Assignability of Secure Tenancies Under Housing Act 1985

Burton v. Mayor of Camden [2000]: Affirming Non-Assignability of Secure Tenancies Under Housing Act 1985

Date: Feb 18, 2000
Burton v. Mayor of Camden [2000]: Affirming Non-Assignability of Secure Tenancies Under Housing Act 1985 Introduction Burton v. Mayor etc of The London Borough of Camden ([2000] UKHL 8) is a landmark...
Indirect Sex Discrimination in Unfair Dismissal Claims: The Landmark Decision in Secretary of State For Employment, Ex Parte Seymour Smith and Another, R v. [2000] UKHL 12

Indirect Sex Discrimination in Unfair Dismissal Claims: The Landmark Decision in Secretary of State For Employment, Ex Parte Seymour Smith and Another, R v. [2000] UKHL 12

Date: Feb 18, 2000
Indirect Sex Discrimination in Unfair Dismissal Claims: The Landmark Decision in Secretary of State For Employment, Ex Parte Seymour Smith and Another, R v. [2000] UKHL 12 Introduction The case of...
Defining Jurisdictional Boundaries for Reinsurance Contracts under the Lugano Convention: Insights from Agnew v. Länsförsäkringsbolagens A.B.

Defining Jurisdictional Boundaries for Reinsurance Contracts under the Lugano Convention: Insights from Agnew v. Länsförsäkringsbolagens A.B.

Date: Feb 18, 2000
Defining Jurisdictional Boundaries for Reinsurance Contracts under the Lugano Convention: Insights from Agnew v. Länsförsäkringsbolagens A.B. Introduction The case of Agnew and Others v....
Affirmation of the Implied Exclusion of Self-Incrimination Privilege in Environmental Law

Affirmation of the Implied Exclusion of Self-Incrimination Privilege in Environmental Law

Date: Feb 18, 2000
Affirmation of the Implied Exclusion of Self-Incrimination Privilege in Environmental Law Introduction Overview of the Case In the landmark case of Hertfordshire County Council, Ex Parte Green...
Establishing Strict Admissibility Standards for Intercepted Communications: A Comprehensive Analysis of Morgans v Director of Public Prosecutions

Establishing Strict Admissibility Standards for Intercepted Communications: A Comprehensive Analysis of Morgans v Director of Public Prosecutions

Date: Feb 18, 2000
Establishing Strict Admissibility Standards for Intercepted Communications: A Comprehensive Analysis of Morgans v Director of Public Prosecutions Introduction Morgans v Director of Public...
Clarification of Local Planning Authorities' Assumptions Under Section 17(4) of the Land Compensation Act 1961 in Newell v Secretary of State

Clarification of Local Planning Authorities' Assumptions Under Section 17(4) of the Land Compensation Act 1961 in Newell v Secretary of State

Date: Feb 18, 2000
Clarification of Local Planning Authorities' Assumptions Under Section 17(4) of the Land Compensation Act 1961 in Newell v Secretary of State Introduction The case of Newell and Others v. Secretary...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert