Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Planning Merits Held Irrelevant in Forestry Restocking Appeals – Commentary on Smar Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2025] EWCA Civ 1041

Planning Merits Held Irrelevant in Forestry Restocking Appeals – Commentary on Smar Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2025] EWCA Civ 1041

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Planning Merits Held Irrelevant in Forestry Restocking Appeals Smar Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs ([2025] EWCA Civ 1041) Introduction This Court of Appeal...
Re-drawing the Lines: “Similar Arrests” and “Senior Management” under the Insurance Act 2015 — Commentary on Delos Shipholding SA & Ors v Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1019

Re-drawing the Lines: “Similar Arrests” and “Senior Management” under the Insurance Act 2015 — Commentary on Delos Shipholding SA & Ors v Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1019

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Re-drawing the Lines: “Similar Arrests” and “Senior Management” under the Insurance Act 2015 Commentary on Delos Shipholding SA & Ors v Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty SE & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ...
“No-Order Is Not an Option”: The Court of Appeal Re-states the Duty to Sanction Contempt in Family Proceedings – Commentary on B (A Child) (Sentencing In Contempt Proceedings) [2025] EWCA Civ 1048

“No-Order Is Not an Option”: The Court of Appeal Re-states the Duty to Sanction Contempt in Family Proceedings – Commentary on B (A Child) (Sentencing In Contempt Proceedings) [2025] EWCA Civ 1048

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“No-Order Is Not an Option”: The Court of Appeal Re-states the Duty to Sanction Contempt in Family Proceedings – Commentary on B (A Child) (Sentencing In Contempt Proceedings) [2025] EWCA Civ 1048 1....
Strict Invalidity of RTM Claim Notices for Participation-Notice Breaches and the Inclusion of Equitable Lessees as “Qualifying Tenants” – Commentary on Avon Freeholds Ltd v Cresta Court E RTM Company Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1016

Strict Invalidity of RTM Claim Notices for Participation-Notice Breaches and the Inclusion of Equitable Lessees as “Qualifying Tenants” – Commentary on Avon Freeholds Ltd v Cresta Court E RTM Company Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1016

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Strict Invalidity of RTM Claim Notices for Participation-Notice Breaches and the Inclusion of Equitable Lessees as “Qualifying Tenants” Commentary on Avon Freeholds Ltd v Cresta Court E RTM Company...
“From Poor Cover-Up to High Culpability” – Sami & Salem [2025] EWCA Crim 1115 Re-defines Sentencing for High-Value Vehicle Theft Conspiracies

“From Poor Cover-Up to High Culpability” – Sami & Salem [2025] EWCA Crim 1115 Re-defines Sentencing for High-Value Vehicle Theft Conspiracies

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“From Poor Cover-Up to High Culpability” – Sami & Salem ([2025] EWCA Crim 1115) Re-defines Sentencing for High-Value Vehicle Theft Conspiracies Introduction In Sami & Anor, R v the Court of Appeal...
Leslie & Anor v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1045: No Judicial Discretion to Exclude Strictly Relevant Co‑Accused Confessions

Leslie & Anor v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1045: No Judicial Discretion to Exclude Strictly Relevant Co‑Accused Confessions

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Leslie & Anor v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1045: No Judicial Discretion to Exclude Strictly Relevant Co‑Accused Confessions 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)...
“The Grace Test”: Re-calibrating Youth Sentencing When Serious Sexual Offending Tips the Scales Toward Custody

“The Grace Test”: Re-calibrating Youth Sentencing When Serious Sexual Offending Tips the Scales Toward Custody

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“The Grace Test”: Re-calibrating Youth Sentencing When Serious Sexual Offending Tips the Scales Toward Custody 1. Introduction Grace, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 1047) is a reference by His Majesty’s...
Parity Without Inflation: Age-Based Starting Points, One‑Sixth Plea Credit, and Lawful Youth Sentencing in Murder Tariffs — R v Douglas [2025] EWCA Crim 1158

Parity Without Inflation: Age-Based Starting Points, One‑Sixth Plea Credit, and Lawful Youth Sentencing in Murder Tariffs — R v Douglas [2025] EWCA Crim 1158

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Parity Without Inflation: Age-Based Starting Points, One‑Sixth Plea Credit, and Lawful Youth Sentencing in Murder Tariffs — R v Douglas [2025] EWCA Crim 1158 Introduction This commentary examines the...
R v Mills [2025] EWCA Crim 1285: On‑Duty Police Status and Public Trust as “Other Relevant Factors” Justifying Upward Departure from Sexual Assault Guideline Ranges—With a Recalibration for Totality and Personal Mitigation

R v Mills [2025] EWCA Crim 1285: On‑Duty Police Status and Public Trust as “Other Relevant Factors” Justifying Upward Departure from Sexual Assault Guideline Ranges—With a Recalibration for Totality and Personal Mitigation

Date: Aug 1, 2025
R v Mills [2025] EWCA Crim 1285: On‑Duty Police Status and Public Trust as “Other Relevant Factors” Justifying Upward Departure from Sexual Assault Guideline Ranges—With a Recalibration for Totality...
McIntyre and the Sentencing of Online Incitement: Absence of Direct Causation Is No Mitigation under s.46 SCA 2007 in Widespread Public Disorder

McIntyre and the Sentencing of Online Incitement: Absence of Direct Causation Is No Mitigation under s.46 SCA 2007 in Widespread Public Disorder

Date: Aug 1, 2025
McIntyre and the Sentencing of Online Incitement: Absence of Direct Causation Is No Mitigation under s.46 SCA 2007 in Widespread Public Disorder Citation: R v McIntyre [2025] EWCA Crim 1191 Court:...
Rossiter: Guarding Against Double-Counting and Preserving Full Plea Credit in Extended Sentences

Rossiter: Guarding Against Double-Counting and Preserving Full Plea Credit in Extended Sentences

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Rossiter: Guarding Against Double-Counting and Preserving Full Plea Credit in Extended Sentences 1. Introduction Case: R v Rossiter [2025] EWCA Crim 1120 (CA). The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)...
Beyond Chronological Age: Brzozowski and the Nuanced Assessment of “Significant Age Disparity” in Sentencing for Sexual Activity with a Child

Beyond Chronological Age: Brzozowski and the Nuanced Assessment of “Significant Age Disparity” in Sentencing for Sexual Activity with a Child

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Beyond Chronological Age: Brzozowski and the Nuanced Assessment of “Significant Age Disparity” in Sentencing for Sexual Activity with a Child 1. Introduction In Brzozowski, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim...
ACR: Post‑evidence withdrawal confined to rare “knock‑out blow” cases; inferential proof of s.11 SOA 2003 gratification; tailored s.71 CJA 2003 reporting

ACR: Post‑evidence withdrawal confined to rare “knock‑out blow” cases; inferential proof of s.11 SOA 2003 gratification; tailored s.71 CJA 2003 reporting

Date: Jul 31, 2025
ACR: Post‑evidence withdrawal confined to rare “knock‑out blow” cases; inferential proof of s.11 SOA 2003 gratification; tailored s.71 CJA 2003 reporting Introduction In R v ACR [2025] EWCA Crim...
Poulson & Ors: The “campaign of rape” benchmark, weighting of guideline factors, and limited scope for delay as mitigation in multi‑count sexual offending ([2025] EWCA Crim 1241)

Poulson & Ors: The “campaign of rape” benchmark, weighting of guideline factors, and limited scope for delay as mitigation in multi‑count sexual offending ([2025] EWCA Crim 1241)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Calibrating Multi‑Count Sexual Sentencing: the “campaign of rape” 20‑year benchmark, flexible guideline weighting, and limited delay mitigation — Commentary on R v Poulson & Ors [2025] EWCA Crim 1241...
Beyond Parental Dominion: Court of Appeal Re-Affirms Welfare Paramountcy
            and Restricts the Reach of Gillick Competence – Commentary on 
            S, Re (Wardship: Removal to Ghana) [2025] EWCA Civ 1011

Beyond Parental Dominion: Court of Appeal Re-Affirms Welfare Paramountcy and Restricts the Reach of Gillick Competence – Commentary on S, Re (Wardship: Removal to Ghana) [2025] EWCA Civ 1011

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Beyond Parental Dominion: Court of Appeal Re-Affirms Welfare Paramountcy and Restricts the Reach of Gillick Competence – Commentary on S, Re (Wardship: Removal to Ghana) [2025] EWCA Civ 1011 1....
“One Trial, Not Two” – The Consolidation Principle for Set-Aside Hearings of Freezing Injunctions (Commentary on Mold Investments Ltd v Holloway [2025] EWCA Civ 986)

“One Trial, Not Two” – The Consolidation Principle for Set-Aside Hearings of Freezing Injunctions (Commentary on Mold Investments Ltd v Holloway [2025] EWCA Civ 986)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“One Trial, Not Two” – The Consolidation Principle for Set-Aside Hearings of Freezing Injunctions A Commentary on Mold Investments Ltd v Holloway ([2025] EWCA Civ 986) 1. Introduction In Mold...
Appeals in Restructuring Plans: The Return of the General Costs Rule – Commentary on Kington SARL & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1003

Appeals in Restructuring Plans: The Return of the General Costs Rule – Commentary on Kington SARL & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1003

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Appeals in Restructuring Plans: The Return of the General Costs Rule Commentary on Kington SARL & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd & Anor ([2025] EWCA Civ 1003) 1. Introduction Thames Water...

The “H Principle” – Court of Appeal Mandates Holistic-Chronological Analysis and Stricter ABE Compliance in Child Abuse Fact-Finding (Commentary on H (Children) (Findings of Fact) [2025] EWCA Civ 993)

The “H Principle” – Court of Appeal Mandates Holistic-Chronological Analysis and Stricter ABE Compliance in Child Abuse Fact-Finding (Commentary on H (Children) (Findings of Fact) [2025] EWCA Civ 993)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
The “H Principle” – Court of Appeal Mandates Holistic-Chronological Analysis and Stricter ABE Compliance in Child Abuse Fact-Finding Introduction H (Children) (Findings of Fact) [2025] EWCA Civ 993...
“Selective Summary-Judgment” Doctrine in Deceit Actions: Giwa v JNFX Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 961

“Selective Summary-Judgment” Doctrine in Deceit Actions: Giwa v JNFX Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 961

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Selective Summary-Judgment” Doctrine in Deceit Actions: Giwa v JNFX Ltd & Others [2025] EWCA Civ 961 Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Giwa v JNFX Ltd & Ors reshapes the boundaries of...
Defining Independent Sub-Categories of Services for Partial Revocation: The Precedent Set in easyGroup Ltd v easyfundraising Ltd ([2025] EWCA Civ 1000)

Defining Independent Sub-Categories of Services for Partial Revocation: The Precedent Set in easyGroup Ltd v easyfundraising Ltd ([2025] EWCA Civ 1000)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Defining Independent Sub-Categories of Services for Partial Revocation: The Precedent Set in easyGroup Ltd v easyfundraising Ltd ([2025] EWCA Civ 1000) 1. Introduction In July 2025 the Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert