Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

“High Threshold for Suspension of Sentence in POCSO Convictions” – Comment on Lilaben v. State of Gujarat (2025 INSC 519)

“High Threshold for Suspension of Sentence in POCSO Convictions” – Comment on Lilaben v. State of Gujarat (2025 INSC 519)

Date: Apr 22, 2025
High Threshold for Suspension of Sentence in POCSO Convictions: A Commentary on Lilaben v. State of Gujarat (2025 INSC 519) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Lilaben v. State of Gujarat...
“Clean‑Slate” Finality after IBC Resolution & the Narrow Door of S.47 CPC – Commentary on Electrosteel Steel Ltd. v. Ispat Carrier Pvt. Ltd. (2025)

“Clean‑Slate” Finality after IBC Resolution & the Narrow Door of S.47 CPC – Commentary on Electrosteel Steel Ltd. v. Ispat Carrier Pvt. Ltd. (2025)

Date: Apr 22, 2025
“Clean‑Slate” Finality after IBC Resolution & the Narrow Door of S.47 CPC A Detailed Commentary on Supreme Court Judgment in Electrosteel Steel Ltd. (now ESL Steel) v. Ispat Carrier Pvt. Ltd....

        “No Power to Rewrite the Award” – Supreme Court reinforces the bar on
        courts modifying arbitral awards under Sections 34 & 37 and urges procedural economy

“No Power to Rewrite the Award” – Supreme Court reinforces the bar on courts modifying arbitral awards under Sections 34 & 37 and urges procedural economy

Date: Apr 22, 2025
“No Power to Rewrite the Award” – Supreme Court reinforces the bar on courts modifying arbitral awards under Sections 34 & 37 and urges procedural economy 1. Introduction In Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v....
Sheikh v. State of U.P. (2025): The Supreme Court Re‑defines the Duty to Confront the Accused under Section 313 CrPC

Sheikh v. State of U.P. (2025): The Supreme Court Re‑defines the Duty to Confront the Accused under Section 313 CrPC

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Sheikh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 529): The Supreme Court Re‑defines the Duty to Confront the Accused under Section 313 CrPC and the Appellate Obligation to Cure Omissions Promptly 1....
Limited Adjudicatory Scope of Competent Authorities and Registrars in “Deemed Conveyance” Proceedings under MOFA – A Commentary on Angeline Randolph Pereira v. Suyog Industrial Estate Premises Co‑operative Society Ltd. (2025 INSC 524)

Limited Adjudicatory Scope of Competent Authorities and Registrars in “Deemed Conveyance” Proceedings under MOFA – A Commentary on Angeline Randolph Pereira v. Suyog Industrial Estate Premises Co‑operative Society Ltd. (2025 INSC 524)

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Limited Adjudicatory Scope of Competent Authorities and Registrars in “Deemed Conveyance” Proceedings under MOFA Commentary on Angeline Randolph Pereira v. Suyog Industrial Estate Premises...
Barla Ram Reddy v. State of Telangana (2025): Supreme Court Declares Post‑Notification Auction Sales Unreliable and Fixes 20 % Compounded Escalation for Metropolitan Fringe Land Valuation

Barla Ram Reddy v. State of Telangana (2025): Supreme Court Declares Post‑Notification Auction Sales Unreliable and Fixes 20 % Compounded Escalation for Metropolitan Fringe Land Valuation

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Barla Ram Reddy v. State of Telangana (2025 INSC 531) Supreme Court clarifies that post‑notification auction sales cannot guide market value and adopts 20 % compounded annual escalation for...
Malagi v. Malagi (2025): Supreme Court Fortifies the Bar Under Order 23 Rule 3‑A CPC Against Collateral Challenges to Consent Decrees

Malagi v. Malagi (2025): Supreme Court Fortifies the Bar Under Order 23 Rule 3‑A CPC Against Collateral Challenges to Consent Decrees

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Malagi v. Malagi (2025): Supreme Court Fortifies the Bar Under Order 23 Rule 3‑A CPC Against Collateral Challenges to Consent Decrees 1. Introduction In...
“Judicial Deference in the Face of an Undecided Reference” – Commentary on B.S. Yediyurappa v. A. Alam Pasha (2025 INSC 515)

“Judicial Deference in the Face of an Undecided Reference” – Commentary on B.S. Yediyurappa v. A. Alam Pasha (2025 INSC 515)

Date: Apr 22, 2025
“Judicial Deference in the Face of an Undecided Reference” – A Comprehensive Commentary on B.S. Yediyurappa v. A. Alam Pasha, 2025 INSC 515 1. Introduction The Order dated 21 April 2025 in...
Temporal Limitation on Section 498A IPC: Supreme Court Bars Prosecution of Husband’s Relatives After Dissolution of Marriage – A Commentary on Sushila v. State of U.P. (2025)

Temporal Limitation on Section 498A IPC: Supreme Court Bars Prosecution of Husband’s Relatives After Dissolution of Marriage – A Commentary on Sushila v. State of U.P. (2025)

Date: Apr 20, 2025
Temporal Limitation on Section 498A IPC: Supreme Court Bars Prosecution of Husband’s Relatives After Dissolution of Marriage A Comprehensive Commentary on Sushila & Ors. v. State of U.P. (2025 INSC...
“From Civil Breach to Criminal Overreach” – Supreme Court Prescribes Costs and Caution for Mis‑labelling Contractual Disputes as Cheating

“From Civil Breach to Criminal Overreach” – Supreme Court Prescribes Costs and Caution for Mis‑labelling Contractual Disputes as Cheating

Date: Apr 20, 2025
“From Civil Breach to Criminal Overreach” – Supreme Court Prescribes Costs and Caution for Mis‑labelling Contractual Disputes as Cheating 1. Introduction Rikhab Birani v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025...
Reaffirming the Limits of Second‑Appeal Jurisdiction & the Burden to Prove Oral Partition – A Commentary on Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee (2025 INSC 508)

Reaffirming the Limits of Second‑Appeal Jurisdiction & the Burden to Prove Oral Partition – A Commentary on Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee (2025 INSC 508)

Date: Apr 20, 2025
Reaffirming the Limits of Second‑Appeal Jurisdiction & the Burden to Prove Oral Partition – A Commentary on Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee (2025 INSC 508) 1. Introduction Rajendhiran v....

“From Privilege to Responsibility: Supreme Court Clarifies Power to De‑Register an Advocate‑on‑Record for Misconduct and Misuse of Successive SLPs” – Commentary on N. Eswaranathan v. State (2025 INSC 509)

“From Privilege to Responsibility: Supreme Court Clarifies Power to De‑Register an Advocate‑on‑Record for Misconduct and Misuse of Successive SLPs” – Commentary on N. Eswaranathan v. State (2025 INSC 509)

Date: Apr 18, 2025
“From Privilege to Responsibility” – Supreme Court Clarifies Power to De‑Register an Advocate‑on‑Record for Misconduct and Misuse of Successive SLPs (Commentary on N. Eswaranathan v. State...
“The Adavya Projects Doctrine” – Joinder of Parties in Arbitration Is Governed by Consent, Not by Service of Section 21 Notice or Section 11 Referral

“The Adavya Projects Doctrine” – Joinder of Parties in Arbitration Is Governed by Consent, Not by Service of Section 21 Notice or Section 11 Referral

Date: Apr 18, 2025
“The Adavya Projects Doctrine” – Joinder of Parties in Arbitration Is Governed by Consent, Not by Service of Section 21 Notice or Section 11 Referral 1. Introduction Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s...
Ankit Mishra v. State of M.P.:  The Supreme Court’s “Non‑Heinous Offence” Test for Cancelling Anticipatory Bail of Habitual Offenders

Ankit Mishra v. State of M.P.: The Supreme Court’s “Non‑Heinous Offence” Test for Cancelling Anticipatory Bail of Habitual Offenders

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Ankit Mishra v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 INSC 501): The Supreme Court’s “Non‑Heinous Offence” Test for Cancelling Anticipatory Bail of Habitual Offenders Introduction In Ankit Mishra v. The...
Gunshot Residue & False Exculpation as Decisive Links: A Commentary on Subhash Aggarwal v. State of NCT of Delhi (2025)

Gunshot Residue & False Exculpation as Decisive Links: A Commentary on Subhash Aggarwal v. State of NCT of Delhi (2025)

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Gunshot Residue & False Exculpation as Decisive Links A Commentary on Subhash Aggarwal v. State of NCT of Delhi (2025) 1. Introduction On 17 April 2025 the Supreme Court of India delivered a...
“Shetty Doctrine” – Supreme Court Clarifies that Any Managing Agent Exercising Supervisory Control is a “Principal Employer” under the ESI Act and Re‑affirms Mandatory Fine Regime for Non‑Remittance of Deducted Contributions

“Shetty Doctrine” – Supreme Court Clarifies that Any Managing Agent Exercising Supervisory Control is a “Principal Employer” under the ESI Act and Re‑affirms Mandatory Fine Regime for Non‑Remittance of Deducted Contributions

Date: Apr 17, 2025
“Shetty Doctrine” – Supreme Court Clarifies that Any Managing Agent Exercising Supervisory Control is a “Principal Employer” under the ESI Act and Re‑affirms Mandatory Fine Regime for Non‑Remittance...
Supreme Court Affirms Qualified Privilege for Peaceful Consumer Protest: Expanding the Ninth Exception to Criminal Defamation

Supreme Court Affirms Qualified Privilege for Peaceful Consumer Protest: Expanding the Ninth Exception to Criminal Defamation

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Supreme Court Affirms Qualified Privilege for Peaceful Consumer Protest: Expanding the Ninth Exception to Criminal Defamation 1. Introduction In Shahed Kamal v. M/s A. Surti Developers Pvt. Ltd....
Retrospective Criminal Liability for Non‑Schedule‑I Psychotropic Substances & Limits on Alteration of Charge – Commentary on Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Raj Kumar Arora (2025)

Retrospective Criminal Liability for Non‑Schedule‑I Psychotropic Substances & Limits on Alteration of Charge – Commentary on Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Raj Kumar Arora (2025)

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Retrospective Criminal Liability for Non‑Schedule‑I Psychotropic Substances & Limits on Alteration of Charge A Detailed Commentary on Directorate of Revenue...
MHADA’s Jurisdiction over Free‑Hold Cluster Redevelopment and the Limits of Writ Relief for Private Developers – A Commentary on Lakhani Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 489)

MHADA’s Jurisdiction over Free‑Hold Cluster Redevelopment and the Limits of Writ Relief for Private Developers – A Commentary on Lakhani Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 489)

Date: Apr 17, 2025
MHADA’s Jurisdiction over Free‑Hold Cluster Redevelopment and the Limits of Writ Relief for Private Developers A Commentary on Supreme Court Judgment in Lakhani Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr....
“Parity Is Not a Shield”: Supreme Court Re‑affirms Conspiracy Convictions Despite Investigational Lapses – A Commentary on R. Baiju v. State of Kerala (2025)

“Parity Is Not a Shield”: Supreme Court Re‑affirms Conspiracy Convictions Despite Investigational Lapses – A Commentary on R. Baiju v. State of Kerala (2025)

Date: Apr 17, 2025
“Parity Is Not a Shield”: Supreme Court Re‑affirms Conspiracy Convictions Despite Investigational Lapses – A Commentary on R. Baiju v. State of Kerala (2025 INSC 488) 1. Introduction The Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert