Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

“Circumstantial Conspiracy” and the Rigours of Section 43D(5) UAPA: Supreme Court’s Guiding Principles in Harpreet Singh Talwar v. State of Gujarat (2025)

“Circumstantial Conspiracy” and the Rigours of Section 43D(5) UAPA: Supreme Court’s Guiding Principles in Harpreet Singh Talwar v. State of Gujarat (2025)

Date: May 13, 2025
“Circumstantial Conspiracy” and the Rigours of Section 43D(5) UAPA: Supreme Court’s Guiding Principles in Harpreet Singh Talwar v. State of Gujarat (2025) Introduction On 13 May 2025, the Supreme...
“The Vijay Kumar Joshi Doctrine” – Uniform Pension Rights for Absorbed Employees, Yet Qualifying Service Begins Only From Date of Absorption

“The Vijay Kumar Joshi Doctrine” – Uniform Pension Rights for Absorbed Employees, Yet Qualifying Service Begins Only From Date of Absorption

Date: May 13, 2025
“The Vijay Kumar Joshi Doctrine” – Uniform Pension Rights for Absorbed Employees, Yet Qualifying Service Begins Only From Date of Absorption 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India in Vijay Kumar...
“Effects-Based” Necessity and Due-Process Primacy under Section 4 of the Competition Act – A Commentary on CCI v. Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 668)

“Effects-Based” Necessity and Due-Process Primacy under Section 4 of the Competition Act – A Commentary on CCI v. Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 668)

Date: May 13, 2025
“Effects-Based” Necessity and Due-Process Primacy under Section 4 of the Competition Act Commentary on Competition Commission of India v. Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 668) 1. Introduction...
From Points to Principles: The New Regime for Designating Senior Advocates after Jitender @ Kalla v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 667

From Points to Principles: The New Regime for Designating Senior Advocates after Jitender @ Kalla v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 667

Date: May 13, 2025
From Points to Principles: The New Regime for Designating Senior Advocates Commentary on Jitender @ Kalla v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2025 INSC 667) 1. Introduction The decision in Jitender @...
“Specificity & Corroboration” – The New Benchmark for Section 498A Convictions in Rajesh Chaddha v. State of U.P.

“Specificity & Corroboration” – The New Benchmark for Section 498A Convictions in Rajesh Chaddha v. State of U.P.

Date: May 13, 2025
“Specificity & Corroboration” – The Supreme Court’s New Benchmark for Section 498A Convictions 1. Introduction In Rajesh Chaddha v. The State of Uttar Pradesh, 2025 INSC 671, the Supreme Court of...
“Fortifying the Triple-Test”:  Paritala Sudhakar v. State of Telangana (2025) and the Heightened Standard of Proof in Anti-Corruption Trap Cases

“Fortifying the Triple-Test”: Paritala Sudhakar v. State of Telangana (2025) and the Heightened Standard of Proof in Anti-Corruption Trap Cases

Date: May 10, 2025
“Fortifying the Triple-Test”: Supreme Court Clarifies the Evidentiary Threshold in Anti-Corruption Trap Cases 1. Introduction Case: Paritala Sudhakar v. State of Telangana, 2025 INSC 655. Court &...
“Taxability” vs. “Payability” – Supreme Court Affirms Independent Purchase-Tax Liability Despite Sales-Tax Exemption

“Taxability” vs. “Payability” – Supreme Court Affirms Independent Purchase-Tax Liability Despite Sales-Tax Exemption

Date: May 10, 2025
“Taxability” vs. “Payability” – Supreme Court Affirms Independent Purchase-Tax Liability Despite Sales-Tax Exemption 1. Introduction In the consolidated decision C.T. Kochouseph v. State of Kerala &...
Doctrine of Pragmatic Leniency: Demotion-plus-Fine as an Alternative to Imprisonment for Contempt by Public Servants

Doctrine of Pragmatic Leniency: Demotion-plus-Fine as an Alternative to Imprisonment for Contempt by Public Servants

Date: May 10, 2025
Doctrine of Pragmatic Leniency: Demotion-plus-Fine as an Alternative to Imprisonment for Contempt by Public Servants 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in Tata Mohan Rao v. S. Venkateswarlu...
“Arbitrability of Trademark-Assignment Disputes – Even Where Fraud Is Alleged” : A Commentary on K. Mangayarkarasi v. N.J. Sundaresan (2025 INSC 687)

“Arbitrability of Trademark-Assignment Disputes – Even Where Fraud Is Alleged” : A Commentary on K. Mangayarkarasi v. N.J. Sundaresan (2025 INSC 687)

Date: May 10, 2025
“Arbitrability of Trademark-Assignment Disputes – Even Where Fraud Is Alleged” Commentary on K. Mangayarkarasi v. N.J. Sundaresan (2025 INSC 687) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s order in K....
Re-drawing the Line: Supreme Court Re-affirms Strict Limits on Using
Section 161 Statements and Section 27 Recoveries – Commentary on
Renuka Prasad v. State (2025 INSC 657)

Re-drawing the Line: Supreme Court Re-affirms Strict Limits on Using Section 161 Statements and Section 27 Recoveries – Commentary on Renuka Prasad v. State (2025 INSC 657)

Date: May 9, 2025
Re-drawing the Line: Supreme Court Re-affirms Strict Limits on Using Section 161 Statements and Section 27 Recoveries – Commentary on Renuka Prasad v. State (2025 INSC 657) 1. Introduction In Renuka...
“The Wikimedia Takedown Standard” – Supreme Court Re-defines Judicial Power to Order Online Content Removal

“The Wikimedia Takedown Standard” – Supreme Court Re-defines Judicial Power to Order Online Content Removal

Date: May 9, 2025
“The Wikimedia Takedown Standard” – Supreme Court Re-defines Judicial Power to Order Online Content Removal 1. Introduction In Wikimedia Foundation Inc. v. ANI Media Private Limited (2025 INSC 656)...
“Section 195 Bar Prevails: Supreme Court Tightens Scrutiny over Non-Cognizable ‘Obstruction’ Prosecutions and Re-affirms Expansive 482 CrPC Powers”

“Section 195 Bar Prevails: Supreme Court Tightens Scrutiny over Non-Cognizable ‘Obstruction’ Prosecutions and Re-affirms Expansive 482 CrPC Powers”

Date: May 9, 2025
“Section 195 Bar Prevails: Supreme Court Tightens Scrutiny over Non-Cognizable ‘Obstruction’ Prosecutions and Re-affirms Expansive 482 CrPC Powers” 1. Introduction In Umashankar Yadav v. State of...
“No District Survey Report, No Sand-Mining” – Supreme Court’s Peremptory Rule in State of U.P. v. Gaurav Kumar (2025)

“No District Survey Report, No Sand-Mining” – Supreme Court’s Peremptory Rule in State of U.P. v. Gaurav Kumar (2025)

Date: May 9, 2025
“No District Survey Report, No Sand-Mining” – Supreme Court’s Peremptory Rule in State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. v. Gaurav Kumar & Ors. (2025 INSC 650) 1. Introduction Sand is the second-most consumed...
Anti-Dispossession Writs & The Limits of “Validated” Sale Agreements – Commentary on
            Mahnoor Fatima Imran v. Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., (2025) INSC 646

Anti-Dispossession Writs & The Limits of “Validated” Sale Agreements – Commentary on Mahnoor Fatima Imran v. Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., (2025) INSC 646

Date: May 9, 2025
Anti-Dispossession Writs & The Limits of “Validated” Sale Agreements – Commentary on Mahnoor Fatima Imran v. Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India, 07 May 2025) 1. Introduction...
The Consistency Doctrine in Matrimonial Offences: Supreme Court’s Clarification in Disha Kapoor v. State of Uttar Pradesh

The Consistency Doctrine in Matrimonial Offences: Supreme Court’s Clarification in Disha Kapoor v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: May 8, 2025
The Consistency Doctrine in Matrimonial Offences: Supreme Court’s Clarification in Disha Kapoor v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in Disha Kapoor v. State...
“Discovery Rights in PMLA Trials: Supreme Court Enlarges Accused’s Entitlements to Seized & Un-relied Documents”

“Discovery Rights in PMLA Trials: Supreme Court Enlarges Accused’s Entitlements to Seized & Un-relied Documents”

Date: May 8, 2025
Discovery Rights in PMLA Trials: Supreme Court Enlarges Accused’s Entitlements to Seized & Un-relied Documents 1. Introduction In Sarla Gupta v. Directorate of Enforcement (2025 INSC 645) the Supreme...
Reasoned Medical-Board Findings as a Condition Precedent to Denial of Disability Pension – A Commentary on Rajumon T.M. v. Union of India (2025 INSC 644)

Reasoned Medical-Board Findings as a Condition Precedent to Denial of Disability Pension – A Commentary on Rajumon T.M. v. Union of India (2025 INSC 644)

Date: May 8, 2025
Reasoned Medical-Board Findings as a Condition Precedent to Denial of Disability Pension – A Commentary on Rajumon T.M. v. Union of India (2025 INSC 644) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision...
“Name-Lending” Is Not Enough – The Supreme Court’s Split Verdict on Spousal Liability for Disproportionate Assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act

“Name-Lending” Is Not Enough – The Supreme Court’s Split Verdict on Spousal Liability for Disproportionate Assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act

Date: May 8, 2025
“Name-Lending” Is Not Enough – The Supreme Court’s Split Verdict on Spousal Liability for Disproportionate Assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1. Introduction The decision in P. Nallammal...
Supreme Court re-emphasises “Status-Quo Protection” of Bank Guarantees Pending Section 9 Proceedings – M/S Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. v. M/S Bansal Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 640)

Supreme Court re-emphasises “Status-Quo Protection” of Bank Guarantees Pending Section 9 Proceedings – M/S Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. v. M/S Bansal Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 640)

Date: May 8, 2025
Supreme Court re-emphasises “Status-Quo Protection” of Bank Guarantees Pending Section 9 Proceedings – M/S Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. v. M/S Bansal Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 640) 1....
No Condonation Beyond 45 Days: Supreme Court Re-affirms Absolute Time-Bar under Section 61(2) IBC

No Condonation Beyond 45 Days: Supreme Court Re-affirms Absolute Time-Bar under Section 61(2) IBC

Date: May 8, 2025
No Condonation Beyond 45 Days: Supreme Court Re-affirms Absolute Time-Bar under Section 61(2) Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code Introduction In Tata Steel Ltd v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors. (2025 INSC 639)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert