Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries


        “Regularisation Cannot Erase Criminal Conspiracy in Illegal Constructions” – 
        Commentary on G. Mohandas v. State of Kerala, 2025 INSC 854

“Regularisation Cannot Erase Criminal Conspiracy in Illegal Constructions” – Commentary on G. Mohandas v. State of Kerala, 2025 INSC 854

Date: Jul 16, 2025
“Regularisation Cannot Erase Criminal Conspiracy in Illegal Constructions” – Supreme Court’s New Benchmark in G. Mohandas v. State of Kerala (2025) Introduction In G. Mohandas v. The State of Kerala...
“Adjudication Order = Notice of Demand” – Supreme Court Clarifies Commencement of Interest under Section 28A SEBI Act

“Adjudication Order = Notice of Demand” – Supreme Court Clarifies Commencement of Interest under Section 28A SEBI Act

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Adjudication Order = Notice of Demand” – Supreme Court Clarifies Commencement of Interest under Section 28A SEBI Act 1. Introduction In Jaykishor Chaturvedi v. Securities and Exchange Board of India...
Power-of-Attorney Holders Are Agents, Not Executants: The Supreme Court’s Call to Revisit Rajni Tandon in G. Kalawathi Bai v. G. Shashikala (2025)

Power-of-Attorney Holders Are Agents, Not Executants: The Supreme Court’s Call to Revisit Rajni Tandon in G. Kalawathi Bai v. G. Shashikala (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Power-of-Attorney Holders Are Agents, Not Executants: The Supreme Court’s Call to Revisit Rajni Tandon in G. Kalawathi Bai v. G. Shashikala (2025) 1. Introduction On 15 July 2025, a two-judge Bench...
Mandatory Prior Board-Level Consultation Before Pension Reduction under Regulation 33: Commentary on Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India (2025)

Mandatory Prior Board-Level Consultation Before Pension Reduction under Regulation 33: Commentary on Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Mandatory Prior Board-Level Consultation Before Pension Reduction under Regulation 33 Introduction Case: Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India & Ors., 2025 INSC 848 Court: Supreme Court of India...
Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Chain-of-Custody Protocols for DNA Evidence – Commentary on “Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu” (2025 INSC 845)

Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Chain-of-Custody Protocols for DNA Evidence – Commentary on “Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu” (2025 INSC 845)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Chain-of-Custody Protocols for DNA Evidence – Commentary on “Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu” (2025 INSC 845) 1. Introduction In a landmark judgment...
Unity of Purpose over Separate Incorporation – Supreme Court’s Expanded Test for Clubbing Establishments under the EPF Act

Unity of Purpose over Separate Incorporation – Supreme Court’s Expanded Test for Clubbing Establishments under the EPF Act

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Unity of Purpose over Separate Incorporation – Supreme Court’s Expanded Test for Clubbing Establishments under the EPF Act 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in M/S Torino Laboratories Pvt....

        Supreme Court Introduces “Equitable Enhancement of Consideration” 
        in Decrees for Specific Performance – A Comment on Krishan Gopal v. Gurmeet Kaur (2025)

Supreme Court Introduces “Equitable Enhancement of Consideration” in Decrees for Specific Performance – A Comment on Krishan Gopal v. Gurmeet Kaur (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Equitable Enhancement of Consideration in Specific Performance: A Detailed Commentary on Krishan Gopal v. Gurmeet Kaur (Dead) through LRs., 2025 INSC 850 1. Introduction On 15 July 2025 the Supreme...
Exclusive DRT Jurisdiction & Evidentiary Burden for Unregistered Tenancies under the Post-2016 SARFAESI Regime – Commentary on PNB Housing Finance Ltd. v. Manoj Saha (2025)

Exclusive DRT Jurisdiction & Evidentiary Burden for Unregistered Tenancies under the Post-2016 SARFAESI Regime – Commentary on PNB Housing Finance Ltd. v. Manoj Saha (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Exclusive DRT Jurisdiction & Evidentiary Burden for Unregistered Tenancies under the Post-2016 SARFAESI Regime – Commentary on PNB Housing Finance Ltd. v. Manoj Saha (2025) 1. Introduction The...
“The Muruganantham Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Universal Accessibility & Reasonable Accommodation for Prisoners with Disabilities (2025)

“The Muruganantham Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Universal Accessibility & Reasonable Accommodation for Prisoners with Disabilities (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“The Muruganantham Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Universal Accessibility & Reasonable Accommodation for Prisoners with Disabilities (L. Muruganantham v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 INSC 844) 1....

"Nullus Commodum" over Procedure: Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC in
Binod Pathak v. Shankar Choudhary (2025)

"Nullus Commodum" over Procedure: Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC in Binod Pathak v. Shankar Choudhary (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Nullus Commodum Capere Potest de Injuria Sua Propria” Triumphs Over Procedural Abatement A Commentary on Binod Pathak & Ors. v. Shankar Choudhary & Ors., 2025 INSC 842 1. Introduction The Supreme...
Torrent Power Ltd. v. UPERC (2025): Supreme Court Draws Jurisdictional Lines for State Commissions over Distribution-Franchisee Arrangements & Section 128 Investigations

Torrent Power Ltd. v. UPERC (2025): Supreme Court Draws Jurisdictional Lines for State Commissions over Distribution-Franchisee Arrangements & Section 128 Investigations

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Torrent Power Ltd. v. U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission (2025 INSC 838) “No Statutory Hook, No Regulatory Net” — The Supreme Court’s new template for Section 128 investigations and franchisee...
Current Policy Governs Oustee Allotments: Supreme Court’s Clarion Call in EState officer, HUDA v. Nirmala Devi (2025)

Current Policy Governs Oustee Allotments: Supreme Court’s Clarion Call in EState officer, HUDA v. Nirmala Devi (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Current Policy Governs Oustee Allotments: Supreme Court’s Clarion Call in EState officer, HUDA v. Nirmala Devi (2025) Introduction Background, Parties & Key Issues Land acquisition in Haryana for...
Shailesh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. (2025) – Supreme Court Bars Coercive Monetary Pre-Conditions & Re-affirms the Civil/Criminal Divide

Shailesh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. (2025) – Supreme Court Bars Coercive Monetary Pre-Conditions & Re-affirms the Civil/Criminal Divide

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“No Coercive Monetary Pre-Condition” – A Commentary on Shailesh Kumar Singh @ Shailesh R. Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., 2025 INSC 869 1. Introduction The judgment in Shailesh Kumar Singh @...
Supreme Court Mandates Full & Frank Disclosure in Multi-Forum Environmental Litigation – A Commentary on Arun Kumar Sharma v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 INSC 826)

Supreme Court Mandates Full & Frank Disclosure in Multi-Forum Environmental Litigation – A Commentary on Arun Kumar Sharma v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 INSC 826)

Date: Jul 14, 2025
Supreme Court Mandates Full & Frank Disclosure in Multi-Forum Environmental Litigation A Comprehensive Commentary on Arun Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. (2025 INSC 826) 1....
Stem Cell Banking Declared “Healthcare Service”: A New Service-Tax Exemption Benchmark from the Supreme Court

Stem Cell Banking Declared “Healthcare Service”: A New Service-Tax Exemption Benchmark from the Supreme Court

Date: Jul 14, 2025
Stem Cell Banking Declared “Healthcare Service”: A New Service-Tax Exemption Benchmark from the Supreme Court Introduction In M/s Stemcyte India Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central...

        Supreme Court Declares Consultation with State PSC & Adopted UGC Regulations
        Mandatorily Binding in Public Recruitment – A Commentary on
        “Mandeep Singh v. State of Punjab” (2025 INSC 834)

Supreme Court Declares Consultation with State PSC & Adopted UGC Regulations Mandatorily Binding in Public Recruitment – A Commentary on “Mandeep Singh v. State of Punjab” (2025 INSC 834)

Date: Jul 14, 2025
“PSC Consultation & Incorporated UGC Regulations Are Non-Negotiable” – A Comprehensive Commentary on Mandeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in...
“Causing Entry” Doctrine: Manufacturers’ Liability for Entry-Tax Despite State-Warehouse Interposition

“Causing Entry” Doctrine: Manufacturers’ Liability for Entry-Tax Despite State-Warehouse Interposition

Date: Jul 14, 2025
“Causing Entry” Doctrine: Manufacturers’ Liability for Entry-Tax Despite State-Warehouse Interposition 1. Introduction On 14 July 2025, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India in M/S United...

        “DCRG over PGA” – The Supreme Court’s New Rule on Gratuity  
        for Maharashtra’s Aided-School Teachers (Vikram B. Ghongade v. Headmistress, 2025)

“DCRG over PGA” – The Supreme Court’s New Rule on Gratuity for Maharashtra’s Aided-School Teachers (Vikram B. Ghongade v. Headmistress, 2025)

Date: Jul 14, 2025
Doctrine of “Better Terms Supersede” – Supreme Court Declares Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 as the Exclusive Gratuity Regime for...
Supreme Court Settles Admissibility of Covert Spousal Recordings – Vibhor Garg v. Neha (2025)

Supreme Court Settles Admissibility of Covert Spousal Recordings – Vibhor Garg v. Neha (2025)

Date: Jul 14, 2025
Covertly-Recorded Spousal Conversations Held Admissible in Matrimonial Litigation – Commentary on Vibhor Garg v. Neha, 2025 INSC 829 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Vibhor Garg v....
Asian Paints v. Ram Babu (2025): Corporate Victim’s Unfettered Right to Appeal under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

Asian Paints v. Ram Babu (2025): Corporate Victim’s Unfettered Right to Appeal under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

Date: Jul 14, 2025
Asian Paints Ltd. v. Ram Babu (2025) – Supreme Court Recognises Corporate Entities as “Victims” and Declares the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC a Stand-Alone, Unrestricted Appellate Remedy 1....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert