Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Article 233 Recast: In‑service Judicial Officers Now Eligible for Direct Recruitment as District Judges — Dheeraj Mor Overruled; Seven‑Year Combined Experience and Age 35 Minimum Mandated

Article 233 Recast: In‑service Judicial Officers Now Eligible for Direct Recruitment as District Judges — Dheeraj Mor Overruled; Seven‑Year Combined Experience and Age 35 Minimum Mandated

Date: Oct 12, 2025
Article 233 Recast: In‑service Judicial Officers Now Eligible for Direct Recruitment as District Judges — Dheeraj Mor Overruled; Seven‑Year Combined Experience and Age 35 Minimum Mandated...
Rule 21 confined to merit-list preparation: Vocational-subject marks count toward eligibility; termination on a new ground without fresh notice violates natural justice

Rule 21 confined to merit-list preparation: Vocational-subject marks count toward eligibility; termination on a new ground without fresh notice violates natural justice

Date: Oct 12, 2025
Rule 21 confined to merit-list preparation: Vocational-subject marks count toward eligibility; termination on a new ground without fresh notice violates natural justice Case: Ravi Oraon v. State of...
AFT’s Substitution Power Clarified: Unauthorized Ammunition Possession May Be Punished under Section 63 (Army Act) When a Section 69 Civil Offence Fails

AFT’s Substitution Power Clarified: Unauthorized Ammunition Possession May Be Punished under Section 63 (Army Act) When a Section 69 Civil Offence Fails

Date: Oct 12, 2025
AFT’s Substitution Power Clarified: Unauthorized Ammunition Possession May Be Punished under Section 63 (Army Act) When a Section 69 Civil Offence Fails Case: S.K. Jain v. Union of India, 2025 INSC...
Trust Need Not Be Arraigned Under Section 138 NI Act; Trustee–Signatory Can Be Prosecuted: Supreme Court in Sankar Padam Thapa v. Vijaykumar D. Agarwal (2025 INSC 1210)

Trust Need Not Be Arraigned Under Section 138 NI Act; Trustee–Signatory Can Be Prosecuted: Supreme Court in Sankar Padam Thapa v. Vijaykumar D. Agarwal (2025 INSC 1210)

Date: Oct 12, 2025
Trust Need Not Be Arraigned Under Section 138 NI Act; Trustee–Signatory Can Be Prosecuted Case: SANKAR PADAM THAPA v. VIJAYKUMAR DINESHCHANDRA AGARWAL | Citation: 2025 INSC 1210 | Court: Supreme...
Section 19 Empowers Commissioner to Fasten Joint and Several Liability on Insurer Under the Employees’ Compensation Act Where Risk Is Covered

Section 19 Empowers Commissioner to Fasten Joint and Several Liability on Insurer Under the Employees’ Compensation Act Where Risk Is Covered

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Section 19 Empowers Commissioner to Fasten Joint and Several Liability on Insurer Under the Employees’ Compensation Act Where Risk Is Covered 1. Introduction Alok Kumar Ghosh v. The New India...
Illegality as to Essential Object Bars Specific Performance: Courts Cannot Rewrite Building-Law-Violative Construction Contracts via Section 12 SRA

Illegality as to Essential Object Bars Specific Performance: Courts Cannot Rewrite Building-Law-Violative Construction Contracts via Section 12 SRA

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Illegality as to Essential Object Bars Specific Performance: Courts Cannot Rewrite Building-Law-Violative Construction Contracts via Section 12 SRA 1. Introduction Case: CANARA BANK v. K.L. RAJGARHIA...
Executability of a Specific-Plot Allotment Decree Despite Alleged Merger and Subsequent Construction; Court-May Order Removal of Non-Integral Encroachment

Executability of a Specific-Plot Allotment Decree Despite Alleged Merger and Subsequent Construction; Court-May Order Removal of Non-Integral Encroachment

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Executability of a Specific-Plot Allotment Decree Despite Alleged Merger and Subsequent Construction; Court-May Order Removal of Non-Integral Encroachment Case: Prakash Namdeorao Dhage v. Ganpati s/o...
Presumption of Electricity Theft under Section 39 (1910 Act) requires proof of “artificial means”; inference from consumption mismatch is insufficient — Mahaveer v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 1206)

Presumption of Electricity Theft under Section 39 (1910 Act) requires proof of “artificial means”; inference from consumption mismatch is insufficient — Mahaveer v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 1206)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Presumption of Electricity Theft under Section 39 (1910 Act) requires proof of “artificial means”; inference from consumption mismatch is insufficient Mahaveer v. State of Maharashtra, 2025 INSC 1206...
Security Bonds under Article 57 Require a Distinct Surety; Self‑Mortgages by the Principal Debtor Are Mortgage‑Deeds under Article 40 (M/s Godwin Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Meerut Division, 2025 INSC 1207)

Security Bonds under Article 57 Require a Distinct Surety; Self‑Mortgages by the Principal Debtor Are Mortgage‑Deeds under Article 40 (M/s Godwin Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Meerut Division, 2025 INSC 1207)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Security Bonds under Article 57 Require a Distinct Surety; Self‑Mortgages by the Principal Debtor Are Mortgage‑Deeds under Article 40 Citation: 2025 INSC 1207 Case Title: M/S Godwin Construction Pvt....
Order XV-A (Bombay Amendment): Mandatory Interim Deposit of Contractual Licence Fee; Liquidated Damages Not Awardable Interim Without Evidence

Order XV-A (Bombay Amendment): Mandatory Interim Deposit of Contractual Licence Fee; Liquidated Damages Not Awardable Interim Without Evidence

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Order XV-A (Bombay Amendment): Mandatory Interim Deposit of Contractual Licence Fee; Liquidated Damages Not Awardable Interim Without Evidence 1. Introduction Case: ATUL J DOSHI v. PRAMUKH PROPERTIES...
COVID-19 Limitation Exclusion Applies to Written Statements in Commercial Suits; Non-filing of Written Statement Does Not Extinguish Right to Cross-Examination — Commentary on M/s Anvita Auto Tech Works Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Aroush Motors & Anr., 2025 INSC 1202

COVID-19 Limitation Exclusion Applies to Written Statements in Commercial Suits; Non-filing of Written Statement Does Not Extinguish Right to Cross-Examination — Commentary on M/s Anvita Auto Tech Works Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Aroush Motors & Anr., 2025 INSC 1202

Date: Oct 8, 2025
COVID-19 Limitation Exclusion Applies to Written Statements in Commercial Suits; Non-filing of Written Statement Does Not Extinguish Right to Cross-Examination Commentary on M/s Anvita Auto Tech...
Official Ticket Verification as Prima Facie Proof of Bona Fide Travel under Section 124-A: Supreme Court’s Burden-Shifting Clarification in Rajni v. Union of India

Official Ticket Verification as Prima Facie Proof of Bona Fide Travel under Section 124-A: Supreme Court’s Burden-Shifting Clarification in Rajni v. Union of India

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Official Ticket Verification as Prima Facie Proof of Bona Fide Travel under Section 124-A: Supreme Court’s Burden-Shifting Clarification in Rajni v. Union of India Introduction The Supreme Court of...
No “Pay and Recover” Without Pleaded and Proved Willful Breach: Owner’s Production of Licence and Driver’s Non‑appearance Do Not Establish Collusion

No “Pay and Recover” Without Pleaded and Proved Willful Breach: Owner’s Production of Licence and Driver’s Non‑appearance Do Not Establish Collusion

Date: Oct 8, 2025
No “Pay and Recover” Without Pleaded and Proved Willful Breach: Owner’s Production of Licence and Driver’s Non‑appearance Do Not Establish Collusion Introduction In Hind Samachar Ltd. (Delhi Unit) v....
No Notional Aggregation for OSR; Pre‑1975 Sub‑divisions Recognized; OSR Charges Nil for Plots under 3000 m²

No Notional Aggregation for OSR; Pre‑1975 Sub‑divisions Recognized; OSR Charges Nil for Plots under 3000 m²

Date: Oct 8, 2025
No Notional Aggregation for OSR; Pre‑1975 Sub‑divisions Recognized; OSR Charges Nil for Plots under 3000 m² Case: Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority v. Dr. Kamala Selvaraj, 2025 INSC 1200...
Guardrails on Inherent Powers under BNSS: No Recall/Review Save for Clerical Errors; Successive Petitions Barred After Withdrawal Without Liberty

Guardrails on Inherent Powers under BNSS: No Recall/Review Save for Clerical Errors; Successive Petitions Barred After Withdrawal Without Liberty

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Guardrails on Inherent Powers under BNSS: No Recall/Review Save for Clerical Errors; Successive Petitions Barred After Withdrawal Without Liberty Introduction In State of Rajasthan v. Parmeshwar...
No Death Penalty Without Due Process: Supreme Court’s Fair‑Trial Protocols and Forensic Integrity in Capital Cases — Commentary on Dashwanth v. State of Tamil Nadu (2025 INSC 1203)

No Death Penalty Without Due Process: Supreme Court’s Fair‑Trial Protocols and Forensic Integrity in Capital Cases — Commentary on Dashwanth v. State of Tamil Nadu (2025 INSC 1203)

Date: Oct 8, 2025
No Death Penalty Without Due Process: Supreme Court’s Fair‑Trial Protocols and Forensic Integrity in Capital Cases Commentary on: Dashwanth v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 INSC 1203 (Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court bars State‑specific past performance criteria in public procurement: A commentary on Vinishma Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 1182)

Supreme Court bars State‑specific past performance criteria in public procurement: A commentary on Vinishma Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 1182)

Date: Oct 8, 2025
State‑Specific Past Performance as Tender Eligibility Is Unconstitutional: Supreme Court Reaffirms Level Playing Field in Public Procurement Case: Vinishma Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. State of...
Exceptional-Case Doctrine for Unconditional Stay of Money Decrees: Supreme Court clarifies directory nature of Order XLI Rule 1(3) CPC and the scope of Rule 5

Exceptional-Case Doctrine for Unconditional Stay of Money Decrees: Supreme Court clarifies directory nature of Order XLI Rule 1(3) CPC and the scope of Rule 5

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Exceptional-Case Doctrine for Unconditional Stay of Money Decrees: Supreme Court clarifies directory nature of Order XLI Rule 1(3) CPC and the scope of Rule 5 Introduction In Lifestyle Equities C.V....
From Presence to Participation: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 149 IPC and FIR Gatekeeping in Zainul v. State of Bihar (2025 INSC 1192)

From Presence to Participation: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 149 IPC and FIR Gatekeeping in Zainul v. State of Bihar (2025 INSC 1192)

Date: Oct 8, 2025
From Presence to Participation: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 149 IPC and FIR Gatekeeping in Zainul v. State of Bihar Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of India’s decision in...
Proving Hiba Requires Contemporaneous Possession; Appellate Enlargement Without Cross‑Appeal Impermissible; Constructive Notice Triggers Limitation for Declaratory Suits

Proving Hiba Requires Contemporaneous Possession; Appellate Enlargement Without Cross‑Appeal Impermissible; Constructive Notice Triggers Limitation for Declaratory Suits

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Proving Hiba Requires Contemporaneous Possession; Appellate Enlargement Without Cross‑Appeal Impermissible; Constructive Notice Triggers Limitation for Declaratory Suits Case: Dharmrao Sharanappa...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert