Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Of India Case Commentaries

Section 106 Cannot Bridge Foundational Gaps in Circumstantial Cases: Supreme Court Clarifies Co-residence Threshold and Permits Defence Reliance on Unexhibited Prosecution Records

Section 106 Cannot Bridge Foundational Gaps in Circumstantial Cases: Supreme Court Clarifies Co-residence Threshold and Permits Defence Reliance on Unexhibited Prosecution Records

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Section 106 Cannot Bridge Foundational Gaps in Circumstantial Cases: Supreme Court Clarifies Co-residence Threshold and Permits Defence Reliance on Unexhibited Prosecution Records Introduction In...
Repudiation by Conduct under Section 8 HMG Act: Supreme Court Clarifies Minors Need Not Sue to Avoid Guardian’s Unauthorized Transfer; Avoidance Relates Back; Plaintiff Must Prove Title Personally

Repudiation by Conduct under Section 8 HMG Act: Supreme Court Clarifies Minors Need Not Sue to Avoid Guardian’s Unauthorized Transfer; Avoidance Relates Back; Plaintiff Must Prove Title Personally

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Repudiation by Conduct under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act: Supreme Court Clarifies Minors Need Not Sue to Avoid Guardian’s Unauthorized Transfer; Avoidance Relates Back;...
Transfer-on-Incorporation Doctrine: Consumables used in works contracts are taxable once property passes on application — Supreme Court in Aristo Printers v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P. (2025 INSC 1188)

Transfer-on-Incorporation Doctrine: Consumables used in works contracts are taxable once property passes on application — Supreme Court in Aristo Printers v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P. (2025 INSC 1188)

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Transfer-on-Incorporation Doctrine: Consumables used in works contracts are taxable once property passes on application — Supreme Court in Aristo Printers v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P. (2025...
Only the Discovery Speaks: Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits of Section 27 Evidence Act and the High Threshold for Reversing Acquittals — Rajendra Singh v. State of Uttarakhand (2025)

Only the Discovery Speaks: Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits of Section 27 Evidence Act and the High Threshold for Reversing Acquittals — Rajendra Singh v. State of Uttarakhand (2025)

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Only the Discovery Speaks: Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits of Section 27 Evidence Act and the High Threshold for Reversing Acquittals — Rajendra Singh v. State of Uttarakhand (2025) Introduction In...
Public Trust Doctrine Extends to Man‑Made Waterbodies; ‘Wetland’ under 2017 Rules Excludes Man‑Made Irrigation/Drinking Tanks; Courts May Apply the Spirit of Rule 4 to NWIA‑Mapped Lakes

Public Trust Doctrine Extends to Man‑Made Waterbodies; ‘Wetland’ under 2017 Rules Excludes Man‑Made Irrigation/Drinking Tanks; Courts May Apply the Spirit of Rule 4 to NWIA‑Mapped Lakes

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Public Trust Doctrine Extends to Man‑Made Waterbodies; ‘Wetland’ under 2017 Rules Excludes Man‑Made Irrigation/Drinking Tanks; Courts May Apply the Spirit of Rule 4 to NWIA‑Mapped Lakes Case Overview...
Substance over Form in Reversing Acquittals and the Primacy of Injured Eyewitness Testimony: Commentary on Sri Chikkegowda v. State of Karnataka

Substance over Form in Reversing Acquittals and the Primacy of Injured Eyewitness Testimony: Commentary on Sri Chikkegowda v. State of Karnataka

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Substance over Form in Reversing Acquittals and the Primacy of Injured Eyewitness Testimony: Commentary on Sri Chikkegowda v. State of Karnataka I. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Sri...
Equitable Compensation in Lieu of Specific Performance Necessarily Entails Surrender of Possession: Commentary on Prem Aggarwal v. Mohan Singh (2025 INSC 1214)

Equitable Compensation in Lieu of Specific Performance Necessarily Entails Surrender of Possession: Commentary on Prem Aggarwal v. Mohan Singh (2025 INSC 1214)

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Equitable Compensation in Lieu of Specific Performance Necessarily Entails Surrender of Possession: Commentary on Prem Aggarwal v. Mohan Singh (2025 INSC 1214) I. Introduction The judgment of the...
Equal Treatment Is Non‑Negotiable: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award for asymmetric waiver of contractual notices and rewriting milestone preconditions (SEPCO v. GMR Kamalanga, 2025 INSC 1171)

Equal Treatment Is Non‑Negotiable: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award for asymmetric waiver of contractual notices and rewriting milestone preconditions (SEPCO v. GMR Kamalanga, 2025 INSC 1171)

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Equal Treatment Is Non‑Negotiable: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award for asymmetric waiver of contractual notices and rewriting milestone preconditions Case: SEPCO Electric Power Construction...
Reaffirmation of strict evidentiary thresholds in circumstantial murder cases: Section 65-B compliance, limits of Section 27, and caution on delayed “last seen” evidence — State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Singh, 2025 INSC 1166

Reaffirmation of strict evidentiary thresholds in circumstantial murder cases: Section 65-B compliance, limits of Section 27, and caution on delayed “last seen” evidence — State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Singh, 2025 INSC 1166

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Reaffirmation of strict evidentiary thresholds in circumstantial murder cases: Section 65-B compliance, limits of Section 27, and caution on delayed “last seen” evidence — State of Rajasthan v....
No Pan‑India Clubbing of FIRs for Multi‑State Financial Frauds; Only Intra‑State Consolidation Permissible and No Pre‑Emptive Clubbing of Future FIRs — Commentary on Pavan Kumar Odela v. State of Telangana (2025 INSC 1174)

No Pan‑India Clubbing of FIRs for Multi‑State Financial Frauds; Only Intra‑State Consolidation Permissible and No Pre‑Emptive Clubbing of Future FIRs — Commentary on Pavan Kumar Odela v. State of Telangana (2025 INSC 1174)

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Pan‑India Clubbing of FIRs for Multi‑State Financial Frauds; Only Intra‑State Consolidation Permissible and No Pre‑Emptive Clubbing of Future FIRs — Commentary on Pavan Kumar Odela v. State of...
Single-Notice Suffices: Supreme Court affirms no second penalty show-cause under the Competition Act and upholds behavioural remedies binding office-bearers

Single-Notice Suffices: Supreme Court affirms no second penalty show-cause under the Competition Act and upholds behavioural remedies binding office-bearers

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Single-Notice Suffices: Supreme Court affirms no second penalty show-cause under the Competition Act and upholds behavioural remedies binding office-bearers Introduction This commentary examines the...
Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific

Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific Introduction This commentary examines...
Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181

Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181 Introduction This Supreme...
CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC in Kalyani Transco v. BPSL (2025 INSC 1165)

CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC in Kalyani Transco v. BPSL (2025 INSC 1165)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC Case: KALYANI TRANSCO v. M/S BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LTD. & Ors....
Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on Undertaking

Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on Undertaking

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on...
Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases

Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases Case: SANJABIJ TARI v. KISHORE S....
Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific Performance

Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific Performance

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific...
Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment

Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment Introduction This commentary...
Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under Section 35

Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under Section 35

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under...
Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design

Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design Introduction In M/s U.P. Asbestos Limited v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert