Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Balmakund Marwari v. Basanta Kumari Dasi: Clarifying the Applicability of Articles 181 and 182 in Restitution Applications

Balmakund Marwari v. Basanta Kumari Dasi: Clarifying the Applicability of Articles 181 and 182 in Restitution Applications

Date: Jan 11, 1924
Balmakund Marwari v. Basanta Kumari Dasi: Clarifying the Applicability of Articles 181 and 182 in Restitution Applications Introduction The case of Balmakund Marwari v. Basanta Kumari Dasi was...
Admissibility of Unregistered Leases in Agricultural Tenancies: Insights from Maharani Janki Kuer v. Birj Bhikhan Ojha

Admissibility of Unregistered Leases in Agricultural Tenancies: Insights from Maharani Janki Kuer v. Birj Bhikhan Ojha

Date: Jan 5, 1924
Admissibility of Unregistered Leases in Agricultural Tenancies: Insights from Maharani Janki Kuer v. Birj Bhikhan Ojha Introduction The case of Maharani Janki Kuer v. Birj Bhikhan Ojha, adjudicated...
Upholding Jury Integrity in Sexual Offence Cases: Emperor Complainant v. Phagunia Bhuian Accused (1923)

Upholding Jury Integrity in Sexual Offence Cases: Emperor Complainant v. Phagunia Bhuian Accused (1923)

Date: Sep 12, 1923
Upholding Jury Integrity in Sexual Offence Cases: Emperor Complainant v. Phagunia Bhuian Accused (1923) Introduction The case of Emperor Complainant v. Phagunia Bhuian Accused, adjudicated by the...
Clarification on Grounds for Review under Order XLVII, Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code: Srimati Garabini Kamarin v. Suraja Narain Singh

Clarification on Grounds for Review under Order XLVII, Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code: Srimati Garabini Kamarin v. Suraja Narain Singh

Date: Aug 17, 1923
Clarification on Grounds for Review under Order XLVII, Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code: Srimati Garabini Kamarin v. Suraja Narain Singh Introduction The case of Srimati Garabini Kamarin v. Suraja...
Guardians' Authority and Specific Performance: Insights from Abdul Haq v. Mohammad Yehia Khan

Guardians' Authority and Specific Performance: Insights from Abdul Haq v. Mohammad Yehia Khan

Date: Jul 3, 1923
Guardians' Authority and Specific Performance: Insights from Abdul Haq v. Mohammad Yehia Khan Introduction Abdul Haq v. Mohammad Yehia Khan, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on July 2, 1923,...
Inherent Power of Courts to Rectify Decrees under Fraud: Sadho Saran Rai v. Anant Rai

Inherent Power of Courts to Rectify Decrees under Fraud: Sadho Saran Rai v. Anant Rai

Date: May 12, 1923
Inherent Power of Courts to Rectify Decrees under Fraud: Sadho Saran Rai v. Anant Rai Introduction Sadho Saran Rai v. Anant Rai is a landmark judgment delivered by the Patna High Court on May 11,...
Execution of Compromise Decrees for Minors under CPC Order XXXII, Rule 7: Patna High Court in Ishan Chandra Kundu v. Nilratan Adhikari

Execution of Compromise Decrees for Minors under CPC Order XXXII, Rule 7: Patna High Court in Ishan Chandra Kundu v. Nilratan Adhikari

Date: Mar 22, 1923
Execution of Compromise Decrees for Minors under CPC Order XXXII, Rule 7 Patna High Court in Ishan Chandra Kundu v. Nilratan Adhikari Introduction The case of Ishan Chandra Kundu v. Nilratan Adhikari...
Admissibility of Evidence in Gatha Oraon v. King-Emperor: A Landmark Judgment on Section 162 CPI

Admissibility of Evidence in Gatha Oraon v. King-Emperor: A Landmark Judgment on Section 162 CPI

Date: Mar 21, 1923
Admissibility of Evidence in Gansa Oraon v. King-Emperor: A Landmark Judgment on Section 162 CPI Introduction Gansa Oraon v. King-Emperor is a seminal case adjudicated by the Patna High Court on...
Liability of Railway Administration as an Ordinary Bailee in Great Indian Peninsular Railway Company v. Jitan Ram

Liability of Railway Administration as an Ordinary Bailee in Great Indian Peninsular Railway Company v. Jitan Ram

Date: Feb 1, 1923
Liability of Railway Administration as an Ordinary Bailee in Great Indian Peninsular Railway Company v. Jitan Ram Introduction The case of Great Indian Peninsular Railway Company v. Jitan Ram,...
Emperor v. Abdul Hamid: Defining the Limits of Police Authority under the Police Act

Emperor v. Abdul Hamid: Defining the Limits of Police Authority under the Police Act

Date: Aug 4, 1922
Emperor v. Abdul Hamid: Defining the Limits of Police Authority under the Police Act Introduction Case Overview: The case of Emperor v. Abdul Hamid was adjudicated by the Patna High Court on August...
Determining Court-Fees under Section 7 of the Court-Fees Act: Ram Sumran Prasad v. Gobind Das

Determining Court-Fees under Section 7 of the Court-Fees Act: Ram Sumran Prasad v. Gobind Das

Date: Aug 2, 1922
Determining Court-Fees under Section 7 of the Court-Fees Act: Ram Sumran Prasad v. Gobind Das Introduction The case of Ram Sumran Prasad v. Gobind Das presented before the Patna High Court on August...
Comprehensive Commentary on Sital Prasad Ray v. Asho Singh: Joinder of Parties in Mortgage Suits

Comprehensive Commentary on Sital Prasad Ray v. Asho Singh: Joinder of Parties in Mortgage Suits

Date: Jul 27, 1922
Joinder of Parties in Mortgage Suits: An Analysis of Sital Prasad Ray v. Asho Singh Introduction The case of Sital Prasad Ray v. Asho Singh, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on July 26, 1922,...
Subrogation Rights and Limitation Periods in Mortgage Law: An Analysis of Sibanand Misra v. Jagmohan Lall

Subrogation Rights and Limitation Periods in Mortgage Law: An Analysis of Sibanand Misra v. Jagmohan Lall

Date: Jul 8, 1922
Subrogation Rights and Limitation Periods in Mortgage Law: An Analysis of Sibanand Misra v. Jagmohan Lall Introduction The case of Sibanand Misra v. Jagmohan Lall adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Matuk Singh v. Tian Sahu: Presumptions and Probabilities in Adverse Possession Cases

Matuk Singh v. Tian Sahu: Presumptions and Probabilities in Adverse Possession Cases

Date: May 19, 1922
Matuk Singh v. Tian Sahu: Presumptions and Probabilities in Adverse Possession Cases Introduction The case of Matuk Singh v. Tian Sahu adjudicated by the Patna High Court on May 18, 1922, presents a...
Annulment of Under-Tenures and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Possession Disputes: Insights from Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo v Bhaiain Sunderbans Koer

Annulment of Under-Tenures and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Possession Disputes: Insights from Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo v Bhaiain Sunderbans Koer

Date: May 11, 1922
Annulment of Under-Tenures and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Possession Disputes: Insights from Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo v Bhaiain Sunderbans Koer Introduction The case of Maharaja Pratap...
Succession by Survivorship and Mortgage Distinctions in Order XXXIV Applications: Raja Sri Sri Shiva Prasad Singh v. Beni Madhab Chowdhury

Succession by Survivorship and Mortgage Distinctions in Order XXXIV Applications: Raja Sri Sri Shiva Prasad Singh v. Beni Madhab Chowdhury

Date: Feb 17, 1922
Succession by Survivorship and Mortgage Distinctions in Order XXXIV Applications Raja Sri Sri Shiva Prasad Singh v. Beni Madhab Chowdhury Court: Patna High Court Date: February 16, 1922 Introduction...
Recognition of Tenants' Fishery Rights Under Adverse Possession and Custom

Recognition of Tenants' Fishery Rights Under Adverse Possession and Custom

Date: Nov 26, 1921
Recognition of Tenants' Fishery Rights Under Adverse Possession and Custom Introduction The case of Henry Hill And Co. v. Sheoraj Rai adjudicated by the Patna High Court on November 25, 1921, delves...
Clarifying Non-Delivery vs. Loss under the Railway Act: East Indian Railway Co. v. Kali Charan Ram Prasad

Clarifying Non-Delivery vs. Loss under the Railway Act: East Indian Railway Co. v. Kali Charan Ram Prasad

Date: Jul 13, 1921
Clarifying Non-Delivery vs. Loss under the Railway Act: East Indian Railway Co. v. Kali Charan Ram Prasad Introduction The case of East Indian Railway Co. v. Kali Charan Ram Prasad, adjudicated by...
Valuation Date Principle for Probate Duty in Multi-Jurisdictional Estates

Valuation Date Principle for Probate Duty in Multi-Jurisdictional Estates

Date: May 26, 1921
Valuation Date Principle for Probate Duty in Multi-Jurisdictional Estates Introduction The case of Deputy Commissioner Of Singhbhum v. Jagadish Chandra Deo Dhabal Deb adjudicated by the Patna High...
Challenging Settlement Records on Grounds of Fraud: Insights from Hare Krishna Sen v. Umesh Chandra Dutt

Challenging Settlement Records on Grounds of Fraud: Insights from Hare Krishna Sen v. Umesh Chandra Dutt

Date: Apr 27, 1921
Challenging Settlement Records on Grounds of Fraud: Insights from Hare Krishna Sen v. Umesh Chandra Dutt Introduction The landmark case of Hare Krishna Sen v. Umesh Chandra Dutt, adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert