Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Statutory Limitation and Appeal Procedures in Income Tax Cases: Analysis of Mohan Lal Hardeo Das v. Commissioner of Income-Tax (1929)

Statutory Limitation and Appeal Procedures in Income Tax Cases: Analysis of Mohan Lal Hardeo Das v. Commissioner of Income-Tax (1929)

Date: Jul 20, 1929
Statutory Limitation and Appeal Procedures in Income Tax Cases: Analysis of Firm Of Mohan Lal Hardeo Das v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bihar And Orissa (Patna High Court, 1929) Introduction The case...
Raja Kirtyanand Singh v. Raja Pirthiohand Lal Choudhri: Execution Barred by Limitation Period

Raja Kirtyanand Singh v. Raja Pirthiohand Lal Choudhri: Execution Barred by Limitation Period

Date: Jul 11, 1929
Raja Kirtyanand Singh v. Raja Pirthiohand Lal Choudhri: Execution Barred by Limitation Period Introduction Raja Kirtyanand Singh and Ors. v. Raja Pirthiohand Lal Choudhri is a landmark case...
Rigorous Evaluation of Evidence and Hostile Witnesses in Capital Offenses: A Detailed Commentary on Sohrai Sao v. King-Emperor

Rigorous Evaluation of Evidence and Hostile Witnesses in Capital Offenses: A Detailed Commentary on Sohrai Sao v. King-Emperor

Date: Jun 9, 1929
Rigorous Evaluation of Evidence and Hostile Witnesses in Capital Offenses: A Detailed Commentary on Sohrai Sao v. King-Emperor Introduction The landmark case of Sohrai Sao v. King-Emperor,...
Discretionary Power under Section 149 in Suits by Paupers: Insights from Bank of Bihar Ltd v. Maharaj

Discretionary Power under Section 149 in Suits by Paupers: Insights from Bank of Bihar Ltd v. Maharaj

Date: May 24, 1929
Discretionary Power under Section 149 in Suits by Paupers: Insights from Bank of Bihar Limited v. Sri Thakur Ramchanderji Maharaj Introduction Bank of Bihar Limited v. Sri Thakur Ramchanderji Maharaj...
Clarifying Judicial Discretion in Further Enquiries: Insights from Hema Singh v. King-Emperor

Clarifying Judicial Discretion in Further Enquiries: Insights from Hema Singh v. King-Emperor

Date: May 24, 1929
Clarifying Judicial Discretion in Further Enquiries: Insights from Hema Singh v. King-Emperor Introduction Hema Singh v. King-Emperor is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Patna High Court on May...
Enforcement of Contractual Obligations and Limitation Periods: An Analysis of Ram Rachhya Singh Thakur v. Raghunath Prasad Misser

Enforcement of Contractual Obligations and Limitation Periods: An Analysis of Ram Rachhya Singh Thakur v. Raghunath Prasad Misser

Date: Mar 12, 1929
Enforcement of Contractual Obligations and Limitation Periods: An Analysis of Ram Rachhya Singh Thakur v. Raghunath Prasad Misser Introduction The case of Ram Rachhya Singh Thakur v. Raghunath Prasad...
Application of the Limitation Act in Compensation Suits for Property Subsidence: Jagannath Marwari v. Kalidas

Application of the Limitation Act in Compensation Suits for Property Subsidence: Jagannath Marwari v. Kalidas

Date: Feb 6, 1929
Application of the Limitation Act in Compensation Suits for Property Subsidence: Jagannath Marwari v. Kalidas Introduction Jagannath Marwari v. Kalidas is a landmark case adjudicated by the Patna...
Legal Necessity in Property Conveyance: Insights from Lala Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal

Legal Necessity in Property Conveyance: Insights from Lala Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal

Date: Jan 25, 1929
Legal Necessity in Property Conveyance: Insights from Lala Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal Introduction The case of Lala Ram Asre Singh And Ors. v. Ambica Lal And Ors. adjudicated by the Patna High...
Admissibility of Confessions under Section 24 of the Evidence Act: Insights from Kunja Subudhi v. King-Emperor

Admissibility of Confessions under Section 24 of the Evidence Act: Insights from Kunja Subudhi v. King-Emperor

Date: Aug 17, 1928
Admissibility of Confessions under Section 24 of the Evidence Act: Insights from Kunja Subudhi v. King-Emperor Introduction Kunja Subudhi v. King-Emperor is a landmark judgment delivered by the Patna...
Defining 'Scandalizing the Court': Insights from Murli Manohar Prasad, In Re

Defining 'Scandalizing the Court': Insights from Murli Manohar Prasad, In Re

Date: Aug 17, 1928
Defining 'Scandalizing the Court': Insights from Murli Manohar Prasad, In Re Introduction The case of Murli Manohar Prasad, In Re adjudicated by the Patna High Court on August 16, 1928, marks a...
Clarifying the Limitation Period for Sureties in Execution of Decrees

Clarifying the Limitation Period for Sureties in Execution of Decrees

Date: Aug 17, 1928
Clarifying the Limitation Period for Sureties in Execution of Decrees Introduction The case of Raja Raghunandan Prasad Singh v. Raja Kirtyanand Singh Bahadur was adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Magistrate's Jurisdiction Over Charge Sheets: Insights from Shukadeva Sahay v. Hamid Mian

Magistrate's Jurisdiction Over Charge Sheets: Insights from Shukadeva Sahay v. Hamid Mian

Date: Dec 23, 1927
Magistrate's Jurisdiction Over Charge Sheets: Insights from Shukadeva Sahay v. Hamid Mian Introduction The case of Shukadeva Sahay v. Hamid Mian, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on December 22,...
Reaffirming the Doctrine of Mushaa in Muhammadan Law: Insights from Musammat Bibi Bilkis v. Sheikh Wahid Ali

Reaffirming the Doctrine of Mushaa in Muhammadan Law: Insights from Musammat Bibi Bilkis v. Sheikh Wahid Ali

Date: Aug 12, 1927
Reaffirming the Doctrine of Mushaa in Muhammadan Law: Insights from Musammat Bibi Bilkis v. Sheikh Wahid Ali Introduction Musammat Bibi Bilkis v. Sheikh Wahid Ali is a seminal judgment delivered by...
Clarifying Criminal Trespass and Unlawful Assembly: Insights from King-Emperor v. Bandhu Singh

Clarifying Criminal Trespass and Unlawful Assembly: Insights from King-Emperor v. Bandhu Singh

Date: May 25, 1927
Clarifying Criminal Trespass and Unlawful Assembly: Insights from King-Emperor v. Bandhu Singh Introduction The case of King-Emperor v. Bandhu Singh adjudicated by the Patna High Court on May 24,...
Clarifying Execution under Article 182 in Mortgage Decrees: Insights from Somar Singh v. Deonandan Prasad Singh

Clarifying Execution under Article 182 in Mortgage Decrees: Insights from Somar Singh v. Deonandan Prasad Singh

Date: May 21, 1927
Clarifying Execution under Article 182 in Mortgage Decrees: Insights from Somar Singh v. Deonandan Prasad Singh Introduction The case of Somar Singh v. Deonandan Prasad Singh adjudicated by the Patna...
Protection of Minor's Interests in Consent Decrees: Insights from Ganganand Singh v. Rameshwar Singh Bahadur

Protection of Minor's Interests in Consent Decrees: Insights from Ganganand Singh v. Rameshwar Singh Bahadur

Date: Feb 2, 1927
Protection of Minor's Interests in Consent Decrees: Insights from Ganganand Singh v. Rameshwar Singh Bahadur Introduction The case of Ganganand Singh v. Rameshwar Singh Bahadur adjudicated by the...
Validating Dattak Adoption Under Mithila Law: Chandreshwar Prasad Narain Singh v. Bisheshwar Pratab Narain Singh

Validating Dattak Adoption Under Mithila Law: Chandreshwar Prasad Narain Singh v. Bisheshwar Pratab Narain Singh

Date: Apr 14, 1926
Validating Dattak Adoption Under Mithila Law: Chandreshwar Prasad Narain Singh v. Bisheshwar Pratab Narain Singh Introduction The case of Chandreshwar Prasad Narain Singh v. Bisheshwar Pratab Narain...
Limitation Period for Recovery of Excess Payments Under Mistake: Tofa Lal Das v. Syed Moinuddin Mirza

Limitation Period for Recovery of Excess Payments Under Mistake: Tofa Lal Das v. Syed Moinuddin Mirza

Date: Jan 20, 1925
Limitation Period for Recovery of Excess Payments Under Mistake: Tofa Lal Das v. Syed Moinuddin Mirza Introduction The case of Tofa Lal Das v. Syed Moinuddin Mirza adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Jurisdiction of Taxing-Officer in Valuation for Court Fees: Insights from Krishna Mohan Sinha v. Raghunandan Pandey

Jurisdiction of Taxing-Officer in Valuation for Court Fees: Insights from Krishna Mohan Sinha v. Raghunandan Pandey

Date: Dec 24, 1924
Jurisdiction of Taxing-Officer in Valuation for Court Fees: Insights from Krishna Mohan Sinha v. Raghunandan Pandey Introduction Krishna Mohan Sinha v. Raghunandan Pandey is a seminal judgment...
Capital vs. Income: Tax Implications of Salami and Royalties in Mining Leases as Established in Sri Sri Raja Shiva Prasad Singh v. The Crown

Capital vs. Income: Tax Implications of Salami and Royalties in Mining Leases as Established in Sri Sri Raja Shiva Prasad Singh v. The Crown

Date: Jul 4, 1924
Capital vs. Income: Tax Implications of Salami and Royalties in Mining Leases as Established in Sri Sri Raja Shiva Prasad Singh v. The Crown Introduction The case of Sri Sri Raja Shiva Prasad Singh...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert