Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Subrogation Rights and Limitation Periods in Mortgage Law: An Analysis of Sibanand Misra v. Jagmohan Lall

Subrogation Rights and Limitation Periods in Mortgage Law: An Analysis of Sibanand Misra v. Jagmohan Lall

Date: Jul 8, 1922
Subrogation Rights and Limitation Periods in Mortgage Law: An Analysis of Sibanand Misra v. Jagmohan Lall Introduction The case of Sibanand Misra v. Jagmohan Lall adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Matuk Singh v. Tian Sahu: Presumptions and Probabilities in Adverse Possession Cases

Matuk Singh v. Tian Sahu: Presumptions and Probabilities in Adverse Possession Cases

Date: May 19, 1922
Matuk Singh v. Tian Sahu: Presumptions and Probabilities in Adverse Possession Cases Introduction The case of Matuk Singh v. Tian Sahu adjudicated by the Patna High Court on May 18, 1922, presents a...
Annulment of Under-Tenures and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Possession Disputes: Insights from Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo v Bhaiain Sunderbans Koer

Annulment of Under-Tenures and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Possession Disputes: Insights from Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo v Bhaiain Sunderbans Koer

Date: May 11, 1922
Annulment of Under-Tenures and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Possession Disputes: Insights from Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo v Bhaiain Sunderbans Koer Introduction The case of Maharaja Pratap...
Succession by Survivorship and Mortgage Distinctions in Order XXXIV Applications: Raja Sri Sri Shiva Prasad Singh v. Beni Madhab Chowdhury

Succession by Survivorship and Mortgage Distinctions in Order XXXIV Applications: Raja Sri Sri Shiva Prasad Singh v. Beni Madhab Chowdhury

Date: Feb 17, 1922
Succession by Survivorship and Mortgage Distinctions in Order XXXIV Applications Raja Sri Sri Shiva Prasad Singh v. Beni Madhab Chowdhury Court: Patna High Court Date: February 16, 1922 Introduction...
Recognition of Tenants' Fishery Rights Under Adverse Possession and Custom

Recognition of Tenants' Fishery Rights Under Adverse Possession and Custom

Date: Nov 26, 1921
Recognition of Tenants' Fishery Rights Under Adverse Possession and Custom Introduction The case of Henry Hill And Co. v. Sheoraj Rai adjudicated by the Patna High Court on November 25, 1921, delves...
Clarifying Non-Delivery vs. Loss under the Railway Act: East Indian Railway Co. v. Kali Charan Ram Prasad

Clarifying Non-Delivery vs. Loss under the Railway Act: East Indian Railway Co. v. Kali Charan Ram Prasad

Date: Jul 13, 1921
Clarifying Non-Delivery vs. Loss under the Railway Act: East Indian Railway Co. v. Kali Charan Ram Prasad Introduction The case of East Indian Railway Co. v. Kali Charan Ram Prasad, adjudicated by...
Valuation Date Principle for Probate Duty in Multi-Jurisdictional Estates

Valuation Date Principle for Probate Duty in Multi-Jurisdictional Estates

Date: May 26, 1921
Valuation Date Principle for Probate Duty in Multi-Jurisdictional Estates Introduction The case of Deputy Commissioner Of Singhbhum v. Jagadish Chandra Deo Dhabal Deb adjudicated by the Patna High...
Challenging Settlement Records on Grounds of Fraud: Insights from Hare Krishna Sen v. Umesh Chandra Dutt

Challenging Settlement Records on Grounds of Fraud: Insights from Hare Krishna Sen v. Umesh Chandra Dutt

Date: Apr 27, 1921
Challenging Settlement Records on Grounds of Fraud: Insights from Hare Krishna Sen v. Umesh Chandra Dutt Introduction The landmark case of Hare Krishna Sen v. Umesh Chandra Dutt, adjudicated by the...
Presumption of Possession and Burden of Proof in Ejectment: Raja Shiva Prasad Singh v. Hira Singh

Presumption of Possession and Burden of Proof in Ejectment: Raja Shiva Prasad Singh v. Hira Singh

Date: Apr 26, 1921
Presumption of Possession and Burden of Proof in Ejectment Raja Shiva Prasad Singh v. Hira Singh Patna High Court, 1921 Introduction The case of Raja Shiva Prasad Singh v. Hira Singh, adjudicated by...
Mandatory Examination of the Accused under Section 342 Cr PC in Sessions Trials: Insights from Raghu Bhumij Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party

Mandatory Examination of the Accused under Section 342 Cr PC in Sessions Trials: Insights from Raghu Bhumij Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party

Date: Apr 28, 1920
Mandatory Examination of the Accused under Section 342 Cr PC in Sessions Trials: Insights from Raghu Bhumij Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party Introduction The case of Raghu Bhumij Accused v. Emperor...
Execution of Decrees and Delivery of Possession: Insights from Deonandan Prasad Singh v. Janki Singh

Execution of Decrees and Delivery of Possession: Insights from Deonandan Prasad Singh v. Janki Singh

Date: Mar 31, 1920
Execution of Decrees and Delivery of Possession: Insights from Deonandan Prasad Singh v. Janki Singh Introduction The case of Deonandan Prasad Singh Judgment-Debtor And Objector v. Janki Singh And...
Valuation of Suits for Court Fees under the Court-Fees Act: Insights from Brij Krishna Das v. Murli Rai

Valuation of Suits for Court Fees under the Court-Fees Act: Insights from Brij Krishna Das v. Murli Rai

Date: Jul 5, 1919
Valuation of Suits for Court Fees under the Court-Fees Act: Insights from Brij Krishna Das v. Murli Rai Introduction The case of Brij Krishna Das v. Murli Rai adjudicated by the Patna High Court on...
Survival of Cause of Action and Admissibility of Arbitration Evidence: Insights from Punjab Singh v. Ramautar Singh

Survival of Cause of Action and Admissibility of Arbitration Evidence: Insights from Punjab Singh v. Ramautar Singh

Date: Jul 3, 1919
Survival of Cause of Action and Admissibility of Arbitration Evidence: Insights from Punjab Singh And Others v. Ramautar Singh And Others Introduction Punjab Singh And Others v. Ramautar Singh And...
Contribution Among Joint Defendants in Partition Proceedings: Mahabir Prasad v. Darbhangi Thakur

Contribution Among Joint Defendants in Partition Proceedings: Mahabir Prasad v. Darbhangi Thakur

Date: Jun 18, 1919
Contribution Among Joint Defendants in Partition Proceedings: Mahabir Prasad v. Darbhangi Thakur Introduction Mahabir Prasad v. Darbhangi Thakur is a landmark case adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Strict Adherence to Appeal Deadlines: The Precedent Set in Jahar Mal v. G.M. Pritchard

Strict Adherence to Appeal Deadlines: The Precedent Set in Jahar Mal v. G.M. Pritchard

Date: Apr 9, 1919
Strict Adherence to Appeal Deadlines: The Precedent Set in Jahar Mal v. G.M. Pritchard Introduction The case of Jahar Mal v. G.M. Pritchard was adjudicated by the Patna High Court on April 8, 1919....
Establishing Rights of Judgment Debtors under Order 21, Rule 89: Insights from the Mt. Dhanwanti Kuer Judgment

Establishing Rights of Judgment Debtors under Order 21, Rule 89: Insights from the Mt. Dhanwanti Kuer Judgment

Date: Mar 29, 1919
Establishing Rights of Judgment Debtors under Order 21, Rule 89: Insights from the Mt. Dhanwanti Kuer Judgment Introduction The Mt. Dhanwanti Kuer Judgment delivered by the Patna High Court on March...
Arbitration Awards Out of Time Are Voidable, Not Per Se Null – Patto Kumari v. Upendra Nath Ghosh

Arbitration Awards Out of Time Are Voidable, Not Per Se Null – Patto Kumari v. Upendra Nath Ghosh

Date: Feb 18, 1919
Arbitration Awards Out of Time Are Voidable, Not Per Se Null – Patto Kumari v. Upendra Nath Ghosh Introduction Patto Kumari v. Upendra Nath Ghosh is a landmark judgment delivered by the Patna High...
Execution of Decrees Against Deceased Defendants: Establishing Nullity Standards

Execution of Decrees Against Deceased Defendants: Establishing Nullity Standards

Date: Feb 5, 1919
Execution of Decrees Against Deceased Defendants: Establishing Nullity Standards Introduction Jungli Lall And Others v. Laddu Ram Marwari And Another, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on February...
Application of Section 34 IPC in Murder Cases: Insights from Satrughan Patar v. Emperor

Application of Section 34 IPC in Murder Cases: Insights from Satrughan Patar v. Emperor

Date: Jan 25, 1919
Application of Section 34 IPC in Murder Cases: Insights from Satrughan Patar v. Emperor Introduction The case of Satrughan Patar And Others v. Emperor Opposite Party, adjudicated by the Patna High...
Charu Chandra Mitra v. Sambhu Nath Pandey (1918): Establishing the Admissibility and Binding Nature of Judicially Endorsed Compromises Without Registration

Charu Chandra Mitra v. Sambhu Nath Pandey (1918): Establishing the Admissibility and Binding Nature of Judicially Endorsed Compromises Without Registration

Date: Feb 15, 1918
Charu Chandra Mitra v. Sambhu Nath Pandey (1918) Establishing the Admissibility and Binding Nature of Judicially Endorsed Compromises Without Registration Introduction The case of Charu Chandra Mitra...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert