Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Defining Joint Family Property and Partnership Boundaries under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Sudarsanam Maistri v. Narasimhulu Maistri

Defining Joint Family Property and Partnership Boundaries under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Sudarsanam Maistri v. Narasimhulu Maistri

Date: Sep 21, 1901
Defining Joint Family Property and Partnership Boundaries under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Sudarsanam Maistri v. Narasimhulu Maistri Introduction Sudarsanam Maistri v. Narasimhulu Maistri is a...
Ahinsa Bibi v. Abdul Kader Saheb: Interpretation of the Limitation Act in Partnership Dissolution Cases Involving Minor Heirs

Ahinsa Bibi v. Abdul Kader Saheb: Interpretation of the Limitation Act in Partnership Dissolution Cases Involving Minor Heirs

Date: Aug 21, 1901
Ahinsa Bibi v. Abdul Kader Saheb: Interpretation of the Limitation Act in Partnership Dissolution Cases Involving Minor Heirs Introduction Ahinsa Bibi v. Abdul Kader Saheb is a seminal case decided...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Magistrate Proceedings: Insights from King-Emperor v. Ayyan

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Magistrate Proceedings: Insights from King-Emperor v. Ayyan

Date: Jul 31, 1901
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Magistrate Proceedings: Insights from King-Emperor v. Ayyan Introduction King-Emperor v. Ayyan is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on July 30, 1901....
Recognition of Tangals' Rights in Estate Management under Madras High Court in Alabi Koya v. Mussa Koya

Recognition of Tangals' Rights in Estate Management under Madras High Court in Alabi Koya v. Mussa Koya

Date: May 3, 1901
Recognition of Tangals' Rights in Estate Management under Madras High Court in Alabi Koya v. Mussa Koya Introduction The case of Alabi Koya v. Mussa Koya was adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Equity of Redemption and Right of Preemption in Mortgages: Insights from Ramasami Pattar v. Chinnan Asari

Equity of Redemption and Right of Preemption in Mortgages: Insights from Ramasami Pattar v. Chinnan Asari

Date: Apr 4, 1901
Equity of Redemption and Right of Preemption in Mortgages: Insights from Ramasami Pattar v. Chinnan Asari Introduction The case of Ramasami Pattar v. Chinnan Asari adjudicated by the Madras High...
Vasudevan Nambudripad v. Valia Chathu Achan: Kanomdar's Rights to Self-Planted Trees Established

Vasudevan Nambudripad v. Valia Chathu Achan: Kanomdar's Rights to Self-Planted Trees Established

Date: May 31, 1900
Kanomdar's Rights to Self-Planted Trees Established: Comprehensive Commentary on Vasudevan Nambudripad v. Valia Chathu Achan Introduction The landmark case Vasudevan Nambudripad v. Valia Chathu Achan...
Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 622 CPC: Insights from Chakkara Chappan v. Moidin Kutti

Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 622 CPC: Insights from Chakkara Chappan v. Moidin Kutti

Date: Oct 29, 1898
Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 622 CPC: Insights from Chakkara Chappan v. Moidin Kutti 1. Introduction Chakkara Chappan v. Moidin Kutti is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Madras High Court...
Authority to Suspend Trustees: Insights from Seshadri Ayyangar v. Nataraja Ayyar

Authority to Suspend Trustees: Insights from Seshadri Ayyangar v. Nataraja Ayyar

Date: Feb 25, 1898
Authority to Suspend Trustees: Insights from Seshadri Ayyangar v. Nataraja Ayyar And Ors. Introduction Seshadri Ayyangar v. Nataraja Ayyar And Ors. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High...
Distinct Causes of Action in Partition Suits: Insights from Ittappan v. Manavikrama

Distinct Causes of Action in Partition Suits: Insights from Ittappan v. Manavikrama

Date: Dec 18, 1897
Distinct Causes of Action in Partition Suits: Insights from Ittappan v. Manavikrama Introduction Ittappan v. Manavikrama is a landmark case adjudicated by the Madras High Court on December 17, 1897....
Adultery under the Criminal Procedure Code: Expanding the Legal Definition

Adultery under the Criminal Procedure Code: Expanding the Legal Definition

Date: Oct 15, 1897
Adultery under the Criminal Procedure Code: Expanding the Legal Definition Introduction The case of Gantapalli Appalamma v. Gantapalli Yellayya (Madras High Court, 14th October 1897) marks a...
Adoptive Son's Rights vs. Charitable Trusts: Insights from Ganapati Ayyan v. Savithri Ammal

Adoptive Son's Rights vs. Charitable Trusts: Insights from Ganapati Ayyan v. Savithri Ammal

Date: Oct 6, 1897
Adoptive Son's Rights vs. Charitable Trusts: Insights from Ganapati Ayyan v. Savithri Ammal Introduction Ganapati Ayyan And Anr. v. Savithri Ammal And Anr. is a landmark case decided by the Madras...
Establishing Distinct Tenancy Rights between Zamindars and Raiyats: Venkatanarasimha Naidu v. Dandamudi Kotayya

Establishing Distinct Tenancy Rights between Zamindars and Raiyats: Venkatanarasimha Naidu v. Dandamudi Kotayya

Date: Aug 23, 1897
Establishing Distinct Tenancy Rights between Zamindars and Raiyats: Venkatanarasimha Naidu v. Dandamudi Kotayya Introduction The case of Venkatanarasimha Naidu v. Dandamudi Kotayya adjudicated by the...
Limitations on Accused’s Right to Inspect Police Reports under Indian Evidence Act: Queen Empress v. Arumugam And Ors.

Limitations on Accused’s Right to Inspect Police Reports under Indian Evidence Act: Queen Empress v. Arumugam And Ors.

Date: May 1, 1897
Limitations on Accused’s Right to Inspect Police Reports under Indian Evidence Act: Queen Empress v. Arumugam And Ors. Introduction Queen Empress v. Arumugam And Ors. is a landmark judgment delivered...
Preventing Fraudulent Conveyances: An Analysis of Yaramati Krishnayya v. Chundru Papayya And Anr.

Preventing Fraudulent Conveyances: An Analysis of Yaramati Krishnayya v. Chundru Papayya And Anr.

Date: Apr 8, 1897
Preventing Fraudulent Conveyances: An Analysis of Yaramati Krishnayya v. Chundru Papayya And Anr. Introduction The landmark case of Yaramati Krishnayya v. Chundru Papayya And Anr. adjudicated by the...
Permanent Tenancy Confirmation under Ulavadi Kani: Chockalingam Pillai And Ors. v. Mayandi Chettiar

Permanent Tenancy Confirmation under Ulavadi Kani: Chockalingam Pillai And Ors. v. Mayandi Chettiar

Date: Aug 14, 1896
Permanent Tenancy Confirmation under Ulavadi Kani: Chockalingam Pillai And Ors. v. Mayandi Chettiar Introduction The case of Chockalingam Pillai And Ors. v. Mayandi Chettiar adjudicated by the Madras...
Kamalakshi v. Ramasami Chetti: Establishing the Validity of Adoptions by Minor Temple Dancers

Kamalakshi v. Ramasami Chetti: Establishing the Validity of Adoptions by Minor Temple Dancers

Date: Dec 17, 1895
Kamalakshi v. Ramasami Chetti: Establishing the Validity of Adoptions by Minor Temple Dancers Introduction The case of Kamalakshi v. Ramasami Chetti adjudicated by the Madras High Court on December...
Dispossession Rights and Coparcenary Interests in Rangayya Chetti v. Thanikachalla Mudali And Ors. (1895)

Dispossession Rights and Coparcenary Interests in Rangayya Chetti v. Thanikachalla Mudali And Ors. (1895)

Date: Oct 4, 1895
Dispossession Rights and Coparcenary Interests in Rangayya Chetti v. Thanikachalla Mudali And Ors. (Madras High Court, 1895) Introduction The case of Rangayya Chetti v. Thanikachalla Mudali And Ors.,...
Madras Mutual Benefit v. Ragava Chetti: Establishing the Illegality of Unregistered Associations Pursuing Gain

Madras Mutual Benefit v. Ragava Chetti: Establishing the Illegality of Unregistered Associations Pursuing Gain

Date: Sep 6, 1895
Madras Mutual Benefit v. Ragava Chetti: Establishing the Illegality of Unregistered Associations Pursuing Gain Introduction The case of The Madras Mutual Benefit v. Ragava Chetti And Anr, adjudicated...
Veeramma v. Abbiah And Anr.: Establishing the Autonomy of Special Acts in Limitation Law

Veeramma v. Abbiah And Anr.: Establishing the Autonomy of Special Acts in Limitation Law

Date: Oct 19, 1894
Veeramma v. Abbiah And Anr.: Establishing the Autonomy of Special Acts in Limitation Law Introduction The case of Veeramma v. Abbiah And Anr. adjudicated by the Madras High Court on October 18, 1894,...
Validating the Adoption of an Only Son: Insights from Gurulingaswami v. Ramalakshmamma And Anr.

Validating the Adoption of an Only Son: Insights from Gurulingaswami v. Ramalakshmamma And Anr.

Date: Sep 21, 1894
Validating the Adoption of an Only Son: Insights from Gurulingaswami v. Ramalakshmamma And Anr. Introduction The case of Gurulingaswami v. Ramalakshmamma And Anr. adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert