Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Res Judicata and Cause of Action: Insights from Ramaswami Aiyar v. Vythinatha Aiyar

Res Judicata and Cause of Action: Insights from Ramaswami Aiyar v. Vythinatha Aiyar

Date: Jul 16, 1903
Res Judicata and Cause of Action: Insights from Ramaswami Aiyar v. Vythinatha Aiyar Introduction The case of Ramaswami Aiyar And Anr. v. Vythinatha Aiyar And Ors. adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Devolution of Stridhanam Property: Joint Tenancy and Mitakshara Hindu Law in Karuppai Nachiar v. Sankaranarayanan Chetty

Devolution of Stridhanam Property: Joint Tenancy and Mitakshara Hindu Law in Karuppai Nachiar v. Sankaranarayanan Chetty

Date: Mar 21, 1903
Devolution of Stridhanam Property: Joint Tenancy and Mitakshara Hindu Law in Karuppai Nachiar v. Sankaranarayanan Chetty Introduction The case of Karuppai Nachiar v. Sankaranarayanan Chetty...
Establishing the Necessity of Genuine Consent in Adoptions: Subrahmanyam v. Venkamma And Ors. Analysis

Establishing the Necessity of Genuine Consent in Adoptions: Subrahmanyam v. Venkamma And Ors. Analysis

Date: Feb 19, 1903
Establishing the Necessity of Genuine Consent in Adoptions: Subrahmanyam v. Venkamma And Ors. Analysis Introduction The case of Subrahmanyam v. Venkamma And Ors. adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Jambu Chetty v. Palaniappa Chettiar: Establishing Conditional Payment Principles for Hundis

Jambu Chetty v. Palaniappa Chettiar: Establishing Conditional Payment Principles for Hundis

Date: Dec 6, 1902
Jambu Chetty v. Palaniappa Chettiar: Establishing Conditional Payment Principles for Hundis Introduction The case Jambu Chetty And Anr. v. N.P.L. N. Palaniappa Chettiar was adjudicated by the Madras...
Limitation under Article 119 of the Indian Limitation Act in Adoption Suits: Comprehensive Analysis of Ratnamasari v. Akilandammal

Limitation under Article 119 of the Indian Limitation Act in Adoption Suits: Comprehensive Analysis of Ratnamasari v. Akilandammal

Date: Oct 4, 1902
Limitation under Article 119 of the Indian Limitation Act in Adoption Suits: Comprehensive Analysis of Ratnamasari v. Akilandammal And Ors. Introduction The case of Ratnamasari v. Akilandammal And...
Aiyyagari Venkataramayya v. Aiyyagari Ramayya: Establishing Share Computation at Date of Suit under Mitakshara Law

Aiyyagari Venkataramayya v. Aiyyagari Ramayya: Establishing Share Computation at Date of Suit under Mitakshara Law

Date: Aug 29, 1902
Aiyyagari Venkataramayya v. Aiyyagari Ramayya: Establishing Share Computation at Date of Suit under Mitakshara Law Introduction The case of Aiyyagari Venkataramayya v. Aiyyagari Ramayya was...
Clarifying Succession Under Mitakshara Law: Venkayyamma Garu v. Venkataramanayyamma Bahadur

Clarifying Succession Under Mitakshara Law: Venkayyamma Garu v. Venkataramanayyamma Bahadur

Date: Jun 19, 1902
Clarifying Succession Under Mitakshara Law: Venkayyamma Garu v. Venkataramanayyamma Bahadur Introduction The case of Venkayyamma Garu v. Venkataramanayyamma Bahadur was adjudicated by the Madras High...
Enforcement of Negative Covenants Through Injunctions: Insights from Subba Naidu v. Badsha Sahib

Enforcement of Negative Covenants Through Injunctions: Insights from Subba Naidu v. Badsha Sahib

Date: Apr 26, 1902
Enforcement of Negative Covenants Through Injunctions: Insights from Subba Naidu v. Badsha Sahib Introduction The case of Subba Naidu And Anr. v. Badsha Sahib And Ors. adjudicated by the Madras High...
Madras High Court Confirms Binding Authority of Revenue Officers in Land Grants under Darkhast Rules

Madras High Court Confirms Binding Authority of Revenue Officers in Land Grants under Darkhast Rules

Date: Apr 26, 1902
Madras High Court Confirms Binding Authority of Revenue Officers in Land Grants under Darkhast Rules Introduction The case of The Secretary Of State For India In Council Represented By The Collector...
Legal Commentary on Kadir Mohideen Marakkayar v. Muthukrishna Aiyar And Anr. (1902)

Legal Commentary on Kadir Mohideen Marakkayar v. Muthukrishna Aiyar And Anr. (1902)

Date: Apr 25, 1902
Equitable Representation in Mortgage Enforcement: Analysis of Kadir Mohideen Marakkayar v. Muthukrishna Aiyar And Anr. (1902) Introduction The case of Kadir Mohideen Marakkayar v. Muthukrishna Aiyar...
Adopted Son's Rights and Limitation Period in Property Inheritance – Sreeramulu v. Kristamma And Ors. (1902) Comprehensive Analysis

Adopted Son's Rights and Limitation Period in Property Inheritance – Sreeramulu v. Kristamma And Ors. (1902) Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Mar 27, 1902
Adopted Son's Rights and Limitation Period in Property Inheritance – Sreeramulu v. Kristamma And Ors. (1902) Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Sreeramulu v. Kristamma And Ors....
Limitation Act and Execution of Joint Decrees: Insights from Periasami v. Krishna Ayyan

Limitation Act and Execution of Joint Decrees: Insights from Periasami v. Krishna Ayyan

Date: Mar 27, 1902
Limitation Act and Execution of Joint Decrees: Insights from Periasami v. Krishna Ayyan Introduction The case of Periasami And Others v. Krishna Ayyan And Others adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Separate Suits for Distinct Properties Under the Same Cause of Action Permitted: Dampanaboyina Gangi v. Addala Ramaswami

Separate Suits for Distinct Properties Under the Same Cause of Action Permitted: Dampanaboyina Gangi v. Addala Ramaswami

Date: Feb 22, 1902
Separate Suits for Distinct Properties Under the Same Cause of Action Permitted Introduction Dampanaboyina Gangi v. Addala Ramaswami is a pivotal judgment delivered by Justice Bhashyam Ayyangar of...
Clarification on Limitation Law in Mortgage Redemption and Tenancy: Seshamma Shettati v. Chickaya Hegade

Clarification on Limitation Law in Mortgage Redemption and Tenancy: Seshamma Shettati v. Chickaya Hegade

Date: Feb 15, 1902
Clarification on Limitation Law in Mortgage Redemption and Tenancy: Seshamma Shettati v. Chickaya Hegade Introduction The case of Seshamma Shettati v. Chickaya Hegade adjudicated by the Madras High...
Vedapuratti v. Vallabha Valiya Raja: Establishing the Immutable Nature of Res Judicata in Mortgage Redemption Suits

Vedapuratti v. Vallabha Valiya Raja: Establishing the Immutable Nature of Res Judicata in Mortgage Redemption Suits

Date: Feb 15, 1902
Vedapuratti v. Vallabha Valiya Raja: Establishing the Immutable Nature of Res Judicata in Mortgage Redemption Suits Introduction The case of Vedapuratti v. Vallabha Valiya Raja, adjudicated by the...
Mallikarjunadu Setti v. Lingamurti Pantulu: Affirming Appealability of Orders Refusing to Make Absolute Sales under Section 89 of the Transfer of Property Act

Mallikarjunadu Setti v. Lingamurti Pantulu: Affirming Appealability of Orders Refusing to Make Absolute Sales under Section 89 of the Transfer of Property Act

Date: Feb 11, 1902
Mallikarjunadu Setti v. Lingamurti Pantulu: Affirming Appealability of Orders Refusing to Make Absolute Sales under Section 89 of the Transfer of Property Act Introduction In the landmark case of...
Applicability of Municipal Licensing to Government Timber: Bell v. Municipal Commissioners for the City of Madras

Applicability of Municipal Licensing to Government Timber: Bell v. Municipal Commissioners for the City of Madras

Date: Jan 10, 1902
Applicability of Municipal Licensing to Government Timber: Bell v. Municipal Commissioners for the City of Madras Introduction Case Title: Bell (Accused) v. The Municipal Commissioners For The City...
Sundaran Ayyar v. Municipal Council Of Madura: Adverse Possession and Municipal Authority Over Public Streets

Sundaran Ayyar v. Municipal Council Of Madura: Adverse Possession and Municipal Authority Over Public Streets

Date: Dec 14, 1901
Sundaran Ayyar v. Municipal Council Of Madura: Adverse Possession and Municipal Authority Over Public Streets Introduction The case of S. Sundaran Ayyar v. Municipal Council Of Madura adjudicated by...
Akkanna v. Venkayya: Affirming a Hindu Widow's Autonomy over Property Acquired from Her Estate Income

Akkanna v. Venkayya: Affirming a Hindu Widow's Autonomy over Property Acquired from Her Estate Income

Date: Dec 11, 1901
Akkanna v. Venkayya: Affirming a Hindu Widow's Autonomy over Property Acquired from Her Estate Income Introduction The landmark case of Akkanna v. Venkayya, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
The Doctrine of Warranty in Life Insurance Contracts: An Analysis of Oriental Government Security Life Assurance Co. v. Narasimha Chari

The Doctrine of Warranty in Life Insurance Contracts: An Analysis of Oriental Government Security Life Assurance Co. v. Narasimha Chari

Date: Oct 18, 1901
The Doctrine of Warranty in Life Insurance Contracts An Analysis of Oriental Government Security Life Assurance Company, Limited v. Narasimha Chari Madras High Court | Date: October 17, 1901...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert