Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Revisionary Jurisdiction under Section 622: Insights from Kristamma Naidu v. Chapa Naidu

Revisionary Jurisdiction under Section 622: Insights from Kristamma Naidu v. Chapa Naidu

Date: Aug 7, 1894
Revisionary Jurisdiction under Section 622: Insights from Kristamma Naidu And Ors. v. Chapa Naidu And Ors. Introduction The case of Kristamma Naidu And Ors. v. Chapa Naidu And Ors. adjudicated by the...
Preference of Bhinna Gotra Sapindas Over Sister's Daughters in Hindu Succession: Sundrammal And Anr. v. Rangasami Mudaliar And Ors.

Preference of Bhinna Gotra Sapindas Over Sister's Daughters in Hindu Succession: Sundrammal And Anr. v. Rangasami Mudaliar And Ors.

Date: May 3, 1894
Preference of Bhinna Gotra Sapindas Over Sister's Daughters in Hindu Succession: Sundrammal And Anr. v. Rangasami Mudaliar And Ors. Introduction The case of Sundrammal And Anr. v. Rangasami Mudaliar...
Liability of Landowners for Public Infrastructure Repairs: Insights from C Damodara Mudaliar v. Secretary of State for India

Liability of Landowners for Public Infrastructure Repairs: Insights from C Damodara Mudaliar v. Secretary of State for India

Date: Mar 22, 1894
Liability of Landowners for Public Infrastructure Repairs: Insights from C Damodara Mudaliar And Anr v. The Secretary Of State For India 1. Introduction The case of C Damodara Mudaliar And Anr v. The...
Rangasami Naickan v. Varadappa Naickan: Section 539 CPC Does Not Permit Suits for Trustee Removal

Rangasami Naickan v. Varadappa Naickan: Section 539 CPC Does Not Permit Suits for Trustee Removal

Date: Mar 8, 1894
Rangasami Naickan v. Varadappa Naickan: Section 539 CPC Does Not Permit Suits for Trustee Removal Introduction The case Rangasami Naickan v. Varadappa Naickan And Ors. was adjudicated by the Madras...
Succession Rights in Impartible Estates: Ramasami Kamaya Naik v. Sundaralingasami Kamaya Naik

Succession Rights in Impartible Estates: Ramasami Kamaya Naik v. Sundaralingasami Kamaya Naik

Date: Mar 3, 1894
Succession Rights in Impartible Estates: Ramasami Kamaya Naik v. Sundaralingasami Kamaya Naik Introduction The case of Ramasami Kamaya Naik v. Sundaralingasami Kamaya Naik adjudicated by the Madras...
Clarifying Subordinate Courts' Jurisdiction in Execution Decrees: Insights from Shanmuga Pillai v. Ramanathan Chetti

Clarifying Subordinate Courts' Jurisdiction in Execution Decrees: Insights from Shanmuga Pillai v. Ramanathan Chetti

Date: Jan 26, 1894
Clarifying Subordinate Courts' Jurisdiction in Execution Decrees: Insights from Shanmuga Pillai v. Ramanathan Chetti Introduction The case of Shanmuga Pillai v. Ramanathan Chetti adjudicated by the...
Rowlandson v. Champion: Real Property Mortgages by Adjudicated Insolvents Not Binding on Official Assignee

Rowlandson v. Champion: Real Property Mortgages by Adjudicated Insolvents Not Binding on Official Assignee

Date: Sep 8, 1893
Rowlandson v. Champion: Real Property Mortgages by Adjudicated Insolvents Not Binding on Official Assignee Introduction The case of Rowlandson v. Champion And Anr., adjudicated by the Madras High...
Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee: Precedent on Tarwad Property and Attachment under Marumakkatayam Law

Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee: Precedent on Tarwad Property and Attachment under Marumakkatayam Law

Date: Dec 14, 1892
Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee: Precedent on Tarwad Property and Attachment under Marumakkatayam Law Introduction The case of Kunhacha Umma v. Kutti Mammi Hajee adjudicated by the Madras High...
Revisiting Acknowledgment under Section 19 of the Limitation Act in Venkata v. Parthasaradhi

Revisiting Acknowledgment under Section 19 of the Limitation Act in Venkata v. Parthasaradhi

Date: Oct 26, 1892
Revisiting Acknowledgment under Section 19 of the Limitation Act in Venkata v. Parthasaradhi Introduction Venkata v. Parthasaradhi is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on October...
Sundaram v. Sithammal And Anr. (1892): Establishing Limits on Article 91 of the Limitation Act in Property Recovery Suits

Sundaram v. Sithammal And Anr. (1892): Establishing Limits on Article 91 of the Limitation Act in Property Recovery Suits

Date: Oct 5, 1892
Sundaram v. Sithammal And Anr. (1892): Establishing Limits on Article 91 of the Limitation Act in Property Recovery Suits Introduction The case of Sundaram v. Sithammal And Anr., adjudicated by the...
Establishing Maternal Uncle of Half Blood as Atma Bandhu under Mitakshara: Muttusami v. Muttukumarasami

Establishing Maternal Uncle of Half Blood as Atma Bandhu under Mitakshara: Muttusami v. Muttukumarasami

Date: May 6, 1892
Establishing Maternal Uncle of Half Blood as Atma Bandhu under Mitakshara: Muttusami v. Muttukumarasami Introduction The case of Muttusami And Ors. v. Muttukumarasami adjudicated by the Madras High...
Preservation of Redemption Rights in Mortgages: Insights from Ramunni v. Brahma Dattan [1892]

Preservation of Redemption Rights in Mortgages: Insights from Ramunni v. Brahma Dattan [1892]

Date: Apr 26, 1892
Preservation of Redemption Rights in Mortgages: Insights from Ramunni v. Brahma Dattan [1892] Introduction Ramunni v. Brahma Dattan is a landmark case decided by the Madras High Court on April 25,...
Res Judicata and Lessor Liability in Wrongful Eviction: Vithilinga Padayachi v. Vithilinga Mudali

Res Judicata and Lessor Liability in Wrongful Eviction: Vithilinga Padayachi v. Vithilinga Mudali

Date: Dec 17, 1891
Res Judicata and Lessor Liability in Wrongful Eviction: Vithilinga Padayachi v. Vithilinga Mudali Introduction The case of Vithilinga Padayachi v. Vithilinga Mudali And Anr. was adjudicated by the...
Gross Negligence as Grounds for Mortgage Postponement under Section 78: Insights from Shan Maun Mull And Anr. v. Madras Building Company

Gross Negligence as Grounds for Mortgage Postponement under Section 78: Insights from Shan Maun Mull And Anr. v. Madras Building Company

Date: Nov 25, 1891
Gross Negligence as Grounds for Mortgage Postponement under Section 78: Insights from Shan Maun Mull And Anr. v. Madras Building Company Introduction The case of Shan Maun Mull And Anr. v. Madras...
Enforcement of Mesne Profits Against Sureties: Arunachellam v. Arunachellam And Ors.

Enforcement of Mesne Profits Against Sureties: Arunachellam v. Arunachellam And Ors.

Date: Sep 30, 1891
Enforcement of Mesne Profits Against Sureties: Arunachellam v. Arunachellam And Ors. Introduction The case of Arunachellam v. Arunachellam And Ors. heard by the Madras High Court on September 29,...
Limitations on Executing Against Sureties for Mesne Profits: The T R M Arunachellam Chetti Case

Limitations on Executing Against Sureties for Mesne Profits: The T R M Arunachellam Chetti Case

Date: Sep 30, 1891
Limitations on Executing Against Sureties for Mesne Profits: The T R M Arunachellam Chetti Case Introduction The case of T R M Arunachellam Chetti v. V R R M A R Arunachellam was adjudicated by the...
Byathamma v. Avulla And Anr.: Affirming Marumakkatayom Law in Tarwad Descent

Byathamma v. Avulla And Anr.: Affirming Marumakkatayom Law in Tarwad Descent

Date: Aug 19, 1891
Byathamma v. Avulla And Anr.: Affirming Marumakkatayom Law in Tarwad Descent Introduction Byathamma v. Avulla And Anr. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on August 18, 1891....
Recognition of Attorney Privilege in Judicial Proceedings – Sullivan Petitioner v. Norton

Recognition of Attorney Privilege in Judicial Proceedings – Sullivan Petitioner v. Norton

Date: Sep 25, 1886
Recognition of Attorney Privilege in Judicial Proceedings – Sullivan Petitioner v. Norton Introduction Sullivan Petitioner v. Norton is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on...
Establishing Implied Rent Contracts: Insights from Venkatagopal v. Rangappa

Establishing Implied Rent Contracts: Insights from Venkatagopal v. Rangappa

Date: Dec 19, 1883
Establishing Implied Rent Contracts: Insights from Venkatagopal v. Rangappa Introduction The case of Venkatagopal v. Rangappa, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on December 18, 1883, addresses a...
Hindu Father's Limited Power to Alienate Ancestral and Self-Acquired Estates: Insights from Baba v. Timma And Ors.

Hindu Father's Limited Power to Alienate Ancestral and Self-Acquired Estates: Insights from Baba v. Timma And Ors.

Date: May 6, 1883
Hindu Father's Limited Power to Alienate Ancestral and Self-Acquired Estates: Insights from Baba v. Timma And Ors. Introduction The case of Baba v. Timma And Ors., adjudicated by the Madras High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert