Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Ensuring Proper Nexus for Interest Deduction under Section 36(1)(iii): R.D Joshi And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Ensuring Proper Nexus for Interest Deduction under Section 36(1)(iii): R.D Joshi And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Apr 11, 2001
Ensuring Proper Nexus for Interest Deduction under Section 36(1)(iii): R.D Joshi And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of R.D Joshi And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
Setting Aside Conviction Under Section 306 IPC: A Detailed Analysis of Ahshan Khan v. State Of M.P.

Setting Aside Conviction Under Section 306 IPC: A Detailed Analysis of Ahshan Khan v. State Of M.P.

Date: Apr 5, 2001
Setting Aside Conviction Under Section 306 IPC: A Detailed Analysis of Ahshan Khan v. State Of M.P. Introduction The case of Ahshan Khan v. State Of M.P., adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court...
Election Petitions Must Be Filed After Notification Under Rule 22: Analysis of Chandra Bhan Singh v. State of M.P.

Election Petitions Must Be Filed After Notification Under Rule 22: Analysis of Chandra Bhan Singh v. State of M.P.

Date: Apr 1, 2001
Election Petitions Must Be Filed After Notification Under Rule 22: Analysis of Chandra Bhan Singh v. State of M.P. Introduction The case of Chandra Bhan Singh v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated...
Affirmation of Power of Attorney Holders' Competency to File Complaints Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Anil Kumar Haritwal v. Sant Prakash Gupta

Affirmation of Power of Attorney Holders' Competency to File Complaints Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Anil Kumar Haritwal v. Sant Prakash Gupta

Date: Mar 23, 2001
Affirmation of Power of Attorney Holders' Competency to File Complaints Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Anil Kumar Haritwal v. Sant Prakash Gupta Introduction The case of Anil...
Termination of Employment Without Proper Inquiry: Establishing the Importance of Fair Procedures

Termination of Employment Without Proper Inquiry: Establishing the Importance of Fair Procedures

Date: Feb 16, 2001
Termination of Employment Without Proper Inquiry: Establishing the Importance of Fair Procedures Introduction The case of Rahul Tripathi v. Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Bhopal And Others...
Judicial Scrutiny on Special Public Prosecutor Appointments: Poonamchand Jain v. State Of M.P.

Judicial Scrutiny on Special Public Prosecutor Appointments: Poonamchand Jain v. State Of M.P.

Date: Jan 24, 2001
Judicial Scrutiny on Special Public Prosecutor Appointments: Poonamchand Jain v. State Of M.P. Introduction The case of Poonamchand Jain v. State Of M.P. And Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh...
Clarification on Review Jurisdiction under Rule 29(1) of Madhya Pradesh Civil Services Rules: State Of M.P v. Om Prakash Gupta

Clarification on Review Jurisdiction under Rule 29(1) of Madhya Pradesh Civil Services Rules: State Of M.P v. Om Prakash Gupta

Date: Jan 17, 2001
Clarification on Review Jurisdiction under Rule 29(1) of Madhya Pradesh Civil Services Rules: State Of M.P v. Om Prakash Gupta Introduction The case of State Of M.P And Another v. Om Prakash Gupta...
Survival of Cause of Action for Loss to Estate in Motor Accident Claims: Umed Chand Golcha v. Dayaram and Others

Survival of Cause of Action for Loss to Estate in Motor Accident Claims: Umed Chand Golcha v. Dayaram and Others

Date: Oct 21, 2000
Survival of Cause of Action for Loss to Estate in Motor Accident Claims: Umed Chand Golcha v. Dayaram and Others Introduction The case of Umed Chand Golcha v. Dayaram and Others was adjudicated by...
Ensuring Due Process: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Precedent on Proper Service of Summons under Civil Procedure Code

Ensuring Due Process: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Precedent on Proper Service of Summons under Civil Procedure Code

Date: Oct 10, 2000
Ensuring Due Process: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Precedent on Proper Service of Summons under Civil Procedure Code Introduction The case of Baijnath Mishrilal Kachhi v. Harishanker adjudicated by...
Ad-Valorem Court Fees in Injunctive Relief: Insights from Subhash Chand Jain v. M.P. Electricity Board

Ad-Valorem Court Fees in Injunctive Relief: Insights from Subhash Chand Jain v. M.P. Electricity Board

Date: Sep 27, 2000
Ad-Valorem Court Fees in Injunctive Relief: Insights from Subhash Chand Jain v. The Chairman, M.P. Electricity Board And Others Introduction The case of Subhash Chand Jain v. The Chairman, M.P....
Restricting Quantum Challenges by Insurers: New Precedent in New India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rafeeka Sultana

Restricting Quantum Challenges by Insurers: New Precedent in New India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rafeeka Sultana

Date: Sep 27, 2000
Restricting Quantum Challenges by Insurers: New Precedent in New India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rafeeka Sultana Introduction The case of New India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Rafeeka Sultana adjudicated...
Exemption from Liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Flora v. Talwar

Exemption from Liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Flora v. Talwar

Date: Aug 9, 2000
Exemption from Liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Flora v. Talwar Introduction The case of Jitendra Sing Flora v. Ravikant Talwar was adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh...
Understanding the Jurisdictional Limits: Punpratap Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Understanding the Jurisdictional Limits: Punpratap Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Jul 13, 2000
Understanding the Jurisdictional Limits: Punpratap Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh 1. Introduction The case of Punpratap Singh and Another v. State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others adjudicated by the...
Mohan v. State of Madhya Pradesh: Elevating the Standards for Circumstantial Evidence and the Use of Section 313 Statements in Criminal Convictions

Mohan v. State of Madhya Pradesh: Elevating the Standards for Circumstantial Evidence and the Use of Section 313 Statements in Criminal Convictions

Date: Jun 26, 2000
Mohan v. State of Madhya Pradesh: Elevating the Standards for Circumstantial Evidence and the Use of Section 313 Statements in Criminal Convictions Introduction The case of Mohan v. State of Madhya...
Chief Municipal Officer Recognized as State Government Servant: Suresh Chandra Sharma v. State Of M.P

Chief Municipal Officer Recognized as State Government Servant: Suresh Chandra Sharma v. State Of M.P

Date: May 11, 2000
Chief Municipal Officer Recognized as State Government Servant: Suresh Chandra Sharma v. State Of M.P Introduction Suresh Chandra Sharma v. State Of M.P is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madhya...
Retired Government Servants and Section 23A: A Landmark Judgment in Madhya Pradesh High Court

Retired Government Servants and Section 23A: A Landmark Judgment in Madhya Pradesh High Court

Date: Apr 25, 2000
Retired Government Servants and Section 23A: A Landmark Judgment in Madhya Pradesh High Court Introduction The judgment in Kunjulal Yadu v. Parasram Sharma, delivered by Justice Dipak Misra on April...
Maintainability of Regular Appeals Post Order 9 Rule 13 Dismissal: Archana Kumar v. Mukherjee

Maintainability of Regular Appeals Post Order 9 Rule 13 Dismissal: Archana Kumar v. Mukherjee

Date: Apr 7, 2000
Maintainability of Regular Appeals Post Order 9 Rule 13 Dismissal: Archana Kumar v. Mukherjee Introduction The case of Archana Kumar and Another v. Purendu Prakash Mukherjee and Another adjudicated...
Geeta Sahu v. District Magistrate, Shahdol: Strengthening Judicial Scrutiny Over Detention Under the National Security Act

Geeta Sahu v. District Magistrate, Shahdol: Strengthening Judicial Scrutiny Over Detention Under the National Security Act

Date: Mar 30, 2000
Geeta Sahu v. District Magistrate, Shahdol: Strengthening Judicial Scrutiny Over Detention Under the National Security Act Introduction The case of Geeta Sahu v. District Magistrate, Shahdol...
Judicial Commentary: Maintenance Eligibility Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act

Judicial Commentary: Maintenance Eligibility Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act

Date: Mar 25, 2000
Maintenance Eligibility Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act: Analysis of Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal Introduction The case of Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal adjudicated by the...
Legal Commentary on Sirmul v. Annapurna Devi Ravi Kumar Awasthy: Upholding Judicial Scrutiny in Land Dealings

Legal Commentary on Sirmul v. Annapurna Devi Ravi Kumar Awasthy: Upholding Judicial Scrutiny in Land Dealings

Date: Feb 24, 2000
Legal Commentary on Sirmul v. Annapurna Devi Ravi Kumar Awasthy: Upholding Judicial Scrutiny in Land Dealings Introduction The case of Sirmul v. Annapurna Devi Ravi Kumar Awasthy, adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert