Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

MP High Court Upholds Extensive Reservation Policy in Panchayat Elections

MP High Court Upholds Extensive Reservation Policy in Panchayat Elections

Date: Dec 18, 1999
MP High Court Upholds Extensive Reservation Policy in Panchayat Elections Introduction In the landmark case of Ashok Kumar Tripathi v. Union Of India And Others, adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh...
Protection of Settled Possession: Gajendra Singh v. Mansingh

Protection of Settled Possession: Gajendra Singh v. Mansingh

Date: Dec 8, 1999
Protection of Settled Possession: Gajendra Singh v. Mansingh Introduction Gajendra Singh v. Mansingh is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on December 7, 1999. The case...
Interpretation of "Dispatch" in No-Confidence Motions: Bhulin Dewangan v. State Of M.P And Others

Interpretation of "Dispatch" in No-Confidence Motions: Bhulin Dewangan v. State Of M.P And Others

Date: Nov 3, 1999
Interpretation of "Dispatch" in No-Confidence Motions: Bhulin Dewangan v. State Of M.P And Others Introduction The case of Bhulin Dewangan v. State Of M.P And Others deliberated on the procedural...
Retention of Magistrate's Authority to Release Seized Property under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972

Retention of Magistrate's Authority to Release Seized Property under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972

Date: Oct 29, 1999
Retention of Magistrate's Authority to Release Seized Property under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 Introduction The case of Madhukar Rao v. State Of M.P., adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
Establishing Legal Necessity for Specific Performance in Joint Family Property: Babulal Agrawal v. Jyoti Shrivastava And Others

Establishing Legal Necessity for Specific Performance in Joint Family Property: Babulal Agrawal v. Jyoti Shrivastava And Others

Date: Sep 21, 1999
Establishing Legal Necessity for Specific Performance in Joint Family Property: Babulal Agrawal v. Jyoti Shrivastava And Others Introduction The case of Babulal Agrawal v. Jyoti Shrivastava And...
Limits of Insurer's Right to Appeal in Compensation Awards under the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ramdas Raoji Patil

Limits of Insurer's Right to Appeal in Compensation Awards under the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ramdas Raoji Patil

Date: Aug 10, 1999
Limits of Insurer's Right to Appeal in Compensation Awards under the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Bhilai v. Ramdas Raoji Patil And Others Introduction The case of...
Ensuring Fair Hearing in Panchayat Raj Proceedings: Analysis of Kailash Kumar Parmanand Dangi v. State Of M.P And Others

Ensuring Fair Hearing in Panchayat Raj Proceedings: Analysis of Kailash Kumar Parmanand Dangi v. State Of M.P And Others

Date: Aug 4, 1999
Ensuring Fair Hearing in Panchayat Raj Proceedings: Analysis of Kailash Kumar Parmanand Dangi v. State Of M.P And Others Introduction The case of Kailash Kumar Parmanand Dangi v. State Of M.P And...
Strict Adherence to Writ Petition Pleadings and Limited Scope for Amendments in Letters Patent Appeals: Insights from Shivhare v. Municipal Corporation, Gwalior

Strict Adherence to Writ Petition Pleadings and Limited Scope for Amendments in Letters Patent Appeals: Insights from Shivhare v. Municipal Corporation, Gwalior

Date: Jun 25, 1999
Strict Adherence to Writ Petition Pleadings and Limited Scope for Amendments in Letters Patent Appeals: Insights from Shivhare v. Municipal Corporation, Gwalior Introduction Case: Jagdish Prasad...
Non-Applicability of Seized Assets towards Advance Tax: Insights from Ramjilal Jagannath v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Non-Applicability of Seized Assets towards Advance Tax: Insights from Ramjilal Jagannath v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Apr 22, 1999
Non-Applicability of Seized Assets towards Advance Tax: Insights from Ramjilal Jagannath v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Ramjilal Jagannath And Others v. Assistant...
Owner Not Covered for Personal Injury under Comprehensive Vehicle Insurance: Hemlata Sahu v. Ramadhar

Owner Not Covered for Personal Injury under Comprehensive Vehicle Insurance: Hemlata Sahu v. Ramadhar

Date: Mar 20, 1999
Owner Not Covered for Personal Injury under Comprehensive Vehicle Insurance: Hemlata Sahu v. Ramadhar Introduction The case of Hemlata Sahu And Others v. Ramadhar And Another adjudicated by the...
Affirming Appellate Jurisdiction over Ex Parte Injunction Orders: Jabalpur Cable v. ESPN Software

Affirming Appellate Jurisdiction over Ex Parte Injunction Orders: Jabalpur Cable v. ESPN Software

Date: Mar 14, 1999
Affirming Appellate Jurisdiction over Ex Parte Injunction Orders: Jabalpur Cable v. ESPN Software Introduction The case of Jabalpur Cable Network Pvt. Ltd. v. E.S.P.N Software India Pvt. Ltd. And...
Clarifying Valuation of Intangible Reliefs Under Section 7(iv) of the Court Fees Act: Raj Kaur v. Kinetic Gallery

Clarifying Valuation of Intangible Reliefs Under Section 7(iv) of the Court Fees Act: Raj Kaur v. Kinetic Gallery

Date: Dec 11, 1998
Clarifying Valuation of Intangible Reliefs Under Section 7(iv) of the Court Fees Act: Raj Kaur v. Kinetic Gallery Introduction The case of Raj Kaur v. Kinetic Gallery adjudicated by the Madhya...
Applicability of M.P. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1961 to Service Governed by Specific Rules

Applicability of M.P. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1961 to Service Governed by Specific Rules

Date: Dec 10, 1998
Applicability of M.P. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1961 to Service Governed by Specific Rules Introduction The case of Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Circle Gwalior...
Negligence and State Liability in Prisoner Custody: Sudha Gupta & Others v. State of M.P. Analysis

Negligence and State Liability in Prisoner Custody: Sudha Gupta & Others v. State of M.P. Analysis

Date: Nov 25, 1998
Negligence and State Liability in Prisoner Custody: Sudha Gupta & Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh - Comprehensive Commentary Introduction Sudha Gupta and Others v. State of M.P. and Others is a...
Arjun Singh v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax (Investigation): Upholding Jurisdictional Limits in Tax Assessment Reopenings

Arjun Singh v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax (Investigation): Upholding Jurisdictional Limits in Tax Assessment Reopenings

Date: Nov 24, 1998
Arjun Singh v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax (Investigation): Upholding Jurisdictional Limits in Tax Assessment Reopenings Introduction The case of Arjun Singh and Another v. Assistant Director Of...
Enhancing Spousal Posting Rights: Insights from Suneeta Dharmendra Singh v. Union Of India

Enhancing Spousal Posting Rights: Insights from Suneeta Dharmendra Singh v. Union Of India

Date: Sep 11, 1998
Enhancing Spousal Posting Rights: Insights from Suneeta Dharmendra Singh v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Suneeta Dharmendra Singh v. Union Of India And Others adjudicated by the Madhya...
Mandatory Interpretation of Rule 3(3) under M.P. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam: Establishing Precedent in No-Confidence Motions

Mandatory Interpretation of Rule 3(3) under M.P. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam: Establishing Precedent in No-Confidence Motions

Date: Aug 19, 1998
Mandatory Interpretation of Rule 3(3) under M.P. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam: Establishing Precedent in No-Confidence Motions Introduction The case of Muku Bai v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated by...
Separate Permit Applications Required for Distinct Routes under the Motor Vehicles Act: Dwivedi v. Ramlal

Separate Permit Applications Required for Distinct Routes under the Motor Vehicles Act: Dwivedi v. Ramlal

Date: Jul 14, 1998
Separate Permit Applications Required for Distinct Routes under the Motor Vehicles Act: Dwivedi v. Ramlal Introduction The case of Vivek Tejnarain Dwivedi And Another v. Prem Narain Ramlal And...
Preservation of Contractual Arbitration Appointment Procedures Under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act: Insights from Subhash Projects v SECL

Preservation of Contractual Arbitration Appointment Procedures Under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act: Insights from Subhash Projects v SECL

Date: May 16, 1998
Preservation of Contractual Arbitration Appointment Procedures Under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act: Insights from Subhash Projects v SECL Introduction The case of Subhash Projects And Marketing...
Jurisdictional Clarification under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, 1996: Nepa Limited v. Manoj Kumar Agrawal

Jurisdictional Clarification under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, 1996: Nepa Limited v. Manoj Kumar Agrawal

Date: May 15, 1998
Jurisdictional Clarification under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, 1996: Nepa Limited v. Manoj Kumar Agrawal Introduction The case of Nepa Limited v. Manoj Kumar Agrawal adjudicated by the Madhya...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert