Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Clarification on the Burden of Proof under Section 271(l)(c) – Insights from Rukmini Bai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Clarification on the Burden of Proof under Section 271(l)(c) – Insights from Rukmini Bai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Apr 18, 2003
Clarification on the Burden of Proof under Section 271(l)(c) – Insights from Rukmini Bai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Rukmini Bai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal,...
Limitation on Use of Post-Search Valuation Reports in Block Assessments under Section 158BB

Limitation on Use of Post-Search Valuation Reports in Block Assessments under Section 158BB

Date: Apr 15, 2003
Limitation on Use of Post-Search Valuation Reports in Block Assessments under Section 158BB Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Khushlal Chand Nirmal Kumar adjudicated by the...
Applicability of Section 30(1) Third Proviso to Insurer's Appeals under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Applicability of Section 30(1) Third Proviso to Insurer's Appeals under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Date: Apr 8, 2003
Applicability of Section 30(1) Third Proviso to Insurer's Appeals under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Introduction The case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Savita Sen And Others adjudicated...
Establishing the Boundaries of Review: Non-Supply of Reasons in Motion Dismissals Does Not Constitute Error Apparent

Establishing the Boundaries of Review: Non-Supply of Reasons in Motion Dismissals Does Not Constitute Error Apparent

Date: Mar 6, 2003
Establishing the Boundaries of Review: Non-Supply of Reasons in Motion Dismissals Does Not Constitute Error Apparent Introduction The case of Ratanlal v. Bardi Bai adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh...
Appellate Tribunal Appeals Preempt Writ Petitions: Kowa Spinning Ltd. v. Debt Recovery Tribunal

Appellate Tribunal Appeals Preempt Writ Petitions: Kowa Spinning Ltd. v. Debt Recovery Tribunal

Date: Mar 1, 2003
Appellate Tribunal Appeals Preempt Writ Petitions: Kowa Spinning Ltd. v. Debt Recovery Tribunal Introduction The case of Kowa Spinning Ltd. And Others v. Debt Recovery Tribunal And Others adjudicated...
Non-Retrospectivity of Legislative Amendments in Railway Compensation: Union of India v. Satish Patidar

Non-Retrospectivity of Legislative Amendments in Railway Compensation: Union of India v. Satish Patidar

Date: Jan 28, 2003
Non-Retrospectivity of Legislative Amendments in Railway Compensation: Union of India v. Satish Patidar Introduction The case of Union of India v. Satish Patidar adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh...
Limits on Governor's Discretion in Sanctioning Prosecutions of Ministers: Analysis of M.P Special Police Establishment, Bhopal v. State Of M.P And Others

Limits on Governor's Discretion in Sanctioning Prosecutions of Ministers: Analysis of M.P Special Police Establishment, Bhopal v. State Of M.P And Others

Date: Jan 11, 2003
Limits on Governor's Discretion in Sanctioning Prosecutions of Ministers: Analysis of M.P Special Police Establishment, Bhopal v. State Of M.P And Others Introduction The case of M.P Special Police...
Resolving Conflicts Among Co-equal Supreme Court Benches: A Precedent by Madhya Pradesh High Court in Jabalpur Bus Operators Association v. State Of M.P.

Resolving Conflicts Among Co-equal Supreme Court Benches: A Precedent by Madhya Pradesh High Court in Jabalpur Bus Operators Association v. State Of M.P.

Date: Dec 18, 2002
Resolving Conflicts Among Co-equal Supreme Court Benches: A Precedent by Madhya Pradesh High Court in Jabalpur Bus Operators Association v. State Of M.P. Introduction The case of Jabalpur Bus...
Expedited Grant of Mutual Divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act: Insights from Deepak v. Tanuja

Expedited Grant of Mutual Divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act: Insights from Deepak v. Tanuja

Date: Nov 20, 2002
Expedited Grant of Mutual Divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act: Insights from Deepak v. Tanuja Introduction Deepak v. Tanuja is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madhya Pradesh...
Holding Company Officials Liable under Section 138 NIA Without Signature: Ram Raj Singh v. State Of M.P. (2002)

Holding Company Officials Liable under Section 138 NIA Without Signature: Ram Raj Singh v. State Of M.P. (2002)

Date: Oct 19, 2002
Holding Company Officials Liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act Without Signature: Ram Raj Singh v. State Of M.P. (2002) Introduction The case of Ram Raj Singh v. State Of Madhya...
Interpretation of Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure: Impact on Letters Patent Appeals – Laxmi Narayan v. Shiv Lal Gujar and Others

Interpretation of Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure: Impact on Letters Patent Appeals – Laxmi Narayan v. Shiv Lal Gujar and Others

Date: Oct 4, 2002
Interpretation of Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure: Impact on Letters Patent Appeals – Laxmi Narayan v. Shiv Lal Gujar and Others Introduction The case of Laxmi Narayan v. Shiv Lal Gujar...
Revisional Jurisdiction over Final Appellate Orders: Insights from Hanuman Datt And Others v. State Of M.P And Others

Revisional Jurisdiction over Final Appellate Orders: Insights from Hanuman Datt And Others v. State Of M.P And Others

Date: Oct 1, 2002
Revisional Jurisdiction over Final Appellate Orders: Insights from Hanuman Datt And Others v. State Of M.P And Others Introduction The case of Hanuman Datt And Others v. State Of M.P And Others,...
Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC: Insights from Sawal Singh v. Ramsakhi

Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC: Insights from Sawal Singh v. Ramsakhi

Date: Jul 30, 2002
Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC: Insights from Sawal Singh v. Ramsakhi Introduction The case of Sawal Singh v. Ramsakhi adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on July 29, 2002,...
Affirming Transferee as Plaintiff under Section 53A: Chetak Constructions Ltd. v. Om Prakash

Affirming Transferee as Plaintiff under Section 53A: Chetak Constructions Ltd. v. Om Prakash

Date: Jul 26, 2002
Affirming Transferee as Plaintiff under Section 53A: Chetak Constructions Ltd. v. Om Prakash Introduction The case Chetak Constructions Ltd., Indore v. Om Prakash And Others, adjudicated by the...
Reaffirmation of Judicial Discipline and Binding Nature of Tribunal Orders in Income Tax Jurisprudence

Reaffirmation of Judicial Discipline and Binding Nature of Tribunal Orders in Income Tax Jurisprudence

Date: Jul 12, 2002
Reaffirmation of Judicial Discipline and Binding Nature of Tribunal Orders in Income Tax Jurisprudence Introduction The case of Agrawal Warehousing And Leasing Ltd. (Now Admanum Finance Ltd.) v....
Reaffirming Agricultural Land Exemption Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act: Ramprasad v. State of M.P.

Reaffirming Agricultural Land Exemption Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act: Ramprasad v. State of M.P.

Date: May 1, 2002
Reaffirming Agricultural Land Exemption Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act: Ramprasad v. State of M.P. Introduction The case of Ramprasad And Others v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated...
State Of M.P v. Laxmi Chand Awadhiya And Another: Establishing Principles on Compulsory Retirement

State Of M.P v. Laxmi Chand Awadhiya And Another: Establishing Principles on Compulsory Retirement

Date: Mar 2, 2002
State Of M.P v. Laxmi Chand Awadhiya And Another: Establishing Principles on Compulsory Retirement Introduction The case of State Of M.P v. Laxmi Chand Awadhiya And Another was adjudicated by the...
Judicial Clarification on Rounding Off Academic Percentages: Dharmendra Kumar Shrivastava v. Jiwaji University

Judicial Clarification on Rounding Off Academic Percentages: Dharmendra Kumar Shrivastava v. Jiwaji University

Date: Feb 20, 2002
Judicial Clarification on Rounding Off Academic Percentages: Dharmendra Kumar Shrivastava v. Jiwaji University Introduction Dharmendra Kumar Shrivastava v. Jiwaji University, Gwalior is a pivotal...
Accountability of Examination Boards and Examiners for Administrative Errors: Insights from Prem Ratan Agrawal v. Board Of Secondary Education

Accountability of Examination Boards and Examiners for Administrative Errors: Insights from Prem Ratan Agrawal v. Board Of Secondary Education

Date: Feb 19, 2002
Accountability of Examination Boards and Examiners for Administrative Errors: Insights from Prem Ratan Agrawal v. Board Of Secondary Education Introduction The case of Prem Ratan Agrawal v. Board Of...
M.P. High Court Affirms Inclusion of Work-Charged Service in Pensionable Service under Rule 42 of 1976 Rules

M.P. High Court Affirms Inclusion of Work-Charged Service in Pensionable Service under Rule 42 of 1976 Rules

Date: Jan 30, 2002
M.P. High Court Affirms Inclusion of Work-Charged Service in Pensionable Service under Rule 42 of 1976 Rules Introduction The case of Gopi Pillai v. M.P.E.B, Jabalpur And Another adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert